arXiv++ Combinatorics

The expansion $F^{\triangle}$ of a graph $F$ is the graph obtained from $F$ by replacing each edge with a triangle. Lv \etal proposed a conjecture on the maximum number of triangles in a graph without $P_k^{\triangle}$ or $C_k^{\triangle}$ for every $k \ge 4$. Their conjecture was confirmed in previous work for $P_k^{\triangle}$ when $k \ge 4$ and $C_k^{\triangle}$ when $k \ge 5$. In this note, we resolve the remaining case $C_4^{\triangle}$, demonstrating that this is the only counterexample to their conjecture.

The famous Tetrahedron Conjecture of Turán from the 1940s asserts that the number of edges in an $n$-vertex $3$-graph without the tetrahedron, the complete $3$-graph on four vertices, cannot exceed that of the balanced complete cyclic $3$-partite $3$-graph, whose edges are of types $V_1 V_2 V_3$, $V_1 V_1 V_2$, $V_2 V_2 V_3$, and $V_3 V_3 V_1$. A recent surprising result of Balogh-Clemen-Lidický [J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 106 (2022)] shows that this conjecture is asymptotically true in the $\ell_2$-norm, where the number of edges is replaced by the sum of squared codegrees. They further conjectured that, in this $\ell_2$-norm setting, the $3$-partite construction is uniquely extremal for large $n$. We confirm this conjecture. Two key ingredients in our proofs include establishing a Mantel theorem for vertex-colored graphs that forbid certain types of triangles, and introducing a novel procedure integrated into Simonovits' stability method, which essentially reduces the task to verifying that the $\ell_2$-norm of certain near-extremal constructions increases under suitable local modifications. The strategy in the latter may be of independent interest and potentially applicable to other extremal problems.

The expansion of a graph $F$, denoted by $F^3$, is the $3$-graph obtained from $F$ by adding a new vertex to each edge such that different edges receive different vertices. For large $n$, we establish tight upper bounds for: The maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $3$-graph that does not contain $T^3$ for certain class $\mathcal{T}$ of trees, sharpening (partially) a result of Kostochka--Mubayi--Verstraëte. The minimum number of colors needed to color the complete $n$-vertex $3$-graph to ensure the existence of a rainbow copy of $F^3$ when $F$ is a graph obtained from some tree $T\in \mathcal{T}$ by adding a new edge, extending anti-Ramsey results on $P_{2t}^3$ by Gu--Li--Shi and $C_{2t}^3$ by Tang--Li--Yan. The maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $3$-graph whose shadow does not contain the shadow of $C_{k}^3$ or $T^3$ for $T\in \mathcal{T}$, answering a question of Lv \etal on generalized Turán problems.

The anti-Ramsey number $\mathrm{ar}(n,F)$ of an $r$-graph $F$ is the minimum number of colors needed to color the complete $n$-vertex $r$-graph to ensure the existence of a rainbow copy of $F$. We establish a removal-type result for the anti-Ramsey problem of $F$ when $F$ is the expansion of a hypergraph with a smaller uniformity. We present two applications of this result. First, we refine the general bound $\mathrm{ar}(n,F) = \mathrm{ex}(n,F_{-}) + o(n^r)$ proved by Erd{\H o}s--Simonovits--S{\' o}s, where $F_{-}$ denotes the family of $r$-graphs obtained from $F$ by removing one edge. Second, we determine the exact value of $\mathrm{ar}(n,F)$ for large $n$ in cases where $F$ is the expansion of a specific class of graphs. This extends results of Erd{\H o}s--Simonovits--S{\' o}s on complete graphs to the realm of hypergraphs.

A hole is an induced cycle of length at least 4, and an odd hole is a hole of odd length. A full house is a graph composed by a vertex adjacent to both ends of an edge in $K_4$ . Let $H$ be the complement of a cycle on 7 vertices. Chudnovsky et al [6] proved that every (odd hole, $K_4$)-free graph is 4-colorable and is 3-colorable if it does not has $H$ as an induced subgraph. In this paper, we use the proving technique of Chudnovsky et al to generalize this conclusion to (odd hole, full house)-free graphs, and prove that for (odd hole, full house)-free graph $G$, $χ(G)\le ω(G)+1$, and the equality holds if and only if $ω(G)=3$ and $G$ has $H$ as an induced subgraph.