Papers by Eugen Mandrescu
60 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
A Ridge-Saturation Characterization of $α$-Critical $\mathbf {W}_p$ Graphs
We characterize the graphs which are simultaneously $α$-critical and members of the class $\mathbf W_p$. The characterization is stated in three equivalent languages. In the graph itself, such a graph is a well-covered graph whose codimension-one localization fibers all have size at least $p$ and whose edges are exactly covered by the cliques induced by those fibers. In the independence complex, it is a pure flag complex in which every ridge has degree at least $p$ and every missing edge is generated by the link of a ridge. In the complement, it is a $K_{r+1}$-saturated graph, where $r=α(G)$, all maximal cliques have size $r$, and the minimum $(r-1)$-clique-codegree is at least $p$. This gives an exact formula for the largest $p$ for which a well-covered graph belongs to $\mathbf W_p$. We make this complement correspondence explicit, record saturation-theoretic consequences including dense-complement rigidity and $p$-sensitive edge and order bounds, and give a family of sharp examples showing that the local sufficient condition from the recent work of Hoang, Levit and Mandrescu is not necessary outside the locally triangle-free setting, for all $p\ge2$.
Graphs with core(G) = nucleus(G)
Let $G$ be a finite simple graph. An independent set $I$ of $G$ is critical if $\left|I\right|-\left|N(I)\right|\ge\left|J\right|-\left|N(J)\right|$ for every independent set $J$ of $G$. A critical independent set is maximum if it has maximum cardinality. The $core$ and the $nucleus$ of $G$ are defined as the intersection of all maximum independent sets and the intersection of all maximum critical independent sets, respectively. In 2019, Jarden, Levit, and Mandrescu posed the problem of characterizing the graphs satisfying $core(G)=nucleus(G)$. In this paper, we provide a complete solution to this problem. Using Larson's independence decomposition, which partitions any graph into a König--Egerváry component $L_G$ an a $2$-bicritical component $L_G^c$, we establish that $core(G)=nucleus(G)$ holds if and only if $core ({L_G^c})=\emptyset$ and no vertex of $corona(G)$ lies in the boundary between $L_G$ and $L_G^c$. We also show that the same boundary condition is equivalent to the identity $diadem(G)=corona(G) \cap L(G)$. Several consequences and related structural properties are also derived.
The family of all local maximum independent sets is an augmentoid
It was proved in (Levit and Mandrescu, 2022) that both $(V(G), Crown(G))$ and $(V(G), CritIndep(G))$ are augmentoids, established partial augmentation phenomena for the family $Ψ(G)$ of local maximum independent sets, and asked in Problem~5.5 to characterize the graphs whose family $Ψ(G)$ is an augmentoid. We prove that the answer is positive in full generality: for every finite simple graph $G$, the set system $(V(G),Ψ(G))$ is an augmentoid. The proof is constructive. If $S,T\inΨ(G)$, then the explicit choice \[ A=S \setminus N[T],\qquad B=T \setminus N[S] \] satisfies \[ T\cup A\inΨ(G),\qquad S\cup B\inΨ(G),\qquad |T\cup A|=|S\cup B|. \] As a structural consequence, for every fixed $S\inΨ(G)$ the map $T\mapsto S\cup T$ induces a canonical bijection from $Ψ(G-N[S])$ onto the members of $Ψ(G)$ containing $S$, and \[ α(G)=|S|+α(G-N[S]). \] This decomposition also yields explicit formulas for the intersection and the union of all the maximum independent sets extending $S$, together with counting formulas for the local maximum and maximum independent sets containing $S$. We also add a short visual guide to the framework $CritIndep(G) \subseteq Crown(G)\subseteq Psi(G)$ and end with several natural follow-up problems suggested by the theorem.
Structural properties and characterizations of $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ class
We establish new characterizations of graphs belonging to the $\mathbf{W}_p$ class. In addition, we characterize locally triangle-free $α$-critical graphs in this class. As a consequence, our results yield a partial answer to a question raised by Plummer \cite{Plum93} in the case $p=2$.
On corona of Konig-Egervary graphs
Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set and $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching of a graph $G=\left( V,E\right) $. If $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph, and $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph whenever $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert -1$. The corona $H\circ\mathcal{X}$ of a graph $H$ and a family of graphs $\mathcal{X}=\left\{ X_{i}:1\leq i\leq\left\vert V(H)\right\vert \right\} $ is obtained by joining each vertex $v_{i}$ of $H$ to all the vertices of the corresponding graph $X_{i},i=1,2,...,\left\vert V(H)\right\vert $.
In this paper we completely characterize graphs whose coronas are $k$-König-Egerváry graphs, where $k\in\left\{ 0,1\right\} $.
Log-concavity of the independence polynomials of $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graphs
Let $G$ be a graph of order $n$. For a positive integer $p$, $G$ is said to be a $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph if $n\geq p$ and every $p$ pairwise disjoint independent sets of $G$ are contained within $p$ pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. In this paper, we establish that every connected $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph $G$ is $p$-quasi-regularizable if and only if $n\geq(p+1)\cdotα$, where $α$ is the independence number of $G$ and $p\neq2$. This finding ensures that the independence polynomial of a connected $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph $G$ is log-concave whenever $(p+1)\cdotα\leq n\leq p\cdotα+2\sqrt{p\cdotα+p}$ and $\frac{α^{2}}{4\left( α+1\right) }\leq p$, or $p\cdotα+2\sqrt{p\cdotα+p}<n\leq \frac{\left( α^{2}+1\right) \cdot p+\left( α-1\right) ^{2}}{α-1}$ and $\frac{α\left( α-1\right) }{α+1}\leq p$. Moreover, the clique corona graph $G\circ K_{p}$ serves as an example of the $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph class. We further demonstrate that the independence polynomial of $G\circ K_{p}$ is always log-concave for sufficiently large $p$.
Keywords: very well-covered graph; quasi-regularizable graph; corona graph; $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph; independence polynomial; log-concavity.
Almost Bipartite non-König-Egerváry Graphs Revisited
Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in $G=\left( V,E\right) $. It is known that if $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph.
The critical difference $d(G)$ is $\max\{d(I):I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$\ denotes the family of all independent sets of $G$. If $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ with $d\left( X\right) =d(G)$, then $A$ is a critical independent set. For a graph $G$, let $\mathrm{diadem}(G)=\bigcup\{S:S$ is a critical independent set in $G\}$, and $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) $ denote the number of vertices $v\in V\left( G\right) $, such that $G-v$ is a König-Egerváry graph. A graph is called almost bipartite if it has a unique odd cycle.
In this paper, we show that if $G$ is an almost bipartite non-König-Egerváry graph with the unique odd cycle $C$, then the following assertions are true:
1. every maximum matching of $G$ contains $\left\lfloor {V(C)}/{2}\right\rfloor $ edges belonging to $C$;
2. $V(C)\cup N_{G}\left[ \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right] =V$ and $V(C)\cap N_{G}\left[ \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right] =\emptyset$;
3. $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) =\left\vert \mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) \right\vert -\left\vert \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right\vert $, where $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $ is the union of all maximum independent sets of $G$;
4. $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) =\left\vert V\right\vert $ if and only if $G=C_{2k+1}$ for some integer $k\geq1$.
On the Number of Vertices/Edges whose Deletion Preserves the Konig-Egervary Property
The graph G=(V,E) is called Konig-Egervary if the sum of its independence number and its matching number equals its order. Let RV(G) denote the number of vertices v such that G-v is Konig-Egervary, and let RE(G) denote the number of edges e such that G-e is Konig-Egervary. Clearly, RV(G) = |V| and RE(G) = |E| for bipartite graphs. Unlike the bipartiteness, the property of being a Konig-Egervary graph is not hereditary. In this paper, we present an equality expressing RV(G) in terms of some graph parameters, and a tight inequality bounding RE(G) in terms of the same parameters, when G is Konig-Egervary.
On 1-Konig-Egervary Graphs
Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in $G=\left( V,E\right) $. Let $ξ(G)$ denote the size of the intersection of all maximum independent sets. It is known that if $α(G)+μ(G)=n(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph. If $α(G)+μ(G)=n(G) -1$, then $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph. If $G$ is not a König-Egerváry graph, and there exists a vertex $v\in V$ (an edge $e\in E$) such that $G-v$ ($G-e$) is König-Egerváry, then $G$ is called a vertex (an edge) almost König-Egerváry graph (respectively). The critical difference $d(G)$ is $\max\{d(I):I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ denotes the family of all independent sets of $G$. If $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ with $d\left( X\right) =d(G)$, then $A$ is a critical independent set. Let $diadem (G)=\bigcup\{S:S$ is a critical independent set in $G\}$, and $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) $ denote the number of vertices $v\in V\left( G\right) $, such that $G-v$ is a König-Egerváry graph.
In this paper, we characterize all types of almost König-Egerváry graphs and present interrelationships between them. We also show that if $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph, then $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) \leq n\left( G\right) +d\left( G\right) -ξ\left( G\right) -β(G)$, where $β(G)=\left\vert diadem(G)\right\vert $. As an application, we characterize the $1$-König-Egerváry graphs that become König-Egerváry after deleting any vertex.
On Minimal Critical Independent Sets of Almost Bipartite non-Konig-Egervary Graphs
The independence number $α(G)$ is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$. If $α(G)+μ(G)$ equals the order of $G$, then $G$ is called a Konig-Egervary graph. The number $d\left( G\right) =\max\{\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N\left( A\right) \right\vert :A\subseteq V\}$ is called the critical difference of $G$ (where $N\left( A\right) =\left\{ v:v\in V,N\left( v\right) \cap A\neq\emptyset\right\} $). It is known that $α(G)-μ(G)\leq d\left( G\right) $ holds for every graph. A graph $G$ is unicyclic if it has a unique cycle and almost bipartite if it has only one odd cycle. Let $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=\bigcap\left\{ S:S\text{ is a critical independent set}\right\} $, $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ be the intersection of all maximum independent sets, and $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $ be the union of all maximum independent sets of $G$. It is known that $\mathrm{\ker}(G)\subseteq\mathrm{core}(G)$ is true for every graph, while the equality holds for bipartite graphs, and for unicyclic non-Konig-Egervary graphs. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is an almost bipartite non-Konig-Egervary graph, then $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=$ $\mathrm{core}(G)$, $\mathrm{corona}(G)$ $\cup$ $N(\mathrm{core} \left( G\right) )=V(G)$, and $\left\vert \mathrm{corona}(G)\right\vert +\left\vert \mathrm{core}(G)\right\vert =2α(G)+1$.
Critical sets, crowns, and local maximum independent sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is independent (or stable) if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the set of all independent sets of $G$.
A set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical (and we write $A\in CritIndep(G)$) if $\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N(A)\right\vert =\max\{\left\vert I\right\vert -\left\vert N(I)\right\vert :I\in \mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $N(I)$ denotes the neighborhood of $I$.
If $S\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ and there is a matching from $N(S)$ into $S$, then $S$ is a crown, and we write $S\in Crown(G)$.
Let $Ψ(G)$ be the family of all local maximum independent sets of graph $G$, i.e., $S\inΨ(G)$ if $S$ is a maximum independent set in the subgraph induced by $S\cup N(S)$.
In this paper we show that $CritIndep(G)\subseteq Crown(G)$ $\subseteqΨ(G)$ are true for every graph. In addition, we present some classes of graphs where these families coincide and form greedoids or even more general set systems that we call augmentoids.
On the Critical Difference of Almost Bipartite Graphs
A set $S\subseteq V$ is \textit{independent} in a graph $G=\left( V,E\right) $ if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent. The \textit{independence number} $α(G)$ is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$. If $α(G)+μ(G)$ equals the order of $G$, then $G$ is called a \textit{König-Egerváry graph }\cite{dem,ster}. The number $d\left( G\right) =\max\{\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N\left( A\right) \right\vert :A\subseteq V\}$ is called the \textit{critical difference} of $G$ \cite{Zhang} (where $N\left( A\right) =\left\{ v:v\in V,N\left( v\right) \cap A\neq\emptyset\right\} $). It is known that $α(G)-μ(G)\leq d\left( G\right) $ holds for every graph \cite{Levman2011a,Lorentzen1966,Schrijver2003}. In \cite{LevMan5} it was shown that $d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)$ is true for every König-Egerváry graph.
A graph $G$ is \textit{(i)} \textit{unicyclic} if it has a unique cycle, \textit{(ii)} \textit{almost bipartite} if it has only one odd cycle. It was conjectured in \cite{LevMan2012a,LevMan2013a} and validated in \cite{Bhattacharya2018} that $d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)$ holds for every unicyclic non-König-Egerváry graph $G$.
In this paper we prove that if $G$ is an almost bipartite graph of order $n\left( G\right) $, then $α(G)+μ(G)\in\left\{ n\left( G\right) -1,n\left( G\right) \right\} $. Moreover, for each of these two values, we characterize the corresponding graphs. Further, using these findings, we show that the critical difference of an almost bipartite graph $G$ satisfies \[ d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)=\left\vert \mathrm{core}(G)\right\vert -\left\vert N(\mathrm{core}(G))\right\vert , \] where by \textrm{core}$\left( G\right) $ we mean the intersection of all maximum independent sets.
On an Annihilation Number Conjecture
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in the graph $G=\left(V,E\right) $. If $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph. If $d_{1}\leq d_{2}\leq\cdots\leq d_{n}$ is the degree sequence of $G$, then the annihilation number $h\left(G\right) $ of $G$ is the largest integer $k$ such that $\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k}d_{i}\leq\left\vert E\right\vert $ (Pepper 2004, Pepper 2009). A set $A\subseteq V$ satisfying $\sum \limits_{a\in A} deg(a)\leq\left\vert E\right\vert $ is an annihilation set, if, in addition, $ deg\left(v\right) +\sum\limits_{a\in A} deg(a)>\left\vert E\right\vert $, for every vertex $v\in V(G)-A$, then $A$ is a maximal annihilation set in $G$.
In (Larson & Pepper 2011) it was conjectured that the following assertions are equivalent:
(i) $α\left(G\right) =h\left(G\right) $;
(ii) $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph and every maximum independent set is a maximal annihilating set.
In this paper, we prove that the implication "(i) $\Longrightarrow$ (ii)" is correct, while for the opposite direction we provide a series of generic counterexamples.
Keywords: maximum independent set, matching, tree, bipartite graph, König-Egerváry graph, annihilation set, annihilation number.
On graphs admitting two disjoint maximum independent sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
An independent set A is maximal if it is not a proper subset of an independent set, while A is maximum if it has a maximum size. The problem of whether a graph has a pair of disjoint maximal independent sets was introduced by C. Berge in early 70's. The class of graphs for which every induced subgraph admits two disjoint maximal independent sets was characterized in (Shaudt, 2015). It is known that deciding whether a graph has two disjoint maximal independent sets is a NP-complete problem (Henning et al., 2009). In this paper, we are focused on finding conditions ensuring the existence of two disjoint maximum independent sets.
The Roller-Coaster Conjecture Revisited
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality (Plummer, 1970). If G is a well-covered graph, has at least two vertices, and G-v is well-covered for every vertex v, then G is a 1-well-covered graph (Staples, 1975). We call G a λ-quasi-regularizable graph if λ |S| =< |N(S)| for every independent set S of G. The independence polynomial I(G;x) is the generating function of independent sets in a graph G (Gutman & Harary, 1983). The Roller-Coaster Conjecture (Michael & Travis, 2003), saying that for every permutation σ of the set {(α/2),...,α} there exists a well-covered graph G with independence number α such that the coefficients (s_{k}) of I(G;x) are chosen in accordance with σ, has been validated in (Cutler & Pebody, 2017). In this paper, we show that independence polynomials of λ-quasi-regularizable graphs are partially unimodal. More precisely, the coefficients of an upper part of I(G;x) are in non-increasing order. Based on this finding, we prove that the domain of the Roller- Coaster Conjecture can be shortened for well-covered graphs and 1-well-covered graphs.
1-well-covered graphs revisited
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same size (M. D. Plummer, 1970). A well-covered graph is 1-well-covered if the deletion of every vertex leaves a graph which is well-covered as well (J. W. Staples, 1975). A graph G belongs to class W_{n} if every n pairwise disjoint independent sets in G are included in $n$ pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets (J. W. Staples, 1975). Clearly, W_{1} is the family of all well-covered graphs. It turns out that G belongs to W_{2} if and only if it is a 1-well-covered graph without isolated vertices. We show that deleting a shedding vertex does not change the maximum size of a maximal independent set including a given independent set A in a graph G. Specifically, for well-covered graphs, it means that the vertex v is shedding if and only if G-v is well-covered. In addition, we provide new characterizations of 1-well-covered graphs, which we further use in building 1-well-covered graphs by corona, join, and concatenation operations.
On Konig-Egervary Collections of Maximum Critical Independent Sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The graph G is known to be a Konig-Egervary if alpha(G)+mu(G)= |V(G)|, where alpha(G) denotes the size of a maximum independent set and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching. The number d(X)= |X|-|N(X)| is the difference of X, and an independent set A is critical if d(A) = max{d(I):I is an independent set in G} (Zhang; 1990). Let Omega(G) denote the family of all maximum independent sets. Let us say that a family Gamma of independent sets is a Konig-Egervary collection if |Union of Gamma| + |Intersection of Gamma| = 2alpha(G) (Jarden, Levit, Mandrescu; 2015). In this paper, we show that if the family of all maximum critical independent sets of a graph G is a Konig-Egervary collection, then G is a Konig-Egervary graph. It generalizes one of our conjectures recently validated in (Short; 2015).
Monotonic Properties of Collections of Maximum Independent Sets of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A subset S of V(G) is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The graph G is known to be a Konig-Egervary if alpha(G) + mu(G)= |V(G)|, where alpha(G) denotes the size of a maximum independent set and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching. Let Omega(G) denote the family of all maximum independent sets, and f be the function from the set of subcollections Gamma of Omega(G) such that f(Gamma) = (the cardinality of the union of elements of Gamma) + (the cardinality of the intersection of elements of Gamma). Our main finding claims that f is "<<"-increasing, where the preorder {Gamma1} << {Gamma2} means that the union of all elements of {Gamma1} is a subset of the union of all elements of {Gamma2}, while the intersection of all elements of {Gamma2} is a subset of the intersection of all elements of {Gamma1}. Let us say that a family {Gamma} is a Konig-Egervary collection if f(Gamma) = 2*alpha(G). We conclude with the observation that for every graph G each subcollection of a Konig-Egervary collection is Konig-Egervary as well.
Critical and Maximum Independent Sets of a Graph
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A subset S of V(G) is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. By Ind(G) we mean the family of all independent sets of G while core(G) and corona(G) denote the intersection and the union of all maximum independent sets, respectively. The number d(X)= |X|-|N(X)| is the difference of the set of vertices X, and an independent set A is critical if d(A)=max{d(I):I belongs to Ind(G)} (Zhang, 1990). Let ker(G) and diadem(G) be the intersection and union, respectively, of all critical independent sets of G (Levit and Mandrescu, 2012). In this paper, we present various connections between critical unions and intersections of maximum independent sets of a graph. These relations give birth to new characterizations of Koenig-Egervary graphs, some of them involving ker(G), core(G), corona(G), and diadem(G).
Critical Independent Sets of a Graph
Let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V\left( G\right) $. A set $S\subseteq V\left( G\right) $ is independent if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the family of all independent sets of $G$.
The number $d\left( X\right) =$ $\left\vert X\right\vert -\left\vert N(X)\right\vert $ is the difference of $X\subseteq V\left( G\right) $, and a set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical if $d(A)=\max \{d\left( I\right) :I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$ (Zhang, 1990).
Let us recall the following definitions:
$\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a maximum independent set}.
$\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right)$ = $\bigcup$ {S :S is a maximum independent set}.
$\mathrm{\ker}(G)$ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a critical independent set}.
$\mathrm{diadem}(G)$ = $\bigcup$ {S : S is a critical independent set}.
In this paper we present various structural properties of $\mathrm{\ker}(G)$, in relation with $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $, $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $, and $\mathrm{diadem}(G)$.