arXiv++ Combinatorics

The inducibility of a graph $H$ is about the maximum number of induced copies of $H$ in a graph on $n$ vertices. We consider its edge version, that is, the maximum number of induced copies of $H$ in a graph with $m$ edges. Let $c(G,H)$ be the number of induced copies of $H$ in $G$ and $ρ(H,m) = \max \{c(G,H) \mid |E(G)| = m\}$. For any graph $H$, we prove that $ρ(H,m) = Θ(m^{α_f(H)})$ where $α_f(H)$ is the fractional independence number of $H$. Therefore, we now focus on the constant factor in front of $m^{α_f(H)}$. In this paper, we give some results of $ρ(H,m)$ when $H$ is a cycle or path. We conjecture that for any cycle $C_k$ with $k \ge 5$, $ρ(C_k,m)= (1+o(1))\left( m/k\right)^{k/2}$ and the bound achieves by the blow up of $C_k$. For even cycles, we establish an upper bound with an extra constant factor. For odd cycles, we can only establish an upper bound with an extra factor depending on $k$. We prove that $ρ(P_{2l},m) \le \frac{m^l}{2(l-1)^{l-1}}$ and $ρ(P_{2l+1},m) \le \frac{m^{l+1}}{4l^l}$, where $l \ge 2$. We also conjecture the asymptotic value of $ρ(P_k, m)$. The entropy method is mainly used to prove our results.

Let $F$ be a graph of order $r$. In this paper, we study the maximum number of induced copies of $F$ with restricted intersections, which highlights the motivation from extremal set theory. Let $L=\{\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s\}\subseteq[0,r-1]$ be an integer set with $s\not\in\{1,r\}$. Let $Ψ_r(n,F,L)$ be the maximum number of induced copies of $F$ in an $n$-vertex graph, where the induced copies of $F$ are $L$-intersecting as a family of $r$-subsets, i.e., for any two induced copies of $F$, the size of their intersection is in $L$. Helliar and Liu initiated a study of the function $Ψ_r(n,K_r,L)$. Very recently, Zhao and Zhang improved their result and showed that $Ψ_r(n,K_r,L)=Θ_{r,L}(n^{s})$ if and only if $\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s,r$ form an arithmetic progression. In this paper, we show that $Ψ_r(n,F,L)=o_{r,L}(n^{s})$ when $\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s,r$ do not form an arithmetic progression. We study the asymptotical result of $Ψ_r(n,C_r,L)$, and determined the asymptotically optimal result when $\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s,r$ form an arithmetic progression and take certain values. We also study the generalized Turán problem, determining the maximum number of $H$, where the copies of $H$ are $L$-intersecting as a family of $r$-subsets. The entropy method is used to prove our results.

We study the derangement graph $Γ_n$ whose vertex set consists of all permutations of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$, where two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding permutations differ at every position. It is well-known that $Γ_n$ is a Cayley graph, Hamiltonian and Hamilton-connected. In this paper, we prove that for $n \geq 4$, the derangement graph $Γ_n$ is edge pancyclic. Moreover, we extend this result to two broader classes of Cayley graphs defined on symmetric group.

Let $\mathscr{F}$ be a family of graphs. A graph $G$ is $\mathscr{F}$-free if $G$ does not contain any $F\in \mathscr{F}$ as a subgraph. The Turán number, denoted by $ex(n, \mathscr{F})$, is the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $\mathscr{F}$-free graph. Let $F $ be a fixed graph with $ χ(F) \geq 3 $. A forest $H$ is called a linear forest if all components of $H$ are paths. In this paper, we determined the exact value of $ex(n, \{H, F\}) $ for a fixed graph $F$ with $χ(F)\geq 3$ and a linear forest $H$ with at least $2$ components and each component with size at least $3$.

A graph $G$ of order $n$ is called edge-pancyclic if, for every integer $k$ with $3 \leq k \leq n$, every edge of $G$ lies in a cycle of length $k$. Determining the minimum size $f(n)$ of a simple edge-pancyclic graph with $n$ vertices seems difficult. Recently, Li, Liu and Zhan \cite{li2024minimum} gave both a lower bound and an upper bound of $f(n)$. In this paper, we improve their lower bound by considering a new class of graphs and improve the upper bound by constructing a family of edge-pancyclic graphs.

Let $\mathscr{F}$ be a family of graphs. A graph $G$ is $\mathscr{F}$-free if $G$ does not contain any $F\in \mathcal{F}$ as a subgraph. The general Turán number, denoted by $ex(n, H,\mathscr{F})$, is the maximum number of copies of $H$ in an $n$-vertex $\mathscr{F}$-free graph. Then $ex(n, K_2,\mathscr{F})$, also denote by $ex(n, \mathscr{F})$, is the Turán number. Recently, Alon and Frankl determined the exact value of $ex(n, \{K_{k},M_{s+1}\})$, where $K_{k}$ and $M_{s+1}$ are a complete graph on $k $ vertices and a matching of size $s +1$, respectively. Then many results were obtained by extending $K_{k}$ to a general fixed graph or family of graphs. Let $C_k$ be a cycle of order $k$. Denote $C_{\ge k}=\{C_k,C_{k+1},\ldots\}$. In this paper, we determine the value of $ex(n,K_r, \{C_{\ge k},M_{s+1}\})$ for large enough $n$ and obtain the extremal graphs when $k$ is odd. Particularly, the exact value of $ex(n, \{C_{\ge k},M_{s+1}\})$ and the extremal graph are given for large enough $n$.

Constructing the maximum spanning tree $T$ of an edge-weighted connected graph $G$ is one of the important research topics in computer science and optimization, and the related research results have played an active role in practical applications. In this paper, we are concerned with the ratio of the weighted sum of a spanning tree $T$ of $G$ to the weighted sum of $G$, which we try to minimize. We propose an interesting theorem to simplify this problem and show that this optimal problem can be solved in polynomial time. Furthermore, we apply the optimal problem in chordal graphs.

Let $\mathscr{F}$ be a family of graphs. A graph $G$ is $\mathscr{F}$-free if $G$ does not contain any $F\in \mathcal{F}$ as a subgraph. The Turán number $ex(n, \mathscr{F})$ is the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $\mathscr{F}$-free graph. Let $M_{s}$ be the matching consisting of $ s $ independent edges. Recently, Alon and Frank determined the exact value of $ex(n,\{K_{m},M_{s+1}\})$. Gerbner obtained several results about $ex(n,\{F,M_{s+1}\})$ when $F$ satisfies certain proportions. In this paper, we determine the exact value of $ex(n,\{K_{l,t},M_{s+1}\})$ when $s, n$ are large enough for every $3\leq l\leq t$. When $n$ is large enough, we also show that $ex(n,\{K_{2,2}, M_{s+1}\})=n+{s\choose 2}-\left\lceil\frac{s}{2}\right\rceil$ for $s\ge 12$ and $ex(n,\{K_{2,t},M_{s+1}\})=n+(t-1){s\choose 2}-\left\lceil\frac{s}{2}\right\rceil$ when $t\ge 3$ and $s$ is large enough.