arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $\mathcal{B}$ be the class consisting of the six-vertex bipartite graphs that possess a perfect matching and their complements. It is proved that every $\mathcal{B}$-free graph $G$ satisfies $α(G)+ω(G)\ge |V(G)|-1$. This establishes Conjecture 3.1 of Litjens, Polak and Sivaraman (B-Free Graphs Conjecture). For a smallest counterexample, Hall-type exchange arguments show that two maximum stable sets, and likewise two maximum cliques, differ in at most two vertices. A core-corona matching lemma then forces $|α(G)-ω(G)|\le 2$. Double counting between suitably dense and sparse vertices reduces the problem to twenty-one binary feasibility systems on at most fourteen vertices. Their infeasibility is verified by two independent exact encodings, with a separate exhaustive validation of the forbidden-family constraints.

Given a graph $G$, denote by $h(G)$ the smallest size of a subset of $V(G)$ which intersects every maximum independent set of $G$. We prove that any graph $G$ without induced matching of size $t$ satisfies $h(G)\le ω(G)^{3t-3+o(1)}$. This resolves a conjecture of Hajebi, Li and Spirkl (Hitting all maximum stable sets in $P_{5}$-free graphs, JCTB 2024).

We prove that every $P_5$-free graph of bounded clique number contains a small hitting set of all its maximum stable sets. More generally, let us say a class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs is $η$-bounded if there exists a function $h:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that $η(G)\leq h(ω(G))$ for every graph $G\in \mathcal{C}$, where $η(G)$ denotes smallest cardinality of a hitting set of all maximum stable sets in $G$, and $ω(G)$ is the clique number of $G$. Also, $\mathcal{C}$ is said to be polynomially $η$-bounded if in addition $h$ can be chosen to be a polynomial. We introduce $η$-boundedness inspired by a question of Alon and motivated by a number of meaningful similarities to $χ$-boundedness. In particular, we propose an analogue of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture, that the class of all $H$-free graphs is $η$-bounded if (and only if) $H$ is a forest. Like $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a star is easy to verify, and we prove two non-trivial extensions of this: $H$-free graphs are $η$-bounded if (1) $H$ has a vertex incident with all edges of $H$, or (2) $H$ can be obtained from a star by subdividing at most one edge, exactly once. Unlike $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a path is surprisingly hard. Our main result mentioned at the beginning shows that $P_5$-free graphs are $η$-bounded. The proof is rather involved compared to the classical ``Gyárfás path'' argument which establishes, for all $t$, the $χ$-boundedness of $P_t$-free graphs. It remains open whether $P_t$-free graphs are $η$-bounded for $t\geq 6$. It also remains open whether $P_5$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded, which, if true, would imply the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for $P_5$-free graphs. But we prove that $H$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded if $H$ is a proper induced subgraph of $P_5$.

Let $D$ be a digraph. A stable set $S$ of $D$ and a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $D$ are orthogonal if every path $P \in \mathcal{P}$ contains exactly one vertex of $S$. In 1982, Berge defined the class of $α$-diperfect digraphs. A digraph $D$ is $α$-diperfect if for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$ there is a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $D$ orthogonal to $S$ and this property holds for every induced subdigraph of $D$. An anti-directed odd cycle is an orientation of an odd cycle $(x_0,\ldots,x_{2k},x_0)$ with $k\geq2$ in which each vertex $x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3,x_5,x_7\ldots,x_{2k-1}$ is either a source or a sink. Berge conjectured that a digraph $D$ is $α$-diperfect if and only if $D$ does not contain an anti-directed odd cycle as an induced subdigraph. In this paper, we show that this conjecture is false by exhibiting an infinite family of orientations of complements of odd cycles with at least seven vertices that are not $α$-diperfect.

Let $D$ be a digraph. A subset $S$ of $V(D)$ is a stable set if every pair of vertices in $S$ is non-adjacent in $D$. A collection of disjoint paths $\mathcal{P}$ of $D$ is a path partition of $V(D)$, if every vertex in $V(D)$ is exactly on a path of $\mathcal{P}$. We say that a stable set $S$ and a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal if each path of $P$ contains exactly one vertex of $S$. A digraph $D$ satisfies the $α$-property if for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$, there exists a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ such that $S$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal. A digraph $D$ is $α$-diperfect if every induced subdigraph of $D$ satisfies the $α$-property. In 1982, Claude Berge proposed a characterization for $α$-diperfect digraphs in terms of forbidden anti-directed odd cycles. In 2018, Sambinelli, Silva and Lee proposed a similar conjecture. A digraph $D$ satisfies the Begin-End-property or BE-property if for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$, there exists a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ such that (i) $S$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal and (ii) for each path $P \in \mathcal{P}$, either the start or the end of $P$ belongs to $S$. A digraph $D$ is BE-diperfect if every induced subdigraph of $D$ satisfies the BE-property. Sambinelli, Silva and Lee proposed a characterization for BE-diperfect digraphs in terms of forbidden blocking odd cycles. In this paper, we verified both conjectures for $3$-anti-circulant digraphs. We also present some structural results for $α$-diperfect and BE-diperfect digraphs.

Let $D$ be a digraph. A subset $S$ of $V(D)$ is a stable set if every pair of vertices in $S$ is non-adjacent in $D$. A collection of disjoint paths $\mathcal{P}$ of $D$ is a path partition of $V(D)$, if every vertex in $V(D)$ is on a path of $\mathcal{P}$. We say that a stable set $S$ and a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal if each path of $P$ contains exactly one vertex of $S$. A digraph $D$ satisfies the $α$-property if for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$, there exists a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ such that $S$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal. A digraph $D$ is $α$-diperfect if every induced subdigraph of $D$ satisfies the $α$-property. In 1982, Claude Berge proposed a characterization of $α$-diperfect digraphs in terms of forbidden anti-directed odd cycles. In 2018, Sambinelli, Silva and Lee proposed a similar conjecture. A digraph $D$ satisfies the Begin-End-property or BE-property if for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$, there exists a path partition $\mathcal{P}$ such that (i) $S$ and $\mathcal{P}$ are orthogonal and (ii) for each path $P \in \mathcal{P}$, either the start or the end of $P$ lies in $S$. A digraph $D$ is BE-diperfect if every induced subdigraph of $D$ satisfies the BE-property. Sambinelli, Silva and Lee proposed a characterization of BE-diperfect digraphs in terms of forbidden blocking odd cycles. In this paper, we show some structural results for $α$-diperfect and BE-diperfect digraphs. In particular, we show that in every minimal counterexample $D$ to both conjectures, the size of a maximum stable set is smaller than $\vert V(D)\vert /2$. As an application we use these results to prove both conjectures for arc-locally in-semicomplete and arc-locally out-semicomplete digraphs.

Motivated by the analogous questions in graphs, we study the complexity of coloring and stable set problems in hypergraphs with forbidden substructures and bounded edge size. Letting $ν(G)$ denote the maximum size of a matching in $H$, we obtain complete dichotomies for the complexity of the following problems parametrized by fixed $r, k, s \in \mathbb{N}$: $r$-Coloring in hypergraphs $G$ with edge size at most $k$ and $ν(G) \leq s$; $r$-Precoloring Extension in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq s$; $r$-Precoloring Extension in hypergraphs $G$ with edge size at most $k$ and $ν(G) \leq s$; Maximum Stable Set in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq s$; Maximum Weight Stable Set in $k$-uniform hypergraphs with $ν(G) \leq s$; as well as partial results for $r$-Coloring in $k$-uniform hypergraphs $ν(G) \leq s$. We then turn our attention to $2$-Coloring in 3-uniform hypergraphs with forbidden induced subhypergraphs, and give a polynomial-time algorithm when restricting the input to hypergraphs excluding a fixed one-edge hypergraph. Finally, we consider linear 3-uniform hypergraphs (in which every two edges share at most one vertex), and show that excluding an induced matching in $G$ implies that $ν(G)$ is bounded by a constant; and that $3$-coloring linear $3$-uniform hypergraphs $G$ with $ν(G) \leq 532$ is NP-hard.

We provide lower and upper bounds on the minimum size of a maximum stable set over graphs of flag spheres, as a function of the dimension of the sphere and the number of vertices. Further, we use stable sets to obtain an improved Lower Bound Theorem for the face numbers of flag spheres.

Graphical designs are an extension of spherical designs to functions on graphs. We connect linear codes to graphical designs on cube graphs, and show that the Hamming code in particular is a highly effective graphical design. We show that even in highly structured graphs, graphical designs are distinct from the related concepts of extremal designs, maximum stable sets in distance graphs, and $t$-designs on association schemes.

Let $D$ be a digraph. Given a set of vertices $S \subseteq V(D)$, an $S$-path partition $\mathcal{P}$ of $D$ is a collection of paths of $D$ such that $\{V(P) \colon P \in \mathcal{P}\}$ is a partition of $V(D)$ and $|V(P) \cap S| = 1$ for every $P \in \mathcal{P}$. We say that $D$ satisfies the $α$-property if, for every maximum stable set $S$ of $D$, there exists an $S$-path partition of $D$, and we say that $D$ is $α$-diperfect if every induced subdigraph of $D$ satisfies the $α$-property. A digraph $C$ is an anti-directed odd cycle if (i) the underlying graph of $C$ is a cycle $x_1x_2 \cdots x_{2k + 1}x_1$, where $k \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $k \geq 2$, and (ii) each of the vertices $x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_6,$ $x_8, \ldots, x_{2k}$ is either a source or a sink. Berge (1982) conjectured that a digraph is $α$-diperfect if, and only if, it contains no induced anti-directed odd cycle. Remark that this conjecture is strikingly similar to Berge's conjecture on perfect graphs -- nowadays known as the Strong Perfect Graph Theorem (Chudnovsky, Robertson, Seymour, and Thomas, 2006). To the best of our knowledge, Berge's conjecture for $α$-diperfect digraphs has been verified only for symmetric digraphs and digraphs whose underlying graph are perfect. In this paper, we verify it for digraphs whose underlying graphs are series-parallel and for in-semicomplete digraphs. Moreover, we propose a conjecture similar to Berge's and verify it for all the known cases of Berge's conjecture.

A 2-join is an edge cutset that naturally appears in decomposition of several classes of graphs closed under taking induced subgraphs, such as perfect graphs and claw-free graphs. In this paper we construct combinatorial polynomial time algorithms for finding a maximum weighted clique, a maximum weighted stable set and an optimal coloring for a class of perfect graphs decomposable by 2-joins: the class of perfect graphs that do not have a balanced skew partition, a 2-join in the complement, nor a homogeneous pair. The techniques we develop are general enough to be easily applied to finding a maximum weighted stable set for another class of graphs known to be decomposable by 2-joins, namely the class of even-hole-free graphs that do not have a star cutset. We also give a simple class of graphs decomposable by 2-joins into bipartite graphs and line graphs, and for which finding a maximum stable set is NP-hard. This shows that having holes all of the same parity gives essential properties for the use of 2-joins in computing stable sets.

We give a structural description of the class $\cal C$ of graphs that do not contain a cycle with a unique chord as an induced subgraph. Our main theorem states that any connected graph in $\cal C$ is either in some simple basic class or has a decomposition. Basic classes are chordless cycles, cliques, bipartite graphs with one side containing only nodes of degree two and induced subgraphs of the famous Heawood or Petersen graph. Decompositions are node cutsets consisting of one or two nodes and edge cutsets called 1-joins. Our decomposition theorem actually gives a complete structure theorem for ${\cal C}$, i.e. every graph in ${\cal C}$ can be built from basic graphs that can be explicitly constructed, and gluing them together by prescribed composition operations; and all graphs built this way are in ${\cal C}$. This has several consequences: an ${\cal O}(nm)$-time algorithm to decide whether a graph is in $\cal C$, an ${\cal O}(n+m)$-time algorithm that finds a maximum clique of any graph in $\cal C$ and an ${\cal O}(nm)$-time coloring algorithm for graphs in $\cal C$. We prove that every graph in $\cal C$ is either 3-colorable or has a coloring with $ω$ colors where $ω$ is the size of a largest clique. The problem of finding a maximum stable set for a graph in $\cal C$ is known to be NP-hard.

The maximum stable set problem is a well-known NP-hard problem in combinatorial optimization, which can be formulated as the maximization of a quadratic square-free polynomial over the (Boolean) hypercube. We investigate a hierarchy of linear programming relaxations for this problem, based on a result of Handelman showing that a positive polynomial over a polytope with non-empty interior can be represented as conic combination of products of the linear constraints defining the polytope. We relate the rank of Handelman's hierarchy with structural properties of graphs. In particular we show a relation to fractional clique covers which we use to upper bound the Handelman rank for perfect graphs and determine its exact value in the vertex-transitive case. Moreover we show two upper bounds on the Handelman rank in terms of the (fractional) stability number of the graph and compute the Handelman rank for several classes of graphs including odd cycles and wheels and their complements. We also point out links to several other linear and semidefinite programming hierarchies.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is called a local maximum stable set of G if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by the closed neighborhood of S. A greedoid (V,F) is called a local maximum stable set greedoid if there exists a graph G=(V,E) such that its family of local maximum stable sets coinsides with (V,F). It has been shown that the family local maximum stable sets of a forest T forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we demonstrate that if G is a very well-covered graph, then its family of local maximum stable sets is a greedoid if and only if G has a unique perfect matching.

A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. In this paper we prove that if F is a collection of maximum independent sets of a graph, then there is a matching from S-{intersection of all members of F} into {union of all members of F}-S, for every independent set S. Based on this finding we give alternative proofs for a number of well-known lemmata, as the "Maximum Stable Set Lemma" due to Claude Berge and the "Clique Collection Lemma" due to András Hajnal.

A \textit{maximum stable set} in a graph $G$ is a stable set of maximum cardinality. $S$ is a \textit{local maximum stable set} of $G$, and we write $S\inΨ(G)$, if $S$ is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by $S\cup N(S)$, where $N(S)$ is the neighborhood of $S$. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. (1975), proved that any $S\inΨ(G)$ is a subset of a maximum stable set of $G$. In (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002) we have shown that the family $Ψ(T)$ of a forest $T$ forms a greedoid on its vertex set. The cases where $G$ is bipartite, triangle-free, well-covered, while $Ψ(G)$ is a greedoid, were analyzed in (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002),(Levit & Mandrescu, 2004),(Levit & Mandrescu, 2007), respectively. In this paper we demonstrate that if $G$ is a very well-covered graph of girth $\geq4$, then the family $Ψ(G)$ is a greedoid if and only if $G$ has a unique perfect matching.

The square of a graph G is the graph G^2 with the same vertex set as in G, and an edge of G^2 is joining two distinct vertices, whenever the distance between them in G is at most 2. G is a square-stable graph if it enjoys the property alpha(G)=alpha(G^2), where alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set in G. In this paper we show that G^2 is a Konig-Egervary graph if and only if G is a square-stable Konig-Egervary graph.

The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a maximum stable set, and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. If alpha(G)+mu(G) equals its order, then G is a Konig-Egervary graph. In this paper we deal with square-stable graphs, i.e., the graphs G enjoying the equality alpha(G)=alpha(G^{2}), where G^{2} denotes the second power of G. In particular, we show that a Konig-Egervary graph is square-stable if and only if it has a perfect matching consisting of pendant edges, and in consequence, we deduce that well-covered trees are exactly the square-stable trees.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. It is known that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. Bipartite, triangle-free, and well-covered graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids have been analyzed as well. A unicycle graph owns only one cycle. In this paper we characterize the unicycle graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved in 1975 that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In 2002 we showed that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. The cases where G is bipartite, triangle-free, well-covered, while the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid, were analyzed in 2004, 2007, and 2008, respectively. In this paper we demonstrate that if the family of all local maximum stable sets of the graph satisfies the accessibility property, then it is an interval greedoid. We also characterize those graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets are either antimatroids or matroids.