arXiv++ Combinatorics

A subset of the $d$-dimensional lattice cube $[n]^d$ is sum-free if it contains no solution to the equation $x+y=z$. We study the total number of such subsets. For $d=1$, Cameron and Erdős conjectured that the number of sum-free subsets of $[n]$ is $O(2^{n/2})$, and this was proved independently by Green and Sapozhenko. A recent work by Ghosal solved the case $d = 2$. In this paper, we consider all remaining dimensions and prove that for every fixed integer $d \geqslant 3$, the number of sum-free subsets of $[n]^d$ is $2^{M([n]^d) + O_d(n^{d-1})}$, where $M([n]^d)$ is the maximum possible size of a sum-free subset of $[n]^d$. This verifies a conjecture of Elsholtz and Rackham. Our proof combines the dual weights constructed by Keevash and Lim in their work for $M([n]^d)$, a one-dimensional counting estimate due to Ghosal, a bipartite swapping lemma of Zhao, and a strong fractional entropy inequality of Madiman and Tetali, and it avoids the use of the container lemma or deriving a stability theorem first.

A subset $S$ of a group $G$ is said to be sum-free (resp. $Δ$-free) if there are no solutions to $a+b=c$ (resp. $a+b+c=0$) with $a,b,c\in S$. For a convex region $R\subset\mathbb{R}^d$, let $σ(R)$ denote the maximal proportion of the volume of $R$ that a sum-free subset of $R$ can occupy. We prove that $σ([-1,1]^d)=1/2$. Our proof employs a careful application of the Brunn-Minkowski inequality. Moreover, for the $d$-dimensional Euclidean ball $\mathbb{B}^d(0,1)$, we show that $σ(\mathbb{B}^d(0,1))\leq 1/2+o_d(1)$. We present two arguments for this. The first combines some routine harmonic analysis on the sphere with known bounds on values of the ultraspherical polynomials. The second more elementary argument proceeds by establishing that the maximal $Δ$-free subset of the unit sphere $\mathbb{S}^{d-1}$ occupies $1/2+O(d^{-1})$ of the sphere's surface measure. This answers a question raised by Bukh.

We determine the limiting density of the largest sum-free subset of the lattice cube $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}^d$ for all $d$, thus resolving the natural conjecture that it is constructed by two appropriate hyperplane slices.

For a prime $p \equiv 2 \pmod 3$, it is well known that the largest sum-free subsets of $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ have size $\frac{p+1}{3} p^{n-1}$, and the extremal sets must be a cuboid of the form $\{\frac{p+1}{3}, \frac{p+1}{3}+1, \ldots, \frac{2p-1}{3}\} \times \mathbb{F}_p^{n-1}$ up to isomorphism. Recently, Reiner and Zotova proved a Hilton--Milner type stability result showing that for large $p$, any sum-free set not contained in the extremal cuboid has size at most $\frac{p-2}{3} p^{n-1}$, and all possible structures attaining this bound were classified. In this paper, we develop a general Hilton--Milner theory for $(k,\ell)$-sum-free sets in $\mathbb{F}_p^n$ for $k > \ell \ge 1$. We determine the maximum size of such sets for all $p \equiv μ\pmod{k+\ell}$ with $2 \le μ\le k+\ell-1$, and show that the extremal configurations are precisely $\lceil (μ-1)/2 \rceil$ non-isomorphic cuboids. Beyond the extremal regime, we prove sharp Hilton--Milner type stability results showing that, for all sufficiently large $p$, a $(k,\ell)$-sum-free set not contained in any of these extremal cuboids is uniformly bounded away from the maximum by a gap of order $p^{n-1}$, and we determine the full structure of all sets achieving this second-best bound in several broad parameter ranges. In particular, when $2 \le μ\le k+\ell-3$ (which is tight), only two structural types occur for all $k+\ell \ge 5$; and when $μ= 2$ or $3$, we obtain a complete classification for all $k > \ell \ge 1$. Our arguments combine additive combinatorics and Fourier-analytic methods, and make use of recent progress toward the long-standing $3k-4$ conjecture, highlighting new connections between inverse additive number theory and extremal problems over finite vector spaces.

Generalising the Cameron--Erdős conjecture to two dimensions, Elsholtz and Rackham conjectured that the number of sum-free subsets of $[n]^2$ is $2^{0.6n^2+O(n)}$. We prove their conjecture.

Given an Abelian groups $G$, denote $μ(G)$ the size of its largest sum-free subset and $f_{\max}(G)$ the number of maximal sum-free sets in $G$. Confirming a prediction by Liu and Sharifzadeh, we prove that all even-order $G\ne \mathbb{Z}_2^k$ have exponentially fewer maximal sum-free sets than $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$, i.e. $f_{\max}(G) \leq 2^{(1/2-c)μ(G)}$, where $c > 10^{-64}$. We construct an infinite family of Abelian groups $G$ with intermediate growth in the number of maximal sum-free sets, i.e., with $ 2^{(\frac{1}{2}+c)μ(G)}\leq f_{\max}(G) \leq 3^{(\frac{1}{3}-c)μ(G)} $, where $c=10^{-4}$. This disproves a conjecture of Liu and Sharifzadeh and also answers a question of Hassler and Treglown in the negative. Furthermore, we determine for every even-order group $G$, the number of maximal distinct sum-free sets (where a distinct sum is $a+b= c$ with distinct $a,b,c$): it is $ 2^{(1/2+o(1))μ(G)}$ with the only exception being $G=\mathbb{Z}_2^k \oplus \mathbb{Z}_3$, when this function is $3^{(1/3+o(1))μ(G)}$, refuting a conjecture of Hassler and Treglown. Our proofs rely on a container theorem due to Green and Ruzsa. Other key ingredient is a sharp upper bound we establish on the number of maximal independent sets in graphs with given matching number, which interpolates between the classical results of Moon and Moser, and Hujter and Tuza. A special case of our bound implies that every $n$-vertex graph with a perfect matching has at most $2^{n/2}$ maximal independent sets, resolving another conjecture of Hassler and Treglown.

In this paper we highlight a few open problems concerning maximal sum-free sets in abelian groups. In addition, for most even order abelian groups $G$ we asymptotically determine the number of maximal distinct sum-free subsets in $G$. Our proof makes use of the container method.

A set $B$ is said to be \emph{sum-free} if there are no $x,y,z\in B$ with $x+y=z$. We show that there exists a constant $c>0$ such that any set $A$ of $n$ integers contains a sum-free subset $A'$ of size $|A'|\geqslant n/3+c\log \log n$. This answers a longstanding problem in additive combinatorics, originally due to Erdős.

We classify the sum-free subsets of ${\mathbb F}_3^n$ whose density exceeds $\frac16$. This yields a resolution of Vsevolod Lev's periodicity conjecture, which asserts that if a sum-free subset ${A\subseteq {\mathbb F}_3^n}$ is maximal with respect to inclusion and aperiodic (in the sense that there is no non-zero vector $v$ satisfying $A+v=A$), then $|A|\le \frac12(3^{n-1}+1)$ -- a bound known to be optimal if $n\ne 2$, while for $n=2$ there are no such sets.

Let $p$ be a prime number with $p\equiv 2\pmod{3}$ and let $n\ge 1$ be a dimension. It is known that a sum-free subset of ${\mathbb F}_p^n$ can have at most the size $\frac13(p+1)p^{n-1}$ and that, up to automorphisms of ${\mathbb F}_p^n$, the only extremal example is the `cuboid' $\bigl[\frac{p+1}3, \frac{2p-1}3\bigr]\times {\mathbb F}_p^{n-1}$. For $p\ge 11$ we show that if a sum-free subset of ${\mathbb F}_p^n$ is not contained in such an extremal one, then its size is at most $\frac13(p-2)p^{n-1}$. This bound is optimal and we classify the extremal configurations. The remaining cases $p=2, 5$ are known to behave differently. For $p=3$ the analogous question was solved by Vsevolod Lev, and for $p\equiv 1\pmod{3}$ it is less interesting.

We determine the density of the largest sum-free subset of the lattice cube $\{1, 2, \dots, n\}^d$ for $d = 3$ and $d = 4$. This solves a conjecture of Cameron and Aydinian in dimensions $3$ and $4$.

In this paper we rectify two previous results found in the literature. Our work leads to a new upper bound for the largest sum-free subset of $[1,n]$ with lowest value in $\left [\frac{n}{3},\frac{n}{2}\right ]$, and the identification of all patterns that can be used to form sum-free sets of maximum cardinality.

In this paper we discuss some of the key properties of sum-free subsets of abelian groups. Our discussion has been designed with a broader readership in mind, and is hence not overly technical. We consider answers to questions like: how many sum-free subsets are there in a given abelian group $G$? what are its sum-free subsets of maximum cardinality? what is the maximum cardinality of these sum-free subsets? what does a typical sum-free subset of $G$ looks like? among others.

Let $A \subset \mathbb{Z}_{>0}$ of size $n$. It is conjectured that for any $C >0$ and $n$ large enough that $A$ contains a sum-free subset of size at least $n/3 +C$. We study this problem and find an alternate proof of Bourgain's result that one make take $C=2/3$.

Balogh, Liu, Sharifzadeh and Treglown [Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 2018] recently gave a sharp count on the number of maximal sum-free subsets of $\{1, \dots, n\}$, thereby answering a question of Cameron and Erdős. In contrast, not as much is know about the analogous problem for finite abelian groups. In this paper we give the first sharp results in this direction, determining asymptotically the number of maximal sum-free sets in both the binary and ternary spaces $\mathbb Z^k_2$ and $\mathbb Z^k_3$. We also make progress on a conjecture of Balogh, Liu, Sharifzadeh and Treglown concerning a general lower bound on the number of maximal sum-free sets in abelian groups of a fixed order. Indeed, we verify the conjecture for all finite abelian groups with a cyclic component of size at least 3084. Other related results and open problems are also presented.

This paper records some apparently new results for the partition of integer intervals [1, n] into weakly sum-free subsets. These were produced using a method closely related to that used by Schur in 1917. New lower bounds can be produced in this way for partitions of unlimited size. The asymptotic growth rate of the lower bounds, as the number of subsets increases, cannot be less than the same growth rate for strongly sum-free partitions, and therefore exceeds 3.27. Specific results for partitions into a 'small' number of subsets include $WS(6) \ge 642$, $WS(7) \ge 2146$, $WS(8) \ge 6976$, $WS(9) \ge 21848$, and $WS(10) \ge 70778$.

Given $A$ a set of $N$ positive integers, an old question in additive combinatorics asks that whether $A$ contains a sum-free subset of size at least $N/3+ω(N)$ for some increasing unbounded function $ω$. The question is generally attacked in the literature by considering another conjecture, which asserts that as $N\to\infty$, $\max_{x\in\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}}\sum_{n\in A}({\bf 1}_{(1/3,2/3)}-1/3)(nx)\to\infty$. This conjecture, if true, would also imply that a similar phenomenon occurs for $(2k,4k)$-sum-free sets for every $k\geq1$. In this note, we prove the latter result directly. The new ingredient of our proof is a structural analysis on the host set $A$, which might be of independent interest.

Let $\mathscr{M}_{(2,1)}(N)$ be the infimum of the largest sum-free subset of any set of $N$ positive integers. An old conjecture in additive combinatorics asserts that there is a constant $c=c(2,1)$ and a function $ω(N)\to\infty$ as $N\to\infty$, such that $cN+ω(N)<\mathscr{M}_{(2,1)}(N)<(c+o(1))N$. The constant $c(2,1)$ is determined by Eberhard, Green, and Manners, while the existence of $ω(N)$ is still wide open. In this paper, we study the analogous conjecture on $(k,\ell)$-sum-free sets and restricted $(k,\ell)$-sum-free sets. We determine the constant $c(k,\ell)$ for every $(k,\ell)$-sum-free sets, and confirm the conjecture for infinitely many $(k,\ell)$.

The Minkowski sum of two subsets $A$ and $B$ of a finite abelian group $G$ is defined as all pairwise sums of elements of $A$ and $B$: $A + B = \{ a + b : a \in A, b \in B \}$. The largest size of a $(k, \ell)$-sum-free set in $G$ has been of interest for many years and in the case $G = \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ has recently been computed by Bajnok and Matzke. Motivated by sum-free sets of the torus, Kravitz introduces the noisy Minkowski sum of two sets, which can be thought of as discrete evaluations of these continuous sumsets. That is, given a noise set $C$, the noisy Minkowski sum is defined as $A +_C B = A + B + C$. We give bounds on the maximum size of a $(k, \ell)$-sum-free subset of $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ under this new sum, for $C$ equal to an arithmetic progression with common difference relatively prime to $n$ and for any two element set $C$.

A subset $A$ of a finite abelian group is called $(k,\ell)$-sum-free if $kA \cap \ell A=\emptyset.$ In this paper, we extend this concept to compact abelian groups and study the question of how large a measurable $(k,\ell)$-sum-free set can be. For integers $1 \leq k <\ell$ and a compact abelian group $G$, let $$λ_{k,\ell}(G)=\sup\{ μ(A): kA \cap \ell A =\emptyset \}$$ be the maximum possible size of a $(k,\ell)$-sum-free subset of $G$. We prove that if $G=\mathbb{I} \times M$, where $\mathbb{I}$ is the identity component of $G$, then $$λ_{k, \ell}(G)=\max \left\{ λ_{k, \ell}(M), λ_{k, \ell}(\mathbb{I}) \right\}.$$ Moreover, if $\mathbb{I}$ is nontrivial, then $λ_{k,\ell}(\mathbb{I})=\frac{1}{k+\ell}$. Finally, we discuss how this problem motivates a new framework for studying $(k,\ell)$-sum-free sets in finite groups.