arXiv++ Combinatorics

The set of discrete lattice paths from (0, 0) to (n, n) with North and East steps (i.e. words w $\in$ { x, y } * such that |w| x = |w| y = n) has a canonical monoid structure inherited from the bijection with the set of join-continuous maps from the chain { 0, 1,. .. , n } to itself. We explicitly describe this monoid structure and, relying on a general characterization of idempotent join-continuous maps from a complete lattice to itself, we characterize idempotent paths as upper zigzag paths. We argue that these paths are counted by the odd Fibonacci numbers. Our method yields a geometric/combinatorial proof of counting results, due to Howie and to Laradji and Umar, for idempotents in monoids of monotone endomaps on finite chains.

The set of permutations on a finite set can be given the lattice structure known as the weak Bruhat order. This lattice structure is generalized to the set of words on a fixed alphabet $Σ$ = {x,y,z,...}, where each letter has a fixed number of occurrences. These lattices are known as multinomial lattices and, when card($Σ$) = 2, as lattices of lattice paths. By interpreting the letters x, y, z, . . . as axes, these words can be interpreted as discrete increasing paths on a grid of a d-dimensional cube, with d = card($Σ$).We show how to extend this ordering to images of continuous monotone functions from the unit interval to a d-dimensional cube and prove that this ordering is a lattice, denoted by L(I^d). This construction relies on a few algebraic properties of the quantale of join-continuous functions from the unit interval of the reals to itself: it is cyclic $\star$-autonomous and it satisfies the mix rule.We investigate structural properties of these lattices, which are self-dual and not distributive. We characterize join-irreducible elements and show that these lattices are generated under infinite joins from their join-irreducible elements, they have no completely join-irreducible elements nor compact elements. We study then embeddings of the d-dimensional multinomial lattices into L(I^d). We show that these embeddings arise functorially from subdivisions of the unit interval and observe that L(I^d) is the Dedekind-MacNeille completion of the colimit of these embeddings. Yet, if we restrict to embeddings that take rational values and if d > 2, then every element of L(I^d) is only a join of meets of elements from the colimit of these embeddings.

The set of permutations on a finite set can be given a lattice structure (known as the weak Bruhat order). The lattice structure is generalized to the set of words on a fixed alphabet $Σ= \{ x, y, z, ... \}$, where each letter has a fixed number of occurrences (these lattices are known as multinomial lattices and, in dimension 2, as lattices of lattice paths). By interpreting the letters $x, y, z, ...$ as axes, these words can be interpreted as discrete increasing paths on a grid of a $d$-dimensional cube, where $d = {\rm card}(Σ)$. We show in this paper how to extend this order to images of continuous monotone paths from the unit interval to a $d$-dimensional cube. The key tool used to realize this construction is the quantale $\mathsf{L}_{\vee}(\mathbb{I})$ of join-continuous functions from the unit interval to itself; the construction relies on a few algebraic properties of this quantale: it is $\star$-autonomous and it satisfies the mix rule. We begin developing a structural theory of these lattices by characterizing join-irreducible elements, and by proving these lattices are generated from their join-irreducible elements under infinite joins.

For a closure space (P,f) with f(\emptyset)=\emptyset, the closures of open subsets of P, called the regular closed subsets, form an ortholattice Reg(P,f), extending the poset Clop(P,f) of all clopen subsets. If (P,f) is a finite convex geometry, then Reg(P,f) is pseudocomplemented. The Dedekind-MacNeille completion of the poset of regions of any central hyperplane arrangement can be obtained in this way, hence it is pseudocomplemented. The lattice Reg(P,f) carries a particularly interesting structure for special types of convex geometries, that we call closure spaces of semilattice type. For finite such closure spaces, (1) Reg(P,f) satisfies an infinite collection of stronger and stronger quasi-identities, weaker than both meet- and join-semidistributivity. Nevertheless it may fail semidistributivity. (2) If Reg(P,f) is semidistributive, then it is a bounded homomorphic image of a free lattice. (3) Clop(P,f) is a lattice iff every regular closed set is clopen. The extended permutohedron R(G) on a graph G, and the extended permutohedron Reg(S) on a join-semilattice S, are both defined as lattices of regular closed sets of suitable closure spaces. While the lattice of regular closed sets is, in the semilattice context, always the Dedekind Mac-Neille completion of the poset of clopen sets, this does not always hold in the graph context, although it always does so for finite block graphs and for cycles. Furthermore, both R(G) and Reg(S) are bounded homomorphic images of free lattices.

For a given transitive binary relation e on a set E, the transitive closures of open (i.e., co-transitive in e) sets, called the regular closed subsets, form an ortholattice Reg(e), the extended permutohedron on e. This construction, which contains the poset Clop(e) of all clopen sets, is a common generalization of known notions such as the generalized permutohedron on a partially ordered set on the one hand, and the bipartition lattice on a set on the other hand. We obtain a precise description of the completely join-irreducible (resp., completely meet-irreducible) elements of Reg(e) and the arrow relations between them. In particular, we prove that (1) Reg(e) is the Dedekind-MacNeille completion of the poset Clop(e); (2) Every open subset of e is a set-theoretic union of completely join-irreducible clopen subsets of e; (3) Clop(e) is a lattice iiff every regular closed subset of e is clopen, iff e contains no "square" configuration, iff Reg(e)=Clop(e); (4) If e is finite, then Reg(e) is pseudocomplemented iff it is semidistributive, iff it is a bounded homomorphic image of a free lattice, iff e is a disjoint sum of antisymmetric transitive relations and two-element full relations. We illustrate the strength of our results by proving that, for n greater than or equal to 3, the congruence lattice of the lattice Bip(n) of all bipartitions of an n-element set is obtained by adding a new top element to a Boolean lattice with n2^{n-1} atoms. We also determine the factors of the minimal subdirect decomposition of Bip(n).

Grätzer asked in 1971 for a characterization of sublattices of Tamari lattices (associahedra). A natural candidate was coined by McKenzie in 1972 with the notion of a bounded homomorphic image of a free lattice---in short, bounded lattice. Urquhart proved in 1978 that every associahedron is bounded (thus so are its sublattices). Geyer conjectured in 1994 that every finite bounded lattice embeds into some associahedron. We disprove Geyer's conjecture, by introducing an infinite collection of lattice-theoretical identities that hold in every associahedron, but not in every finite bounded lattice. Among those finite counterexamples, there are the permutohedron on four letters P(4), and in fact two of its subdirectly irreducible retracts, which are Cambrian lattices of type A. For natural numbers m and n, we denote by B(m,n) the (bounded) lattice obtained by doubling a join of m atoms in an (m+n)-atom Boolean lattice. We prove that B(m,n) embeds into an associahedron iff min(m,n) is less than or equal to 1, and that B(m,n) embeds into a permutohedron iff min(m,n) is less than or equal to 2. In particular, B(3,3) cannot be embedded into any permutohedron. Nevertheless we prove that B(3,3) is a homomorphic image of a sublattice of the permutohedron on 12 letters.

For L a finite lattice, let C(L) denote the set of pairs g = (g_0,g_1) such that g_0 is a lower cover of g_1 and order it as follows: g <= d iff g_0 <= d_0, g_1 <= d_1, but not g_1 <= d_0. Let C(L,g) denote the connected component of g in this poset. Our main result states that C(L,g) is a semidistributive lattice if L is semidistributive, and that C(L,g) is a bounded lattice if L is bounded. Let S_n be the permutohedron on n letters and T_n be the associahedron on n+1 letters. Explicit computations show that C(S_n,a) = S_{n-1} and C(T_n,a) = T_{n-1}, up to isomorphism, whenever a is an atom. These results are consequences of new characterizations of finite join semidistributive and finite lower bounded lattices: (i) a finite lattice is join semidistributive if and only if the projection sending g in C(L) to g_0 in L creates pullbacks, (ii) a finite join semidistributive lattice is lower bounded if and only if it has a strict facet labelling. Strict facet labellings, as defined here, are generalization of the tools used by Barbut et al. to prove that lattices of Coxeter groups are bounded.

We study the congruence lattices of the multinomial lattices L(v) introduced by Bennett and Birkhoff. Our main motivation is to investigate Parikh equivalence relations that model concurrent computation. We accomplish this goal by providing an explicit description of the join dependency relation between two join irreducible elements and of its reflexive transitive closure. The explicit description emphasizes several properties and makes it possible to separate the equational theories of multinomial lattices by their dimensions. In their covering of non modular varieties Jipsen and Rose define a sequence of equations SD_{n}(\land), for n \geq 0. Our main result sounds as follows: if v = (v_{1},...,v_{n}) \in N^{n} and v_{i} > 0 for i = 1,..., n, then the multinomial lattice L(v) satisfies SD_{n-1}(\land) and fails SD_{n-2}(\land).