arXiv++ Combinatorics

Chung, Graham, and Spiro introduced slow Fibonacci walks and used them to partition the integers $n\ge2$ into two sequences, the down-integers and the up-integers. They studied the local spacing of these two sequences and conjectured that their $\ell$-step gap sets agree for every $\ell\ge1$. We show that the conjecture fails at $\ell=4$ by proving \[ 9\in U_4\setminus D_4 . \]

We unify two matching theories, one for finite subsets of groups and the other for finite-dimensional subspaces in a field extension. To achieve this, we study groups equipped with a compatible finitary matroid structure, termed here independence groups. Applying Rado's independent transversal theorem, we derive necessary and sufficient rank criteria for matchability between finite-rank sets. In the setting of a modular abelian independence group $G$, we develop an analogue of the $e$-transform from additive number theory, derive structural matching criteria, and characterize a global matching property by the absence of a submonoid $H$ satisfying $1<ρ(H)<ρ(G)$ and $ρ(H)<\infty$, where $ρ$ denotes rank. Examples of modular abelian independence groups are given and examined in the matching context. Arising from this matching theory, but formulated without any reference to it, is a product-growth bound that generalizes the Cauchy--Davenport theorem: we define a parameter $μ(G)$ and prove that $ρ(XY)\geq \min\{μ(G),ρ(X)+ρ(Y)-1\}$ for all nonempty finite-rank subsets $X,Y$ of $G$. Furthermore, $ρ(XY)$ is shown to be controlled from below by a submonoid of $G$ that stabilizes a flat, a phenomenon reminiscent of Kneser's theorem.

For any graph $G = (V,E)$, a subset $S {\subseteq} V$ dominates $G$ if $N[S] = V$. The minimum cardinality over all such $S$ is called the domination number, written $γ(G)$. The classical conjecture of V.G. Vizing states that $γ(G{\square} H) {\ge} γ(G)γ(H)$ where ${\square}$ stands for the Cartesian product of graphs. In this paper, we apply well-known results to prove the Vizing-type inequality $γ(G{\square} H) {\ge} .5809 γ(G)γ(H)$.

We formulate and prove linear counterparts of results on partial matchings between finite subsets in abelian groups. In the group setting, there are necessary and sufficient criteria for the existence of partial matchings under suitable hypotheses; our aim is to obtain parallel statements in a linear framework. In particular, for a field extension $K\subsetneq L$ we introduce a notion of partial matching between finite-dimensional $K$-subspaces $A,B\subseteq L$, and we prove existence theorems mirroring known results for subsets of abelian groups. Along the way, we recover and extend various parts of this area of matching theory, emphasizing the close analogy between the group-theoretic and linear settings. Our approach blends classical linear-algebraic techniques with tools from matroidal transversal theory, and utilizes a linearized version of a method originating in additive number theory.

The Mayhew--Newman--Welsh--Whittle conjecture predicts that asymptotically almost all matroids are sparse paving. We study the gap between paving and sparse paving matroids at the logarithmic scale. Let \(p_n\) be the number of paving matroids on \([n]\), let \(sp_n\) be the number of sparse paving matroids on \([n]\), and let \(sp_{n,r}\) be the number of rank-\(r\) sparse paving matroids on \([n]\). We prove that \[ p_n-sp_n\ge sp_{n,\lfloor n/2\rfloor}^{1-o(1)}. \] Thus the paving matroids that are not sparse paving are themselves logarithmically large. The construction prescribes one hyperplane larger than the rank and then counts stable sets in an induced subgraph of a Johnson graph. We also give amplified versions obtained by varying the large hyperplane and by prescribing distance-six families of large hyperplanes.

Let $G$ be a finite simple graph with adjacency matrix $A(G)$ over $\mathbb F_2$. The closed neighborhood matrix $A(G)+I$ is central in the theory of odd domination. Sutner proved that every graph has an odd dominating set, equivalently $\mathbf 1$ lies in the range of $A(G)+I$, and Batal proved that every such set has cardinality congruent to $\rank(A(G)+I)$ modulo $2$. We extend this parity phenomenon from closed neighborhood matrices to partially looped graph matrices $A(G)+D$, where $D$ is an arbitrary diagonal matrix over $\mathbb F_2$. Equivalently, we work with arbitrary symmetric matrices $M$ over $\mathbb F_2$ and the natural right-hand side $\diag(M)$. We include a self-contained proof, attributed by Filmus to Alon, that $\diag(M)\in\Img(M)$, and we prove that every solution of $Mx=\diag(M)$ satisfies \[ \diag(M)^\top x\equiv \rank(M)\pmod 2. \] We also give a complete rank and nullity formula for rank-one diagonal perturbations $M\mapsto M+uu^\top$, which in the graph setting describes exactly how toggling loops changes the associated solution spaces. Finally, for rooted trees with arbitrary diagonal labels, we develop a finite-state boundary recursion that counts all solutions of $M(T,\varepsilon)x=\varepsilon+αe_r$ with prescribed root value, and we derive explicit nullity formulas for complete rooted $d$-ary trees. For $d\ge2$, we also prove an eventual-periodicity theorem for complete rooted $d$-ary trees with depth-dependent eventually periodic diagonal labels.

Deltoids provide a natural framework for studying defective (partial) matchings in abelian groups, and we develop both structure and existence results in this setting. Given finite subsets $A$ and $B$ of an abelian group $G$, a matching is a bijection $f:A\to B$ such that $af(a)\notin A$ for all $a\in A$, a definition motivated by the study of canonical forms for symmetric tensors. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of a partial matching with any prescribed defect, and then describe the minimal unavoidable defect for a pair $(A,B)$. We also define and examine a defective version of Chowla sets in the matching context. We prove a structure theorem identifying obstructions to the existence of partial matchings with small defect. Finally, within the deltoid setup, we establish max-min results on the partitioning of $A$ and $B$ into left- and right-admissible sets. Our tools mix results from transversal theory with ideas from additive number theory.

A theory of matchings for finite subsets of an abelian group, introduced in connection with a conjecture of Wakeford on canonical forms for homogeneous polynomials, has since been extended to the setting of field extensions and to that of matroids. Earlier approaches have produced numerous criteria for matchability and unmatchability, but have offered little structural insight. In this paper, we develop parallel structure theorems which characterize unmatchable pairs in both abelian groups and field extensions. Our framework reveals analogous obstructions to matchability: nearly periodic decompositions of sets in the group setting correspond to decompositions of subspaces involving translates of a subfield in the linear setting. This perspective not only recovers previously known results through short proofs, but also leads to new matching criteria and guarantees the existence of nontrivial unmatchable pairs.

In an abelian group $G$, a \emph{matching} is a bijection $f\colon A\to B$ between finite subsets $A,B\subseteq G$ such that $a+f(a)\notin A$ for all $a\in A$. We say that $G$ has the \emph{matching property} if every pair of finite subsets $A,B\subseteq G$ with $|A|=|B|$ and $0\notin B$ admits such a matching. This paper develops matroidal analogues of classical results on group matchings. By embedding matroid ground sets in $G$, we introduce base matchings between matroid bases, recovering the group-theoretic setting in the uniform case, and derive structural and combinatorial criteria for their existence. Our methods blend techniques from matroid theory, group theory, and additive number theory. Our main focus is on paving matroids, a class conjectured to constitute asymptotically almost all matroids. We prove symmetric self-matchability for all paving matroids, extend asymmetric results via the hyperplane-nullity parameter, and connect stressed hyperplanes to matchability through relaxation, bridging paving and uniform matroids. This paper continues a line of research initiated in [3,4], yet is written to be self-contained and may be read independently.

A matching from a finite subset $A$ of an abelian group $G$ to another subset $B$ is a bijection $f : A \to B$ such that $af(a) \notin A$ for all $a \in A$. The study of matchings began in the 1990s and was motivated by a conjecture of E. K. Wakeford on canonical forms for homogeneous polynomials. The theory was later extended to the linear setting of vector subspaces over field extensions, and then to matroids. In this paper, we investigate the existence and structure of matchings in both abelian groups and field extensions. Using Dyson's $e$-transform, a tool from additive combinatorics, along with a linear analogue which is introduced in this paper, we establish characterization theorems for matchable sets and subspaces. Several applications are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of these theorems as standalone tools. Throughout, we highlight the parallels between the group-theoretic and linear perspectives.

The concept of matchings originated in group theory to address a linear algebra problem related to canonical forms for symmetric tensors. In an abelian group $(G,+)$, a matching is a bijection $f: A \to B$ between two finite subsets $A$ and $B$ of $G$ such that $a + f(a) \notin A$ for all $a \in A$. A group $G$ has the matching property if, for every two finite subsets $A, B \subset G$ of the same size with $0 \notin B$, there exists a matching from $A$ to $B$. In prior work [5], matroid analogues of results concerning matchings in groups were introduced and established. This paper serves as a sequel, extending that line of inquiry by investigating sparse paving, panhandle, and Schubert matroids through the lens of matchability. While some proofs draw upon earlier findings on the matchability of sparse paving matroids, the paper is designed to be self-contained and accessible without reference to the preceding sequel. Our approach combines tools from both matroid theory and additive number theory.

A matching from a finite subset $A\subset\mathbb{Z}^n$ to another subset $B\subset\mathbb{Z}^n$ is a bijection $f : A \rightarrow B$ with the property that $a+f(a)$ never lies in $A$. A matching is called acyclic if it is uniquely determined by its multiplicity function. Alon et al. established the acyclic matching property for $\mathbb{Z}^n$, which was later extended to all abelian torsion-free groups. In a prior work, the authors of this paper settled the acyclic matching property for all abelian groups. The objective of this note is to explore a related concept, known as the weak acyclic matching property, within the context of abelian groups.

The inquiry into identifying sets of monomials that can be eliminated from a generic homogeneous polynomial via a linear change of coordinates was initiated by E. K. Wakeford. This linear algebra problem prompted C. K. Fan and J. Losonczy to introduce the notion of acyclic matchings in the additive group $\mathbb{Z}^n$, subsequently extended to abelian groups by the latter author. Alon, Fan, Kleitman, and Losonczy established the acyclic matching property for $\mathbb{Z}^n$. This note aims to classify all abelian groups with respect to the acyclic matching property.

We present sufficient conditions for the existence of matchings in abelian groups and their linear counterparts. These conditions lead to extensions of existing results in matching theory. Additionally, we classify subsets within abelian groups that cannot be matched. We introduce the concept of Chowla subspaces and formulate and conjecture a linear analogue of a result originally attributed to Y. O. Hamidoune [20] concerning Chowla sets. If proven true, this result would extend matchings in primitive subspaces. Throughout the paper, we emphasize the analogy between matchings in abelian groups and field extensions. We also pose numerous open questions for future research. Our approach relies on classical theorems in group theory, additive number theory and linear algebra. As the title of the paper suggests, this work is the second sequel to a previous paper [5] with a similar theme. This paper is self-contained and can be read independently.

We formulate and prove matroid analogues of results concerning matchings in groups. A matching in an abelian group $(G,+)$ is a bijection $f:A\to B$ between two finite subsets $A,B$ of $G$ satisfying $a+f(a)\notin A$ for all $a\in A$. A group $G$ has the matching property if for every two finite subsets $A,B \subset G$ of the same size with $0 \notin B$, there exists a matching from $A$ to $B$. In [19] it was proved that an abelian group has the matching property if and only if it is torsion-free or cyclic of prime order. Here we consider a similar question in a matroid setting. We introduce an analogous notion of matching between matroids whose ground sets are subsets of an abelian group $G$, and we obtain criteria for the existence of such matchings. Our tools are classical theorems in matroid theory, group theory and additive number theory.

The origins of the notion of matchings in groups spawn from a linear algebra problem proposed by E. K. Wakeford [24] which was tackled in 1996 [10]. In this paper, we first discuss unmatchable subsets in abelian groups. Then we formulate and prove linear analogues of results concerning matchings, along with a conjecture that, if true, would extend the primitive subspace theorem. We discuss the dimension $m$-intersection property for vector spaces and its connection to matching subspaces in a field extension, and we prove the linear version of an intersection property result of certain subsets of a given set.

A matching from a finite subset $A$ of an abelian group to another subset $B$ is a bijection $f:A\rightarrow B$ with the property that $a+f(a)$ never lies in $A$. A matching is called acyclic if it is uniquely determined by its multiplicity function. Motivated by a question of E. K. Wakeford on canonical forms for symmetric tensors, the study of matchings and acyclic matchings in abelian groups was initiated by C. K. Fan and J. Losonczy in [16, 26], and was later generalized to the context of vector subspaces in a field extension [13, 1]. We discuss the acyclic matching and weak acyclic matching properties and we provide results on the existence of acyclic matchings in finite cyclic groups. As for field extensions, we completely classify field extensions with the linear acyclic matching property. The analogy between matchings in abelian groups and in field extensions is highlighted throughout the paper and numerous open questions are presented for further inquiry.

The purpose of this note is to give a linear algebra algorithm to find out if a rank of a given tensor over a field $\F$ is at most $k$ over the algebraic closure of $\F$, where $k$ is a given positive integer. We estimate the arithmetic complexity of our algorithm.

The question of finding sets of monomials which are removable from a generic homogeneous polynomial through a linear change in its variables was raised by E. K. Wakeford in 1916. This linear algebra question motivated J. Losonczy to define the concept of acyclic matchings in Z n, and later in abelian groups. In this paper, we give a constructive approach to study the acyclic matchings in cyclic groups. We also introduce the notion of weakly matched subsets and investigate its relation with matchings in abelian groups.

In this paper, we define locally matchable subsets of a group which is derived from the concept of matchings in groups and used as a tool to give alternative proofs for existing results in matching theory. We also give the linear analogue of local matching property for subspaces in a field extension. Our tools mix additive number theory, combinatorics and algebra.