arXiv++ Combinatorics

Assume $G$ is a graph and $k$ is a positive integer. Let $f:V(G)\to \mathbb{N}$ be defined as $f(v)=\min\{k,d_G(v)\}$. If $G$ is $f$-choosable, then we say $G$ is degree-truncated $k$-choosable. The degree-truncated choice number of $G$ is $\operatorname{ch}^{\text{\st{d}}}(G) = \min\{k: G \text{ is degree-truncated $k$-choosable}\}$. For a family $\mathcal{G}$ of graphs, $\operatorname{ch}^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{G}) = \max\{\operatorname{ch}^{\text{\st{d}}}(G):G \in \mathcal{G}\}$. Let $\mathcal{P}$ denote the family of 3-connected non-complete planar graphs. Richter asked in 2008 whether $ch^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{P}) \le 6$. In 2025, Zhou, Zhu and Zhu answered this question in negative and proved that $8 \le ch^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{P}) \le 16$. This result was improved by Jiang, Xu, Xu, and Zhu, who proved that $9 \le ch^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{P}) \le 12$. In this paper, we further improve the result and prove that $10 \le \operatorname{ch}^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{P}) \le 11$. We conjecture that $\operatorname{ch}^{\text{\st{d}}}(\mathcal{P}) =10$, and we confirm this conjecture for those planar graphs $G \in \mathcal{P}$ for which the subgraph induced by vertices of degree at least 11 is 4-choosable.

A graph $G$ is called degree-truncated $k$-choosable if for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)| \ge \min\{d_G(v), k\}$ for each vertex $v$, $G$ is $L$-colourable. Richter asked whether every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is degree-truncated 6-choosable. We answer this question in negative by constructing a 3-connected non-complete planar graph which is not degree-truncated 7-choosable. Then we prove that every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is degree-truncated 16-DP-colourable (and hence degree-truncated $16$-choosable). We further prove that for an arbitrary proper minor closed family ${\mathcal G}$ of graphs, let $s$ be the minimum integer such that $K_{s,t} \notin \mathcal{G}$ for some $t$, then there is a constant $k$ such that every $s$-connected graph $G \in {\mathcal G}$ other than a GDP tree is degree-truncated DP-$k$-colourable (and hence degree-truncated $k$-choosable), where a GDP-tree is a graph whose blocks are complete graphs or cycles. In particular, for any surface $Σ$, there is a constant $k$ such that every 3-connected non-complete graph embeddable on $Σ$ is degree-truncated DP-$k$-colourable (and hence degree-truncated $k$-choosable). The $s$-connectedness for graphs in $\mathcal{G}$ (and 3-connectedness for graphs embeddable on $Σ$) is necessary, as for any positive integer $k$, $K_{s-1,k^{s-1}} \in \mathcal{G}$ ($K_{2,k^2}$ is planar) is not degree-truncated $k$-choosable. Also, non-completeness is a necessary condition, as complete graphs are not degree-choosable.

Given a graph $G$ and a list assignment $L$ for $G$, the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$ is played by two players: Ann and Ben. In each round, Ann chooses an uncoloured vertex $v$, and Ben colours $v$ with a colour from $L(v)$ that is not used by its coloured neighbours. If all vertices are coloured, then Ann wins the game. Otherwise after a finite number of rounds, there remains an uncoloured vertex $v$ such that all colours in $L(v)$ have been used by its coloured neighbours, Ben wins. We say $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable if Ann has a winning strategy for the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$. For a mapping $g: V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, we say $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable if $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)| \ge g(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and $G$ is indicated degree-choosable if $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable for $g(v) =d_G(v)$ (the degree of $v$). This paper proves that a graph $G$ is not indicated degree-choosable if and only if $G$ is an expanded Gallai-tree - a graph whose maximal connected induced subgraphs with no clique-cut are complete graphs or blow-ups of odd cycles, along with a technical condition (see Definition \ref{def-egt}). This leads to a linear-time algorithm that determines if a graph is indicated degree-choosable. A connected graph $G$ is called an IC-Brooks graph if its indicated chromatic number equals $Δ(G)+1$. Every IC-Brooks graph is a regular expanded Gallai-tree. We show that if $r \le 3$, then every $r$-regular expanded Gallai-tree is an IC-Brooks graph. For $r \ge 4$, there are $r$-regular expanded Gallai-trees that are not IC-Brooks graphs. We give a characterization of IC-Brooks graphs, and present a linear-time algorithm that determines if a given graph of bounded maximum degree is an IC-Brooks graph.

This paper studies generalizations of the concept of acyclic orientations to arc-weighted orientations. These lead to four types of variations of strict degeneracy of graphs. Some of these variations are studied in the literature under different names and we put them in a same framework for comparison. Then we concentrate on one of these variations, which is new and is defined as follows: For a graph $G$ and a mapping $f \in \mathbb{N}^G$, we say $G$ is $ST^{(2)}$-$f$-degenerate if there is an arc-weighted orientation $(D, w)$ of $G$ such that $d_{(D,w)}^+(v) < f(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and every sub-digraph $D'$ of $D$ contains an arc $e=(u,v)$ with $w(e) > d_{(D', w)}^+(v)$. We prove that if $G$ is $ST^{(2)}$-$f$-degenerate, then $G$ is $f$-paintable, as well as $f$-AT. Then we use $ST^{(2)}$-degeneracy to study truncated degree choosability of graphs. A graph $G$ is called $k$-truncated degree-choosable (respectively $ST^{(2)}$-$k$-truncated degree degenerate) if $G$ is $f$-choosable (respectively, $ST^{(2)}$-$f$-degenerate), where $f(v)= \min\{k, d_G(v)\}$. Richter asked whether every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is $6$-truncated-degree-choosable. We answer this question in negative by constructing a 3-connected non-complete planar graph which is not $7$-truncated-degree-choosable. On the other hand, we prove that every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is $ST^{(2)}$-$16$-truncated-degree-degenerate, and hence $16$-truncated-degree-choosable. We further prove that for an arbitrary proper minor closed family ${\mathcal G}$ of graphs, let $s$ be the minimum integer such that $K_{s,t} \notin \mathcal{G}$ for some $t$, then there is a constant $k$ such that every $s$-connected non-complete graph $G \in {\mathcal G}$ is $ST^{(2)}$-$k$-truncated-degree-degenerate and hence $k$-truncated-degree-choosable.

For a multi-set $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $λ$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $λ$-choosability puts $k$-colourability and $k$-choosability in the same framework: If $λ= \{k\}$, then $λ$-choosability is equivalent to $k$-choosability; if $λ$ consists of $k $ copies of $1$, then $λ$-choosability is equivalent to $k $-colourability. If $G$ is $λ$-choosable, then $G$ is $k_λ$-colourable. On the other hand, there are $k_λ$-colourable graphs that are not $λ$-choosable, provided that $λ$ contains an integer larger than $1$. Let $φ(λ)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a $k_λ$-colourable non-$λ$-choosable graph. This paper determines the value of $φ(λ)$ for all $λ$.

It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2k+1$ are chromatic-choosable. This upper bound on $|V(G)|$ is tight: if $k$ is even, then $K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ and $K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ are $k$-chromatic graphs with $2 k+2$ vertices that are not chromatic-choosable. It was proved in [arXiv:2201.02060] that these are the only non-$k$-choosable complete $k$-partite graphs with $2k+2$ vertices. For $G =K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ or $K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$, a bad list assignment of $G$ is a $k$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that $G$ is not $L$-colourable. Bad list assignments for $G=K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ were characterized in [Discrete Mathematics 244 (2002), 55-66]. In this paper, we first give a simpler proof of this result, and then we characterize bad list assignments for $G=K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$. Using these results, we characterize all non-$k$-choosable (non-complete) $k$-partite graphs with $2k+2$ vertices.

A graph $G$ is called chromatic-choosable if $χ(G)=ch(G)$. A natural problem is to determine the minimum number of vertices in a $k$-chromatic non-$k$-choosable graph. It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2k+1$ are $k$-choosable. This upper bound on $|V(G)|$ is tight. It is known that if $k$ is even, then $G=K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ and $G=K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ are $k$-chromatic graphs with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ that are not $k$-choosable. Some subgraphs of these two graphs are also non-$k$-choosable. The main result of this paper is that all other $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ are $k$-choosable. In particular, if $χ(G)$ is odd and $|V(G)| \le 2χ(G)+2$, then $G$ is chromatic-choosable, which was conjectured by Noel.

Assume $n, m$ are positive integers and $G$ is a graph. Let $P_{n,m}$ be the graph obtained from the path with vertices $\{-m, -(m-1), \ldots, 0, \ldots, n\}$ by adding a loop at vertex $ 0$. The double cone $Δ_{n,m}(G)$ over a graph $G$ is obtained from the direct product $G \times P_{n,m}$ by identifying $V(G) \times \{n\}$ into a single vertex $(\star, n)$, identifying $V(G) \times \{-m\}$ into a single vertex $(\star, -m)$, and adding an edge connecting $(\star, -m)$ and $(\star, n)$. This paper determines the fractional chromatic number of $Δ_{n,m}(G)$. In particular, if $n < m$ or $n=m$ is even, then $χ_f(Δ_{n,m}(G)) = χ_f(Δ_n(G))$, where $Δ_n(G)$ is the $n$th cone over $G$. If $n=m$ is odd, then $χ_f(Δ_{n,m}(G)) > χ_f(Δ_n(G))$. The chromatic number of $Δ_{n,m}(G)$ is also discussed.

Let $φ(k)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$k$-choosable $k$-chromatic graph. The Ohba conjecture, confirmed by Noel, Reed and Wu, asserts that $φ(k) \ge 2k+2$. This bound is tight if $k$ is even. If $k$ is odd, then it is known that $φ(k) \le 2k+3$ and it is conjectured by Noel that $φ(k) = 2k+3$. For a multi-set $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ of positive integers, let $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_λ$-list assignment $L$ for which the colour set $\cup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into the disjoint union $C_1 \cup C_2 \cup \ldots \cup C_q$ of $q$ sets so that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is $λ$-choosable if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. Let $φ(λ)$ be the minimum number of vertices in a non-$λ$-choosable $k_λ$-chromatic graph. Let $1_λ$ be the multiplicity of $1$ in $λ$, and let $o_λ$ be the number of elements in $λ$ that are odd integers. We prove that if $1_λ \ne k_λ$, then $2k_λ+1_λ+2 \leqslant φ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+ o_λ+2$. In particular, if $1_λ=o_λ=t$, i.e. $λ$ contains no odd integer greater than $1$, then $φ(λ) = 2k_λ+t+2$. We also prove that $φ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+5 1_λ+3$. In particular, if $1_λ=0$, then $2k_λ+2 \leqslant φ(λ) \leqslant 2k_λ+3$.