arXiv++ Combinatorics

The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a maximum stable set, and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. If alpha(G)+mu(G) equals its order, then G is a Konig-Egervary graph. In this paper we deal with square-stable graphs, i.e., the graphs G enjoying the equality alpha(G)=alpha(G^{2}), where G^{2} denotes the second power of G. In particular, we show that a Konig-Egervary graph is square-stable if and only if it has a perfect matching consisting of pendant edges, and in consequence, we deduce that well-covered trees are exactly the square-stable trees.

Let alpha(G) be the cardinality of a independence set of maximum size in the graph G, while mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching. G is a Konig--Egervary graph if its order equals alpha(G) + mu(G). The set core(G) is the intersection of all maximum independent sets of G (Levit & Mandrescu, 2002). The number def(G)=|V(G)|-2*mu(G) is the deficiency of G (Lovasz & Plummer, 1986). The number d(G)=max{|S|-|N(S)|:S in Ind(G)} is the critical difference of G. An independent set A is critical if |A|-|N(A)|=d(G), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S (Zhang, 1990). In 2009, Larson showed that G is Konig--Egervary graph if and only if there exists a maximum independent set that is critical as well. In this paper we prove that: (i) d(G)=|core(G)|-|N(core(G))|=alpha(G)-mu(G)=def(G) for every Konig--Egervary graph G; (ii) G is Konig--Egervary graph if and only if every maximum independent set of G is critical.

If alpha=alpha(G) is the maximum size of an independent set and s_{k} equals the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+...+s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G. In this paper we provide an elementary proof of the inequality claiming that the absolute value of I(G;-1) is not greater than 2^phi(G), for every graph G, where phi(G) is its decycling number.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. It is known that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. Bipartite, triangle-free, and well-covered graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids have been analyzed as well. A unicycle graph owns only one cycle. In this paper we characterize the unicycle graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets form greedoids.

If alpha=alpha(G) is the maximum size of an independent set and s_{k} equals the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then I(G;x)=s_{0}+s_{1}x+...+s_{alpha}x^{alpha} is the independence polynomial of G. In this paper we prove that: 1. I(T;-1) equels either -1 or 0 or 1 for every tree T; 2. I(G;-1)=0 for every connected well-covered graph G of girth > 5, non-isomorphic to C_{7} or K_{2}; 3. the absolute value of I(G;-1) is not greater than 2^nu(G), for every graph G, where nu(G) is its cyclomatic number.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set of G, if S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved in 1975 that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In 2002 we showed that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. The cases where G is bipartite, triangle-free, well-covered, while the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid, were analyzed in 2004, 2007, and 2008, respectively. In this paper we demonstrate that if the family of all local maximum stable sets of the graph satisfies the accessibility property, then it is an interval greedoid. We also characterize those graphs whose families of local maximum stable sets are either antimatroids or matroids.

S is a local maximum stable set of a graph G, if the set S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. In (Levit, Mandrescu, 2002) we have proved that the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid for every forest. The cases of bipartite graphs and triangle-free graphs were analyzed in (Levit, Mandrescu, 2004) and (Levit, Mandrescu, 2007), respectively. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the family of all local maximum stable sets of a graph G to form a greedoid, where G is: (a) the disjoint union of a family of graphs; (b) the Zykov sum of a family of graphs, or (c) the corona X*{H_1,H_2,...,H_n} obtained by joining each vertex k of a graph X to all the vertices of a graph H_k.

G is a Koenig-Egervary graph provided alpha(G)+ mu(G)=|V(G)|, where mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching and alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum stable set. S is a local maximum stable set of G if S is a maximum stable set of the closed neighborhood of S. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In this paper we demonstrate that if S is a local maximum stable set, the subgraph H induced by the closed neighborhood of S is a Koenig-Egervary graph, and M is a maximum matching in H, then M is a local maximum stable set in the line graph of G.

A function $F$ defined on all subsets of a finite ground set $E$ is quasi-concave if $F(X\cup Y)\geq\min\{F(X),F(Y)\}$ for all $X,Y\subset E$. Quasi-concave functions arise in many fields of mathematics and computer science such as social choice, theory of graph, data mining, clustering and other fields. The maximization of quasi-concave function takes, in general, exponential time. However, if a quasi-concave function is defined by associated monotone linkage function then it can be optimized by the greedy type algorithm in a polynomial time. Quasi-concave functions defined as minimum values of monotone linkage functions were considered on antimatroids, where the correspondence between quasi-concave and bottleneck functions was shown (Kempner & Levit, 2003). The goal of this paper is to analyze quasi-concave functions on different families of sets and to investigate their relationships with monotone linkage functions.

The notion of "antimatroid with repetition" was conceived by Bjorner, Lovasz and Shor in 1991 as a multiset extension of the notion of antimatroid. When the underlying set consists of only two elements, such two-dimensional antimatroids correspond to point sets in the plane. In this research we concentrate on geometrical properties of antimatroidal point sets in the plane and prove that these sets are exactly parallelogram polyominoes. Our results imply that two-dimensional antimatroids have convex dimension 2. The second part of the research is devoted to geometrical properties of three-dimensional antimatroids closed under intersection.

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial $I(G;x)$ is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal, whenever $G$ is a forest, while Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal for any well-covered graph G. Michael and Traves (2003) showed that the assertion is false for well-covered graphs with $a(G)$ > 3 ($a(G)$ is the size of a maximum stable set of the graph $G$), while for very well-covered graphs the conjecture is still open. In this paper we give support to both conjectures by demonstrating that if $a(G)$ < 4, or $G$ belongs to ${K_{1,n}, P_{n}: n > 0}$, then $I(G*;x)$ is log-concave, and, hence, unimodal (where $G*$ is the very well-covered graph obtained from $G$ by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex).

In this paper we consider quasi-concave set functions defined on antimatroids. There are many equivalent axiomatizations of antimatroids, that may be separated into two categories: antimatroids defined as set systems and antimatroids defined as languages. An algorthmic characterization of antimatroids, that considers them as set systems, was given in (Kempner, Levit 2003). This characterization is based on the idea of optimization using set functions defined as minimum values of linkages between a set and the elements from the set complement. Such set functions are quasi-concave. Their behavior on antimatroids was studied in (Kempner, Muchnik 2003), where they were applied to constraint clustering. In this work we investigate a duality between quasi-concave set functions and linkage functions. Our main finding is that quasi-concave set functions on an antimatroid may be represented as minimum values of some monotone linkage functions.

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Let $a$ be the size of a maximum stable set. Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987)conjectured that I(T,x) is unimodal for any tree T, while, in general, they proved that for any permutation $p$ of {1,2,...,a} there is a graph such that s_{p(1)}<s_{p(2)}<...<s_{p(a)}. Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal for any well-covered graph. Michael and Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs with non-unimodal independence polynomials. They proposed the "roller-coaster" conjecture: for a well-covered graph, the subsequence (s_{a/2},s_{a/2+1},...,s_{a}) is unconstrained in the sense of Alavi et al. The conjecture of Brown et al. is still open for very well-covered graphs. In this paper we prove that s_{(2a-1)/3}>=...>=s_{a-1}>=s_{a} are valid for any (a) bipartite graph $G$; (b) quasi-regularizable graph $G$ on $2a$ vertices. In particular, we infer that this is true for (a) trees, thus doing a step in an attempt to prove Alavi et al.' conjecture; (b) very well-covered graphs. Consequently, for this case, the unconstrained subsequence appearing in the roller-coaster conjecture can be shorten to (s_{a/2},s_{a/2+1},...,s_{(2a-1)/3}). We also show that the independence polynomial of a very well-covered graph $G$ is unimodal for a<10, and is log-concave whenever a<6.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if all its maximal stable sets have the same size, denoted by alpha(G) (M. D. Plummer, 1970). If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal (that is, there exists an index $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-increasing) for any well-covered graph $G$. T. S. Michael and W. N. Traves (2002) proved that this assertion is true for alpha(G) < 4, while for alpha(G) from the set {4,5,6,7} they provided counterexamples. In this paper we show that for any integer $alpha$ > 7, there exists a (dis)connected well-covered graph $G$ with $alpha$ = alpha(G), whose independence polynomial is not unimodal. In addition, we present a number of sufficient conditions for a graph $G$ with alpha(G) < 7 to have unimodal independence polynomial.

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that the independence polynomial of a well-covered graph $G$ (i.e., a graph whose all maximal independent sets are of the same size) is unimodal, that is, there exists an index $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the other part of coefficients is non-increasing. T. S. Michael and N. Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs whose independence polynomials are not unimodal. A. Finbow, B. Hartnell and R. J. Nowakowski (1993) proved that under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some $G$, where G* is the graph obtained from $G$ by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of $G$. Y. Alavi, P. J. Malde, A. J. Schwenk and P. Erdös (1987) asked whether for trees the independence polynomial is unimodal. V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu (2002) validated the unimodality of the independence polynomials of some well-covered trees (e.g., $P_{n}^{*},K_{1,n}^{*}$, where $P_{n}$ is the path on $n$ vertices and $K_{1,n}$ is the $n$-star graph). In this paper we show that for any graph $G$ with the stability number alpha(G) < 5, the independence polynomial of G* is unimodal.

The basic distinction between already known algorithmic characterizations of matroids and antimatroids is in the fact that for antimatroids the ordering of elements is of great importance. While antimatroids can also be characterized as set systems, the question whether there is an algorithmic description of antimatroids in terms of sets and set functions was open for some period of time. This article provides a selective look at classical material on algorithmic characterization of antimatroids, i.e., the ordered version, and a new unordered version. Moreover we empathize formally the correspondence between these two versions.

If for any k the k-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x)is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then it is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). A graph G is very well-covered (Favaron, 1982) if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2*alpha(G), where alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set, and it is well-covered (i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size, Plummer, 1970). For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G (Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakowski, 1993). The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real (Brown, Dilcher, and Nowakowski, 2000). The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I(G;x) and I(G*;x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I(G;x) is equal to the number of roots of I(G*;x) different from -1, which appears as a root of multiplicity alpha(G*)- alpha(G) for I(G*;x). We also prove that the real roots of I(G*;x) are in [-1,-1/(2*alpha(G*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in |z| > 1/(2n-1). Using the properties of the roots of the independence polynomial, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (well-covered trees with at most one vertex of degree greater than two) among general well-covered trees.

The number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in graph $G$ is the $k$-th coefficient of the independence polynomial of $G$ (I. Gutman and F. Harary, 1983). In 1990, Y. O. Hamidoune proved that for any claw-free graph, its independence polynomial is unimodal, i.e., there exists a coefficient $k$ such that the part of the sequence of coefficients from the first to $k$-th is non-decreasing while the second part of coefficients is non-increasing. Y. Alavi, P. J. Malde, A. J. Schwenk and P. Erdös (1987) asked whether for trees (or perhaps forests) the independence polynomial is unimodal. J. I. Brown, K. Dilcher and R. J. Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that it is true for any well-covered graph (a graph whose all maximal independent sets have the same size). V. E. Levit and E. Mandrescu (1999) demonstrated that every well-covered tree can be obtained as a join of a number of well-covered spiders, where a spider is a tree having at most one vertex of degree at least three. In this paper we show that the independence polynomial of any well-covered spider is unimodal. In addition, we introduce some graph transformations respecting independence polynomials. They allow us to reduce several types of well-covered trees to claw-free graphs, and, consequently, to prove that their independence polynomials are unimodal.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum size. S is a local maximum stable set if it is a maximum stable set of the subgraph of G spanned by the union of S and N(S), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S. A matching M is uniquely restricted if its saturated vertices induce a subgraph which has a unique perfect matching, namely M itself. One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr., working as a useful sufficient local optimality condition for the weighted maximum stable set problem, ensures that any local maximum stable set of G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of G. In one of our previous papers it is proven that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we obtain a generalization of this assertion claiming that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a bipartite graph G is a greedoid if and only if all maximum matchings of G are uniquely restricted.

A stable set in a graph G is a set of mutually non-adjacent vertices, alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set of G, and core(G) is the intersection of all its maximum stable sets. In this paper we demonstrate that in a tree T, of order n greater than 1, any stable set of size greater or equal to n/2 contains at least one pendant vertex. Hence, we deduce that any maximum stable set in a tree contains at least one pendant vertex. Our main finding is the theorem claiming that if T does not own a perfect matching, then at least two pendant vertices an even distance apart belong to core(T). While it is proved by Levit and Mandrescu that if G is a connected bipartite graph of order at least 2, then the size of core(G) is different from 1, our new statement reveals an additional structure of the intersection of all maximum stable sets of a tree. The above assertions give refining of one result of Hammer, Hansen and Simeone, stating that if a graph G is of order less than 2*alpha(G), then core(G) is non-empty, and also of a result of Jamison, Gunter, Hartnel and Rall, and Zito, saying that for a tree T of order at least two, the size of core(G) is different from 1.