Papers by Meiqin Wei
11 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Solution to a conjecture of Alon, Dębski, Grytczuk and Przybyło on fixed-cardinality arithmetic progressions
Fix a positive integer $n$, and put $B_d=\{d,2d,\ldots,nd\}$. Let $M_k(n)$ be the least integer $m$ for which one translate of each of $B_1,\ldots,B_k$ can be placed pairwise disjointly in $[m]$. We prove that, for every $\eps\in(0,1)$ and all sufficiently large $k$, one has $M_k(n)\le n\lceil(1+\eps)k\rceil$. Since the trivial counting bound gives $M_k(n)\ge nk$, it follows that $M_k(n)=(1+o(1))nk$ for every fixed $n$. This confirms a conjecture of Alon, Dębski, Grytczuk and Przybyło on prescribed-difference packings of fixed-cardinality arithmetic progressions.
A complete solution to the biased Alon-Krivelevich-Spencer-Szabó criterion problem for the discrepancy game
Let \(H=(V,\mathcal E)\) be a finite hypergraph. For positive integers \(p\) and \(q\), the \((p:q)\)-biased discrepancy game on \(H\) is played in complete rounds. In each round, Balancer first claims \(p\) previously unclaimed vertices, and then Unbalancer claims \(q\) previously unclaimed vertices. Let \(B\) and \(U\) be the final sets of vertices claimed by Balancer and Unbalancer, respectively. For an edge \(e\in\mathcal E\), define $D_e = q|B\cap e|-p|U\cap e|
= (p+q)|B\cap e|-p|e|$. Thus \(D_e\) measures the deviation of Balancer's share of \(e\) from the density \(p/(p+q)\). In 2005, Alon, Krivelevich, Spencer and Szabó proved a Chernoff-type potential criterion for the unbiased alternating discrepancy game, corresponding to the case \(p=q=1\), and asked for a biased analogue for general $p,q$. In this paper, we prove a complete biased analogue in the complete-round formulation. More precisely, for every finite hypergraph \(H=(V,\mathcal E)\) and every fixed bias \((p:q)\), we give an explicit exponential condition under which Balancer has a strategy forcing $-L_e^- \le D_e \le L_e^+$ for every $e\in\mathcal E$, where \(L_e^+\) and \(L_e^-\) are prescribed edge-dependent target values. The criterion is fully non-uniform: the edge size \(|e|\), the upper target \(L_e^+\), the lower target \(L_e^-\), and the exponential parameters in the condition may all vary with \(e\).
Gallai-Ramsey Numbers for $\ell$-Connected Graphs
Given a nonempty graph $G$, a collection of nonempty graphs $\cal{H}$, and a positive integer $k$, the Gallai-Ramsey number $\mathrm{gr}_k(G:\mathcal{H})$ is defined to be the minimum positive integer $n$ such that every exact $k$-edge-coloring of a complete graph $K_n$ contains either a rainbow copy of $G$ or a monochromatic copy of some element in $\mathcal{H}$. In this paper, we obtain some exact values and general lower and upper bounds for $\mathrm{gr}_k(G:\mathcal{F}^\ell)$, where $\mathcal{F}^\ell$ is the set of $\ell$-connected graphs and $G\in\{P_5, K_{1,3}\}$.
Complete bipartite graphs without small rainbow stars
The $k$-edge-colored bipartite Gallai-Ramsey number $\operatorname{bgr}_k(G:H)$ is defined as the minimum integer $n$ such that $n^2\geq k$ and for every $N\geq n$, every edge-coloring (using all $k$ colors) of complete bipartite graph $K_{N,N}$ contains a rainbow copy of $G$ or a monochromatic copy of $H$. In this paper, we first study the structural theorem on the complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$ with no rainbow copy of $K_{1,3}$. Next, we utilize the results to prove the exact values of $\operatorname{bgr}_{k}(P_4: H)$, $\operatorname{bgr}_{k}(P_5: H)$, $\operatorname{bgr}_{k}(K_{1,3}: H)$, where $H$ is a various union of cycles and paths and stars.
Distance proper connection of graphs and their complements
Let $G$ be an edge-colored connected graph. A path $P$ in $G$ is called a distance $\ell$-proper path if no two edges of the same color can appear with less than $\ell$ edges in between on $P$. The graph $G$ is called $(k,\ell)$-proper connected if there is an edge-coloring such that every pair of distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by $k$ pairwise internally vertex-disjoint distance $\ell$-proper paths in $G$. The minimum number of colors needed to make $G$ $(k,\ell)$-proper connected is called the $(k,\ell)$-proper connection number of $G$ and denoted by $pc_{k,\ell}(G)$. In this paper we first focus on the $(1,2)$-proper connection number of $G$ depending on some constraints of $\overline G$. Then, we characterize the graphs of order $n$ with $(1,2)$-proper connection number $n-1$ or $n-2$. Using this result, we investigate the Nordhaus-Gaddum-Type problem of $(1,2)$-proper connection number and prove that $pc_{1,2}(G)+pc_{1,2}(\overline{G})\leq n+2$ for connected graphs $G$ and $\overline{G}$. The equality holds if and only if $G$ or $\overline{G}$ is isomorphic to a double star.
Distance proper connection of graphs
Let $G$ be an edge-colored connected graph. A path $P$ in $G$ is called a distance $\ell$-proper path if no two edges of the same color appear with fewer than $\ell$ edges in between on $P$. The graph $G$ is called $(k,\ell)$-proper connected if every pair of distinct vertices of $G$ are connected by $k$ pairwise internally vertex-disjoint distance $\ell$-proper paths in $G$. For a $k$-connected graph $G$, the minimum number of colors needed to make $G$ $(k,\ell)$-proper connected is called the $(k,\ell)$-proper connection number of $G$ and denoted by $pc_{k,\ell}(G)$. In this paper, we prove that $pc_{1,2}(G)\leq 5$ for any $2$-connected graph $G$. Considering graph operations, we find that $3$ is a sharp upper bound for the $(1,2)$-proper connection number of the join and the Cartesian product of almost all graphs. In addition, we find some basic properties of the $(k,\ell)$-proper connection number and determine the values of $pc_{1,\ell}(G)$ where $G$ is a traceable graph, a tree, a complete bipartite graph, a complete multipartite graph, a wheel, a cube or a permutation graph of a nontrivial traceable graph.
Proper connection number and connected dominating sets
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The proper connection number $pc(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is defined as the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges, so that every pair of distinct vertices of $G$ is connected by at least one path in $G$ such that no two adjacent edges of the path are colored the same, and such a path is called a proper path. In this paper, we show that for every connected graph with diameter 2 and minimum degree at least 2, its proper connection number is 2. Then, we give an upper bound $\frac{3n}{δ+ 1}-1$ for every connected graph of order $n$ and minimum degree $δ$. We also show that for every connected graph $G$ with minimum degree at least $2$, the proper connection number $pc(G)$ is upper bounded by $pc(G[D])+2$, where $D$ is a connected two-way (two-step) dominating set of $G$. Bounds of the form $pc(G)\leq 4$ or $pc(G)=2$, for many special graph classes follow as easy corollaries from this result, which include connected interval graphs, asteroidal triple-free graphs, circular arc graphs, threshold graphs and chain graphs, all with minimum degree at least $2$. Furthermore, we get the sharp upper bound 3 for the proper connection numbers of interval graphs and circular arc graphs through analyzing their structures.
Novel Inequalities for Generalized Graph Entropies Revisited, Graph Energies and Topological Indices
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
The entropy of a graph is an information-theoretic quantity which expresses the complexity of a graph \cite{DM1,M}. After Shannon introduced the definition of entropy to information and communication, many generalizations of the entropy measure have been proposed, such as Rényi entropy and Daròczy's entropy. In this article, we prove accurate connections (inequalities) between generalized graph entropies, distinct graph energies and topological indices. Additionally, we obtain some extremal properties of nine generalized graph entropies by employing distinct graph energies and topological indices.
Additive codes over $GF(4)$ from circulant graphs
In $2006$, Danielsen and Parker \cite{DP} proved that every self-dual additive code over $GF(4)$ is equivalent to a graph code. So, graph is an important tool for searching (proposed) optimum codes. In this paper, we introduce a new method of searching (proposed) optimum additive codes from circulant graphs.
Formally self-dual linear binary codes from circulant graphs
In 2002, Tonchev first constructed some linear binary codes defined by the adjacency matrices of undirected graphs. So, graph is an important tool for searching optimum codes. In this paper, we introduce a new method of searching (proposed) optimum formally self-dual linear binary codes from circulant graphs.
On a conjecture about tricyclic graphs with maximal energy
Published in MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 72(1)(2014), 183--214
• Search Publication
For a given simple graph $G$, the energy of $G$, denoted by $\mathcal {E}(G)$, is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix, which was defined by I. Gutman. The problem on determining the maximal energy tends to be complicated for a given class of graphs. There are many approaches on the maximal energy of trees, unicyclic graphs and bicyclic graphs, respectively. Let $P^{6,6,6}_n$ denote the graph with $n\geq 20$ vertices obtained from three copies of $C_6$ and a path $P_{n-18}$ by adding a single edge between each of two copies of $C_6$ to one endpoint of the path and a single edge from the third $C_6$ to the other endpoint of the $P_{n-18}$. Very recently, Aouchiche et al. [M. Aouchiche, G. Caporossi, P. Hansen, Open problems on graph eigenvalues studied with AutoGraphiX, {\it Europ. J. Comput. Optim.} {\bf 1}(2013), 181--199] put forward the following conjecture: Let $G$ be a tricyclic graphs on $n$ vertices with $n=20$ or $n\geq22$, then $\mathcal{E}(G)\leq \mathcal{E}(P_{n}^{6,6,6})$ with equality if and only if $G\cong P_{n}^{6,6,6}$. Let $G(n;a,b,k)$ denote the set of all connected bipartite tricyclic graphs on $n$ vertices with three vertex-disjoint cycles $C_{a}$, $C_{b}$ and $C_{k}$, where $n\geq 20$. In this paper, we try to prove that the conjecture is true for graphs in the class $G\in G(n;a,b,k)$, but as a consequence we can only show that this is true for most of the graphs in the class except for 9 families of such graphs.