arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $G$ and a list assignment $L$ for $G$, the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$ is played by two players: Ann and Ben. In each round, Ann chooses an uncoloured vertex $v$, and Ben colours $v$ with a colour from $L(v)$ that is not used by its coloured neighbours. If all vertices are coloured, then Ann wins the game. Otherwise after a finite number of rounds, there remains an uncoloured vertex $v$ such that all colours in $L(v)$ have been used by its coloured neighbours, Ben wins. We say $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable if Ann has a winning strategy for the indicated $L$-colouring game on $G$. For a mapping $g: V(G) \to \mathbb{N}$, we say $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable if $G$ is indicated $L$-colourable for every list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)| \ge g(v)$ for each vertex $v$, and $G$ is indicated degree-choosable if $G$ is indicated $g$-choosable for $g(v) =d_G(v)$ (the degree of $v$). This paper proves that a graph $G$ is not indicated degree-choosable if and only if $G$ is an expanded Gallai-tree - a graph whose maximal connected induced subgraphs with no clique-cut are complete graphs or blow-ups of odd cycles, along with a technical condition (see Definition \ref{def-egt}). This leads to a linear-time algorithm that determines if a graph is indicated degree-choosable. A connected graph $G$ is called an IC-Brooks graph if its indicated chromatic number equals $Δ(G)+1$. Every IC-Brooks graph is a regular expanded Gallai-tree. We show that if $r \le 3$, then every $r$-regular expanded Gallai-tree is an IC-Brooks graph. For $r \ge 4$, there are $r$-regular expanded Gallai-trees that are not IC-Brooks graphs. We give a characterization of IC-Brooks graphs, and present a linear-time algorithm that determines if a given graph of bounded maximum degree is an IC-Brooks graph.

Assume $G$ is a graph and $k$ is a positive integer. Let $f:V(G)\to \mathbb{N}$ be defined as $f(v)=\min\{k,d_G(v)\}$. If $G$ is $f$-choosable, then we say $G$ is degree-truncated $k$-choosable. Answering a question of Richter, it was proved in [Zhou,Zhu,Zhu, Degree-truncated choice number of graphs, arXiv:2308.15853] that there exists a 3-connected non-complete planar graph that is not degree-truncated 7-choosable, and every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is degree-truncated 16-choosable. This paper improves the bounds, and proves that there exists a 3-connected non-complete planar graph that is not degree-truncated 8-choosable, and that every 3-connected non-complete planar graph is degree-truncated $12$-choosable.

In this paper, we survey some properties, encoding, and bijections involving combinatorial maps, double occurrence words, and chord diagrams. We particularly study quasi-trees from a purely combinatorial point of view and derive a topological representation of maps with a given spanning quasi-tree using two fundamental polygons, which extends the representation of planar maps based on the equivalence with bipartite circle graphs. Then, we focus on Depth-First Search trees and their connection with a poset we define on the spanning quasi-trees of a map. We apply the bijections obtained in the first section to the problem of enumerating loopless rooted maps. Finally, we return to the planar case and discuss a decomposition of planar rooted loopless maps and its consequences on planar rooted loopless map enumeration.

Assume $λ=\{k_1,k_2, \ldots, k_q\}$ is a partition of $k_λ = \sum_{i=1}^q k_i$. A $λ$-list assignment of $G$ is a $k_λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$ such that the colour set $\bigcup_{v \in V(G)}L(v)$ can be partitioned into $|λ|= q$ sets $C_1,C_2,\ldots,C_q$ such that for each $i$ and each vertex $v$ of $G$, $|L(v) \cap C_i| \ge k_i$. We say $G$ is \emph{$λ$-choosable} if $G$ is $L$-colourable for any $λ$-list assignment $L$ of $G$. The concept of $λ$-choosability is a refinement of choosability that puts $k$-choosability and $k$-colourability in the same framework. If $|λ|$ is close to $k_λ$, then $λ$-choosability is close to $k_λ$-colourability; if $|λ|$ is close to $1$, then $λ$-choosability is close to $k_λ$-choosability. This paper studies Hadwiger's Conjecture in the context of $λ$-choosability. Hadwiger's Conjecture is equivalent to saying that every $K_t$-minor-free graph is $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$-choosable for any positive integer $t$. We prove that for $t \ge 5$, for any partition $λ$ of $t-1$ other than $\{1 \star (t-1)\}$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph $G$ that is not $λ$-choosable. We then construct several types of $K_t$-minor-free graphs that are not $λ$-choosable, where $k_λ- (t-1)$ gets larger as $k_λ-|λ|$ gets larger. In partcular, for any $q$ and any $ε> 0$, there exists $t_0$ such that for any $t \ge t_0$, for any partition $λ$ of $\lfloor (2-ε)t \rfloor$ with $|λ| =q$, there is a $K_t$-minor-free graph that is not $λ$-choosable. The $q=1$ case of this result was recently proved by Steiner, and our proof uses a similar argument. We also generalize this result to $(a,b)$-list colouring.

In this paper, we prove that for any $k\ge 3$, there exist infinitely many minimal asymmetric $k$-uniform hypergraphs. This is in a striking contrast to $k=2$, where it has been proved recently that there are exactly $18$ minimal asymmetric graphs. We also determine, for every $k\ge 1$, the minimum size of an asymmetric $k$-uniform hypergraph.

In this paper, we prove that for any $k\ge 3$, there exist infinitely many minimal asymmetric $k$-uniform hypergraphs. This is in a striking contrast to $k=2$, where it has been proved recently that there are exactly $18$ minimal asymmetric graphs. We also determine, for every $k\ge 1$, the minimum size of an asymmetric $k$-uniform hypergraph.

We study the connections between the notions of combinatorial discrepancy and graph degeneracy. In particular, we prove that the maximum discrepancy over all subgraphs $H$ of a graph $G$ of the neighborhood set system of $H$ is sandwiched between $Ω(\log\mathrm{deg}(G))$ and $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{deg}(G))$, where $\mathrm{deg}(G)$ denotes the degeneracy of $G$. We extend this result to inequalities relating weak coloring numbers and discrepancy of graph powers and deduce a new characterization of bounded expansion classes. Then, we switch to a model theoretical point of view, introduce pointer structures, and study their relations to graph classes with bounded expansion. We deduce that a monotone class of graphs has bounded expansion if and only if all the set systems definable in this class have bounded hereditary discrepancy. Using known bounds on the VC-density of set systems definable in nowhere dense classes we also give a characterization of nowhere dense classes in terms of discrepancy. As consequences of our results, we obtain a corollary on the discrepancy of neighborhood set systems of edge colored graphs, a polynomial-time algorithm to compute $\varepsilon$-approximations of size $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon)$ for set systems definable in bounded expansion classes, an application to clique coloring, and even the non-existence of a quantifier elimination scheme for nowhere dense classes.

In this paper, we prove that a graph $G$ with no $K_{s,s}$-subgraph and twin-width $d$ has $r$-admissibility and $r$-coloring numbers bounded from above by an exponential function of $r$ and that we can construct graphs achieving such a dependency in $r$.

Szemeredi's Regularity Lemma is a very useful tool of extremal combinatorics. Recently, several refinements of this seminal result were obtained for special, more structured classes of graphs. We survey these results in their rich combinatorial context. In particular, we stress the link to the theory of (structural) sparsity, which leads to alternative proofs, refinements and solutions of open problems. It is interesting to note that many of these classes present challenging problems. Nevertheless, from the point of view of regularity lemma type statements, they appear as "gentle" classes.

This paper disproves a conjecture of Wang, Wu, Yan and Xie, and answers in negative a question in Dvorak, Pekarek and Sereni. In return, we pose five open problems.

This paper proves that for each positive integer $m$, there is a triangle-free planar graph $G$ which is not $(3m+ \lceil \frac m{17} \rceil-1, m)$-choosable.