arXiv++ Combinatorics

The idiosyncratic polynomial of a graph $G$ with adjacency matrix $A$ is the characteristic polynomial of the matrix $ A + y(J-A-I)$, where $I$ is the identity matrix and $J$ is the all-ones matrix. It follows from a theorem of Hagos (2000) combined with an earlier result of Johnson and Newman (1980) that the idiosyncratic polynomial of a graph is reconstructible from the multiset of the idiosyncratic polynomial of its vertex-deleted subgraphs. For a digraph $G$ with adjacency matrix $A$, we define its idiosyncratic polynomial as the characteristic polynomial of the matrix $ A + y(J-A-I)+zA^{T}$. By forbidding two fixed digraphs on three vertices as induced subdigraphs, we prove that the idiosyncratic polynomial of a digraph is reconstructible from the multiset of the idiosyncratic polynomial of its induced subdigraphs on three vertices. As an immediate consequence, the idiosyncratic polynomial of a tournament is reconstructible from the collection of its $3$-cycles. Another consequence is that all the transitive orientations of a comparability graph have the same idiosyncratic polynomial.

A well-known theorem of Chung and Graham states that if $h\geq 4$ then a tournament $T$ is quasirandom if and only if $T$ contains each $h$-vertex tournament the "correct number" of times as a subtournament. In this paper we investigate the relationship between quasirandomness of $T$ and the count of a single $h$-vertex tournament $H$ in $T$. We consider two types of counts, the global one and the local one. We first observe that if $T$ has the correct global count of $H$ and $h \geq 7$ then quasirandomness of $T$ is only forced if $H$ is transitive. The next natural question when studying quasirandom objects asks whether possessing the correct local counts of $H$ is enough to force quasirandomness of $T$. A tournament $H$ is said to be locally forcing if it has this property. Variants of the local forcing problem have been studied before in both the graph and hypergraph settings. Perhaps the closest analogue of our problem was considered by Simonovits and Sós who looked at whether having "correct counts" of a fixed graph $H$ as an induced subgraph of $G$ implies $G$ must be quasirandom, in an appropriate sense. They proved that this is indeed the case when $H$ is regular and conjectured that it holds for all $H$ (except the path on 3 vertices). Contrary to the Simonovits-Sós conjecture, in the tournament setting we prove that a constant proportion of all tournaments are not locally forcing. In fact, any locally forcing tournament must itself be strongly quasirandom. On the other hand, unlike the global forcing case, we construct infinite families of non-transitive locally forcing tournaments.

We think of a tournament $T=([n], E)$ as a communication network where in each round of communication processor $P_i$ sends its information to $P_j$, for every directed edge $ij \in E(T)$. By Landau's theorem (1953) there is a King in $T$, i.e., a processor whose initial input reaches every other processor in two rounds or less. Namely, a processor $P_ν$ such that after two rounds of communication along $T$'s edges, the initial information of $P_ν$ reaches all other processors. Here we consider a more general scenario where an adversary selects an arbitrary series of tournaments $T_1, T_2,\ldots$, so that in each round $s=1, 2, \ldots$, communication is governed by the corresponding tournament $T_s$. We prove that for every series of tournaments that the adversary selects, it is still true that after two rounds of communication, the initial input of at least one processor reaches everyone. Concretely, we show that for every two tournaments $T_1, T_2$ there is a vertex in $[n]$ that can reach all vertices via (i) A step in $T_1$, or (ii) A step in $T_2$ or (iii) A step in $T_1$ followed by a step in $T_2$. }

A dominating set $D$ in a digraph is a set of vertices such that every vertex is either in $D$ or has an in-neighbour in $D$. A dominating set $D$ of a digraph is locating-dominating if every vertex not in $D$ has a unique set of in-neighbours within $D$. The location-domination number $γ_L(G)$ of a digraph $G$ is the smallest size of a locating-dominating set of $G$. We investigate upper bounds on $γ_L(G)$ in terms of the order of $G$. We characterize those digraphs with location-domination number equal to the order or the order minus one. Such digraphs always have many twins: vertices with the same (open or closed) in-neighbourhoods. Thus, we investigate the value of $γ_L(G)$ in the absence of twins and give a general method for constructing small locating-dominating sets by the means of special dominating sets. In this way, we show that for every twin-free digraph $G$ of order $n$, $γ_L(G)\leq\frac{4n}{5}$ holds, and there exist twin-free digraphs $G$ with $γ_L(G)=\frac{2(n-2)}{3}$. If moreover $G$ is a tournament or is acyclic, the bound is improved to $γ_L(G)\leq\lceil\frac{n}{2}\rceil$, which is tight in both cases.

Domineering is a two player game played on a checkerboard in which one player places dominoes vertically and the other places them horizontally. We give bivariate generating polynomials enumerating Domineering positions by the number of each player's pieces. We enumerate all positions, maximal positions, and positions where one player has no move. Using these polynomials we count the number of positions that occur during alternating play. Our method extends to enumerating positions from mid-game positions and we include an analysis of a tournament game.

We define strongly chordal digraphs, which generalize strongly chordal graphs and chordal bipartite graphs, and are included in the class of chordal digraphs. They correspond to square 0,1 matrices that admit a simultaneous row and column permutation avoiding the Γ matrix. In general, it is not clear if these digraphs can be recognized in polynomial time, and we focus on symmetric digraphs (i.e., graphs with possible loops), tournaments with possible loops, and balanced digraphs. In each of these cases we give a polynomial-time recognition algorithm and a forbidden induced subgraph characterization. We also discuss an algorithm for minimum general dominating set in strongly chordal graphs with possible loops, extending and unifying similar algorithms for strongly chordal graphs and chordal bipartite graphs.

A descent of a labeled digraph is a directed edge (s, t) with s > t. We count strong tournaments, strong digraphs, and acyclic digraphs by descents and edges. To count strong tournaments we use Eulerian generating functions and to count strong and acyclic digraphs we use a new type of generating function that we call a graphic Eulerian generating function.

A non-empty subset $S$ of the vertices of a digraph $D$ is called a {\it safe set} if \begin{itemize} \item[(i)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$, there exists a strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$ such that there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$; and \item[(ii)] for every strongly connected component $M$ of $D-S$ and every strongly connected component $N$ of $D[S]$, we have $|M|\leq |N|$ whenever there exists an arc from $M$ to $N$. \end{itemize} In the case of acyclic digraphs a set $X$ of vertices is a safe set precisely when $X$ is an {\it in-dominating set}, that is, every vertex not in $X$ has at least one arc to $X$. We prove that, even for acyclic digraphs which are traceable (have a hamiltonian path) it is NP-hard to find a minimum cardinality in-dominating set. Then we show that the problem is also NP-hard for tournaments and give, for every positive constant $c$, a polynomial algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set in a tournament on $n$ vertices in which no strong component has size more than $c\log{}(n)$. Under the so called Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) this is close to best possible in the following sense: If ETH holds, then, for every $ε>0$ there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding a minimum cardinality safe set for the class of tournaments in which the largest strong component has size at most $\log^{1+ε}(n)$. We also discuss bounds on the cardinality of safe sets in tournaments.

We show that for every positive integer $k$, any tournament with minimum out-degree at least $(2+o(1))k^2$ contains a subdivision of the complete directed graph on $k$ vertices, which is best possible up to a factor of $8$. This may be viewed as a directed analogue of a theorem proved by Bollobás and Thomason, and independently by Komlós and Szemerédi, concerning subdivisions of cliques in graphs with sufficiently high average degree. We also consider the following problem: given $k$, what is the smallest positive integer $f(k)$ such that any $f(k)$-vertex tournament contains a $1$-subdivision of the transitive tournament on $k$ vertices? We show that $f(k)= O\left (k^2\log^3 k\right)$ which is best possible up to the logarithmic factors.

An $n$-tournament $T$ with vertex set $V$ is simple if there is no subset $M$ of $V$ such that $2\leq \left \vert M\right \vert \leq n-1$ and for every $x\in V\setminus M$, either $M\rightarrow x$ or $x \rightarrow M$. The simplicity index of an $n$-tournament $T$ is the minimum number $s(T)$ of arcs whose reversal yields a non-simple tournament. Müller and Pelant (1974) proved that $s(T)\leq\frac{n-1}{2}$, and that equality holds if and only if $T$ is doubly regular. As doubly regular tournaments exist only if $n\equiv 3\pmod{4}$, $s(T)<\frac{n-1}{2}$ for $n\not\equiv3\pmod{4}$. In this paper, we study the class of $n$-tournaments with maximal simplicity index for $n\not\equiv3\pmod{4}$.

In 1981 Jackson showed that the diregular bipartite tournament (a complete bipartite graph whose edges are oriented so that every vertex has the same in- and outdegree) contains a Hamilton cycle, and conjectured that in fact the edge set of it can be partitioned into Hamilton cycles. We prove an approximate version of this conjecture: For every $c>1/2$ and $\varepsilon>0$ there exists $n_0$ such that every $cn$-regular bipartite digraph on $2n\geq n_0$ vertices contains $(1-\varepsilon)cn$ edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles.

A digraph is {\bf eulerian} if it is connected and every vertex has its in-degree equal to its out-degree. Having a spanning eulerian subdigraph is thus a weakening of having a hamiltonian cycle. A digraph is {\bf semicomplete} if it has no pair of non-adjacent vertices. A {\bf tournament} is a semicomplete digraph without directed cycles of length 2. Fraise and Thomassen \cite{fraisseGC3} proved that every $(k+1)$-strong tournament has a hamiltonian cycle which avoids any prescribed set of $k$ arcs. In \cite{bangsupereuler} the authors demonstrated that a number of results concerning vertex-connectivity and hamiltonian cycles in tournaments and have analogues when we replace vertex connectivity by arc-connectivity and hamiltonian cycles by spanning eulerian subdigraphs. They showed the existence of a smallest function $f(k)$ such that every $f(k)$-arc-strong semicomplete digraph has a spanning eulerian subdigraph which avoids any prescribed set of $k$ arcs. They proved that $f(k)\leq \frac{(k+1)^2}{4}+1$ and also proved that $f(k)=k+1$ when $k=2,3$. Based on this they conjectured that $f(k)=k+1$ for all $k\geq 0$. In this paper we prove that $f(k)\leq (\lceil\frac{6k+1}{5}\rceil)$.

We prove Turán-type theorems for two related Ramsey problems raised by Bollobás and by Fox and Sudakov. First, for $t \ge 3$, we show that any two-colouring of the complete graph on $n$ vertices that is $δ$-far from being monochromatic contains an \emph{unavoidable $t$-colouring} when $δ\gg n^{-1/t}$, where an unavoidable $t$-colouring is any two-colouring of a clique of order $2t$ in which one colour forms either a clique of order $t$ or two disjoint cliques of order $t$. Next, for $ t\ge 3$, we show that any tournament on $n$ vertices that is $δ$-far from being transitive contains an \emph{unavoidable $t$-tournament} when $δ\gg n^{-1/\lceil t/2 \rceil}$, where an unavoidable $t$-tournament is the blow-up of a cyclic triangle obtained by replacing each vertex of the triangle by a transitive tournament of order $t$. Conditional on a well-known conjecture about bipartite Turán numbers, both results are sharp up to implied constants and hence determine the order of magnitude of the corresponding off-diagonal Ramsey numbers.

We consider acyclic r-colorings in graphs and digraphs: they color the vertices in r colors, each of which induces an acyclic graph or digraph. (This includes the dichromatic number of a digraph, and the arboricity of a graph.) For any girth and sufficiently high degree, we prove the NP-completeness of acyclic r-colorings; our method also implies the known analogue for classical colorings. The proofs use high girth graphs with high arboricity and dichromatic numbers. High girth graphs and digraphs with high chromatic and dichromatic numbers have been well studied; we re-derive the results from a general result about relational systems, which also implies the similar fact about high girth and high arboricity used in the proofs. These facts concern graphs and digraphs of high girth and low degree; we contrast them by considering acyclic colorings of tournaments (which have low girth and high degree). We prove that even though acyclic two-colorability of tournaments is known to be NP-complete, random acyclically r-colorable tournaments allow recovering an acyclic r-coloring in deterministic linear time, with high probablity.

We prove a conjecture of Fox, Huang, and Lee that characterizes directed graphs that have constant density in all tournaments: they are disjoint unions of trees that are each constructed in a certain recursive way.

Let $\vec{T}_k$ be the transitive tournament on $k$ vertices. We show that every oriented graph on $n=4m$ vertices with minimum total degree $(11/12+o(1))n$ can be partitioned into vertex disjoint $\vec{T}_4$'s, and this bound is asymptotically tight. We also improve the best known bound on the minimum total degree for partitioning oriented graphs into vertex disjoint $\vec{T}_k$'s.

A diamond is a $4$-tournament which consists of a vertex dominating or dominated by a $3$-cycle. Assuming the existence of skew-conference matrices, we give a complete characterization of $n$-tournaments with the maximum number of diamonds when $n\equiv0\pmod{4}$ and $n\equiv3\pmod{4}$. For $n\equiv2\pmod{4}$, we obtain an upper bound on the number of diamonds in an $n$-tournament and we give a matricial characterization of tournaments achieving this bound.

In this paper we investigate the structure of the critical groups of doubly regular tournaments (DRTs) associated with skew Hadamard difference families (SDFs) with one, two, or four blocks. Brown and Reid found the existence of a skew Hadamard matrix of order $n+1$ to be equivalent to the existence of a DRT on $n$ vertices. A well known construction of a skew Hadamard matrix order $n$ is by constructing skew Hadamard difference sets in abelian groups of order $n-1$. The Paley skew Hadamard matrix is an example of one such construction. Szekeres and Whiteman constructed skew Hadamard matrices from skew Hadamard difference families with two blocks. Wallis and Whiteman constructed skew Hadamard matrices from skew Hadamard difference families with four blocks. In this paper we consider the critical groups of DRTs associated with skew Hadamard matrices constructed from skew Hadamard difference families with one, two or four blocks. We compute the critical groups of DRTs associated with skew Hadamard difference families with two or four blocks. We also compute the critical group of the Paley tournament and show that this tournament is inequivalent to the other DRTs we considered. Consequently we prove that the associated skew Hadamard matrices are not equivalent.

A generalized $N$-sided die is a random variable $D$ on a sample space of $N$ equally likely outcomes taking values in the set of positive integers. We say of independent $N$ sided dice $D_i, D_j$ that $D_i$ beats $D_j$, written $D_i \to D_j$, if $Prob(D_i > D_j) > \frac{1}{2} $. A collection of dice $\{ D_i : i = 1, \dots, n \}$ models a tournament on the set $[n] = \{ 1, 2, \dots, n \}$, i.e. a complete digraph with $n$ vertices, when $D_i \to D_j$ if and only if $i \to j$ in the tournament. By using $n$-fold partitions of the set $[Nn] $ with each set of size $N$ we can model an arbitrary tournament on $[n]$. A bound on the required size of $N$ is obtained by examples with $N = 3^{n-2}$.

Erdős [On Schütte problem, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963)] proved that every tournament on $n$ vertices has a directed dominating set of at most $\log (n+1)$ vertices, where $\log$ is the logarithm to base $2$. He also showed that there is a tournament on $n$ vertices with no directed domination set of cardinality less than $\log n - 2 \log \log n + 1$. This notion of directed domination number has been generalized to arbitrary graphs by Caro and Henning in [Directed domination in oriented graphs, Discrete Appl. Math. (2012) 160:7--8.]. However, the generalization to directed r-uniform hypergraphs seems to be rare. Among several results, we prove the following upper and lower bounds on $\overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r))$, the upper directed $(r-1)$-domination number of the complete $r$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices $H(n,r)$, which is the main theorem of this paper: \[c (\ln n)^{\frac{1}{r-1}} \le \overrightarrowΓ_{r-1}(H(n,r)) \le C \ln n,\] where $r$ is a positive integer and $c= c(r) > 0$ and $C = C(r) > 0$ are constants depending on $r$.