arXiv++ Combinatorics

S is a local maximum stable set of a graph G, if the set S is a maximum stable set of the subgraph induced by its closed neighborhood. In (Levit, Mandrescu, 2002) we have proved that the family of all local maximum stable sets is a greedoid for every forest. The cases of bipartite graphs and triangle-free graphs were analyzed in (Levit, Mandrescu, 2004) and (Levit, Mandrescu, 2007), respectively. In this paper we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the family of all local maximum stable sets of a graph G to form a greedoid, where G is: (a) the disjoint union of a family of graphs; (b) the Zykov sum of a family of graphs, or (c) the corona X*{H_1,H_2,...,H_n} obtained by joining each vertex k of a graph X to all the vertices of a graph H_k.

G is a Koenig-Egervary graph provided alpha(G)+ mu(G)=|V(G)|, where mu(G) is the size of a maximum matching and alpha(G) is the cardinality of a maximum stable set. S is a local maximum stable set of G if S is a maximum stable set of the closed neighborhood of S. Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. proved that any local maximum stable set is a subset of a maximum stable set of G. In this paper we demonstrate that if S is a local maximum stable set, the subgraph H induced by the closed neighborhood of S is a Koenig-Egervary graph, and M is a maximum matching in H, then M is a local maximum stable set in the line graph of G.

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial $I(G;x)$ is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal, whenever $G$ is a forest, while Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that $I(G;x)$ is unimodal for any well-covered graph G. Michael and Traves (2003) showed that the assertion is false for well-covered graphs with $a(G)$ > 3 ($a(G)$ is the size of a maximum stable set of the graph $G$), while for very well-covered graphs the conjecture is still open. In this paper we give support to both conjectures by demonstrating that if $a(G)$ < 4, or $G$ belongs to ${K_{1,n}, P_{n}: n > 0}$, then $I(G*;x)$ is log-concave, and, hence, unimodal (where $G*$ is the very well-covered graph obtained from $G$ by appending a single pendant edge to each vertex).

If for any $k$ the $k$-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x) is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality $k$ in the graph $G$, then it is called the independence polynomial of $G$ (Gutman and Harary, 1983). Let $a$ be the size of a maximum stable set. Alavi, Malde, Schwenk and Erdos (1987)conjectured that I(T,x) is unimodal for any tree T, while, in general, they proved that for any permutation $p$ of {1,2,...,a} there is a graph such that s_{p(1)}<s_{p(2)}<...<s_{p(a)}. Brown, Dilcher and Nowakowski (2000) conjectured that I(G;x) is unimodal for any well-covered graph. Michael and Traves (2002) provided examples of well-covered graphs with non-unimodal independence polynomials. They proposed the "roller-coaster" conjecture: for a well-covered graph, the subsequence (s_{a/2},s_{a/2+1},...,s_{a}) is unconstrained in the sense of Alavi et al. The conjecture of Brown et al. is still open for very well-covered graphs. In this paper we prove that s_{(2a-1)/3}>=...>=s_{a-1}>=s_{a} are valid for any (a) bipartite graph $G$; (b) quasi-regularizable graph $G$ on $2a$ vertices. In particular, we infer that this is true for (a) trees, thus doing a step in an attempt to prove Alavi et al.' conjecture; (b) very well-covered graphs. Consequently, for this case, the unconstrained subsequence appearing in the roller-coaster conjecture can be shorten to (s_{a/2},s_{a/2+1},...,s_{(2a-1)/3}). We also show that the independence polynomial of a very well-covered graph $G$ is unimodal for a<10, and is log-concave whenever a<6.

If for any k the k-th coefficient of a polynomial I(G;x)is equal to the number of stable sets of cardinality k in graph G, then it is called the independence polynomial of G (Gutman and Harary, 1983). A graph G is very well-covered (Favaron, 1982) if it has no isolated vertices, its order equals 2*alpha(G), where alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set, and it is well-covered (i.e., all its maximal independent sets are of the same size, Plummer, 1970). For instance, appending a single pendant edge to each vertex of G yields a very well-covered graph, which we denote by G*. Under certain conditions, any well-covered graph equals G* for some G (Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakowski, 1993). The root of the smallest modulus of the independence polynomial of any graph is real (Brown, Dilcher, and Nowakowski, 2000). The location of the roots of the independence polynomial in the complex plane, and the multiplicity of the root of the smallest modulus are investigated in a number of articles. In this paper we establish formulae connecting the coefficients of I(G;x) and I(G*;x), which allow us to show that the number of roots of I(G;x) is equal to the number of roots of I(G*;x) different from -1, which appears as a root of multiplicity alpha(G*)- alpha(G) for I(G*;x). We also prove that the real roots of I(G*;x) are in [-1,-1/(2*alpha(G*)), while for a general graph of order n we show that its roots lie in |z| > 1/(2n-1). Using the properties of the roots of the independence polynomial, we demonstrate that the independence polynomial distinguishes well-covered spiders (well-covered trees with at most one vertex of degree greater than two) among general well-covered trees.

This work presents a hybrid approach to solve the maximum stable set problem, using constraint and semidefinite programming. The approach consists of two steps: subproblem generation and subproblem solution. First we rank the variable domain values, based on the solution of a semidefinite relaxation. Using this ranking, we generate the most promising subproblems first, by exploring a search tree using a limited discrepancy strategy. Then the subproblems are being solved using a constraint programming solver. To strengthen the semidefinite relaxation, we propose to infer additional constraints from the discrepancy structure. Computational results show that the semidefinite relaxation is very informative, since solutions of good quality are found in the first subproblems, or optimality is proven immediately.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum size. S is a local maximum stable set if it is a maximum stable set of the subgraph of G spanned by the union of S and N(S), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S. A matching M is uniquely restricted if its saturated vertices induce a subgraph which has a unique perfect matching, namely M itself. One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr., working as a useful sufficient local optimality condition for the weighted maximum stable set problem, ensures that any local maximum stable set of G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of G. In one of our previous papers it is proven that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set. In this paper we obtain a generalization of this assertion claiming that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a bipartite graph G is a greedoid if and only if all maximum matchings of G are uniquely restricted.

A stable set in a graph G is a set of mutually non-adjacent vertices, alpha(G) is the size of a maximum stable set of G, and core(G) is the intersection of all its maximum stable sets. In this paper we demonstrate that in a tree T, of order n greater than 1, any stable set of size greater or equal to n/2 contains at least one pendant vertex. Hence, we deduce that any maximum stable set in a tree contains at least one pendant vertex. Our main finding is the theorem claiming that if T does not own a perfect matching, then at least two pendant vertices an even distance apart belong to core(T). While it is proved by Levit and Mandrescu that if G is a connected bipartite graph of order at least 2, then the size of core(G) is different from 1, our new statement reveals an additional structure of the intersection of all maximum stable sets of a tree. The above assertions give refining of one result of Hammer, Hansen and Simeone, stating that if a graph G is of order less than 2*alpha(G), then core(G) is non-empty, and also of a result of Jamison, Gunter, Hartnel and Rall, and Zito, saying that for a tree T of order at least two, the size of core(G) is different from 1.

The stability number of a graph G, denoted by alpha(G), is the cardinality of a maximum stable set, and mu(G) is the cardinality of a maximum matching in G. If alpha(G) + mu(G) equals its order, then G is a Koenig-Egervary graph. We call G an $α$-square-stable graph, shortly square-stable, if alpha(G) = alpha(G*G), where G*G denotes the second power of G. These graphs were first investigated by Randerath and Wolkmann. In this paper we obtain several new characterizations of square-stable graphs. We also show that G is an square-stable Koenig-Egervary graph if and only if it has a perfect matching consisting of pendant edges. Moreover, we find that well-covered trees are exactly square-stable trees. To verify this result we give a new proof of one Ravindra's theorem describing well-covered trees.

A maximum stable set in a graph G is a stable set of maximum cardinality. S is a local maximum stable set if it is a maximum stable set of the subgraph of G spanned by the union of S and N(S), where N(S) is the neighborhood of S. One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr., working as a useful sufficient local optimality condition for the weighted maximum stable set problem, ensures that any local maximum stable set of G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of G. In this paper we demonstrate that an inverse assertion is true for forests. Namely, we show that for any non-empty local maximum stable set S of a forest T there exists a local maximum stable set S1 of T, such that S1 is included in S and |S1| = |S| - 1. Moreover, as a further strengthening of both the theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter Jr. and its inverse, we prove that the family of all local maximum stable sets of a forest forms a greedoid on its vertex set.

A square (0,1)-matrix X of order n > 0 is called fully indecomposable if there exists no integer k with 0 < k < n, such that X has a k by n-k zero submatrix. A stable set of a graph G is a subset of pairwise nonadjacent vertices. The stability number of G, denoted by $α(G)$, is the cardinality of a maximum stable set in G. A graph is called $α$-stable if its stability number remains the same upon both the deletion and the addition of any edge. We show that a connected bipartite graph has exactly two maximum stable sets that partition its vertex set if and only if its reduced adjacency matrix is fully indecomposable. We also describe a decomposition structure of $α$-stable bipartite graphs in terms of their reduced adjacency matrices. On the base of these findings we obtain both new proofs for a number of well-known theorems on the structure of matrices due to Brualdi, Marcus and Minc, Dulmage and Mendelsohn, and some generalizations of these statements. Several new results on $α$-stable bipartite graphs and their corresponding reduced adjacency matrices are presented, as well. Two kinds of matrix product are also considered (namely, Boolean product and Kronecker product), and their corresponding graph operations. As a consequence, we obtain a strengthening of one Lewin's theorem claiming that the product of two fully indecomposable matrices is a fully indecomposable matrix.

The stability number alpha(G) of a graph G is the cardinality of a maximum stable set in G, xi(G) denotes the size of core(G), where core(G) is the intersection of all maximum stable sets of G. In this paper we prove that for a graph G without isolated vertices, the following assertions are true: (i) if xi(G)< 2, then G is quasi-regularizable; (ii) if G is of order n and alpha(G) > (n+k-1)/2, for some k > 0, then xi(G) > k, and xi(G) > k+1, whenever n+k-1 is even. The last finding is a strengthening of a result of Hammer, Hansen, and Simeone, which states that alpha(G) > n/2 implies xi(G) > 0. G is a Koenig-Egervary graph if n equals the sum of its stability number and the cardinality of a maximum matching. For Koenig-Egervary graphs, we prove that alpha(G) > n/2 holds if and only if xi(G) is greater than the size of the neighborhood of core(G). Moreover, for bipartite graphs without isolated vertices, alpha(G) > n/2 is equivalent to xi(G) > 1. We also show that Hall's marriage Theorem is valid for Koenig-Egervary graphs, and it is sufficient to check Hall's condition only for one specific stable set, namely, for core(G).

One theorem of Nemhauser and Trotter ensures that, under certain conditions, a stable set of a graph G can be enlarged to a maximum stable set of this graph. For example, any stable set consisting of only simplicial vertices is contained in a maximum stable set of G. In this paper we demonstrate that an inverse assertion is true for trees of order greater than one, where, in fact, all the simplicial vertices are pendant. Namely, we show that any maximum stable set of such a tree contains at least one pendant vertex. Moreover, we prove that if T does not own a perfect matching, then a stable set, consisting of at least two pendant vertices, is included in the intersection of all its maximum stable sets. For trees, the above assertion is also a strengthening of one result of Hammer, Hansen, and Simeone, stating that if half of order of G is less than the cardinality of a maximum stable set of G, then the intersection of all its maximum stable sets is non-empty.

The stability number of a graph G, is the cardinality of a stable set of maximum size in G. If the stability number of G remains the same upon the addition of any edge, then G is called $α^{+}$-stable. G is a König-Egervary graph if its order equals the sum of its stability number and the cardinality of a maximum matching. In this paper we characterize $α^{+}$-stable König-Egervary graphs, generalizing some previously known results on bipartite graphs and trees. Namely, we prove that a König-Egervary graph is $α^{+}$-stable if and only if either the set of vertices belonging to no maximum stable set is empty, or the cardinality of this set equals one, and G has a perfect matching. Using this characterization we obtain several new findings on general König-Egervary graphs, for example, the equality between the cardinalities of the set of vertices belonging to all maximum stable sets and the set of vertices belonging to no maximum stable set of G is a necessary and sufficient condition for a König-Egervary graph G to have a perfect matching.