arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $G=(V(G),E(G))$ be a simple graph, and let $U\subseteq V(G)$. Two distinct vertices $x,y\in U$ are $U$-mutually visible if $G$ contains a shortest $x$-$y$ path that is internally disjoint from $U$. $U$ is called a mutual-visibility set of $G$ if any two vertices of $U$ are $U$-mutually visible. The mutual-visibility number $μ(G)$ of $G$ is the size of a largest mutual-visibility set of $G$. Let $P$ be a set of $n\geq 3$ points in ${\mathbb R}^2$ in general position. The disjointness graph of segments $D(P)$ of $P$ is the graph whose vertices are all the closed straight line segments with endpoints in $P$, two of which are adjacent in $D(P)$ if and only if they are disjoint. In this paper we establish tight lower and upper bounds for $μ(D(P))$, and show that almost all edge disjointness graphs have diameter 2.

Given a connected graph $G$, a set of vertices $X\subset V(G)$ is a weak $k$-resolving set of $G$ if for each two vertices $y,z\in V(G)$, the sum of the values $|d_G(y,x)-d_G(z,x)|$ over all $x\in X$ is at least $k$, where $d_G(u,v)$ stands for the length of a shortest path between $u$ and $v$. The cardinality of a smallest weak $k$-resolving set of $G$ is the weak $k$-metric dimension of $G$, and is denoted by $\mathrm{wdim}_k(G)$. In this paper, $\mathrm{wdim}_k(K_n\,\square\,K_n)$ is determined for every $n\ge 3$ and every $2\le k\le 2n$. An improvement of a known integer linear programming formulation for this problem is developed and implemented for the graphs $K_n\,\square\,K_m$. Conjectures regarding these general situations are posed.

An $\textit{isometric path}$ is a shortest path between two vertices. An $\textit{isometric path partition}$ (IPP) of a graph $G$ is a set $I$ of vertex-disjoint isometric paths in $G$ that partition the vertices of $G$. The \textit{isometric path partition number} of $G$, denoted by $\text{ipp}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of an IPP of $G$. In this article, we prove that every graph $G$ satisfies $\text{ipp}(G) \leq |V(G)| - ν(G)$, where $ν(G)$ is matching number of $G$. We further prove that a connected graph $G$ is extremal with respect to this upper bound, i.e.\ satisfies $\text{ipp}(G) = |V(G)| - ν(G)$, if and only if either (i) all blocks of $G$ are odd complete graphs, or (ii) all blocks of $G$ except one are odd complete graphs, and the unique block $B$ of $G$ that is not an odd complete graph is even and satisfy $\text{ipp}(B) = |V(B)| - ν(B)$. As corollaries of this result, we obtain a full structural characterization of all connected odd graphs that are extremal with respect to our upper bound, as well as of all extremal block graphs.

For a connected graph $G$ and $X\subseteq V(G)$, we say that two vertices $u$, $v$ are $X$-visible if there is a shortest $u,v$-path $P$ with $V(P)\cap X \subseteq \{u,v\}$. If every two vertices from $X$ are $X$-visible, then $X$ is a mutual-visibility set in $G$. The largest cardinality of such a set in $G$ is the mutual-visibility number $μ(G)$. When the visibility constraint is extended to further types of vertex pairs, we get the definitions of outer, dual, and total mutual-visibility sets and the respective graph invariants $μ_o(G)$, $μ_d(G)$, and $μ_t(G)$. This work concentrates on the possible changes in the four visibility invariants when an edge $e$ or a vertex $x$ is removed from $G$ and the graph remains connected. It is proved that $\frac{1}{2}μ(G) \le μ(G-e) \le 2μ(G)$ and $\frac{1}{6}μ_o(G) \le μ_o(G-e) \le 2μ_o(G)+1$ hold for every graph. Further general upper bounds established here are $μ_t(G-e) \leq μ_t(G)+2$ and $μ(G-x) \leq 2μ(G)$. For all but one of the remaining cases, it is shown that the visibility invariant may increase or decrease arbitrarily under the considered local operation. For example, neither $μ_d(G-e)$ nor $μ_d(G-x)$ allows lower or upper bounds of the form $a \cdot μ_d(G)+b$ with a positive constant $a$. Along the way, the realizability of the four visibility invariants in terms of the order is also characterized in the paper.

The general position problem asks for large sets of vertices such that no three vertices of the set lie on a common shortest path. Recently a dynamic version of this problem was defined, called the \emph{mobile general position problem}, in which a collection of robots must visit all the vertices of the graph whilst remaining in general position. In this paper we investigate this problem in the context of Cartesian products, corona products and joins, giving upper and lower bounds for general graphs and exact values for families including grids, cylinders, Hamming graphs and prisms of trees.

Given two non-adjacent vertices \( u \) and \( v \), we say a $uv$-walk \( W \) dominates a $uv$-walk \( W' \) if every internal vertex of \( W' \) is adjacent to some internal vertex of \( W \) or belongs to \( W \). A class of walks \(\mathbf{A}\) dominates a class of walks \(\mathbf{B}\) if for every pair of non-adjacent vertices $u,v$ in the graph, every $uv$-walk in \(\mathbf{A}\) dominates every $uv$-walk in \(\mathbf{B}\). This paper investigates the domination relationships among various types of walks connecting two non-adjacent vertices in a graph. In particular, we focus on the problem which is proposed in [S. B. Tondato, Graphs Combin. 40 (2024)]. We study the domination between different walk types (shortest paths, toll walks, weakly toll walks, $l_k$-paths for $k\in \left\{2,3\right\}$) and $m_3$-paths. And we show how these relationships give rise to characterizations of graph classes.

This paper proposes earliest and latest path algorithms based on binary weight allocation, assigning weights of 2(i-1) and 2(m-i) to the i-th arc in a network. While traditional shortest path algorithms optimize only distance, our approach leverages Binary-Addition-Tree ordering to efficiently identify lexicographically smallest and largest paths that establish connectivity. These paths partition the solution space into three regions: guaranteed disconnection, transitional connectivity, and guaranteed no simple paths. Our weight allocation enables implicit encoding of multiple objectives directly in binary representations, maintaining the O((|V|+|E|)log|V|) complexity of Dijkstra's algorithm while allowing simultaneous optimization of competing factors like reliability and cost. Experimental validation demonstrates significant computational time reduction compared to traditional multi-objective methods. Applications span telecommunications, transportation networks, and supply chain management, providing efficient tools for network planning and reliability analysis under multiple constraints.

If $G$ is a graph, then $X\subseteq V(G)$ is a general position set if for every two vertices $v,u\in X$ and every shortest $(u,v)$-path $P$, it holds that no inner vertex of $P$ lies in $X$. In this note we propose three algorithms to compute a largest general position set in $G$: an integer linear programming algorithm, a genetic algorithm, and a simulated annealing algorithm. These approaches are supported by examples from different areas of graph theory.

Two graph parameters are said to be coarsely equivalent if they are within constant factors from each other for every graph $G$. Recently, several graph parameters were shown to be coarsely equivalent to tree-length. Recall that the length of a tree-decomposition ${\cal T}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the largest diameter of a bag in ${\cal T}(G)$, and the tree-length $tl(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum of the length, over all tree-decompositions of $G$. Similarly, the length of a path-decomposition ${\cal P}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the largest diameter of a bag in ${\cal P}(G)$, and the path-length $pl(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum of the length, over all path-decompositions of $G$. In this paper, we present several graph parameters that are coarsely equivalent to path-length. Among other results, we show that the path-length of a graph $G$ is small if and only if one of the following equivalent conditions is true: (a) $G$ can be embedded to an unweighted caterpillar tree (equivalently, to a graph of path-width one) with a small additive distortion; (b) there is a constant $r\ge 0$ such that for every triple of vertices $u,v,w$ of $G$, disk of radius $r$ centered at one of them intercepts all paths connecting two others; (c) $G$ has a $k$-dominating shortest path with small $k\ge 0$; (d) $G$ has a $k'$-dominating pair with small $k'\ge 0$; (e) some power $G^μ$ of $G$ is an AT-free (or even a cocomparability) graph for a small integer $μ\ge 0$.

Dumas, Foucaud, Perez, and Todinca [SIAM J. Disc. Math., 2024] proved that if the vertex set of a graph $G$ can be covered by $k$ shortest paths, then the pathwidth of $G$ is bounded by $\mathcal{O}(k \cdot 3^k)$. We prove a coarse variant of this theorem: if in a graph $G$ one can find~$k$ shortest paths such that every vertex is at distance at most $ρ$ from one of them, then $G$ is $(3,12ρ)$-quasi-isometric to a graph of pathwidth $k^{\mathcal{O}(k)}$ and maximum degree $\mathcal{O}(k)$, and $G$ admits a path-partition-decomposition whose bags are coverable by $k^{\mathcal{O}(k)}$ balls of radius at most $2ρ$ and vertices from non-adjacent bags are at distance larger than $2ρ$. We also discuss applications of such decompositions in the context of algorithms for finding maximum distance independent sets and minimum distance dominating sets in graphs.

Let $Γ$ denote a finite, connected graph with vertex set $X$. Fix $x \in X$ and let $\varepsilon \ge 3$ denote the eccentricity of $x$. For mutually distinct scalars $\{θ^*_i\}_{i=0}^\varepsilon$ define a diagonal matrix $A^*=A^*(θ^*_0, θ^*_1, \ldots, θ^*_{\varepsilon}) \in M_X(\mathbb{R})$ as follows: for $y \in X$ we let $(A^*)_{yy} = θ^*_{\partial(x,y)}$, where $\partial$ denotes the shortest path length distance function of $Γ$. We say that $A^*$ is a dual adjacency matrix candidate of $Γ$ with respect to $x$ if the adjacency matrix $A \in M_X(\mathbb{R})$ of $Γ$ and $A^*$ satisfy $$ A^3 A^* - A^* A^3+(β+1)( A A^* A^2 - A^2 A^* A)= γ(A^2A^*-A^*A^2)+ρ( A A^* - A^* A) $$ for some scalars $β, γ, ρ\in \mathbb{R}$. Assume now that $Γ$ is uniform with respect to $x$ in the sense of Terwilliger [Coding theory and design theory, Part I, IMA Vol. Math. Appl., 20, 193-212 (1990)]. In this paper, we give sufficient conditions on the uniform structure of $Γ$, such that $Γ$ admits a dual adjacency matrix candidate with respect to $x$. As an application of our results, we show that the full bipartite graphs of dual polar graphs are $Q$-polynomial.

The stress interval $S(u,v)$ between $u,v\in V(G)$ is the set of all vertices in a graph $G$ that lie on every shortest $u,v$-path. A set $U \subseteq V(G)$ is stress convex if $S(u,v) \subseteq U$ for any $u,v\in U$. A vertex $v \in V(G)$ is s-extreme if $V(G)-v$ is a stress convex set in $G$. The stress number $sn(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set $U$ where $\bigcup_{u,v \in U}S(u,v)=V(G)$. The stress hull number $sh(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a set whose stress convex hull is $V(G)$. In this paper, we present many basic properties of stress intervals. We characterize s-extreme vertices of a graph $G$ and construct graphs $G$ with arbitrarily large difference between the number of s-extreme vertices, $sh(G)$ and $sn(G)$. Then we study these three invariants for some special graph families, such as graph products, split graphs, and block graphs. We show that in any split graph $G$, $sh(G)=sn(G)=|Ext_s(G)|$, where $Ext_s(G)$ is the set of s-extreme vertices of $G$. Finally, we show that for $k \in \mathbb{N}$, deciding whether $sn(G) \leq k$ is NP-complete problem, even when restricted to bipartite graphs.

Inspired by a chessboard puzzle of Dudeney, the general position problem in graph theory asks for a largest set $S$ of vertices in a graph such that no three elements of $S$ lie on a common shortest path. The number of vertices in such a largest set is the \emph{general position number} of the graph. This paper provides a survey of this rapidly growing problem, which now has an extensive literature. We cover exact results for various graph classes and the behaviour of the general position number under graph products and operations. We also discuss interesting variations of the general position problem, including those corresponding to different graph convexities, as well as dynamic, fractional, colouring and game versions of the problem.

The (strong) isometric path complexity is a recently introduced graph invariant that captures how arbitrary isometric paths (i.e., shortest paths) of a graph can be viewed as a union of a few ``rooted" isometric paths (i.e., isometric paths with a common end-vertex). We show that important graph classes studied in \emph{coarse graph theory} have bounded strong isometric path complexity. Let $U_t$ denote the graph obtained by adding a universal vertex to a path of $t-1$ edges. We show that the strong isometric path complexity of $U_t$-asymptotic minor-free graphs is bounded. This implies that $K_4^-$-asymptotic minor-free graphs, i.e., graphs that are quasi-isometric to a cactus [Fujiwara \& Papasoglu '23], have bounded strong isometric path complexity. On the other hand, $K_4$-minor-free graphs have unbounded strong isometric path complexity. Hence, for a graph $H$ on at most four vertices, $H$-asymptotic minor-free graphs have bounded (strong) isometric path complexity if and only if $H\not=K_4$. We show that graphs whose all induced cycles of length at least 4 have the same length (also known as monoholed graphs as defined by [Cook et al., \textsc{JCTB '24}]) form a subclass of $U_4$-asymptotic minor-free graphs. Hence, the strong isometric path complexity of monoholed graphs is bounded. On the other hand, we show that even-hole free graphs have unbounded strong isometric path complexity. We investigate which graph operations preserve strong isometric path complexity. We show that the strong isometric path complexity is preserved under the \emph{fixed power} and \emph{line graph} operators, two important graph operations. We also show that the \emph{clique-sums} of finitely many graphs with strong isometric path complexity at most $k$, yield a graph with strong isometric path complexity at most $3k+18$.

Let $G$ be a weighted graph embedded in a metric space $(M, d_M )$. The vertices of $G$ correspond to the points in $M$ , with the weight of each edge $uv$ being the distance $d_M (u, v)$ between their respective points in $M$ . The dilation (or stretch) of $G$ is defined as the minimum factor $t$ such that, for any pair of vertices $u, v$, the distance between $u$ and $v$-represented by the weight of a shortest $u$, $v$-path is at most $ t \cdot d_M (u, v)$. We study Dilation t-Augmentation, where the objective is, given a metric $M $, a graph $G$, and numerical values $k$ and $t$, to determine whether $G$ can be transformed into a graph with dilation $t$ by adding at most $k$ edges. Our primary focus is on the scenario where the metric $M$ is the shortest path metric of an unweighted graph $Γ$. Even in this specific case, Dilation $t$-Augmentation remains computationally challenging. In particular, the problem is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$ when $Γ$ is a complete graph, already for $t=2$. Our main contribution lies in providing new insights into the impact of combinations of various parameters on the computational complexity of the problem. We establish the following. -- The parameterized dichotomy of the problem with respect to dilation $t$, when the graph $G$ is sparse: Parameterized by $k$, the problem is FPT for graphs excluding a biclique $K_{d,d}$ as a subgraph for $t\leq 2$ and the problem is W[1]-hard for $t\geq 3$ even if $G$ is a forest consisting of disjoint stars. -- The problem is FPT parameterized by the combined parameter $k+t+Δ$, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree of the graph $G$ or $Γ$.

The Seymour Second Neighborhood Conjecture (SSNC) claims that there will always exist a node whose out-degree doubles in the square of an oriented graph. In this paper, we establish the Graph Level Order (GLOVER) data structure, which orders the nodes by shortest path from a minimum out-degree node and establishes a well-ordering of rooted neighborhoods. This data structure allows for the construction of decreasing sequences of subsets of nodes and allows us to partition transitive triangles into distinct sets. The decreasing sequence of nodes shows the non-existence of counterexamples to the SSNC and precisely identifies a path to the required node. Further, our algorithmic approach finds the occurrence of dense graphs inside the rooted neighborhoods. Beyond theoretical implications, the algorithm and data structure have practical applications in data science, network optimization and algorithm design.

The general position problem in graph theory asks for the number of vertices in a largest set $S$ of vertices of a graph $G$ such that no shortest path of $G$ contains more than two vertices of $S$. The analogous monophonic position problem is obtained from the general position problem by replacing ``shortest path'' by ``induced path.'' In this paper the monophonic position number is studied on Cartesian and lexicographic products of graphs. It is proved that in Cartesian products, a monophonic position set can only be in one of three canonical forms, named layered, varied, and cliquey. The monophonic position number of an arbitrary Cartesian product is bounded from below and above. The two bounds coincide if neither of the factors has simplicial vertices. A formula for the monophonic position number of a lexicographic product is given which only contains the clique number and the structure of monophonic sets of the second factor.

Relations between average shortest path length and average clustering coefficient, radiality, closeness and stress centralities were obtained for simple graphs.

The concept of a monitoring edge-geodetic set (MEG-set) in a graph $G$, denoted $MEG(G)$, refers to a subset of vertices $MEG(G)\subseteq V(G)$ such that every edge $e$ in $G$ is monitored by some pair of vertices $ u, v \in MEG(G)$, where $e$ lies on all shortest paths between $u$ and $v$. The minimum number of vertices required to form such a set is called the monitoring edge-geodetic number, denoted $meg(G)$. The primary motivation for studying $MEG$-sets in previous works arises from scenarios in which certain edges are removed from $G$. In these cases, the vertices of the $MEG$-set are responsible for detecting these deletions. Such detection is crucial for identifying which edges have been removed from $G$ and need to be repaired. In real life, repairing these edges may be costly, or sometimes it is impossible to repair edges. In this case, the original $MEG$-set may no longer be effective in monitoring the modified graph. This highlights the importance of reassessing and adapting the $MEG$-set after edge deletions. This work investigates the monitoring edge-geodetic properties of graphs, focusing on how the removal of $k$ edges affects the structure of a graph and influences its monitoring capabilities. Specifically, we explore how the monitoring edge-geodetic number $meg(G)$ changes when $k$ edges are removed. The study aims to compare the monitoring properties of the original graph with those of the modified graph and to understand the impact of edge deletions.

A ($λ,μ$)-bow metric was defined in (Dragan & Ducoffe, 2023) as a far reaching generalization of an $α_i$-metric (which is equivalent to a ($0,i$)-bow metric). A graph $G=(V,E)$ is said to satisfy ($λ,μ$)-bow metric if for every four vertices $u,v,w,x$ of $G$ the following holds: if two shortest paths $P(u,w)$ and $P(v,x)$ share a common shortest subpath $P(v,w)$ of length more than $λ$ (that is, they overlap by more than $λ$), then the distance between $u$ and $x$ is at least $d_G(u,v)+d_G(v,w)+d_G(w,x)-μ$. ($λ,μ$)-Bow metric can also be considered for all geodesic metric spaces. It was shown by Dragan & Ducoffe that every $δ$-hyperbolic graph (in fact, every $δ$-hyperbolic geodesic metric space) satisfies ($δ, 2δ$)-bow metric. Thus, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric is a common generalization of hyperbolicity and of $α_i$-metric. In this paper, we investigate an intriguing question whether ($λ,μ$)-bow metric implies hyperbolicity in graphs. Note that, this is not the case for general geodesic metric spaces as Euclidean spaces satisfy ($0,0$)-bow metric whereas they have unbounded hyperbolicity. We conjecture that, in graphs, ($λ,μ$)-bow metric indeed implies hyperbolicity and show that our conjecture is true for several large families of graphs.