arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $G$ be a finite simple graph. The annihilation number $a(G)$ is an efficiently computable upper bound on the independence number $α(G)$. We develop a sharp matching-number theory for the gap $a(G)-α(G)$. The strongest general theorem is the exact closed form \[a(G)-α(G)\leq 2μ(G)+1- \lceil \sqrt{6 μ(G)} \rceil \qquad(μ(G)\geq 1), \] and the bound is attained for every prescribed matching number. We also prove sharp matching-dependent bounds for forests, bipartite graphs, and König-Egerváry graphs, with equality constructions, equality certificates, and equality criteria. Finally, we treat a TxGraffiti output as a machine-conjecture case study. Using annihilating decompositions together with the classical Havel-Hakimi residue inequality $res(G)\leq α(G)$, we give an independent proof of the TxGraffiti annihilation-residue inequality \[ α(G)\geq \frac{a(G)+res(G)}{Δ(G)} \] for every connected graph $G$ of order at least three, show that both hypotheses are necessary, and compare this proof with a recent Caro-Wei approach. We also refine the Caro-Wei annihilation estimate by an explicit nonnegative slack term, identify its equality cases in degree-sequence form, and combine the refinement with our exact matching-number bound to obtain a combined computable bracket for the independence number and a Gupta-residue bound for the annihilation gap.

We characterize the graphs which are simultaneously $α$-critical and members of the class $\mathbf W_p$. The characterization is stated in three equivalent languages. In the graph itself, such a graph is a well-covered graph whose codimension-one localization fibers all have size at least $p$ and whose edges are exactly covered by the cliques induced by those fibers. In the independence complex, it is a pure flag complex in which every ridge has degree at least $p$ and every missing edge is generated by the link of a ridge. In the complement, it is a $K_{r+1}$-saturated graph, where $r=α(G)$, all maximal cliques have size $r$, and the minimum $(r-1)$-clique-codegree is at least $p$. This gives an exact formula for the largest $p$ for which a well-covered graph belongs to $\mathbf W_p$. We make this complement correspondence explicit, record saturation-theoretic consequences including dense-complement rigidity and $p$-sensitive edge and order bounds, and give a family of sharp examples showing that the local sufficient condition from the recent work of Hoang, Levit and Mandrescu is not necessary outside the locally triangle-free setting, for all $p\ge2$.

For a finite group G, we study the higher commuting probabilities, namely the probabilities that r randomly chosen elements of G commute pairwise, together with the corresponding numbers of simultaneous conjugacy classes of commuting r-tuples. We prove an exact dominant asymptotic for the number of homomorphisms from the free abelian group of rank r to G. The exponential base is the maximum order of an abelian subgroup of G, and the leading coefficient is the number of abelian subgroups of that order. As a consequence, the r-th root of the higher commuting probability tends to this maximum abelian-subgroup order divided by the order of G, while the r-th root of the orbit count tends to the maximum abelian-subgroup order itself. We also prove that the associated rank-generating series is rational and has a finite Dirichlet-spectrum expansion supported on abelian subgroup indices. This spectrum yields a finite linear recurrence, a finite-rank Hankel matrix, and an inverse finite-spectrum theorem: the tail of the hierarchy determines the full abelian-index spectrum. For split abelian extensions, we express the dominant base through fixed-subgroup geometry, and for abelian acting quotients, we obtain an exact subgroup-lattice formula. In the cyclic and coprime cases, this gives closed formulas for all spectral coefficients.

Let $G$ be a finite simple graph. An independent set $I$ of $G$ is critical if $\left|I\right|-\left|N(I)\right|\ge\left|J\right|-\left|N(J)\right|$ for every independent set $J$ of $G$. A critical independent set is maximum if it has maximum cardinality. The $core$ and the $nucleus$ of $G$ are defined as the intersection of all maximum independent sets and the intersection of all maximum critical independent sets, respectively. In 2019, Jarden, Levit, and Mandrescu posed the problem of characterizing the graphs satisfying $core(G)=nucleus(G)$. In this paper, we provide a complete solution to this problem. Using Larson's independence decomposition, which partitions any graph into a König--Egerváry component $L_G$ an a $2$-bicritical component $L_G^c$, we establish that $core(G)=nucleus(G)$ holds if and only if $core ({L_G^c})=\emptyset$ and no vertex of $corona(G)$ lies in the boundary between $L_G$ and $L_G^c$. We also show that the same boundary condition is equivalent to the identity $diadem(G)=corona(G) \cap L(G)$. Several consequences and related structural properties are also derived.

It was proved in (Levit and Mandrescu, 2022) that both $(V(G), Crown(G))$ and $(V(G), CritIndep(G))$ are augmentoids, established partial augmentation phenomena for the family $Ψ(G)$ of local maximum independent sets, and asked in Problem~5.5 to characterize the graphs whose family $Ψ(G)$ is an augmentoid. We prove that the answer is positive in full generality: for every finite simple graph $G$, the set system $(V(G),Ψ(G))$ is an augmentoid. The proof is constructive. If $S,T\inΨ(G)$, then the explicit choice \[ A=S \setminus N[T],\qquad B=T \setminus N[S] \] satisfies \[ T\cup A\inΨ(G),\qquad S\cup B\inΨ(G),\qquad |T\cup A|=|S\cup B|. \] As a structural consequence, for every fixed $S\inΨ(G)$ the map $T\mapsto S\cup T$ induces a canonical bijection from $Ψ(G-N[S])$ onto the members of $Ψ(G)$ containing $S$, and \[ α(G)=|S|+α(G-N[S]). \] This decomposition also yields explicit formulas for the intersection and the union of all the maximum independent sets extending $S$, together with counting formulas for the local maximum and maximum independent sets containing $S$. We also add a short visual guide to the framework $CritIndep(G) \subseteq Crown(G)\subseteq Psi(G)$ and end with several natural follow-up problems suggested by the theorem.

We develop a family-based route to unicyclic graphs whose independence polynomials are unimodal but not log-concave. The paper is organized around one flagship statement: for the explicit KL-closure family $U_{k,r}$, with $r\in\{0,1,2\}$ and admissible $k$, the independence polynomial is unimodal but not log-concave. The proof separates the closure polynomial into a dominant convolution term and a real-rooted correction term. On the non-log-concavity side, we prove symbolically that the penultimate log-concavity inequality fails for every admissible parameter. On the unimodality side, we prove that the main convolution term $H_{k,r}=G_kF_{k+r}$ is unimodal with a controlled mode, using a combination of exact coefficient formulas, Ibragimov's strong-unimodality principle, and a residue-class growth argument. Darroch localization and an adjacent-mode bridge lemma then transfer that mode statement to the full KL closure polynomial. This yields an explicit infinite family of unicyclic graphs with unimodal but non-log-concave independence polynomials. In the exact range $k\le 400$, we further verify that the penultimate break is unique and determine exact mode formulas for $H_{k,r}$, the binomial correction term, and $I(U_{k,r};x)$ itself. The paper also places the KL family inside a broader reservoir program involving Galvin, Ramos-Sun, and Bautista-Ramos trees, from which we obtain substantial universal exact theorems for finite ranges.

We establish new characterizations of graphs belonging to the $\mathbf{W}_p$ class. In addition, we characterize locally triangle-free $α$-critical graphs in this class. As a consequence, our results yield a partial answer to a question raised by Plummer \cite{Plum93} in the case $p=2$.

Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set and $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching of a graph $G=\left( V,E\right) $. If $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph, and $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph whenever $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert -1$. The corona $H\circ\mathcal{X}$ of a graph $H$ and a family of graphs $\mathcal{X}=\left\{ X_{i}:1\leq i\leq\left\vert V(H)\right\vert \right\} $ is obtained by joining each vertex $v_{i}$ of $H$ to all the vertices of the corresponding graph $X_{i},i=1,2,...,\left\vert V(H)\right\vert $. In this paper we completely characterize graphs whose coronas are $k$-König-Egerváry graphs, where $k\in\left\{ 0,1\right\} $.

Let $G$ be a graph of order $n$. For a positive integer $p$, $G$ is said to be a $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph if $n\geq p$ and every $p$ pairwise disjoint independent sets of $G$ are contained within $p$ pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. In this paper, we establish that every connected $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph $G$ is $p$-quasi-regularizable if and only if $n\geq(p+1)\cdotα$, where $α$ is the independence number of $G$ and $p\neq2$. This finding ensures that the independence polynomial of a connected $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph $G$ is log-concave whenever $(p+1)\cdotα\leq n\leq p\cdotα+2\sqrt{p\cdotα+p}$ and $\frac{α^{2}}{4\left( α+1\right) }\leq p$, or $p\cdotα+2\sqrt{p\cdotα+p}<n\leq \frac{\left( α^{2}+1\right) \cdot p+\left( α-1\right) ^{2}}{α-1}$ and $\frac{α\left( α-1\right) }{α+1}\leq p$. Moreover, the clique corona graph $G\circ K_{p}$ serves as an example of the $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph class. We further demonstrate that the independence polynomial of $G\circ K_{p}$ is always log-concave for sufficiently large $p$. Keywords: very well-covered graph; quasi-regularizable graph; corona graph; $\mathbf{W}_{p}$ graph; independence polynomial; log-concavity.

Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in $G=\left( V,E\right) $. It is known that if $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph. The critical difference $d(G)$ is $\max\{d(I):I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$\ denotes the family of all independent sets of $G$. If $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ with $d\left( X\right) =d(G)$, then $A$ is a critical independent set. For a graph $G$, let $\mathrm{diadem}(G)=\bigcup\{S:S$ is a critical independent set in $G\}$, and $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) $ denote the number of vertices $v\in V\left( G\right) $, such that $G-v$ is a König-Egerváry graph. A graph is called almost bipartite if it has a unique odd cycle. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is an almost bipartite non-König-Egerváry graph with the unique odd cycle $C$, then the following assertions are true: 1. every maximum matching of $G$ contains $\left\lfloor {V(C)}/{2}\right\rfloor $ edges belonging to $C$; 2. $V(C)\cup N_{G}\left[ \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right] =V$ and $V(C)\cap N_{G}\left[ \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right] =\emptyset$; 3. $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) =\left\vert \mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) \right\vert -\left\vert \mathrm{diadem}\left( G\right) \right\vert $, where $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $ is the union of all maximum independent sets of $G$; 4. $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) =\left\vert V\right\vert $ if and only if $G=C_{2k+1}$ for some integer $k\geq1$.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Let $w:V(G) \longrightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a weight function. Then $G$ is $w$-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. An edge $xy \in E(G)$ is relating if there exists an independent set $S$ such that both $S \cup \{x\}$ and $S \cup \{y\}$ are maximal independent sets in the graph. If $xy$ is relating then $w(x)=w(y)$ for every weight function $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered. Relating edges play an important role in investigating $w$-well-covered graphs. The decision problem whether an edge in a graph is relating is NP-complete. We prove that the problem remains NP-complete when the input is restricted to graphs without cycles of length $6$. This is an unexpected result because recognizing relating edges is known to be polynomially solvable for graphs without cycles of lengths $4$ and $6$, graphs without cycles of lengths $5$ and $6$, and graphs without cycles of lengths $6$ and $7$. A graph $G$ belongs to the class $W_2$ if every two pairwise disjoint independent sets in $G$ are included in two pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. It is known that if $G$ belongs to the class $W_2$, then it is well-covered. A vertex $v \in V(G)$ is shedding if for every independent set $S \subseteq V(G)-N[v]$, there exists a vertex $u \in N(v)$ such that $S \cup \{u\}$ is independent. Shedding vertices play an important role in studying the class $W_2$. Recognizing shedding vertices is co-NP-complete, even when the input is restricted to triangle-free graphs. We prove that the problem is co-NP-complete for graphs without cycles of length $6$.

The graph G=(V,E) is called Konig-Egervary if the sum of its independence number and its matching number equals its order. Let RV(G) denote the number of vertices v such that G-v is Konig-Egervary, and let RE(G) denote the number of edges e such that G-e is Konig-Egervary. Clearly, RV(G) = |V| and RE(G) = |E| for bipartite graphs. Unlike the bipartiteness, the property of being a Konig-Egervary graph is not hereditary. In this paper, we present an equality expressing RV(G) in terms of some graph parameters, and a tight inequality bounding RE(G) in terms of the same parameters, when G is Konig-Egervary.

Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in $G=\left( V,E\right) $. Let $ξ(G)$ denote the size of the intersection of all maximum independent sets. It is known that if $α(G)+μ(G)=n(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph. If $α(G)+μ(G)=n(G) -1$, then $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph. If $G$ is not a König-Egerváry graph, and there exists a vertex $v\in V$ (an edge $e\in E$) such that $G-v$ ($G-e$) is König-Egerváry, then $G$ is called a vertex (an edge) almost König-Egerváry graph (respectively). The critical difference $d(G)$ is $\max\{d(I):I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ denotes the family of all independent sets of $G$. If $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ with $d\left( X\right) =d(G)$, then $A$ is a critical independent set. Let $diadem (G)=\bigcup\{S:S$ is a critical independent set in $G\}$, and $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) $ denote the number of vertices $v\in V\left( G\right) $, such that $G-v$ is a König-Egerváry graph. In this paper, we characterize all types of almost König-Egerváry graphs and present interrelationships between them. We also show that if $G$ is a $1$-König-Egerváry graph, then $\varrho_{v}\left( G\right) \leq n\left( G\right) +d\left( G\right) -ξ\left( G\right) -β(G)$, where $β(G)=\left\vert diadem(G)\right\vert $. As an application, we characterize the $1$-König-Egerváry graphs that become König-Egerváry after deleting any vertex.

Given a graph $G$, the number of its vertices is represented by $n(G)$, while the number of its edges is denoted as $m(G)$. An independent set in a graph is a set of vertices where no two vertices are adjacent to each other and the size of the maximum independent set is denoted by $α(G)$. A matching in a graph refers to a set of edges where no two edges share a common vertex and the maximum matching size is denoted by $μ(G)$. If $α(G) + μ(G) = n(G)$, then the graph $G$ is called a König-Egerváry graph. Considering a graph $G$ with a degree sequence $d_1 \leq d_2 \leq \cdots \leq d_n$, the annihilation number $a(G)$ is defined as the largest integer $k$ such that the sum of the first $k$ degrees in the sequence is less than or equal to $m(G)$ (Pepper, 2004). It is a known fact that $α(G)$ is less than or equal to $a(G)$ for any graph $G$. Our goal is to estimate the difference between these two parameters. Specifically, we prove a series of inequalities, including $a(G) - α(G) \leq \frac{μ(G) - 1}{2}$ for trees, $a(G) - α(G) \leq 2 + μ(G) - 2\sqrt{1 + μ(G)}$ for bipartite graphs and $a(G) - α(G) \leq μ(G) - 2$ for König-Egerváry graphs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these inequalities serve as tight upper bounds for the difference between the annihilation and independence numbers, regardless of the assigned value for $μ(G)$.

Let $G$ be a graph. A set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is independent if its elements are pairwise non-adjacent. A vertex $v \in V(G)$ is shedding if for every independent set $S \subseteq V(G) \setminus N[v]$ there exists $u \in N(v)$ such that $S \cup \{u\}$ is independent. An independent set $S$ is maximal if it is not contained in another independent set. An independent set $S$ is maximum if the size of every independent set of $G$ is not bigger than $|S|$. The size of a maximum independent set of $G$ is denoted $α(G)$. A graph $G$ is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are maximum, i.e. the size of every maximal independent set is $α(G)$. The graph $G$ belongs to class $\mathbf{W_2}$ if every two pairwise disjoint independent sets in $G$ are included in two pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets. If a graph belongs to the class $\mathbf{W_2}$ then it is well-covered. Finding a maximum independent set in an input graph is an NP-complete problem. Recognizing well-covered graphs is co-NP-complete. The complexity status of deciding whether an input graph belongs to the $\mathbf{W_2}$ class is not known. Even when the input is restricted to well-covered graphs, the complexity status of recognizing graphs in $\mathbf{W_2}$ is not known. In this article, we investigate the connection between shedding vertices and $\mathbf{W_2}$ graphs. On the one hand, we prove that recognizing shedding vertices is co-NP-complete. On the other hand, we find polynomial solutions for restricted cases of the problem. We also supply polynomial characterizations of several families of $\mathbf{W_2}$ graphs.

An independent set in a graph is a collection of vertices that are not adjacent to each other. The cardinality of the largest independent set in $G$ is represented by $α(G)$. The independence polynomial of a graph $G = (V, E)$ was introduced by Gutman and Harary in 1983 and is defined as \[ I(G;x) = \sum_{k=0}^{α(G)}{s_k}x^{k}={s_0}+{s_1}x+{s_2}x^{2}+...+{s_{α(G)}}x^{α(G)}, \] where $s_k$ represents the number of independent sets in $G$ of size $k$. The conjecture made by Alavi, Malde, Schwenk, and Erdös in 1987 stated that the independence polynomials of trees are unimodal, and many researchers believed that this conjecture could be strengthened up to its corresponding log-concave version. However, in our paper, we present evidence that contradicts this assumption by introducing infinite families of trees whose independence polynomials are not log-concave.

The independence number $α(G)$ is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$. If $α(G)+μ(G)$ equals the order of $G$, then $G$ is called a Konig-Egervary graph. The number $d\left( G\right) =\max\{\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N\left( A\right) \right\vert :A\subseteq V\}$ is called the critical difference of $G$ (where $N\left( A\right) =\left\{ v:v\in V,N\left( v\right) \cap A\neq\emptyset\right\} $). It is known that $α(G)-μ(G)\leq d\left( G\right) $ holds for every graph. A graph $G$ is unicyclic if it has a unique cycle and almost bipartite if it has only one odd cycle. Let $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=\bigcap\left\{ S:S\text{ is a critical independent set}\right\} $, $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ be the intersection of all maximum independent sets, and $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $ be the union of all maximum independent sets of $G$. It is known that $\mathrm{\ker}(G)\subseteq\mathrm{core}(G)$ is true for every graph, while the equality holds for bipartite graphs, and for unicyclic non-Konig-Egervary graphs. In this paper, we prove that if $G$ is an almost bipartite non-Konig-Egervary graph, then $\mathrm{\ker}(G)=$ $\mathrm{core}(G)$, $\mathrm{corona}(G)$ $\cup$ $N(\mathrm{core} \left( G\right) )=V(G)$, and $\left\vert \mathrm{corona}(G)\right\vert +\left\vert \mathrm{core}(G)\right\vert =2α(G)+1$.

An independent set in a graph is a set of pairwise non-adjacent vertices. Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set in the graph $G = (V, E)$. Gutman and Harary defined the independence polynomial of $G$ \[ I(G;x) = \sum_{k=0}^{α(G)}{s_k}x^{k}={s_0}+{s_1}x+{s_2}x^{2}+...+{s_{α(G)}}x^{α(G)}, \] where $s_k$ denotes the number of independent sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$. A comprehensive survey on the subject is due to Levit and Mandrescu, where some recursive formulas are allowing to calculate the independence polynomial. A direct implementation of these recursions does not bring about an efficient algorithm. Yosef, Mizrachi, and Kadrawi developed an efficient way for computing the independence polynomials of trees with $n$ vertices, such that a database containing all of the independence polynomials of all the trees with up to $n-1$ vertices is required. This approach is not suitable for big trees, as an extensive database is needed. On the other hand, using dynamic programming, it is possible to develop an efficient algorithm that prevents repeated calculations. In summary, our dynamic programming algorithm runs over a tree in linear time and does not depend on a database.

Given a finite set $E$ and an operator $σ:2^{E}\longrightarrow2^{E}$, two sets $X,Y\subseteq E$ are \textit{cospanning} if $σ\left( X\right) =σ\left( Y\right) $. Corresponding \textit{cospanning equivalence relations} were investigated for greedoids in much detail (Korte, Lovasz, Schrader; 1991). For instance, these relations determine greedoids uniquely. In fact, the feasible sets of a greedoid are exactly the inclusion-wise minimal sets of the equivalence classes. In this research, we show that feasible sets of convex geometries are the inclusion-wise maximal sets of the equivalence classes of the corresponding closure operator. Same as greedoids, convex geometries are uniquely defined by the corresponding cospanning relations. For each closure operator $σ$, an element $x\in X$ is \textit{an extreme point} of $X$ if $x\notinσ(X-x)$. The set of extreme points of $X$ is denoted by $ex(X)$. We prove, that if $σ$ has the anti-exchange property, then for every set $X$ its equivalence class $[X]_σ$ is the interval $[ex(X),σ(X)]$. It results in the one-to-one correspondence between the cospanning partitions of an antimatroid and its complementary convex geometry. The obtained results are based on the connection between violator spaces, greedoids, and antimatroids. Cospanning characterization of these combinatorial structures allows us not only to give the new characterization of antimatroids and convex geometries but also to obtain the new properties of closure operators, extreme point operators, and their interconnections.

Given a finite set E and an operator sigma:2^{E}-->2^{E}, two subsets X,Y of the ground set E are cospanning if sigma(X)=sigma(Y) (Korte, Lovasz, Schrader; 1991). We investigate cospanning relations on violator spaces. A notion of a violator space was introduced in (Gartner, Matousek, Rust, Skovrovn; 2008) as a combinatorial framework that encompasses linear programming and other geometric optimization problems. Violator spaces are defined by violator operators. We introduce co-violator spaces based on contracting operators known also as choice functions. Let alpha,beta:2^{E}-->2^{E} be a violator operator and a co-violator operator, respectively. Cospanning characterizations of violator spaces allow us to obtain some new properties of violator operators, co-violator operators, and their interconnections. In particular, we show that uniquely generated violator spaces enjoy so-called Krein-Milman properties, i.e., alpha(beta(X))=alpha(X) and beta(alpha}(X))=beta(X) for every subset X of the ground set E.