arXiv++ Combinatorics

A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is independent (or stable) if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the set of all independent sets of $G$. A set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical (and we write $A\in CritIndep(G)$) if $\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N(A)\right\vert =\max\{\left\vert I\right\vert -\left\vert N(I)\right\vert :I\in \mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$, where $N(I)$ denotes the neighborhood of $I$. If $S\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ and there is a matching from $N(S)$ into $S$, then $S$ is a crown, and we write $S\in Crown(G)$. Let $Ψ(G)$ be the family of all local maximum independent sets of graph $G$, i.e., $S\inΨ(G)$ if $S$ is a maximum independent set in the subgraph induced by $S\cup N(S)$. In this paper we show that $CritIndep(G)\subseteq Crown(G)$ $\subseteqΨ(G)$ are true for every graph. In addition, we present some classes of graphs where these families coincide and form greedoids or even more general set systems that we call augmentoids.

Let G be a finite group. Let pi be a permutation from S{n}. We study the distribution of probabilities of equality a{1} a{2} ...a{n-1}a{n}=a{pi{1}}^{epsilon{1}} a{pi_{2}}^{epsilon{2}}...a{pi{n-1}}^{epsilon_{n-1}} a_{pi_{n}}^{epsilon{n}}, when pi varies over all the permutations in S{n}, and epsilon{i} varies over the set {+1, -1}. By the paper "Hultman Numbers and Generalized Commuting Probability in Finite Groups" (2017), The case where all epsilon{i} are +1 led to a close connection to Hultman numbers. In this paper we generalize the results, permitting epsilon{i} to be -1. We describe the spectrum of the probabilities of signed permutation equalities in a finite group G. This spectrum turns out to be closely related to the partition of 2^{n}*n! into a sum of the corresponding signed Hultman numbers.

A set $S\subseteq V$ is \textit{independent} in a graph $G=\left( V,E\right) $ if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent. The \textit{independence number} $α(G)$ is the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ is the size of a maximum matching in $G$. If $α(G)+μ(G)$ equals the order of $G$, then $G$ is called a \textit{König-Egerváry graph }\cite{dem,ster}. The number $d\left( G\right) =\max\{\left\vert A\right\vert -\left\vert N\left( A\right) \right\vert :A\subseteq V\}$ is called the \textit{critical difference} of $G$ \cite{Zhang} (where $N\left( A\right) =\left\{ v:v\in V,N\left( v\right) \cap A\neq\emptyset\right\} $). It is known that $α(G)-μ(G)\leq d\left( G\right) $ holds for every graph \cite{Levman2011a,Lorentzen1966,Schrijver2003}. In \cite{LevMan5} it was shown that $d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)$ is true for every König-Egerváry graph. A graph $G$ is \textit{(i)} \textit{unicyclic} if it has a unique cycle, \textit{(ii)} \textit{almost bipartite} if it has only one odd cycle. It was conjectured in \cite{LevMan2012a,LevMan2013a} and validated in \cite{Bhattacharya2018} that $d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)$ holds for every unicyclic non-König-Egerváry graph $G$. In this paper we prove that if $G$ is an almost bipartite graph of order $n\left( G\right) $, then $α(G)+μ(G)\in\left\{ n\left( G\right) -1,n\left( G\right) \right\} $. Moreover, for each of these two values, we characterize the corresponding graphs. Further, using these findings, we show that the critical difference of an almost bipartite graph $G$ satisfies \[ d(G)=α(G)-μ(G)=\left\vert \mathrm{core}(G)\right\vert -\left\vert N(\mathrm{core}(G))\right\vert , \] where by \textrm{core}$\left( G\right) $ we mean the intersection of all maximum independent sets.

Let $α(G)$ denote the cardinality of a maximum independent set, while $μ(G)$ be the size of a maximum matching in the graph $G=\left(V,E\right) $. If $α(G)+μ(G)=\left\vert V\right\vert $, then $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph. If $d_{1}\leq d_{2}\leq\cdots\leq d_{n}$ is the degree sequence of $G$, then the annihilation number $h\left(G\right) $ of $G$ is the largest integer $k$ such that $\sum\limits_{i=1}^{k}d_{i}\leq\left\vert E\right\vert $ (Pepper 2004, Pepper 2009). A set $A\subseteq V$ satisfying $\sum \limits_{a\in A} deg(a)\leq\left\vert E\right\vert $ is an annihilation set, if, in addition, $ deg\left(v\right) +\sum\limits_{a\in A} deg(a)>\left\vert E\right\vert $, for every vertex $v\in V(G)-A$, then $A$ is a maximal annihilation set in $G$. In (Larson & Pepper 2011) it was conjectured that the following assertions are equivalent: (i) $α\left(G\right) =h\left(G\right) $; (ii) $G$ is a König-Egerváry graph and every maximum independent set is a maximal annihilating set. In this paper, we prove that the implication "(i) $\Longrightarrow$ (ii)" is correct, while for the opposite direction we provide a series of generic counterexamples. Keywords: maximum independent set, matching, tree, bipartite graph, König-Egerváry graph, annihilation set, annihilation number.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function $w$ is defined on its vertices. Then $G$ is $w$-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph $G$, the set of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered is a vector space, denoted $WCW(G)$. Let $B$ be a complete bipartite induced subgraph of $G$ on vertex sets of bipartition $B_{X}$ and $B_{Y}$. Then $B$ is generating if there exists an independent set $S$ such that $S \cup B_{X}$ and $S \cup B_{Y}$ are both maximal independent sets of $G$. In the restricted case that a generating subgraph $B$ is isomorphic to $K_{1,1}$, the unique edge in $B$ is called a relating edge. Generating subgraphs play an important role in finding $WCW(G)$. Deciding whether an input graph $G$ is well-covered is co-NP-complete. Hence, finding $WCW(G)$ is co-NP-hard. Deciding whether an edge is relating is NP-complete. Therefore, deciding whether a subgraph is generating is NP-complete as well. A graph is chordal if every induced cycle is a triangle. It is known that finding $WCW(G)$ can be done polynomially in the restricted case that $G$ is chordal. Thus recognizing well-covered chordal graphs is a polynomial problem. We present a polynomial algorithm for recognizing relating edges and generating subgraphs in chordal graphs.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function $w$ is defined on its vertices. Then $G$ is $w$-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph $G$, the set of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered is a vector space, denoted as $WCW(G).$ Deciding whether an input graph $G$ is well-covered is co-NP-complete. Therefore, finding $WCW(G)$ is co-NP-hard. A generating subgraph of a graph $G$ is an induced complete bipartite subgraph $B$ of $G$ on vertex sets of bipartition $B_{X}$ and $B_{Y}$, such that each of $S \cup B_{X}$ and $S \cup B_{Y}$ is a maximal independent set of $G$, for some independent set $S$. If $B$ is generating, then $w(B_{X})=w(B_{Y})$ for every weight function $w \in WCW(G)$. Therefore, generating subgraphs play an important role in finding $WCW(G)$. The decision problem whether a subgraph of an input graph is generating is known to be NP-complete. In this article, we prove NP-completeness of the problem for graphs without cycles of length 3 and 5, and for bipartite graphs with girth at least 6. On the other and, we supply polynomial algorithms for recognizing generating subgraphs and finding $WCW(G)$, when the input graph is bipartite without cycles of length 6. We also present a polynomial algorithm which finds $WCW(G)$ when $G$ does not contain cycles of lengths 3, 4, 5, and 7.

An independent set A is maximal if it is not a proper subset of an independent set, while A is maximum if it has a maximum size. The problem of whether a graph has a pair of disjoint maximal independent sets was introduced by C. Berge in early 70's. The class of graphs for which every induced subgraph admits two disjoint maximal independent sets was characterized in (Shaudt, 2015). It is known that deciding whether a graph has two disjoint maximal independent sets is a NP-complete problem (Henning et al., 2009). In this paper, we are focused on finding conditions ensuring the existence of two disjoint maximum independent sets.

A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality (Plummer, 1970). If G is a well-covered graph, has at least two vertices, and G-v is well-covered for every vertex v, then G is a 1-well-covered graph (Staples, 1975). We call G a λ-quasi-regularizable graph if λ |S| =< |N(S)| for every independent set S of G. The independence polynomial I(G;x) is the generating function of independent sets in a graph G (Gutman & Harary, 1983). The Roller-Coaster Conjecture (Michael & Travis, 2003), saying that for every permutation σ of the set {(α/2),...,α} there exists a well-covered graph G with independence number α such that the coefficients (s_{k}) of I(G;x) are chosen in accordance with σ, has been validated in (Cutler & Pebody, 2017). In this paper, we show that independence polynomials of λ-quasi-regularizable graphs are partially unimodal. More precisely, the coefficients of an upper part of I(G;x) are in non-increasing order. Based on this finding, we prove that the domain of the Roller- Coaster Conjecture can be shortened for well-covered graphs and 1-well-covered graphs.

A graph is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same size (M. D. Plummer, 1970). A well-covered graph is 1-well-covered if the deletion of every vertex leaves a graph which is well-covered as well (J. W. Staples, 1975). A graph G belongs to class W_{n} if every n pairwise disjoint independent sets in G are included in $n$ pairwise disjoint maximum independent sets (J. W. Staples, 1975). Clearly, W_{1} is the family of all well-covered graphs. It turns out that G belongs to W_{2} if and only if it is a 1-well-covered graph without isolated vertices. We show that deleting a shedding vertex does not change the maximum size of a maximal independent set including a given independent set A in a graph G. Specifically, for well-covered graphs, it means that the vertex v is shedding if and only if G-v is well-covered. In addition, we provide new characterizations of 1-well-covered graphs, which we further use in building 1-well-covered graphs by corona, join, and concatenation operations.

Violator Spaces were introduced by J. Matousek et al. in 2008 as generalization of Linear Programming problems. Convex geometries were invented by Edelman and Jamison in 1985 as proper combinatorial abstractions of convexity. Convex geometries are defined by anti-exchange closure operators. We investigate an interrelations between violator spaces and closure spaces and show that violator mapping may be defined by a week version of closure operators. Moreover, we prove that violator spaces with an unique basis satisfies the anti-exchange and the Krein-Milman properties.

Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A set S is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The graph G is known to be a Konig-Egervary if alpha(G)+mu(G)= |V(G)|, where alpha(G) denotes the size of a maximum independent set and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching. The number d(X)= |X|-|N(X)| is the difference of X, and an independent set A is critical if d(A) = max{d(I):I is an independent set in G} (Zhang; 1990). Let Omega(G) denote the family of all maximum independent sets. Let us say that a family Gamma of independent sets is a Konig-Egervary collection if |Union of Gamma| + |Intersection of Gamma| = 2alpha(G) (Jarden, Levit, Mandrescu; 2015). In this paper, we show that if the family of all maximum critical independent sets of a graph G is a Konig-Egervary collection, then G is a Konig-Egervary graph. It generalizes one of our conjectures recently validated in (Short; 2015).

Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A subset S of V(G) is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. The graph G is known to be a Konig-Egervary if alpha(G) + mu(G)= |V(G)|, where alpha(G) denotes the size of a maximum independent set and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching. Let Omega(G) denote the family of all maximum independent sets, and f be the function from the set of subcollections Gamma of Omega(G) such that f(Gamma) = (the cardinality of the union of elements of Gamma) + (the cardinality of the intersection of elements of Gamma). Our main finding claims that f is "<<"-increasing, where the preorder {Gamma1} << {Gamma2} means that the union of all elements of {Gamma1} is a subset of the union of all elements of {Gamma2}, while the intersection of all elements of {Gamma2} is a subset of the intersection of all elements of {Gamma1}. Let us say that a family {Gamma} is a Konig-Egervary collection if f(Gamma) = 2*alpha(G). We conclude with the observation that for every graph G each subcollection of a Konig-Egervary collection is Konig-Egervary as well.

Let G be a simple graph with vertex set V(G). A subset S of V(G) is independent if no two vertices from S are adjacent. By Ind(G) we mean the family of all independent sets of G while core(G) and corona(G) denote the intersection and the union of all maximum independent sets, respectively. The number d(X)= |X|-|N(X)| is the difference of the set of vertices X, and an independent set A is critical if d(A)=max{d(I):I belongs to Ind(G)} (Zhang, 1990). Let ker(G) and diadem(G) be the intersection and union, respectively, of all critical independent sets of G (Levit and Mandrescu, 2012). In this paper, we present various connections between critical unions and intersections of maximum independent sets of a graph. These relations give birth to new characterizations of Koenig-Egervary graphs, some of them involving ker(G), core(G), corona(G), and diadem(G).

Let $G$ be a graph. A set $S$ of vertices in $G$ dominates the graph if every vertex of $G$ is either in $S$ or a neighbor of a vertex in $S$. Finding a minimal cardinality set which dominates the graph is an NP-complete problem. The graph $G$ is well-dominated if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same cardinality. The complexity status of recognizing well-dominated graphs is not known. We show that recognizing well-dominated graphs can be done polynomially for graphs without cycles of lengths $4$ and $5$, by proving that a graph belonging to this family is well-dominated if and only if it is well-covered. Assume that a weight function $w$ is defined on the vertices of $G$. Then $G$ is $w$-well-dominated} if all its minimal dominating sets are of the same weight. We prove that the set of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-dominated is a vector space, and denote that vector space by $WWD(G)$. We prove that $WWD(G)$ is a subspace of $WCW(G)$, the vector space of weight functions $w$ such that $G$ is $w$-well-covered. We provide a polynomial characterization of $WWD(G)$ for the case that $G$ does not contain cycles of lengths $4$, $5$, and $6$.

Let $G$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V\left( G\right) $. A set $S\subseteq V\left( G\right) $ is independent if no two vertices from $S$ are adjacent, and by $\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ we mean the family of all independent sets of $G$. The number $d\left( X\right) =$ $\left\vert X\right\vert -\left\vert N(X)\right\vert $ is the difference of $X\subseteq V\left( G\right) $, and a set $A\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)$ is critical if $d(A)=\max \{d\left( I\right) :I\in\mathrm{Ind}(G)\}$ (Zhang, 1990). Let us recall the following definitions: $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a maximum independent set}. $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right)$ = $\bigcup$ {S :S is a maximum independent set}. $\mathrm{\ker}(G)$ = $\bigcap$ {S : S is a critical independent set}. $\mathrm{diadem}(G)$ = $\bigcup$ {S : S is a critical independent set}. In this paper we present various structural properties of $\mathrm{\ker}(G)$, in relation with $\mathrm{core}\left( G\right) $, $\mathrm{corona}\left( G\right) $, and $\mathrm{diadem}(G)$.

A group valued function on a graph is called balanced if the product of its values along any cycle is equal to the identity element of the group. We compute the number of balanced functions from edges and vertices of a directed graph to a finite group.

Let $G$ be a finite group and $π$ be a permutation from $S_{n}$. We investigate the distribution of the probabilities of the equality \[ a_{1}a_{2}\cdots a_{n-1}a_{n}=a_{π_{1}}a_{π_{2}}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}a_{π_{n}} \] when $π$ varies over all the permutations in $S_{n}$. The probability \[ Pr_π(G)=Pr(a_{1}a_{2}\cdots a_{n-1}a_{n}=a_{π_{1}}a_{π_{2}}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}a_{π_{n}}) \] is identical to $Pr_{1}^ω(G)$, with \[ ω=a_{1}a_{2}...a_{n-1}a_{n}a_{π_{1}}^{-1}a_{π_{2}}^{-1}\cdots a_{π_{n-1}}^{-1}a_{π_{n}}^{-1}, \] as it is defined in \cite{DasNath1} and \cite{NathDash1}. The notion of commutativity degree, or the probability of a permutation equality $a_{1}a_{2}=a_{2}a_{1}$, for which $n=2$ and $π=\langle2\;\;1\rangle$, was introduced and assessed by P. Erdös and P. Turan in \cite{ET} in 1968 and by W. H. Gustafson in \cite{G} in 1973. In \cite{G} Gustafson establishes a relation between the probability of $a_{1},a_{2}\in G$ commuting and the number of conjugacy classes in $G$. In this work we define several other parameters, which depend only on a certain interplay between the conjugacy classes of $G$, and compute the probabilities of general permutation equalities in terms of these parameters. It turns out that this probability, for a permutation $π$, depends only on the number $c(Gr(π))$ of the alternating cycles in the cycle graph $Gr(π)$ of $π$. The cycle graph of a permutation was introduced by V. Bafna and P. A. Pevzner in \cite{BP}. We describe the spectrum of the probabilities of permutation equalities in a finite group as $π$ varies over all the elements of $S_{n}$. This spectrum turns-out to be closely related to the partition of $n!$ into a sum of the corresponding Hultman numbers.

Let alpha(G) denote the maximum size of an independent set of vertices and mu(G) be the cardinality of a maximum matching in a graph G. A matching saturating all the vertices is perfect. If alpha(G) + mu(G) equals the number of vertices of G, then it is called a Konig-Egervary graph. A graph is unicyclic if it has a unique cycle. In 2010, Bartha conjectured that a unique perfect matching, if it exists, can be found in O(m) time, where m is the number of edges. In this paper we validate this conjecture for Konig-Egervary graphs and unicylic graphs. We propose a variation of Karp-Sipser leaf-removal algorithm (Karp and Spiser, 1981), which ends with an empty graph if and only if the original graph is a Konig-Egervary graph with a unique perfect matching obtained as an output as well. We also show that a unicyclic non-bipartite graph G may have at most one perfect matching, and this is the case where G is a Konig-Egervary graph.

A graph G is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on its vertices. Then G is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-well-covered is a vector space, denoted WCW(G). Let B be a complete bipartite induced subgraph of G on vertex sets of bipartition B_X and B_Y. Then B is generating if there exists an independent set S such that S \cup B_X and S \cup B_Y are both maximal independent sets of G. A relating edge is a generating subgraph in the restricted case that B = K_{1,1}. Deciding whether an input graph G is well-covered is co-NP-complete. Therefore finding WCW(G) is co-NP-hard. Deciding whether an edge is relating is co-NP-complete. Therefore, deciding whether a subgraph is generating is co-NP-complete as well. In this article we discuss the connections among these problems, provide proofs for NP-completeness for several restricted cases, and present polynomial characterizations for some other cases.

A graph G is well-covered if all its maximal independent sets are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on its vertices. Then G is w-well-covered if all maximal independent sets are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-well-covered is a vector space. Given an input claw-free graph G, we present an O(n^6)algortihm, whose input is a claw-free graph G, and output is the vector space of weight functions w, for which G is w-well-covered. A graph G is equimatchable if all its maximal matchings are of the same cardinality. Assume that a weight function w is defined on the edges of G. Then G is w-equimatchable if all its maximal matchings are of the same weight. For every graph G, the set of weight functions w such that G is w-equimatchable is a vector space. We present an O(m*n^4 + n^5*log(n)) algorithm which receives an input graph G, and outputs the vector space of weight functions w such that G is w-equimatchable.