arXiv++ Combinatorics

We show that the notion of MAT-freeness for hyperplane arrangements depends on the underlying field. In particular, MAT-freeness is not combinatorial.

The study of universal derivations for arbitrary multiarrangements and multiplicity functions was initiated by Abe, Röhrle, Stump, and Yoshinaga in 2024 which focused on arrangements arising from (well-generated) reflection groups. In this paper we provide a criterion for determining whether a derivation is universal along with a characterization of universal derivations for arbitrary 2-multiarrangements. As an application we give descriptions of universal derivations for several multiarrangements, including the so-called deleted $A_3$ arrangement. This is the first known example of a non-reflection arrangement that admits a universal derivation distinct from the Euler derivation.

Recently, Cuntz and Kühne introduced a particular class of hyperplane arrangements stemming from a given graph $G$, so called connected subgraph arrangements $A_G$. In this note we strengthen some of the result from their work and prove new ones for members of this class. For instance, we show that aspherical members withing this class stem from a rather restricted set of graphs. Specifically, if $A_G$ is an aspherical connected subgraph arrangement, then $A_G$ is free with the unique possible exception when the underlying graph $G$ is the complete graph on $4$ nodes.

In 2024, Bellamy, Craw, Rayan, Schedler, and Weiss introduced a particular family of real hyperplane arrangements stemming from hyperpolygonal spaces associated with certain quiver varieties which we thus call hyperpolygonal arrangements $\mathcal H_n$. In this note we study these arrangements and investigate their properties systematically. Remarkably the arrangements $\mathcal H_n$ discriminate between essentially all local properties of arrangements. In addition we show that hyperpolygonal arrangements are projectively unique and combinatorially formal. We note that the arrangement $\mathcal H_5$ is the famous counterexample of Edelman and Reiner from 1993 of Orlik's conjecture that the restriction of a free arrangement is again free.

Cuntz and Kühne introduced the class of connected subgraph arrangements $A_G$, depending on a graph $G$, and classified all graphs $G$ such that the corresponding arrangement $A_G$ is free. We extend their result to the multiarrangement case and classify all graphs $G$ for which the corresponding arrangement $A_G$ supports some multiplicity $μ$ such that the multiarrangement $(A_G,μ)$ is free.

In [MR21], the first two authors introduced the notion of an accurate arrangement, a particular notion of freeness. In this paper, we consider a special subclass, where the property of accuracy stems from a flag of flats in the intersection lattice of the underlying arrangement. Members of this family are called flag-accurate. One relevance of this new notion is that it entails divisional freeness. There are a number of important natural classes which are flag-accurate, the most prominent one among them is the one consisting of Coxeter arrangements. This warrants a systematic study which is put forward in the present paper. More specifically, let $\mathscr A$ be a free arrangement of rank $\ell$. Suppose that for every $1\leq d \leq \ell$, the first $d$ exponents of $\mathscr A$ -- when listed in increasing order -- are realized as the exponents of a free restriction of $\mathscr A$ to some intersection of reflecting hyperplanes of $\mathscr A$ of dimension $d$. Following [MR21], we call such an arrangement $\mathscr A$ with this natural property accurate. If in addition the flats involved can be chosen to form a flag, we call $\mathscr A$ flag-accurate. We investigate flag-accuracy among reflection arrangements, extended Shi and extended Catalan arrangements, and further for various families of graphic and digraphic arrangements. We pursue these both from theoretical and computational perspectives. Along the way we present examples of accurate arrangements that are not flag-accurate. The main result of [MR21] shows that MAT-free arrangements are accurate. We provide strong evidence for the conjecture that MAT-freeness actually entails flag-accuracy.

Let $\mathcal A$ be a free hyperplane arrangement. In 1989, Ziegler showed that the restriction $\mathcal A"$ of $\mathcal A$ to any hyperplane endowed with the natural multiplicity $κ$ is then a free multiarrangement. In 2024, the first two authors proved an analogue of Ziegler's theorem for the stronger notion of inductive freeness: if $\mathcal A$ is inductively free, then so is the free multiarrangement $(\mathcal A'',κ)$. In 2018, all reflection arrangements which admit inductively free Ziegler restrictions were classified by the first two authors. The aim of this paper is an extension of this classification to all restrictions of reflection arrangements utilizing the aforementioned fundamental result from the 2024 paper of the first two authors.

Let $\mathcal A$ be a free hyperplane arrangement. In 1989, Ziegler showed that the restriction $\mathcal A''$ of $\mathcal A$ to any hyperplane endowed with the natural multiplicity $κ$ is then a free multiarrangement $(\mathcal A'',κ)$. The aim of this paper is to prove an analogue of Ziegler's theorem for the stronger notion of inductive freeness: if $\mathcal A$ is inductively free, then so is the multiarrangement $(\mathcal A'',κ)$. In a related result we derive that if a deletion $\mathcal A'$ of $\mathcal A$ is free and the corresponding restriction $\mathcal A''$ is inductively free, then so is $(\mathcal A'',κ)$ -- irrespective of the freeness of $\mathcal A$. In addition, we show counterparts of the latter kind for additive and recursive freeness.

A hyperplane arrangement is called formal provided all linear dependencies among the defining forms of the hyperplanes are generated by ones corresponding to intersections of codimension two. The significance of this notion stems from the fact that complex arrangements with aspherical complements are formal. The aim of this note is twofold. While work of Yuzvinsky shows that formality is not combinatorial, in our first main theorem we prove that the combinatorial property of niceness of arrangements does entail formality. Our second main theorem shows that formality is hereditary, i.e. is passed to restrictions. This is rather counter-intuitive, as in contrast the known sufficient conditions for formality, i.e. asphericity, freeness and niceness (owed to our first theorem), are not hereditary themselves. We also demonstrate that the stronger property of $k$-formality, due to Brandt and Terao, is not hereditary.

Let $\mathscr A$ be a Coxeter arrangement of rank $\ell$. In 1987 Orlik, Solomon and Terao conjectured that for every $1\leq d \leq \ell$, the first $d$ exponents of $\mathscr A$ -- when listed in increasing order -- are realized as the exponents of a free restriction of $\mathscr A$ to some intersection of reflecting hyperplanes of $\mathscr A$ of dimension $d$. This conjecture does follow from rather extensive case-by-case studies by Orlik and Terao from 1992 and 1993, where they show that all restrictions of Coxeter arrangements are free. We call a general free arrangements with this natural property involving their free restrictions accurate. In this paper we initialize their systematic study. Our principal result shows that MAT-free arrangements, a notion recently introduced by Cuntz and Mücksch, are accurate. This theorem in turn directly implies this special property for all ideal subarrangements of Weyl arrangements. In particular, this gives a new, simpler and uniform proof of the aforementioned conjecture of Orlik, Solomon and Terao for Weyl arrangements which is free of any case-by-case considerations. Another application of a slightly more general formulation of our main theorem shows that extended Shi arrangements, extended Catalan arrangements and ideal-Shi arrangements share this property as well. We also study arrangements that satisfy a slightly weaker condition, called almost accurate arrangements, where we simply disregard the ordering of the exponents involved. This property in turn is implied by many well established concepts of freeness such as supersolvability and divisional freeness.

We exhibit a particular free subarrangement of a certain restriction of the Weyl arrangement of type $E_7$ and use it to give an affirmative answer to a recent conjecture by T.~Abe on the nature of additionally free and stair-free arrangements.

We refine Brieskorn's study of the cohomology of the complement of the reflection arrangement of a finite Coxeter group $W$. As a result we complete the verification of a conjecture by Felder and Veselov that gives an explicit basis of the space of $W$-invariants in this cohomology ring.

In 1962, Fadell and Neuwirth showed that the configuration space of the braid arrangement is aspherical. Having generalized this to many real reflection groups, Brieskorn conjectured this for all finite Coxeter groups. This in turn follows from Deligne's seminal work from 1972, where he showed that the complexification of every real simplicial arrangement is a $K(π,1)$-arrangement. In this paper we study the $K(π,1)$-property for a certain class of subarrangements of Weyl arrangements, the so called arrangements of ideal type ${\mathscr A}_I$. These stem from ideals $I$ in the set of positive roots of a reduced root system. We show that the $K(π,1)$-property holds for all arrangements ${\mathscr A}_I$ if the underlying Weyl group is classical and that it extends to most of the ${\mathscr A}_I$ if the underlying Weyl group is of exceptional type. Conjecturally this holds for all ${\mathscr A}_I$. In general, the ${\mathscr A}_I$ are neither simplicial, nor is their complexification fiber type.

Extending earlier work by Sommers and Tymoczko, in 2016 Abe, Barakat, Cuntz, Hoge, and Terao established that each arrangement of ideal type $\mathcal{A}_\mathcal{I}$ stemming from an ideal $\mathcal{I}$ in the set of positive roots of a reduced root system is free. Recently, Röhrle showed that a large class of the $\mathcal{A}_\mathcal{I}$ satisfy the stronger property of inductive freeness and conjectured that this property holds for all $\mathcal{A}_\mathcal{I}$. In this article, we confirm this conjecture.

Solomon showed that the Poincaré polynomial of a Coxeter group $W$ satisfies a product decomposition depending on the exponents of $W$. This polynomial coincides with the rank-generating function of the poset of regions of the underlying Coxeter arrangement. In this note we determine all instances when the analogous factorization property of the rank-generating function of the poset of regions holds for a restriction of a Coxeter arrangement. It turns out that this is always the case with the exception of some instances in type $E_8$.

Let $A$ be a free hyperplane arrangement. In 1989, Ziegler showed that the restriction $A''$ of $A$ to any hyperplane endowed with the natural multiplicity is then a free multiarrangement. We initiate a study of the stronger freeness property of inductive freeness for these canonical free multiarrangements and investigate them for the underlying class of reflection arrangements. More precisely, let $A = A(W)$ be the reflection arrangement of a complex reflection group $W$. By work of Terao, each such reflection arrangement is free. Thus so is Ziegler's canonical multiplicity on the restriction $A''$ of $A$ to a hyperplane. We show that the latter is inductively free as a multiarrangement if and only if $A''$ itself is inductively free.

In 2002, Terao showed that every reflection multi-arrangement of a real reflection group with constant multiplicity is free by providing a basis of the module of derivations. We first generalize Terao's result to multi-arrangements stemming from well-generated unitary reflection groups, where the multiplicity of a hyperplane depends on the order of its stabilizer. Here the exponents depend on the exponents of the dual reflection representation. We then extend our results further to all imprimitive irreducible unitary reflection groups. In this case the exponents turn out to depend on the exponents of a certain Galois twist of the dual reflection representation that comes from a Beynon-Lusztig type semi-palindromicity of the fake degrees.

In a recent paper, Hoge and the second author classified all nice and all inductively factored reflection arrangements. In this note we extend this classification by determining all nice and all inductively factored restrictions of reflection arrangements.

In 2006 Sommers and Tymoczko defined so called arrangements of ideal type A_I stemming from ideals I in the set of positive roots of a reduced root system. They showed in a case by case argument that A_I is free if the root system is of classical type or G_2 and conjectured that this is also the case for all types. This was established only recently in a uniform manner by Abe, Barakat, Cuntz, Hoge and Terao. The set of non-zero exponents of the free arrangement A_I is given by the dual of the height partition of the roots in the complement of I in the set of positive roots, generalizing the Shapiro-Steinberg-Kostant theorem. Our first aim in this paper is to investigate a stronger freeness property of the A_I. We show that all A_I are inductively free, with the possible exception of some cases in type E_8. In the same paper, Sommers and Tymoczko define a Poincaré polynomial I(t) associated with each ideal I which generalizes the Poincaré polynomial W(t) for the underlying Weyl group W. Solomon showed that W(t) satisfies a product decomposition depending on the exponents of W for any Coxeter group W. Sommers and Tymoczko showed in a case by case analysis in type A, B and C, and some small rank exceptional types that a similar factorization property holds for the Poincaré polynomials I(t) generalizing the formula of Solomon for W(t). They conjectured that their multiplicative formula for I(t) holds in all types. Here we show that this conjecture holds inductively in almost all instances.

We show that the class of inductively factored arrangements is closed under taking localizations. We illustrate the usefulness of this with an application.