Papers by Yanjia Li
6 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Rooted $C_5$-Minors
Let $G$ be a graph and $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_k$ be distinct vertices of $G$. We say $(G,x_1x_2\ldots x_k)$ has a $C_k$-minor or $G$ has a $C_k$-minor rooted at $x_1x_2\ldots x_k$, if there exist pairwise disjoint sets $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_k\subseteq V(G)$, such that for all $i\in [k]$, $G[X_i]$ is connected, $x_i\in X_i$, and $G$ has an edge between $X_i$ and $X_{i+1}$, where $X_{k+1}=X_k$. When $k=3$ it is easy to determine when $(G,x_1x_2x_3)$ contains a $C_3$-minor. For $k=4$, Robertson, Seymour and Thomas gave a characterization of $(G,x_1x_2x_3x_4)$ with no $C_4$-minor, which, in particular, implies that such $G$ has connectivity at most 5. In this paper, we apply a method of Thomas and Wollan to prove a result, which implies that if $G$ is $10$-connected then, for all distinct vertices $x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5$ of $G$, $(G,x_1x_2x_3x_4x_5)$ has a $C_5$-minor.
Linkages and removable paths avoiding vertices
We say that a graph $G$ is $(2,m)$-linked if, for any distinct vertices $a_1,\ldots, a_m, b_1,b_2$ in $G$, there exist vertex disjoint connected subgraphs $A,B$ of $G$ such that $\{a_1, \ldots, a_m\}$ is contained in $A$ and $\{b_1,b_2\}$ is contained in $B$. A fundamental result in structural graph theory is the characterization of $(2,2)$-linked graphs, with different versions obtained independently by Robertson and Chakravarty, Seymour, and Thomassen. It appears to be very difficult to characterize $(2,m)$-linked graphs for $m\ge 3$. In this paper, we provide a partial characterization of $(2,m)$-linked graphs by adding an average degree condition. This implies that $(2m+2)$-connected graphs are $(2,m)$-linked. Moreover, if $G$ is a $(2m+2)$-connected graph and $a_1, \ldots, a_m, b_1,b_2$ are distinct vertices of $G$, then there is a path $P$ in $G$ between $b_1$ and $b_2$ and avoiding $\{a_1, \ldots, a_m\}$ such that $G-P$ is connected, improving a previous connectivity bound of $10m$.
Hitting all maximum stable sets in $P_5$-free graphs
Published in Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, Volume 165, March 2024, Pages 142-163
• View Publication
• BIB
We prove that every $P_5$-free graph of bounded clique number contains a small hitting set of all its maximum stable sets.
More generally, let us say a class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs is $η$-bounded if there exists a function $h:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that $η(G)\leq h(ω(G))$ for every graph $G\in \mathcal{C}$, where $η(G)$ denotes smallest cardinality of a hitting set of all maximum stable sets in $G$, and $ω(G)$ is the clique number of $G$. Also, $\mathcal{C}$ is said to be polynomially $η$-bounded if in addition $h$ can be chosen to be a polynomial.
We introduce $η$-boundedness inspired by a question of Alon and motivated by a number of meaningful similarities to $χ$-boundedness. In particular, we propose an analogue of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture, that the class of all $H$-free graphs is $η$-bounded if (and only if) $H$ is a forest. Like $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a star is easy to verify, and we prove two non-trivial extensions of this: $H$-free graphs are $η$-bounded if (1) $H$ has a vertex incident with all edges of $H$, or (2) $H$ can be obtained from a star by subdividing at most one edge, exactly once.
Unlike $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a path is surprisingly hard. Our main result mentioned at the beginning shows that $P_5$-free graphs are $η$-bounded. The proof is rather involved compared to the classical ``Gyárfás path'' argument which establishes, for all $t$, the $χ$-boundedness of $P_t$-free graphs. It remains open whether $P_t$-free graphs are $η$-bounded for $t\geq 6$. It also remains open whether $P_5$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded, which, if true, would imply the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for $P_5$-free graphs. But we prove that $H$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded if $H$ is a proper induced subgraph of $P_5$.
List-3-Coloring ordered graphs with a forbidden induced subgraph
Published in SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 38, no. 1 (2024): 1158-1190
• View Publication
• BIB
The List-3-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph $G$ and a list $L(v)\subseteq \{1,2,3\}$ of colors assigned to each vertex $v$ of $G$, whether $G$ admits a proper coloring $φ$ with $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, and the $3$-Coloring Problem is the List-$3$-Coloring Problem on instances with $L(v)=\{1,2,3\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. The List-$3$-Coloring Problem is a classical NP-complete problem, and it is well-known that while restricted to $H$-free graphs (meaning graphs with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$), it remains NP-complete unless $H$ is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of a path. However, the current state of art is far from proving this to be sufficient for a polynomial time algorithm; in fact, the complexity of the $3$-Coloring Problem on $P_8$-free graphs (where $P_8$ denotes the eight-vertex path) is unknown. Here we consider a variant of the List-$3$-Coloring Problem called the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem, where the input is an ordered graph, that is, a graph along with a linear order on its vertex set. For ordered graphs $G$ and $H$, we say $G$ is $H$-free if $H$ is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $G$ with the isomorphism preserving the linear order. We prove, assuming $H$ to be an ordered graph, a nearly complete dichotomy for the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free ordered graphs. In particular, we show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if $H$ has at most one edge, and remains NP-complete if $H$ has at least three edges. Moreover, in the case where $H$ has exactly two edges, we give a complete dichotomy when the two edges of $H$ share an end, and prove several NP-completeness results when the two edges of $H$ do not share an end, narrowing the open cases down to three very special types of two-edge ordered graphs.
The $r$-coloring and maximum stable set problem in hypergraphs with bounded matching number and edge size
Published in Discrete Mathematics, Volume 346, Issue 4, April 2023, 113342
• View Publication
• BIB
Motivated by the analogous questions in graphs, we study the complexity of coloring and stable set problems in hypergraphs with forbidden substructures and bounded edge size. Letting $ν(G)$ denote the maximum size of a matching in $H$, we obtain complete dichotomies for the complexity of the following problems parametrized by fixed $r, k, s \in \mathbb{N}$: $r$-Coloring in hypergraphs $G$ with edge size at most $k$ and $ν(G) \leq s$; $r$-Precoloring Extension in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq s$; $r$-Precoloring Extension in hypergraphs $G$ with edge size at most $k$ and $ν(G) \leq s$; Maximum Stable Set in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq s$; Maximum Weight Stable Set in $k$-uniform hypergraphs with $ν(G) \leq s$; as well as partial results for $r$-Coloring in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $ν(G) \leq s$.
We then turn our attention to $2$-Coloring in 3-uniform hypergraphs with forbidden induced subhypergraphs, and give a polynomial-time algorithm when restricting the input to hypergraphs excluding a fixed one-edge hypergraph. Finally, we consider linear 3-uniform hypergraphs (in which every two edges share at most one vertex), and show that excluding an induced matching in $G$ implies that $ν(G)$ is bounded by a constant; and that $3$-coloring linear $3$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq 532$ is NP-hard.
Complexity dichotomy for List-5-Coloring with a forbidden induced subgraph
Published in SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Volume 36, Issue 3, 2022, 2004 -- 2027
• View Publication
• BIB
For a positive integer $r$ and graphs $G$ and $H$, we denote by $G+H$ the disjoint union of $G$ and $H$, and by $rH$ the union of $r$ mutually disjoint copies of $H$. Also, we say $G$ is $H$-free if $H$ is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $G$. We use $P_t$ to denote the path on $t$ vertices. For a fixed positive integer $k$, the List-$k$-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph $G$ and a list $L(v)\subseteq \{1,\ldots,k\}$ of colors assigned to each vertex $v$ of $G$, whether $G$ admits a proper coloring $φ$ with $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, and the $k$-Coloring Problem is the List-$k$-Coloring Problem restricted to instances with $L(v)=\{1,\ldots, k\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. We prove that for every positive integer $r$, the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $rP_3$-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time. Together with known results, this gives a complete dichotomy for the complexity of the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free graphs: For every graph $H$, assuming P$\neq$NP, the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time if and only if $H$ is an induced subgraph of either $rP_3$ or $P_5+rP_1$ for some positive integer $r$. As a hardness counterpart, we also show that the $k$-Coloring Problem restricted to $rP_4$-free graphs is NP-complete for all $k\geq 5$ and $r\geq 2$.