arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $G$ and a list assignment $L$ for $G$, the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$ is played by two players: Ann and Ben. In each round, Ann chooses an uncoloured vertex $v$, and Ben colours $v$ with a colour from $L(v)$ that is not used by its coloured neighbours. If all vertices are coloured, then Ann wins the game. Otherwise after a finite number of rounds, there remains an uncoloured vertex $v$ such that all colours in $L(v)$ have been used by its coloured neighbours, Ben wins. We say $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable if Ann has a winning strategy for the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$. For a mapping $g: V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, we say $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable if $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)| \ge g(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and $G$ is indicated degree-choosable if $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable for $g(v) =d_G(v)$ (the degree of $v$). This paper proves that a graph $G$ is not indicated degree-choosable if and only if $G$ is an expanded Gallai-tree - a graph whose maximal connected induced subgraphs with no clique-cut are complete graphs or blow-ups of odd cycles, along with a technical condition (see Definition \ref{def-egt}). This leads to a linear-time algorithm that determines if a graph is indicated degree-choosable. A connected graph $G$ is called an IC-Brooks graph if its indicated chromatic number equals $Δ(G)+1$. Every IC-Brooks graph is a regular expanded Gallai-tree. We show that if $r \le 3$, then every $r$-regular expanded Gallai-tree is an IC-Brooks graph. For $r \ge 4$, there are $r$-regular expanded Gallai-trees that are not IC-Brooks graphs. We give a characterization of IC-Brooks graphs, and present a linear-time algorithm that determines if a given graph of bounded maximum degree is an IC-Brooks graph.

Assume $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ is a partition of $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into $|λ|= q$ sets $C_1,C_2,\ldots,C_q$ such that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is \emph{$λ$-choosable} if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $λ$-choosability is a refinement of choosability that puts $k$-choosability and $k$-colourability in the same framework. If $|λ|$ is close to $k_λ$, then $λ$-choosability is close to $k_λ$-colourability; if $|λ|$ is close to $1$, then $λ$-choosability is close to $k_λ$-choosability. This paper studies Hadwiger's Conjecture in the context of $λ$-choosability. Hadwiger's Conjecture is equivalent to saying that every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$-choosable for any positive integer $t$. We prove that for $t \ge 5$, for any partition $λ$ of $t-1$ other than $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph $G$ that is not $λ$-choosable. We then construct several types of $K_t$-minor-free graphs that are not $λ$-choosable, where $k_λ- (t-1)$ gets larger as $k_λ-|λ|$ gets larger. In partcular, for any $q$ and any $ε> 0$, there exists $t_0$ such that for any $t \ge t_0$, for any partition $λ$ of $\lfloor (2-ε)t \rfloor$ with $|λ| =q$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph that is not $λ$-choosable. The $q=1$ case of this result was recently proved by Steiner, and our proof uses a similar argument. We also generalize this result to $(a,b)$-list colouring.

This paper gives a simple proof of the result that every planar graph $G$ has Alon-Tarsi number at most 5, and has a matching $M$ such that $G-M$ has Alon-Tarsi number at most 4.

Assume $ k $ is a positive integer, $ λ=\{k_1,k_2,...,k_q\} $ is a partition of $ k $ and $ G $ is a graph. A $λ$-assignment of $ G $ is a $ k $-assignment $ L $ of $ G $ such that the colour set $ \bigcup_{v\in V(G)} L(v) $ can be partitioned into $ q $ subsets $ C_1\cup C_2\cup\cdots\cup C_q $ and for each vertex $ v $ of $ G $, $ |L(v)\cap C_i|=k_i $. We say $ G $ is $λ$-choosable if for each $λ$-assignment $ L $ of $ G $, $ G $ is $ L $-colourable. In particular, if $ λ=\{k\} $, then $λ$-choosable is the same as $ k $-choosable, if $ λ=\{1, 1,...,1\} $, then $λ$-choosable is equivalent to $ k $-colourable. For the other partitions of $ k $ sandwiched between $ \{k\} $ and $ \{1, 1,...,1\} $ in terms of refinements, $λ$-choosability reveals a complex hierarchy of colourability of graphs. Assume $λ=\{k_1, \ldots, k_q\} $ is a partition of $ k $ and $λ' $ is a partition of $ k'\ge k $. We write $ λ\le λ' $ if there is a partition $λ''=\{k''_1, \ldots, k''_q\}$ of $k'$ with $k''_i \ge k_i$ for $i=1,2,\ldots, q$ and $λ'$ is a refinement of $λ''$. It follows from the definition that if $ λ\le λ' $, then every $λ$-choosable graph is $λ'$-choosable. It was proved in [X. Zhu, A refinement of choosability of graphs, J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 141 (2020) 143 - 164] that the converse is also true. This paper strengthens this result and proves that for any $ λ\not\le λ' $, for any integer $g$, there exists a graph of girth at least $g$ which is $λ$-choosable but not $λ'$-choosable.