arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $G$ and an integer-valued threshold function $τ$ on its vertex set, a dynamic monopoly is a set of vertices of $G$ such that iteratively adding to it vertices $u$ of $G$ that have at least $τ(u)$ neighbors in it eventually yields the vertex set of $G$. We show that the problem of finding a dynamic monopoly of minimum order can be solved in polynomial time for interval graphs with bounded threshold functions, but is NP-hard for chordal graphs allowing unbounded threshold functions.

A $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition of a graph $G$ is a vertex-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ satisfying that $δ(G[V_i])\geq k_i$ for $i=1,2$. We determine, for all positive integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether a given graph has a $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition. We also address the problem of finding a function $g(k_1,k_2)$ such that the $(δ\geq k_1,δ\geq k_2)$-partition problem is ${\cal NP}$-complete for the class of graphs of minimum degree less than $g(k_1,k_2)$ and polynomial for all graphs with minimum degree at least $g(k_1,k_2)$. We prove that $g(1,k)=k$ for $k\ge 3$, that $g(2,2)=3$ and that $g(2,3)$, if it exists, has value 4 or 5.

The famous Kőnig-Egerváry theorem is equivalent to the statement that the matching number equals the vertex cover number for every induced subgraph of some graph if and only if that graph is bipartite. Inspired by this result, we consider the set ${\cal G}_k$ of all graphs such that, for every induced subgraph, the maximum number of disjoint paths of order $k$ equals the minimum order of a set of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$. For $k\in \{ 3,4\}$, we give complete structural descriptions of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$. Furthermore, for odd $k$, we give a complete structural description of the graphs in ${\cal G}_k$ that contain no cycle of order less than $k$. For these graph classes, our results yield efficient recognition algorithms as well as efficient algorithms that determine maximum sets of disjoint paths of order $k$ and minimum sets of vertices intersecting all paths of order $k$.

Let $k$ be a fixed integer. We determine the complexity of finding a $p$-partition $(V_1, \dots, V_p)$ of the vertex set of a given digraph such that the maximum out-degree of each of the digraphs induced by $V_i$, ($1\leq i\leq p$) is at least $k$ smaller than the maximum out-degree of $D$. We show that this problem is polynomial-time solvable when $p\geq 2k$ and ${\cal NP}$-complete otherwise. The result for $k=1$ and $p=2$ answers a question posed in \cite{bangTCS636}. We also determine, for all fixed non-negative integers $k_1,k_2,p$, the complexity of deciding whether a given digraph of maximum out-degree $p$ has a $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that the digraph induced by $V_i$ has maximum out-degree at most $k_i$ for $i\in [2]$. It follows from this characterization that the problem of deciding whether a digraph has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex $v\in V_i$ has at least as many neighbours in the set $V_{3-i}$ as in $V_i$, for $i=1,2$ is ${\cal NP}$-complete. This solves a problem from \cite{kreutzerEJC24} on majority colourings.

For a given $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ of the vertices of a (di)graph $G$, we study properties of the spanning bipartite subdigraph $B_G(V_1,V_2)$ of $G$ induced by those arcs/edges that have one end in each $V_i$. We determine, for all pairs of non-negative integers $k_1,k_2$, the complexity of deciding whether $G$ has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex in $V_i$ has at least $k_i$ (out-)neighbours in $V_{3-i}$. We prove that it is ${\cal NP}$-complete to decide whether a digraph $D$ has a 2-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that each vertex in $V_1$ has an out-neighbour in $V_2$ and each vertex in $V_2$ has an in-neighbour in $V_1$. The problem becomes polynomially solvable if we require $D$ to be strongly connected. We give a characterisation, based on the so-called strong component digraph of a non-strong digraph of the structure of ${\cal NP}$-complete instances in terms of their strong component digraph. When we want higher in-degree or out-degree to/from the other set the problem becomes ${\cal NP}$-complete even for strong digraphs. A further result is that it is ${\cal NP}$-complete to decide whether a given digraph $D$ has a $2$-partition $(V_1,V_2)$ such that $B_D(V_1,V_2)$ is strongly connected. This holds even if we require the input to be a highly connected eulerian digraph.

We show the hardness of the geodetic hull number for chordal graphs.

For a degree sequence $d:d_1\geq \cdots \geq d_n$, we consider the smallest chromatic number $χ_{\min}(d)$ and the largest chromatic number $χ_{\max}(d)$ among all graphs with degree sequence $d$. We show that if $d_n\geq 1$, then $χ_{\min}(d)\leq \max\left\{ 3,d_1-\frac{n+1}{4d_1}+4\right\}$, and, if $\sqrt{n+\frac{1}{4}}-\frac{1}{2}>d_1\geq d_n\geq 1$, then $χ_{\max}(d)=\max\limits_{i\in [n]}\min\left\{ i,d_i+1\right\}$. For a given degree sequence $d$ with bounded entries, we show that $χ_{\min}(d)$, $χ_{\max}(d)$, and also the smallest independence number $α_{\min}(d)$ among all graphs with degree sequence $d$, can be determined in polynomial time.

An antidirected trail in a digraph is a trail (a walk with no arc repeated) in which the arcs alternate between forward and backward arcs. An antidirected path is an antidirected trail where no vertex is repeated. We show that it is NP-complete to decide whether two vertices $x,y$ in a digraph are connected by an antidirected path, while one can decide in linear time whether they are connected by an antidirected trail. A digraph $D$ is antistrong if it contains an antidirected $(x,y)$-trail starting and ending with a forward arc for every choice of $x,y\in V(D)$. We show that antistrong connectivity can be decided in linear time. We discuss relations between antistrong connectivity and other properties of a digraph and show that the arc-minimal antistrong spanning subgraphs of a digraph are the bases of a matroid on its arc-set. We show that one can determine in polynomial time the minimum number of new arcs whose addition to $D$ makes the resulting digraph the arc-disjoint union of $k$ antistrong digraphs. In particular, we determine the minimum number of new arcs which need to be added to a digraph to make it antistrong. We use results from matroid theory to characterize graphs which have an antistrong orientation and give a polynomial time algorithm for constructing such an orientation when it exists. This immediately gives analogous results for graphs which have a connected bipartite 2-detachment. Finally, we study arc-decompositions of antistrong digraphs and pose several problems and conjectures.

Motivated by a graph theoretic process intended to measure the speed of the spread of contagion in a graph, Bonato, Janssen, and Roshanbin [Burning a Graph as a Model of Social Contagion, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8882 (2014) 13-22] define the burning number $b(G)$ of a graph $G$ as the smallest integer $k$ for which there are vertices $x_1,\ldots,x_k$ such that for every vertex $u$ of $G$, there is some $i\in \{ 1,\ldots,k\}$ with ${\rm dist}_G(u,x_i)\leq k-i$, and ${\rm dist}_G(x_i,x_j)\geq j-i$ for every $i,j\in \{ 1,\ldots,k\}$. For a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, they prove that $b(G)\leq 2\left\lceil\sqrt{n}\right\rceil-1$, and conjecture $b(G)\leq \left\lceil\sqrt{n}\right\rceil$. We show that $b(G)\leq \sqrt{\frac{32}{19}\cdot \frac{n}{1-ε}}+\sqrt{\frac{27}{19ε}}$ and $b(G)\leq \sqrt{\frac{12n}{7}}+3\approx 1.309 \sqrt{n}+3$ for every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and every $0<ε<1$. For a tree $T$ of order $n$ with $n_2$ vertices of degree $2$, and $n_{\geq 3}$ vertices of degree at least $3$, we show $b(T)\leq \left\lceil\sqrt{(n+n_2)+\frac{1}{4}}+\frac{1}{2}\right\rceil$ and $b(T)\leq \left\lceil\sqrt{n}\right\rceil+n_{\geq 3}$. Furthermore, we characterize the binary trees of depth $r$ that have burning number $r+1$.

As a natural variant of domination in graphs, Dankelmann et al. [Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883] introduce exponential domination, where vertices are considered to have some dominating power that decreases exponentially with the distance, and the dominated vertices have to accumulate a sufficient amount of this power emanating from the dominating vertices. More precisely, if $S$ is a set of vertices of a graph $G$, then $S$ is an exponential dominating set of $G$ if $\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{{\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}\geq 1$ for every vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, where ${\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)$ is the distance between $u\in V(G)\setminus S$ and $v\in S$ in the graph $G-(S\setminus \{ v\})$. The exponential domination number $γ_e(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum order of an exponential dominating set of $G$. In the present paper we study exponential domination in subcubic graphs. Our results are as follows: If $G$ is a connected subcubic graph of order $n(G)$, then $$\frac{n(G)}{6\log_2(n(G)+2)+4}\leq γ_e(G)\leq \frac{1}{3}(n(G)+2).$$ For every $ε>0$, there is some $g$ such that $γ_e(G)\leq εn(G)$ for every cubic graph $G$ of girth at least $g$. For every $0<α<\frac{2}{3\ln(2)}$, there are infinitely many cubic graphs $G$ with $γ_e(G)\leq \frac{3n(G)}{\ln(n(G))^α}$. If $T$ is a subcubic tree, then $γ_e(T)\geq \frac{1}{6}(n(T)+2).$ For a given subcubic tree, $γ_e(T)$ can be determined in polynomial time. The minimum exponential dominating set problem is APX-hard for subcubic graphs.

As a natural variant of domination in graphs, Dankelmann et al. [Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883] introduce exponential domination, where vertices are considered to have some dominating power that decreases exponentially with the distance, and the dominated vertices have to accumulate a sufficient amount of this power emanating from the dominating vertices. More precisely, if $S$ is a set of vertices of a graph $G$, then $S$ is an exponential dominating set of $G$ if $\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{{\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}\geq 1$ for every vertex $u$ in $V(G)\setminus S$, where ${\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)$ is the distance between $u\in V(G)\setminus S$ and $v\in S$ in the graph $G-(S\setminus \{ v\})$. The exponential domination number $γ_e(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum order of an exponential dominating set of $G$. Dankelmann et al. show $$\frac{1}{4}({\rm d}+2)\leq γ_e(G)\leq \frac{2}{5}(n+2)$$ for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and diameter ${\rm d}$. We provide further bounds and in particular strengthen their upper bound. Specifically, for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, maximum degree $Δ$ at least $3$, radius ${\rm r}$ at least $1$, we show \begin{eqnarray*} γ_e(G) & \geq & \left(\frac{n}{13(Δ-1)^2}\right)^{\frac{\log_2(Δ-1)+1}{\log_2^2(Δ-1)+\log_2(Δ-1)+1}},\\[3mm] γ_e(G) & \leq & 2^{2{\rm r}-2}\mbox{, and }\\[3mm] γ_e(G) & \leq & \frac{43}{108}(n+2). \end{eqnarray*}

Motivated by frequency assignment in office blocks, we study the chromatic number of the adjacency graph of $3$-dimensional parallelepiped arrangements. In the case each parallelepiped is within one floor, a direct application of the Four-Colour Theorem yields that the adjacency graph has chromatic number at most $8$. We provide an example of such an arrangement needing exactly $8$ colours. We also discuss bounds on the chromatic number of the adjacency graph of general arrangements of $3$-dimensional parallelepipeds according to geometrical measures of the parallelepipeds (side length, total surface or volume).