arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Near-Bipartiteness problem is that of deciding whether or not the vertices of a graph can be partitioned into sets $A$ and $B$, where $A$ is an independent set and $B$ induces a forest. The set $A$ in such a partition is said to be an independent feedback vertex set. Yang and Yuan proved that Near-Bipartiteness is polynomial-time solvable for graphs of diameter 2 and NP-complete for graphs of diameter 4. We show that Near-Bipartiteness is NP-complete for graphs of diameter 3, resolving their open problem. We also generalise their result for diameter 2 by proving that even the problem of computing a minimum independent feedback vertex is polynomial-time solvable for graphs of diameter 2.

The NP-complete problem Feedback Vertex Set is that of deciding whether or not it is possible, for a given integer $k\geq 0$, to delete at most $k$ vertices from a given graph so that what remains is a forest. The variant in which the deleted vertices must form an independent set is called Independent Feedback Vertex Set and is also NP-complete. In fact, even deciding if an independent feedback vertex set exists is NP-complete and this problem is closely related to the $3$-Colouring problem, or equivalently, to the problem of deciding whether or not a graph has an independent odd cycle transversal, that is, an independent set of vertices whose deletion makes the graph bipartite. We initiate a systematic study of the complexity of Independent Feedback Vertex Set for $H$-free graphs. We prove that it is NP-complete if $H$ contains a claw or cycle. Tamura, Ito and Zhou proved that it is polynomial-time solvable for $P_4$-free graphs. We show that it remains polynomial-time solvable for $P_5$-free graphs. We prove analogous results for the Independent Odd Cycle Transversal problem, which asks whether or not a graph has an independent odd cycle transversal of size at most $k$ for a given integer $k\geq 0$. Finally, in line with our underlying research aim, we compare the complexity of Independent Feedback Vertex Set for $H$-free graphs with the complexity of $3$-Colouring, Independent Odd Cycle Transversal and other related problems.

We introduce a variant of the well-studied sum choice number of graphs, which we call the interactive sum choice number. In this variant, we request colours to be added to the vertices' colour-lists one at a time, and so we are able to make use of information about the colours assigned so far to determine our future choices. The interactive sum choice number cannot exceed the sum choice number and we conjecture that, except in the case of complete graphs, the interactive sum choice number is always strictly smaller than the sum choice number. In this paper we provide evidence in support of this conjecture, demonstrating that it holds for a number of graph classes, and indeed that in many cases the difference between the two quantities grows as a linear function of the number of vertices.

Gallai's path decomposition conjecture states that the edges of any connected graph on n vertices can be decomposed into at most (n+1)/2 paths. We confirm that conjecture for all graphs with maximum degree at most five.

We prove a conjecture of Nadjafi-Arani, Khodashenas and Ashrafi on the difference between the Szeged and Wiener index of a graph. Namely, if $G$ is a 2-connected non-complete graph on $n$ vertices, then $Sz(G)-W(G)\ge 2n-6$. Furthermore, the equality is obtained if and only if $G$ is the complete graph $K_{n-1}$ with an extra vertex attached to either $2$ or $n-2$ vertices of $K_{n-1}$. We apply our method to strengthen some known results on the difference between the Szeged and Wiener index of bipartite graphs, graphs of girth at least five, and the difference between the revised Szeged and Wiener index. We also propose a stronger version of the aforementioned conjecture.

Let $G$ be a graph with a vertex colouring $α$. Let $a$ and $b$ be two colours. Then a connected component of the subgraph induced by those vertices coloured either $a$ or $b$ is known as a Kempe chain. A colouring of $G$ obtained from $α$ by swapping the colours on the vertices of a Kempe chain is said to have been obtained by a Kempe change. Two colourings of $G$ are Kempe equivalent if one can be obtained from the other by a sequence of Kempe changes. A conjecture of Mohar (2007) asserts that, for $k \geq 3$, all $k$-colourings of a $k$-regular graph that is not complete are Kempe equivalent. It was later shown that all $3$-colourings of a cubic graph that is neither $K_4$ nor the triangular prism are Kempe equivalent. In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds for each $k\geq 4$. We also report the implications of this result on the validity of the Wang-Swendsen-Kotecký algorithm for the antiferromagnetic Potts model at zero-temperature.

We prove a conjecture of Dvořák, Král, Nejedlý, and Škrekovski that planar graphs of girth at least five are square $(Δ+2)$-colorable for large enough $Δ$. In fact, we prove the stronger statement that such graphs are square $(Δ+2)$-choosable and even square $(Δ+2)$-paintable.

Král' and Sgall (2005) introduced a refinement of list colouring where every colour list must be subset to one predetermined palette of colours. We call this $(k,\ell)$-choosability when the palette is of size at most $\ell$ and the lists must be of size at least $k$. They showed that, for any integer $k\ge 2$, there is an integer $C=C(k,2k-1)$, satisfying $C = O(16^{k}\ln k)$ as $k\to \infty$, such that, if a graph is $(k,2k-1)$-choosable, then it is $C$-choosable, and asked if $C$ is required to be exponential in $k$. We demonstrate it must satisfy $C = Ω(4^k/\sqrt{k})$. For an integer $\ell \ge 2k-1$, if $C(k,\ell)$ is the least integer such that a graph is $C(k,\ell)$-choosable if it is $(k,\ell)$-choosable, then we more generally supply a lower bound on $C(k,\ell)$, one that is super-polynomial in $k$ if $\ell = o(k^2/\ln k)$, by relation to an extremal set theoretic property. By the use of containers, we also give upper bounds on $C(k,\ell)$ that improve on earlier bounds if $\ell \ge 2.75 k$.

An incidence of an undirected graph G is a pair $(v,e)$ where $v$ is a vertex of $G$ and $e$ an edge of $G$ incident with $v$. Two incidences $(v,e)$ and $(w,f)$ are adjacent if one of the following holds: (i) $v = w$, (ii) $e = f$ or (iii) $vw = e$ or $f$. An incidence coloring of $G$ assigns a color to each incidence of $G$ in such a way that adjacent incidences get distinct colors. In 2005, Hosseini Dolama \emph{et al.}~\citep{ds05} proved that every graph with maximum average degree strictly less than $3$ can be incidence colored with $Δ+3$ colors. Recently, Bonamy \emph{et al.}~\citep{Bonamy} proved that every graph with maximum degree at least $4$ and with maximum average degree strictly less than $\frac{7}{3}$ admits an incidence $(Δ+1)$-coloring. In this paper we give bounds for the number of colors needed to color graphs having maximum average degrees bounded by different values between $4$ and $6$. In particular we prove that every graph with maximum degree at least $7$ and with maximum average degree less than $4$ admits an incidence $(Δ+3)$-coloring. This result implies that every triangle-free planar graph with maximum degree at least $7$ is incidence $(Δ+3)$-colorable. We also prove that every graph with maximum average degree less than 6 admits an incidence $(Δ+ 7)$-coloring. More generally, we prove that $Δ+k-1$ colors are enough when the maximum average degree is less than $k$ and the maximum degree is sufficiently large.

Let $c$ be a proper edge colouring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ with integers $1,2,\ldots,k$. Then $k\geq Δ(G)$, while by Vizing's theorem, no more than $k=Δ(G)+1$ is necessary for constructing such $c$. On the course of investigating irregularities in graphs, it has been moreover conjectured that only slightly larger $k$, i.e., $k=Δ(G)+2$ enables enforcing additional strong feature of $c$, namely that it attributes distinct sums of incident colours to adjacent vertices in $G$ if only this graph has no isolated edges and is not isomorphic to $C_5$. We prove the conjecture is valid for planar graphs of sufficiently large maximum degree. In fact even stronger statement holds, as the necessary number of colours stemming from the result of Vizing is proved to be sufficient for this family of graphs. Specifically, our main result states that every planar graph $G$ of maximum degree at least $28$ which contains no isolated edges admits a proper edge colouring $c:E\to\{1,2,\ldots,Δ(G)+1\}$ such that $\sum_{e\ni u}c(e)\neq \sum_{e\ni v}c(e)$ for every edge $uv$ of $G$.

Answering a question of Kalai and Meshulam, we prove that graphs without induced cycles of length $3k$ have bounded chromatic number. This implies the very first case of a much broader question asserting that every graph with large chromatic number induces a graph $H$ such that the sum of the Betti numbers of the independence complex of $H$ is also large.

Erdős and Hajnal conjectured that, for every graph $H$, there exists a constant $c_H$ such that every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices which does not contain any induced copy of $H$ has a clique or a stable set of size $n^{c_H}$. We prove that for every $k$, there exists $c_k>0$ such that every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices not inducing a cycle of length at least $k$ nor its complement contains a clique or a stable set of size $n^{c_k}$.

Two independent sets of a graph are adjacent if they differ on exactly one vertex (i.e. we can transform one into the other by adding or deleting a vertex). Let $k$ be an integer. We consider the reconfiguration graph $TAR_k(G)$ on the set of independent sets of size at least $k$ in a graph $G$, with the above notion of adjacency. Here we provide a cubic-time algorithm to decide whether $TAR_k(G)$ is connected when $G$ is a cograph, thus solving an open question of~[Bonsma 2014]. As a by-product, we also describe a linear-time algorithm which decides whether two elements of $TAR_k(G)$ are in the same connected component.

For planar graphs, we consider the problems of \emph{list edge coloring} and \emph{list total coloring}. Edge coloring is the problem of coloring the edges while ensuring that two edges that are adjacent receive different colors. Total coloring is the problem of coloring the edges and the vertices while ensuring that two edges that are adjacent, two vertices that are adjacent, or a vertex and an edge that are incident receive different colors. In their list extensions, instead of having the same set of colors for the whole graph, every vertex or edge is assigned some set of colors and has to be colored from it. A graph is minimally edge or total choosable if it is list edge $Δ$-colorable or list total $(Δ+1)$-colorable, respectively, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree in the graph. It is already known that planar graphs with $Δ\geq 8$ and no triangle adjacent to a $C_4$ are minimally edge and total choosable (Li Xu 2011), and that planar graphs with $Δ\geq 7$ and no triangle sharing a vertex with a $C_4$ or no triangle adjacent to a $C_k$ ($\forall 3 \leq k \leq 6$) are minimally total colorable (Wang Wu 2011). We strengthen here these results and prove that planar graphs with $Δ\geq 7$ and no triangle adjacent to a $C_4$ are minimally edge and total choosable.

Let $k$ be an integer. Two vertex $k$-colorings of a graph are \emph{adjacent} if they differ on exactly one vertex. A graph is \emph{$k$-mixing} if any proper $k$-coloring can be transformed into any other through a sequence of adjacent proper $k$-colorings. Jerrum proved that any graph is $k$-mixing if $k$ is at least the maximum degree plus two. We first improve Jerrum's bound using the grundy number, which is the worst number of colors in a greedy coloring. Any graph is $(tw+2)$-mixing, where $tw$ is the treewidth of the graph (Cereceda 2006). We prove that the shortest sequence between any two $(tw+2)$-colorings is at most quadratic (which is optimal up to a constant factor), a problem left open in Bonamy et al. (2012). We also prove that given any two $(χ(G)+1)$-colorings of a cograph (resp. distance-hereditary graph) $G$, we can find a linear (resp. quadratic) sequence between them. In both cases, the bounds cannot be improved by more than a constant factor for a fixed $χ(G)$. The graph classes are also optimal in some sense: one of the smallest interesting superclass of distance-hereditary graphs corresponds to comparability graphs, for which no such property holds (even when relaxing the constraint on the length of the sequence). As for cographs, they are equivalently the graphs with no induced $P_4$, and there exist $P_5$-free graphs that admit no sequence between two of their $(χ(G)+1)$-colorings. All the proofs are constructivist and lead to polynomial-time recoloring algorithm

We prove that for $k\geq 3$, the bound given by Brooks' theorem on the chromatic number of $k$-th powers of graphs of maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$ can be lowered by 1, even in the case of online list coloring.

We consider the problem of coloring the squares of graphs of bounded maximum average degree, that is, the problem of coloring the vertices while ensuring that two vertices that are adjacent or have a common neighbour receive different colors. Borodin et al. proved in 2004 and 2008 that the squares of planar graphs of girth at least seven and sufficiently large maximum degree $Δ$ are list $(Δ+1)$-colorable, while the squares of some planar graphs of girth six and arbitrarily large maximum degree are not. By Euler's Formula, planar graphs of girth at least $6$ are of maximum average degree less than $3$, and planar graphs of girth at least $7$ are of maximum average degree less than $14/5<3$. We strengthen their result and prove that there exists a function $f$ such that the square of any graph with maximum average degree $m<3$ and maximum degree $Δ\geq f(m)$ is list $(Δ+1)$-colorable. This bound of $3$ is optimal in the sense that the above-mentioned planar graphs with girth $6$ have maximum average degree less than $3$ and arbitrarily large maximum degree, while their square cannot be $(Δ+1)$-colored. The same holds for list injective $Δ$-coloring.

We consider the problem of list edge coloring for planar graphs. Edge coloring is the problem of coloring the edges while ensuring that two edges that are incident receive different colors. A graph is k-edge-choosable if for any assignment of k colors to every edge, there is an edge coloring such that the color of every edge belongs to its color assignment. Vizing conjectured in 1965 that every graph is (D+1)-edge-choosable, where D is the maximum degree. In 1990, Borodin solved the conjecture for planar graphs with maximum degree at least 9, and asked whether the bound could be lowered to 8. We prove here that planar graphs with maximum degree D at least 8 are (D+1)-edge-choosable.

Let $k$ be an integer. Two vertex $k$-colorings of a graph are \emph{adjacent} if they differ on exactly one vertex. A graph is \emph{$k$-mixing} if any proper $k$-coloring can be transformed into any other through a sequence of adjacent proper $k$-colorings. Any graph is $(tw+2)$-mixing, where $tw$ is the treewidth of the graph (Cereceda 2006). We prove that the shortest sequence between any two $(tw+2)$-colorings is at most quadratic, a problem left open in Bonamy et al. (2012). Jerrum proved that any graph is $k$-mixing if $k$ is at least the maximum degree plus two. We improve Jerrum's bound using the grundy number, which is the worst number of colors in a greedy coloring.

For graphs of bounded maximum average degree, we consider the problem of 2-distance coloring. This is the problem of coloring the vertices while ensuring that two vertices that are adjacent or have a common neighbor receive different colors. It is already known that planar graphs of girth at least 6 and of maximum degree D are list 2-distance (D+2)-colorable when D>=24 (Borodin and Ivanova (2009)) and 2-distance (D+2)-colorable when D>=18 (Borodin and Ivanova (2009)). We prove here that D>=17 suffices in both cases. More generally, we show that graphs with maximum average degree less than 3 and D>=17 are list 2-distance (D+2)-colorable. The proof can be transposed to list injective (D+1)-coloring.