arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $H$, an $H$-colouring of a graph $G$ is a vertex map $φ:V(G) \to V(H)$ such that adjacent vertices are mapped to adjacent vertices. A graph $G$ is $C_{2k+1}$-critical if $G$ has no $C_{2k+1}$-colouring but every proper subgraph of $G$ has a $C_{2k+1}$-colouring. We prove a structural characterisation of $C_{2k+1}$-critical graphs when $k \geq 2$. In the case that $k = 2$, we use the aforementioned charazterisation to show a $C_3$-free series-parallel graph $G$ has a $C_5$-colouring if either $G$ has neither $C_8$ nor $C_{10}$, or $G$ has no two $5$-cycles sharing a vertex.

We consider a reconfiguration version of the homomorphism problem ${\rm Hom}_\mathbb{M}(N)$ for binary matroids $N$. This reconfiguration problem, ${\rm Recol}_\mathbb{M}(N)$, asks, for two homomorphisms $φ$ and $ψ$ of a matroid $M$ to $N$, if there is a path of homomorphism from $φ$ to $ψ$ such that consecutive homomorphism in the path differ on a single cocircuit of $N$. We show that this problem is trivial in the case that $N$ dismantles to the graphic matroid $M(K_2)$, and that the problem is ${\rm PSPACE}$-complete when $N$ is the graphic matroid $M(K_3)$, $M(K_4)$, or any graphic matroid containing $M(K_5)$.

The reconfiguration problem for homomorphisms of digraphs to a reflexive digraph cycle, which amounts to deciding if a `reconfiguration graph' is connected, is known to by polynomially time solvable via a greedy algorithm based on certain topological requirements. Even in the case that the instance digraph is a cycle of length $m$, the algorithm, being greedy, takes time $Ω(m^2)$. Encoding homomorphisms between two cycles as a relation on strings that represent the orientations of the cycles, we give a characterization of the components of the reconfiguration graph that can be computed in linear time and logarithmic space. In particular, this solves the reconfiguration problem for homomorphisms of cycles to cycles in log-space.

For a fixed set ${\cal H}$ of graphs, a graph $G$ is ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free if $G$ does not contain any $H \in {\cal H}$ as a (not necessarily induced) subgraph. A recently proposed framework gives a complete classification on ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graphs (for finite sets ${\cal H}$) for problems that are solvable in polynomial time on graph classes of bounded treewidth, NP-complete on subcubic graphs, and whose NP-hardness is preserved under edge subdivision. While a lot of problems satisfy these conditions, there are also many problems that do not satisfy all three conditions and for which the complexity in ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graphs is unknown. We study problems for which only the first two conditions of the framework hold (they are solvable in polynomial time on classes of bounded treewidth and NP-complete on subcubic graphs, but NP-hardness is not preserved under edge subdivision). In particular, we make inroads into the classification of the complexity of four such problems: Hamilton Cycle, $k$-Induced Disjoint Paths, $C_5$-Colouring and Star $3$-Colouring. Although we do not complete the classifications, we show that the boundary between polynomial time and NP-complete differs among our problems and also from problems that do satisfy all three conditions of the framework, in particular when we forbid certain subdivisions of the ``H''-graph (the graph that looks like the letter ``H''). Hence, we exhibit a rich complexity landscape among problems for ${\cal H}$-subgraph-free graph classes.

In 2000, Brightwell and Winkler characterised dismantlable graphs as the graphs $H$ for which the Hom-graph ${\rm Hom}(G,H)$, defined on the set of homomorphisms from $G$ to $H$, is connected for all graphs $G$. This shows that the reconfiguration version ${\rm Recon_{Hom}}(H)$ of the $H$-colouring problem, in which one must decide for a given $G$ whether ${\rm Hom}(G,H)$ is connected, is trivial if and only if $H$ is dismantlable. We prove a similar starting point for the reconfiguration version of the $H$-extension problem. Where ${\rm Hom}(G,H;p)$ is the subgraph of the Hom-graph ${\rm Hom}(G,H)$ induced by the $H$-colourings extending the $H$-precolouring $p$ of $G$, the reconfiguration version ${\rm Recon_{Ext}(H)}$ of the $H$-extension problem asks, for a given $H$-precolouring $p$ of a graph $G$, if ${\rm Hom}(G,H;p)$ is connected. We show that the graphs $H$ for which ${\rm Hom}(G,H;p)$ is connected for every choice of $(G,p)$ are exactly the ${\rm NU}$ graphs. This gives a new characterisation of ${\rm NU}$ graphs, a nice class of graphs that is important in the algebraic approach to the ${\rm CSP}$-dichotomy. We further give bounds on the diameter of ${\rm Hom}(G,H;p)$ for ${\rm NU}$ graphs $H$, and show that shortest path between two vertices of ${\rm Hom}(G,H;p)$ can be found in parameterised polynomial time. We apply our results to the problem of shortest path reconfiguration, significantly extending recent results.

In the problem ${\rm Mix}(H)$ one is given a graph $G$ and must decide if the Hom-graph ${\rm {\bf Hom}}(G,H)$ is connected. We show that if $H$ is a triangle-free reflexive graph with at least one cycle, ${\rm Mix}(H)$ is ${\rm coNP}$-complete. The main part of this is a reduction to the problem ${\rm NonFlat}({\rm{\bf H}})$ for a simplicial complex ${\rm{\bf H}}$, in which one is given a simplicial complex ${\rm{\bf G}}$ and must decide if there are any simplicial maps $φ$ from ${\rm{\bf G}}$ to ${\rm{\bf H}}$ under which some $1$-cycles of ${\rm{\bf G}}$ maps to homologically non-trivial cycle of ${\rm{\bf H}}$. We show that for any reflexive graph $H$, if the clique complex ${\rm{\bf H}}$ of $H$ has a free, non-trivial homology group $H_1({\rm{\bf H}})$, then ${\rm NonFlat}({\rm{\bf H}})$ is ${\rm NP}$-complete.

For a graph $H$, the $H$-recolouring problem $\operatorname{Recol}(H)$ asks, for two given homomorphisms from a given graph $G$ to $H$, if one can get between them by a sequence of homomorphisms of $G$ to $H$ in which consecutive homomorphisms differ on only one vertex. We show that, if $G$ and $H$ are reflexive and $H$ is triangle-free, then this problem can be solved in polynomial time. This shows, at the same time, that the closely related $H$-reconfiguration problem $\operatorname{Recon}(H)$ of deciding whether two given homomorphisms from a given graph $G$ to $H$ are in the same component of the Hom-graph $\operatorname{Hom}(G,H)$, can be solved in polynomial time for triangle-free reflexive graphs $H$.

We make advances towards a structural characterisation of the signed graphs $H$ for which the list switch $H$-colouring problem $\operatorname{LSwHom}(H)$ problem is polynomial time solvable. We conjecture a characterisation for signed graphs that can be switched to graphs such that every negative edge is also positive, and prove the characterisation in the case that the signed graph is reflexive.

Given a loop-free graph $H$, the reconfiguration problem for homomorphisms to $H$ (also called $H$-colourings) asks: given two $H$-colourings $f$ of $g$ of a graph $G$, is it possible to transform $f$ into $g$ by a sequence of single-vertex colour changes such that every intermediate mapping is an $H$-colouring? This problem is known to be polynomial-time solvable for a wide variety of graphs $H$ (e.g. all $C_4$-free graphs) but only a handful of hard cases are known. We prove that this problem is PSPACE-complete whenever $H$ is a $K_{2,3}$-free quadrangulation of the $2$-sphere (equivalently, the plane) which is not a $4$-cycle. From this result, we deduce an analogous statement for non-bipartite $K_{2,3}$-free quadrangulations of the projective plane. This include several interesting classes of graphs, such as odd wheels, for which the complexity was known, and $4$-chromatic generalized Mycielski graphs, for which it was not. If we instead consider graphs $G$ and $H$ with loops on every vertex (i.e. reflexive graphs), then the reconfiguration problem is defined in a similar way except that a vertex can only change its colour to a neighbour of its current colour. In this setting, we use similar ideas to show that the reconfiguration problem for $H$-colourings is PSPACE-complete whenever $H$ is a reflexive $K_{4}$-free triangulation of the $2$-sphere which is not a reflexive triangle. This proof applies more generally to reflexive graphs which, roughly speaking, resemble a triangulation locally around a particular vertex. This provides the first graphs for which $H$-Recolouring is known to be PSPACE-complete for reflexive instances.

Two families, ${\mathcal A}$ and ${\mathcal B}$, of subsets of $[n]$ are cross $t$-intersecting if for every $A \in {\mathcal A}$ and $B \in {\mathcal B}$, $A$ and $B$ intersect in at least $t$ elements. For a real number $p$ and a family ${\mathcal A}$ the product measure $μ_p ({\mathcal A})$ is defined as the sum of $p^{|A|}(1-p)^{n-|A|}$ over all $A\in{\mathcal A}$. For every non-negative integer $r$, and for large enough $t$, we determine, for any $p$ satisfying $\frac r{t+2r-1}\leq p\leq\frac{r+1}{t+2r+1}$, the maximum possible value of $μ_p ({\mathcal A})μ_p ({\mathcal B})$ for cross $t$-intersecting families ${\mathcal A}$ and ${\mathcal B}$. In this paper we prove a stronger stability result which yields the above result.

For a fixed graph $H$, the reconfiguration problem for $H$-colourings (i.e. homomorphisms to $H$) asks: given a graph $G$ and two $H$-colourings $\varphi$ and $ψ$ of $G$, does there exist a sequence $f_0,\dots,f_m$ of $H$-colourings such that $f_0=\varphi$, $f_m=ψ$ and $f_i(u)f_{i+1}(v)\in E(H)$ for every $0\leq i<m$ and $uv\in E(G)$? If the graph $G$ is loop-free, then this is the equivalent to asking whether it possible to transform $\varphi$ into $ψ$ by changing the colour of one vertex at a time such that all intermediate mappings are $H$-colourings. In the affirmative, we say that $\varphi$ reconfigures to $ψ$. Currently, the complexity of deciding whether an $H$-colouring $\varphi$ reconfigures to an $H$-colouring $ψ$ is only known when $H$ is a clique, a circular clique, a $C_4$-free graph, or in a few other cases which are easily derived from these. We show that this problem is PSPACE-complete when $H$ is an odd wheel. An important notion in the study of reconfiguration problems for $H$-colourings is that of a frozen $H$-colouring; i.e. an $H$-colouring $\varphi$ such that $\varphi$ does not reconfigure to any $H$-colouring $ψ$ such that $ψ\neq \varphi$. We obtain an explicit dichotomy theorem for the problem of deciding whether a given graph $G$ admits a frozen $H$-colouring. The hardness proof involves a reduction from a CSP problem which is shown to be NP-complete by establishing the non-existence of a certain type of polymorphism.

Ahlswede and Khachatrian's diametric theorem is a weighted version of their complete intersection theorem, itself an extension of the $t$-intersecting Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem. Their intersection theorem says that the maximum size of a family of subsets of $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$, every pair of which intersects in at least $t$ elements, is the size of certain trivially intersecting families proposed by Frankl. We address a cross intersecting version of their diametric theorem. Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $[n]$ are {\em cross $t$-intersecting} if for every $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$, $A$ and $B$ intersect in at least $t$ elements. The $p$-weight of a $k$ element subset $A$ of $[n]$ is $p^{k}(1-p)^{n-k}$, and the weight of a family $\mathcal{A}$ is the sum of the weights of its sets. The weight of a pair of families is the product of the weights of the families. The maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family depends on the value of $p$. Ahlswede and Khachatrian showed that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{r}{t + 2r - 1}, \frac{r+1}{t + 2r + 1}]$, the maximum $p$-weight of a $t$-intersecting family is that of the family $\mathcal{F}^t_r$ consisting of all subsets of $[n]$ containing at least $t+r$ elements of the set $[t+2r]$. In a previous paper we showed a cross $t$-intersecting version of this for large $t$ in the case that $r = 0$. In this paper, we do the same in the case that $r = 1$. We show that for $p$ in the range $[\frac{1}{t + 1}, \frac{2}{t + 3}]$ the maximum $p$-weight of a cross $t$-intersecting pair of families, for $t \geq 200$, is achieved when both families are $\mathcal{F}^t_1$. Further, we show that except at the endpoints of this range, this is, up to isomorphism, the only pair of $t$-intersecting families achieving this weight.

A simple but elegant result of Rival states that every sublattice $L$ of a finite distributive lattice $\mathcal{P}$ can be constructed from $\mathcal{P}$ by removing a particular family $\mathcal{I}_L$ of its irreducible intervals. Applying this in the case that $\mathcal{P}$ is a product of a finite set $\mathcal{C}$ of chains, we get a one-to-one correspondence $L \mapsto \mathcal{D}_\mathcal{P}(L)$ between the sublattices of $\mathcal{P}$ and the preorders spanned by a canonical sublattice $\mathcal{C}^\infty$ of $\mathcal{P}$. We then show that $L$ is a tight sublattice of the product of chains $\mathcal{P}$ if and only if $\mathcal{D}_\mathcal{P}(L)$ is asymmetric. This yields a one-to-one correspondence between the tight sublattices of $\mathcal{P}$ and the posets spanned by its poset $J(\mathcal{P})$ of non-zero join-irreducible elements. With this we recover and extend, among other classical results, the correspondence derived from results of Birkhoff and Dilworth, between the tight embeddings of a finite distributive lattice $L$ into products of chains, and the chain decompositions of its poset $J(L)$ of non-zero join-irreducible elements.

In this paper we give two characterisations of the class of reflexive graphs admitting distributive lattice polymorphisms and use these characterisations to address the problem of recognition: for a reflexive graph G in which no two vertices have the same neighbourhood, we find a polynomial time algorithm to decide if G admits a distributive lattice polymorphism.

Two families $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$, of $k$-subsets of an $n$-set, are {\em cross $t$-intersecting} if for every choice of subsets $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$ we have $|A \cap B| \geq t$. We address the following conjectured cross $t$-intersecting version of the Erd\H os--Ko--Rado Theorem: For all $n \geq (t+1)(k-t+1)$ the maximum value of $|\mathcal{A}||\mathcal{B}|$ for two cross $t$-intersecting families $\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} \subset\binom{[n]}{k}$ is $\binom{n-t}{k-t}^2$. We verify this for all $t \geq 14$ except finitely many $n$ and $k$ for each fixed $t$. Further, we prove uniqueness and stability results in these cases, showing, for instance, that the families reaching this bound are unique up to isomorphism. We also consider a {\em $p$-weight} version of the problem, which comes from the product measure on the power set of an $n$-set.