arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper, we study totally disjoint diametral paths in simple connected graphs. A diametral path in a graph is a shortest path that connects two vertices whose mutual distance is equal to the diameter of the graph. Totally disjoint paths are paths that have no vertices in common, including their end vertices. We show that the problem of deciding whether a graph $G$ has $k$ totally disjoint diametral paths is NP-complete. We consider restricted classes of graphs for which the problem of determining the maximum size of a set of totally disjoint diametral paths is readily solved. We then give a linear-time algorithm for a subclass of maximal outerplanar graphs called 2-paths, define a polynomial-time algorithm for threshold graphs, and establish a structural bound for proper interval graphs. Finally, we define classes of extremal graphs with $k$ totally disjoint diametral paths of length $d$ having the fewest possible number of edges.

Graph modification problems, which aim to find a small set of modifications to a graph so that it satisfies a desired property, have been studied for several special graph classes. The literature is rather rich in NP-completeness results and polynomial time solvable cases. However, to the best of our knowledge, only a few exact algorithms have been suggested to address NP-hard cases. In this work, we propose exact solution methods based on integer programming for three perfect graph modification problems: minimum perfect editing, minimum perfect completion and the perfect sandwich problem. The minimum perfect editing problem inquires the smallest number of edge additions and deletions to make a graph perfect, while the completion problem allows only edge additions. In the perfect sandwich problem, only a given subset of non-edges can be changed to edges, and the problem asks whether a perfect graph can be obtained in this way. The proposed methods are based on the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem. We represent odd holes and odd antiholes as linear inequalities, and formulate an integer programming model to solve minimum perfect editing problem. To address the exponential number of constraints, we propose a cutting plane algorithm which relies on finding odd holes and odd antiholes. To enhance the practical efficiency of the cutting plane algorithm, we address the expected number of odd holes and odd antiholes in random graphs. In addition, we propose a heuristic algorithm to make a given graph perfect, which is used to obtain improved upper bounds for the editing and the completion problems. Finally, we demonstrate empirical effectiveness of the proposed methods through computational experiments.

A set of vertices is $k$-sparse if it induces a graph with a maximum degree of at most $k$. In this missive, we consider the order of the largest $k$-sparse set in a triangle-free graph of fixed order. We show, for example, that every triangle-free graph of order 11 contains a 1-sparse 5-set; every triangle-free graph of order 13 contains a 2-sparse 7-set; and every triangle-free graph of order 8 contains a 3-sparse 6-set. Further, these are all best possible. For fixed $k$, we consider the growth rate of the largest $k$-sparse set of a triangle-free graph of order $n$. Also, we consider Ramsey numbers of the following type. Given $i$, what is the smallest $n$ having the property that all triangle-free graphs of order $n$ contain a 4-cycle or a $k$-sparse set of order $i$. We use both direct proof techniques and an efficient graph enumeration algorithm to obtain several values for defective Ramsey numbers and a parameter related to largest sparse sets in triangle-free graphs, along with their extremal graphs.

The maximum number of edges in a graph with matching number m and maximum degree d has been determined in [1] and [2], where some extremal graphs have also been provided. Then, a new question has emerged: how the maximum edge count is affected by forbidding some subgraphs occurring in these extremal graphs? In [3], the problem is solved in triangle-free graphs for $d \geq m$, and for $d < m$ with either $Z(d) \leq m < 2d$ or $d \leq 6$, where $Z(d)$ is approximately $5d/4$. The authors derived structural properties of triangle-free extremal graphs, which allows us to focus on constructing small extremal components to form an extremal graph. Based on these findings, in this paper, we develop an integer programming formulation for constructing extremal graphs. Since our formulation is highly symmetric, we use our own implementation of Orbital Branching to reduce symmetry. We also implement our integer programming formulation so that the feasible region is restricted iteratively. Using a combination of the two approaches, we expand the solution into $d \leq 10$ instead of $d \leq 6$ for $m > d$. Our results endorse the formula for the number of edges in all extremal triangle-free graphs conjectured in [3].

Determining the maximum number of edges under degree and matching number constraints have been solved for general graphs by Chvátal and Hanson (1976), and by Balachandran and Khare (2009). It follows from the structure of those extremal graphs that deciding whether this maximum number decreases or not when restricted to claw-free graphs, to $C_4$-free graphs or to triangle-free graphs are separately interesting research questions. The first two cases being already settled, respectively by Dibek, Ekim and Heggernes (2017), and by Blair, Heggernes, Lima and D.Lokshtanov (2020). In this paper we focus on triangle-free graphs. We show that unlike most cases for claw-free graphs and $C_4$-free graphs, forbidding triangles from extremal graphs causes a strict decrease in the number of edges and adds to the hardness of the problem. We provide a formula giving the maximum number of edges in a triangle-free graph with degree at most $d$ and matching number at most $m$ for all cases where $d\geq m$, and for the cases where $d<m$ with either $d\leq 6$ or $Z(d)\leq m < 2d$ where $Z(d)$ is a function of $d$ which is roughly $5d/4$. We also provide an integer programming formulation for the remaining cases and as a result of further discussion on this formulation, we conjecture that our formula giving the size of triangle-free extremal graphs is also valid for these open cases.

A graph G is equimatchable if every maximal matching of G has the same cardinality. In this paper, we investigate equimatchable graphs such that the removal of any edge harms the equimatchability, called edge-critical equimatchable graphs (ECE-graphs). We show that apart from two simple cases, namely bipartite ECE-graphs and even cliques, all ECE-graphs are 2-connected factor-critical. Accordingly, we give a characterization of factor-critical ECE-graphs with connectivity 2. Our result provides a partial answer to an open question posed by Levit and Mandrescu on the characterization of well-covered graphs with no shedding vertex. We also introduce equimatchable graphs such that the removal of any vertex harms the equimatchability, called vertex-critical equimatchable graphs (VCE-graphs). To conclude, we enlighten the relationship between various subclasses of equimatchable graphs (including ECE-graphs and VCE-graphs) and discuss the properties of factor-critical ECE-graphs with connectivity at least 3.

In this paper, we investigate a variant of Ramsey numbers called defective Ramsey numbers where cliques and independent sets are generalized to $k$-dense and $k$-sparse sets, both commonly called $k$-defective sets. We focus on the computation of defective Ramsey numbers restricted to some subclasses of perfect graphs. Since direct proof techniques are often insufficient for obtaining new values of defective Ramsey numbers, we provide a generic algorithm to compute defective Ramsey numbers in a given target graph class. We combine direct proof techniques with our efficient graph generation algorithm to compute several new defective Ramsey numbers in perfect graphs, bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. We also initiate the study of a related parameter, denoted by $c^{\mathcal G}_k(m)$, which is the maximum order $n$ such that the vertex set of any graph of order at $n$ in a class $\mathcal{G}$ can be partitioned into at most $m$ subsets each of which is $k$-defective. We obtain several values for $c^{\mathcal G}_k(m)$ in perfect graphs and cographs.

A subset of vertices in a graph is called a total dominating set if every vertex of the graph is adjacent to at least one vertex of this set. A total dominating set is called minimal if it does not properly contain another total dominating set. In this paper, we study graphs whose all minimal total dominating sets have the same size, referred to as well-totally-dominated (WTD) graphs. We first show that WTD graphs with bounded total domination number can be recognized in polynomial time. Then we focus on WTD graphs with total domination number two. In this case, we characterize triangle-free WTD graphs and WTD graphs with packing number two, and we show that there are only finitely many planar WTD graphs with minimum degree at least three. Lastly, we show that if the minimum degree is at least three then the girth of a WTD graph is at most 12. We conclude with several open questions.

Given a graph $G$, a $k$-sparse $j$-set is a set of $j$ vertices inducing a subgraph with maximum degree at most $k$. A $k$-dense $i$-set is a set of $i$ vertices that is $k$-sparse in the complement of $G$. As a generalization of Ramsey numbers, the $k$-defective Ramsey number $R_k^{\mathcal{G}}(i,j)$ for the graph class $\mathcal{G}$ is defined as the smallest natural number $n$ such that all graphs on $n$ vertices in the class $\mathcal{G}$ have either a $k$-dense $i$-set or a $k$-sparse $j$-set. In this paper, we examine $R_k^{\mathcal{G}}(i,j)$ where $\mathcal{G}$ represents various graph classes. In forests and cographs, we give formulas for all defective Ramsey numbers. In cacti, bipartite graphs and split graphs, we provide defective Ramsey numbers in most of the cases and point out open questions, formulated as conjectures if possible.

The independence gap of a graph was introduced by Ekim et al. (2018) as a measure of how far a graph is from being well-covered. It is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum size of a maximal independent set. We investigate the independence gap of a graph from structural and algorithmic points of view, with a focus on classes of perfect graphs. Generalizing results on well-covered graphs due to Dean and Zito (1994) and Hujdurović et al. (2018), we express the independence gap of a perfect graph in terms of clique partitions and use this characterization to develop a polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing graphs of constant independence gap in any class of perfect graphs of bounded clique number. Next, we introduce a hereditary variant of the parameter, which we call hereditary independence gap and which measures the maximum independence gap over all induced subgraphs of the graph. We show that determining whether a given graph has hereditary independence gap at most $k$ is polynomial-time solvable if $k$ is fixed and co-NP-complete if $k$ is part of input. We also investigate the complexity of the independent set problem in graph classes related to independence gap, showing that the problem is NP-complete in the class of graphs of independence gap at most one and polynomial-time solvable in any class of graphs with bounded hereditary independence gap. Combined with some known results on claw-free graphs, our results imply that the independent domination problem is solvable in polynomial time in the class of $\{$claw, 2$P_3\}$-free graphs.

We consider a relaxation of the concept of well-covered graphs, which are graphs with all maximal independent sets of the same size. The extent to which a graph fails to be well-covered can be measured by its independence gap, defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum sizes of a maximal independent set in $G$. While the well-covered graphs are exactly the graphs of independence gap zero, we investigate in this paper graphs of independence gap one, which we also call almost well-covered graphs. Previous works due to Finbow et al. (1994) and Barbosa et al. (2013) have implications for the structure of almost well-covered graphs of girth at least $k$ for $k\in \{7,8\}$. We focus on almost well-covered graphs of girth at least $6$. We show that every graph in this class has at most two vertices each of which is adjacent to exactly $2$ leaves. We give efficiently testable characterizations of almost well-covered graphs of girth at least $6$ having exactly one or exactly two such vertices. Building on these results, we develop a polynomial-time recognition algorithm of almost well-covered $\{C_3,C_4,C_5,C_7\}$-free graphs.

A graph is said to be equimatchable if all its maximal matchings are of the same size. In this work we introduce two extensions of the property of equimatchability by defining two new graph parameters that measure how far a graph is from being equimatchable. The first one, called the matching gap, measures the difference between the sizes of a maximum matching and a minimum maximal matching. The second extension is obtained by introducing the concept of equimatchable sets; a set of vertices in a graph $G$ is said to be equimatchable if all maximal matchings of $G$ saturating the set are of the same size. Noting that $G$ is equimatchable if and only if the empty set is equimatchable, we study the equimatchability defect of the graph, defined as the minimum size of an equimatchable set in it. We develop several inapproximability and parameterized complexity results and algorithms regarding the computation of these two parameters, a characterization of graphs of unit matching gap, exact values of the equimatchability defect of cycles, and sharp bounds for both parameters.

A graph is equimatchable if all of its maximal matchings have the same size. A graph is claw-free if it does not have a claw as an induced subgraph. In this paper, we provide, to the best of our knowledge, the first characterization of claw-free equimatchable graphs by identifying the equimatchable claw-free graph families. This characterization implies an efficient recognition algorithm.

The families EPT (resp. EPG) Edge Intersection Graphs of Paths in a tree (resp. in a grid) are well studied graph classes. Recently we introduced the graph classes Edge-Intersecting and Non-Splitting Paths in a Tree ENPT, and in a Grid (ENPG). It was shown that ENPG contains an infinite hierarchy of subclasses that are obtained by restricting the number of bends in the paths. Motivated by this result, in this work we focus on one bend {ENPG} graphs. We show that one bend ENPG graphs are properly included in two bend ENPG graphs. We also show that trees and cycles are one bend ENPG graphs, and characterize the split graphs and co-bipartite graphs that are one bend ENPG. We prove that the recognition problem of one bend ENPG split graphs is NP-complete even in a very restricted subfamily of split graphs. Last we provide a linear time recognition algorithm for one bend ENPG co-bipartite graphs.