arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the properties of the ternary infinite word p = 012102101021012101021012 ... , that is, the fixed point of the map h:0->01, 1->21, 2->0. We determine its factor complexity, critical exponent, and prove that it is 2-balanced. We compute its abelian complexity and determine the lengths of its bispecial factors. Finally, we give a characterization of p in terms of avoided factors.

Stern's diatomic series, denoted by $(a(n))_{n \geq 0}$, is defined by the recurrence relations $a(2n) = a(n)$ and $a(2n + 1) = a(n) + a(n + 1)$ for $n \geq 1$, and initial values $a(0) = 0$ and $a(1) = 1$. A record-setter for a sequence $(s(n))_{n \geq 0}$ is an index $v$ such that $s(i) < s(v)$ holds for all $i < v$. In this paper, we give a complete description of the record-setters for the Stern sequence.

Let ftm = 0111010010001... be the analogue of the Thue-Morse sequence in Fibonacci representation. In this note we show how, using the Walnut theorem-prover, to obtain a measure of its complexity, previously studied by Jamet, Popoli, and Stoll. We strengthen one of their theorems and disprove one of their conjectures.

We consider the positions of occurrences of a factor $x$ and its binary complement $\overline{x}$ in the Thue-Morse word ${\bf t} = {\tt 01101001} \cdots$, and show that these occurrences are "intertwined" in essentially two different ways. Our proof method consists of stating the needed properties as a first-order logic formula $\varphi$, and then using a theorem-prover to prove $\varphi$.

First we reprove two results in additive number theory due to Dombi and Chen & Wang, respectively, on the number of representations of n as the sum of two odious or evil numbers, using techniques from automata theory and logic. We also use this technique to prove a new result about the numbers represented by five summands. Furthermore, we prove some new results on the tenfold sums of the evil and odious numbers, as well as k-fold sums of similar sequences of integers, by using techniques of analytic number theory involving trigonometric sums associated with the (+-1)-characteristic sequences of these integers.

We study the properties of the uncountable set of Stewart words. These are Toeplitz words specified by infinite sequences of Toeplitz patterns of the form $αβγ$, where $α,β,γ$ is any permutation of the symbols 0,1,?. We determine the critical exponent of the Stewart words, prove that they avoid the pattern $xxyyxx$, find all factors that are palindromes, and determine their subword complexity. An interesting aspect of our work is that we use automata-theoretic methods and a decision procedure for automata to carry out the proofs.

We construct an infinite binary word with critical exponent 3 that avoids abelian 4-powers. Our method gives an algorithm to determine if certain types of morphic sequences avoid additive powers. We also show that there are $Ω(1.172^n)$ binary words of length $n$ that avoid abelian 4-powers, which improves on previous estimates.

Certain famous combinatorial sequences, such as the Catalan numbers and the Motzkin numbers, when taken modulo a prime power, can be computed by finite automata. Many theorems about such sequences can therefore be proved using Walnut, which is an implementation of a decision procedure for proving various properties of automatic sequences. In this paper we explore some results (old and new) that can be proved using this method.

We consider avoiding mesosomes -- that is, words of the form $xx'$ with $x'$ a conjugate of $x$ that is different from $x$ -- over a binary alphabet. We give a structure theorem for mesosome-avoiding words, count how many there are, characterize all the infinite mesosome-avoiding words, and determine the minimal forbidden words.

The Frobenius number $g(S)$ of a set $S$ of non-negative integers with $\gcd 1$ is the largest integer not expressible as a linear combination of elements of $S$. Given a sequence ${\bf s} = (s_i)_{i \geq 0}$, we can define the associated sequence $G_{\bf s} (i) = g(\{ s_i,s_{i+1},\ldots \})$. In this paper we compute $G_{\bf s} (i)$ for some classical automatic sequences: the evil numbers, the odious numbers, and the lower and upper Wythoff sequences. In contrast with the usual methods, our proofs are based largely on automata theory and logic.

We show that the first-order theory of Sturmian words over Presburger arithmetic is decidable. Using a general adder recognizing addition in Ostrowski numeration systems by Baranwal, Schaeffer and Shallit, we prove that the first-order expansions of Presburger arithmetic by a single Sturmian word are uniformly $ω$-automatic, and then deduce the decidability of the theory of the class of such structures. Using an implementation of this decision algorithm called Pecan, we automatically reprove classical theorems about Sturmian words in seconds, and are able to obtain new results about antisquares and antipalindromes in characteristic Sturmian words.

Given a finite alphabet $Σ$ and a right-infinite word $\bf w$ over $Σ$, we define the Lie complexity function $L_{\bf w}:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{N}$, whose value at $n$ is the number of conjugacy classes (under cyclic shift) of length-$n$ factors $x$ of $\bf w$ with the property that every element of the conjugacy class appears in $\bf w$. We show that the Lie complexity function is uniformly bounded for words with linear factor complexity, and as a result we show that words of linear factor complexity have at most finitely many primitive factors $y$ with the property that $y^n$ is again a factor for every $n$. We then look at automatic sequences and show that the Lie complexity function of a $k$-automatic sequence is again $k$-automatic.

We show that it is decidable, given an automatic sequence $\bf s$ and a constant $c$, whether all prefixes of $\bf s$ have a string attractor of size $\leq c$. Using a decision procedure based on this result, we show that all prefixes of the period-doubling sequence of length $\geq 2$ have a string attractor of size $2$. We also prove analogous results for other sequences, including the Thue-Morse sequence and the Tribonacci sequence. We also provide general upper and lower bounds on string attractor size for different kinds of sequences. For example, if $\bf s$ has a finite appearance constant, then there is a string attractor for ${\bf s}[0..n-1]$ of size $O(\log n)$. If further $\bf s$ is linearly recurrent, then there is a string attractor for ${\bf s}[0..n-1]$ of size $O(1)$. For automatic sequences, the size of the smallest string attractor for ${\bf s}[0..n-1]$ is either $Θ(1)$ or $Θ(\log n)$, and it is decidable which case occurs. Finally, we close with some remarks about greedy string attractors.

We present a general method for computing the abelian complexity $ρ^{\rm ab}_{\bf s} (n)$ of an automatic sequence $\bf s$ in the case where (a) $ρ^{\rm ab}_{\bf s} (n)$ is bounded by a constant and (b) the Parikh vectors of the length-$n$ prefixes of $\bf s$ form a synchronized sequence. We illustrate the idea in detail, using the free software Walnut to compute the abelian complexity of the Tribonacci word ${\bf TR} = 0102010\cdots$, the fixed point of the morphism $0 \rightarrow 01$, $1 \rightarrow 02$, $2 \rightarrow 0$. Previously, Richomme, Saari, and Zamboni showed that the abelian complexity of this word lies in $\{ 3,4,5,6,7 \}$, and Turek gave a Tribonacci automaton computing it. We are able to "automatically" rederive these results, and more, using the method presented here.

Recently Dekking conjectured the form of the subword complexity function for the Fibonacci-Thue-Morse sequence. In this note we prove his conjecture by purely computational means, using the free software Walnut.

In 1996, Neville Robbins proved the amazing fact that the coefficient of $X^n$ in the Fibonacci infinite product $$ \prod_{n \geq 2} (1-X^{F_n}) = (1-X)(1-X^2)(1-X^3)(1-X^5)(1-X^8) \cdots = 1-X-X^2+X^4 + \cdots$$ is always either $-1$, $0$, or $1$. The same result was proved later by Federico Ardila using a different method. Meanwhile, in 2001, Jean Berstel gave a simple 4-state transducer that converts an "illegal" Fibonacci representation into a "legal" one. We show how to obtain the Robbins-Ardila result from Berstel's with almost no work at all, using purely computational techniques that can be performed by existing software.

We re-examine previous constructions of infinite binary words containing few distinct squares with the goal of finding the "simplest", in a certain sense. We exhibit several new constructions. Rather than using tedious case-based arguments to prove that the constructions have the desired property, we rely instead on theorem-proving software for their correctness.

We give an optimal version of the classical ``three-gap theorem'' on the fractional parts of $n θ$, in the case where $θ$ is an irrational number that is badly approximable. As a consequence, we deduce a version of Kronecker's inhomogeneous approximation theorem in one dimension for badly approximable numbers. We apply these results to obtain an improved measure of sequence diversity for characteristic Sturmian sequences, where the slope is badly approximable.

An overlap-free (or $β$-free) word $w$ over a fixed alphabet $Σ$ is extremal if every word obtained from $w$ by inserting a single letter from $Σ$ at any position contains an overlap (or a factor of exponent at least $β$, respectively). We find all lengths which admit an extremal overlap-free binary word. For every extended real number $β$ such that $2^+\leqβ\leq 8/3$, we show that there are arbitrarily long extremal $β$-free binary words.

Let $α= (1+\sqrt{5})/2$ and define the lower and upper Wythoff sequences by $a_i = \lfloor i α\rfloor$, $b_i = \lfloor i α^2 \rfloor$ for $i \geq 1$. In a recent interesting paper, Kawsumarng et al. proved a number of results about numbers representable as sums of the form $a_i + a_j$, $b_i + b_j$, $a_i + b_j$, and so forth. In this paper I show how to derive all of their results, using one simple idea and existing free software called Walnut. The key idea is that for each of their sumsets, there is a relatively small automaton accepting the Fibonacci representation of the numbers represented. I also show how the automaton approach can easily prove other results.