arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that a biased graph is gainable over the group $\mathsf{Z}_{3}$ if and only if it contains no minor isomorphic to $(4K_{2},\emptyset)$, $\pm K_{3}$, or $-K_{4}$. We develop a theory of "partial groups" that is analogous to that of partial fields, and we use this theory to show that a biased graph is gainable over every non-trivial group if and only if it is gainable over $\mathsf{Z}_{2}$ and $\mathsf{Z}_{3}$. From this we derive an independent proof of the theorem due to Gerards that a biased graph is gainable over every non-trivial group if and only if it has no minor isomorphic to $(3K_{2},\emptyset)$, $\pm K_{3}$, or $-K_{4}$.

For a graph $G$ with at least two vertices, the maximum local edge-connectivity of $G$ is the maximum number of edge-disjoint $(u,v)$-paths over all distinct pairs of vertices $(u,v)$ in $G$. Stiebitz and Toft (2018) proved a Brooks-type theorem for graphs with maximum local edge-connectivity $k$, showing that a graph with maximum local edge-connectivity $k$ is not $k$-colourable if and only if it has a block in $\mathcal{H}_k$, which is the class of graphs that can be obtained by taking Hajós joins of copies of $K_{k+1}$ and, when $k=3$, odd wheels. We prove that a $2$-connected graph with maximum local edge-connectivity $k$ is $k$-choosable if and only if it is not in $\mathcal{H}_k$. On the other hand, deciding $k$-choosability when restricted to graphs with maximum local edge-connectivity $k$ (that might not be $2$-connected) is $Π_2$-complete. To prove the former result, we first prove several generalisations of a well-known characterisation of degree-choosability; these may be of independent interest.

Mayhew et al.\ (2021) posed the problem of showing that the minor-closed class of spikes and their minors has a finite set of excluded minors and describing all of them. In this paper, we resolve this problem.

We prove new parameterized complexity results for the FO Model Checking problem on a well-known generalization of interval and circular-arc graphs: the class of $H$-graphs, for any fixed multigraph $H$. In particular, we research how the parameterized complexity differs between two subclasses of $H$-graphs: proper $H$-graphs and non-crossing $H$-graphs, each generalizing proper interval graphs and proper circular-arc graphs. We first generalize a known result of Bonnet et al. (IPEC 2022) from interval graphs to $H$-graphs, for any (simple) forest $H$, by showing that for such $H$, the class of $H$-graphs is delineated. This implies that for every hereditary subclass ${\cal D}$ of $H$-graphs, FO Model Checking is in FPT if ${\cal D}$ has bounded twin-width and AW[$*$]-hard otherwise. As proper claw-graphs have unbounded twin-width, this means that FO Model Checking is AW[$*$]-hard for proper $H$-graphs for certain forests $H$ like the claw. In contrast, we show that even for every multigraph $H$, non-crossing $H$-graphs have bounded proper mixed-thinness and hence bounded twin-width, and thus FO Model Checking is in FPT on non-crossing $H$-graphs when parameterized by $\Vert H \Vert+\ell$, where $\Vert H \Vert$ is the size of $H$ and $\ell$ is the size of a formula. It is known that a special case of FO Model Checking, Independent Set, is $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hard on $H$-graphs when parameterized by $\Vert H \Vert +k$, where $k$ is the size of a solution. We strengthen this $\mathsf{W}[1]$-hardness result to proper $H$-graphs. Hence, we solve, in two different ways, an open problem of Chaplick (Discrete Math. 2023), who asked about problems that can be solved faster for non-crossing $H$-graphs than for proper $H$-graphs.

Let $M$ be a $3$-connected matroid. A pair $\{e,f\}$ in $M$ is detachable if $M \backslash e \backslash f$ or $M / e / f$ is $3$-connected. Williams (2015) proved that if $M$ has at least 13 elements, then at least one of the following holds: $M$ has a detachable pair, $M$ has a $3$-element circuit or cocircuit, or $M$ is a spike. We address the case where $M$ has a $3$-element circuit or cocircuit, to obtain a characterisation of when a matroid with at least 13 elements has a detachable pair. As a consequence, we characterise when a simple $3$-connected graph $G$ with $|E(G)| \ge 13$ has a pair of edges $\{e,f\}$ such that $G/e/f$ or $G \backslash e\backslash f$ is simple and $3$-connected.

A partitioned matroid $(M, \{X_1,X_2,\dots,X_n\})$ consists of a matroid $M$ and a partition $\{X_1,X_2,\dots,X_n\}$ of its ground set. As such structures arise frequently in structural matroid theory, this paper introduces a general technique for analyzing those special properties of partitioned matroids that depend solely on the values of the connectivities $λ(X_i)$, the local connectivities $\sqcap(\cup_{j\in J}X_j, \cup_{k\in K}X_k,)$, and the dual local connectivities $\sqcap^*(\cup_{h\in H}X_h, \cup_{g\in G}X_g)$. In particular, we consider those partitioned matroids in which each $X_i$ is an independent, coindependent set of clones of cardinality $λ(X_i)$. Calling such partitioned matroids clonal-core matroids, we show that special results of the above type for partitioned matroids can be verified in general by proving them just for clonal-core matroids. Aiming at the long-term goal of finding the unavoidable minors of $4$-connected matroids, we illustrate this technique by studying $4$-paths. These are sequences $(L,P_1,P_2,\ldots, P_n,R)$ of sets that partition the ground set of a matroid so that the union of any proper initial segment of parts is $4$-separating. Viewing the ends $L$ and $R$ as fixed, we call such a partition a $4$-flexipath if $(L,Q_1,Q_2,\ldots, Q_n,R)$ is a $4$-path for all permutations $(Q_1,Q_2,\ldots, Q_n)$ of $(P_1,P_2,\ldots, P_n)$. A straightforward simplification enables us to focus on $(4,c)$-flexipaths for some $c$ in $\{1,2,3\}$, that is, those $4$-flexipaths for which $λ(Q_i) = c$ and $λ(Q_i \cup Q_j) > c$ for all distinct $i$ and $j$. Our main result for $4$-paths is that the only non-trivial case that arises here is when $c=2$. In that case, there are essentially only two possible dual pairs of $(4,c)$-flexipaths when $n \ge 5$.

The {\em breadth} of a tangle $\mathcal{T}$ in a matroid is the size of the largest spanning uniform submatroid of the tangle matroid of $\mathcal{T}$. A matroid $M$ is {\em weakly $4$-connected} if it is 3-connected and whenever $(X,Y)$ is a partition of $E(M)$ with $|X|,|Y|>4$, then $λ(X)\geq 3$. We prove that if $\mathcal{T}$ is a tangle of order $k\geq 4$ and breadth $l$ in a matroid $M$, then $M$ has a weakly 4-connected minor $N$ with a tangle $\mathcal{T}$ of order $k$, breadth $l$ and has the property that $\mathcal{T}$ is the tangle in $M$ induced by $\mathcal{T}_N$. A set $Z$ of elements of a matroid $M$ is $4$-{\em connected} if $λ(A)\geq\min\{|A\cap Z|,|Z-A|,3\}$ for all $A\subseteq E(M)$. As a corollary of our theorems on tangles we prove that if $M$ contains an $n$-element $4$-connected set where $n\geq 7$, then $M$ has a weakly $4$-connected minor that contains an $n$-element $4$-connected set.

We study how the relationship between non-equivalent width parameters changes once we restrict to some special graph class. As width parameters, we consider treewidth, clique-width, twin-width, mim-width, sim-width and tree-independence number, whereas as graph classes we consider $K_{t,t}$-subgraph-free graphs, line graphs and their common superclass, for $t \geq 3$, of $K_{t,t}$-free graphs. We first provide a complete comparison when restricted to $K_{t,t}$-subgraph-free graphs, showing in particular that treewidth, clique-width, mim-width, sim-width and tree-independence number are all equivalent. This extends a result of Gurski and Wanke (2000) stating that treewidth and clique-width are equivalent for the class of $K_{t,t}$-subgraph-free graphs. Next, we provide a complete comparison when restricted to line graphs, showing in particular that, on any class of line graphs, clique-width, mim-width, sim-width and tree-independence number are all equivalent, and bounded if and only if the class of root graphs has bounded treewidth. This extends a result of Gurski and Wanke (2007) stating that a class of graphs ${\cal G}$ has bounded treewidth if and only if the class of line graphs of graphs in ${\cal G}$ has bounded clique-width. We then provide an almost-complete comparison for $K_{t,t}$-free graphs, leaving one missing case. Our main result is that $K_{t,t}$-free graphs of bounded mim-width have bounded tree-independence number. This result has structural and algorithmic consequences. In particular, it proves a special case of a conjecture of Dallard, Milanič and Štorgel. Finally, we consider the question of whether boundedness of a certain width parameter is preserved under graph powers. We show that the question has a positive answer for sim-width precisely in the case of odd powers.

Mayhew and Royle (2008) showed that there are 564 excluded minors for the class of GF(5)-representable matroids having at most 9 elements. We enumerate the excluded minors for GF(5)-representable matroids having 10 elements: there are precisely 2128 such excluded minors. In the process we find, for each $i \in \{2,3,4\}$, the excluded minors for the class of $\mathbb{H}_i$-representable matroids having at most 10 elements, and the excluded minors for the class of $\mathbb{H}_5$-representable matroids having at most 13 elements.

We consider a natural generalization of Vertex Cover: the Subset Vertex Cover problem, which is to decide for a graph $G=(V,E)$, a subset $T\subseteq V$ and integer $k$, if $V$ has a subset $S$ of size at most $k$, such that $S$ contains at least one end-vertex of every edge incident to a vertex of $T$. A graph is $H$-free if it does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. We solve two open problems from the literature by proving that Subset Vertex Cover is NP-complete on subcubic (claw,diamond)-free planar graphs and on $2$-unipolar graphs, a subclass of $2P_3$-free weakly chordal graphs. Our results show for the first time that Subset Vertex Cover is computationally harder than Vertex Cover (under P $\neq$ NP). We also prove new polynomial time results, some of which follow from a reduction to Vertex Cover restricted to classes of probe graphs. We first give a dichotomy on graphs where $G[T]$ is $H$-free. Namely, we show that Subset Vertex Cover is polynomial-time solvable on graphs $G$, for which $G[T]$ is $H$-free, if $H=sP_1+tP_2$ and NP-complete otherwise. Moreover, we prove that Subset Vertex Cover is polynomial-time solvable for $(sP_1+P_2+P_3)$-free graphs and bounded mim-width graphs. By combining our new results with known results we obtain a partial complexity classification for Subset Vertex Cover on $H$-free graphs.

We describe an implementation of a computer search for the "small" excluded minors for a class of matroids representable over a partial field. Using these techniques, we enumerate the excluded minors on at most 15 elements for both the class of dyadic matroids, and the class of 2-regular matroids. We conjecture that there are no other excluded minors for the class of 2-regular matroids; whereas, on the other hand, we show that there is a 16-element excluded minor for the class of dyadic matroids.

We consider matroids with the property that every subset of the ground set of size $s$ is contained in a $2s$-element circuit and every subset of size $t$ is contained in a $2t$-element cocircuit. We say that such a matroid has the \emph{$(s,2s,t,2t)$-property}. A matroid is an \emph{$(s,t)$-spike} if there is a partition of the ground set into pairs such that the union of any $s$ pairs is a circuit and the union of any $t$ pairs is a cocircuit. Our main result is that all sufficiently large matroids with the $(s,2s,t,2t)$-property are $(s,t)$-spikes, generalizing a 2019 result that proved the case where $s=t$. We also present some properties of $(s,t)$-spikes.

The class of 2-regular matroids is a natural generalisation of regular and near-regular matroids. We prove an excluded-minor characterisation for the class of 2-regular matroids. The class of 3-regular matroids coincides with the class of matroids representable over the Hydra-5 partial field, and the 3-connected matroids in the class with a $U_{2,5}$- or $U_{3,5}$-minor are precisely those with six inequivalent representations over GF(5). We also prove that an excluded minor for this class has at most 15 elements.

Let $M$ be an excluded minor for the class of $\mathbb{P}$-representable matroids for some partial field $\mathbb{P}$, let $N$ be a $3$-connected strong $\mathbb{P}$-stabilizer that is non-binary, and suppose $M$ has a pair of elements $\{a,b\}$ such that $M\backslash a,b$ is $3$-connected with an $N$-minor. Suppose also that $|E(M)| \geq |E(N)|+11$ and $M \backslash a,b$ is not $N$-fragile. In the prequel to this paper, we proved that $M \backslash a,b$ is at most five elements away from an $N$-fragile minor. An element $e$ in a matroid $M'$ is $N$-essential if neither $M'/e$ nor $M' \backslash e$ has an $N$-minor. In this paper, we prove that, under mild assumptions, $M \backslash a,b$ is one element away from a minor having at least $r(M)-2$ elements that are $N$-essential.

For all positive integers $s$ and $t$ exceeding one, a matroid $M$ on $n$ elements is {\em nearly $(s, t)$-cyclic} if there is a cyclic ordering $σ$ of its ground set such that every $s-1$ consecutive elements of $σ$ are contained in an $s$-element circuit and every $t-1$ consecutive elements of $σ$ are contained in a $t$-element cocircuit. In the case $s=t$, nearly $(s, s)$-cyclic matroids have been studied previously. In this paper, we show that if $M$ is nearly $(s, t)$-cyclic and $n$ is sufficiently large, then these $s$-element circuits and $t$-element cocircuits are consecutive in $σ$ in a prescribed way, that is, $M$ is "$(s, t)$-cyclic". Furthermore, we show that, given $s$ and $t$ where $t\ge s$, every $(s, t)$-cyclic matroid on $n > s+t-2$ elements is a weak-map image of the $\left(\frac{t-s}{2}\right)$-th truncation of a certain $(s, s)$-cyclic matroid. If $s=3$, this certain matroid is the rank-$\frac{n}{2}$ whirl, and if $s=4$, this certain matroid is the rank-$\frac{n}{2}$ free swirl.

A bipartite graph $G=(A,B,E)$ is ${\cal H}$-convex, for some family of graphs ${\cal H}$, if there exists a graph $H\in {\cal H}$ with $V(H)=A$ such that the set of neighbours in $A$ of each $b\in B$ induces a connected subgraph of $H$. Many $\mathsf{NP}$-complete problems, including problems such as Dominating Set, Feedback Vertex Set, Induced Matching and List $k$-Colouring, become polynomial-time solvable for ${\mathcal H}$-convex graphs when ${\mathcal H}$ is the set of paths. In this case, the class of ${\mathcal H}$-convex graphs is known as the class of convex graphs. The underlying reason is that the class of convex graphs has bounded mim-width. We extend the latter result to families of ${\mathcal H}$-convex graphs where (i) ${\mathcal H}$ is the set of cycles, or (ii) ${\mathcal H}$ is the set of trees with bounded maximum degree and a bounded number of vertices of degree at least $3$. As a consequence, we can re-prove and strengthen a large number of results on generalized convex graphs known in the literature. To complement result (ii), we show that the mim-width of ${\mathcal H}$-convex graphs is unbounded if ${\mathcal H}$ is the set of trees with arbitrarily large maximum degree or an arbitrarily large number of vertices of degree at least $3$. In this way we are able to determine complexity dichotomies for the aforementioned graph problems. Afterwards we perform a more refined width-parameter analysis, which shows even more clearly which width parameters are bounded for classes of ${\cal H}$-convex graphs.

A colouring of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is a mapping $c\colon V\to \{1,2,\ldots\}$ such that $c(u)\neq c(v)$ for every two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$. The {\sc List $k$-Colouring} problem is to decide whether a graph $G=(V,E)$ with a list $L(u)\subseteq \{1,\ldots,k\}$ for each $u\in V$ has a colouring $c$ such that $c(u)\in L(u)$ for every $u\in V$. Let $P_t$ be the path on $t$ vertices and let $K_{1,s}^1$ be the graph obtained from the $(s+1)$-vertex star $K_{1,s}$ by subdividing each of its edges exactly once.Recently, Chudnovsky, Spirkl and Zhong (DM 2020) proved that List $3$-Colouring is polynomial-time solvable for $(K_{1,s}^1,P_t)$-free graphs for every $t\geq 1$ and $s\geq 1$. We generalize their result to List $k$-Colouring for every $k\geq 1$. Our result also generalizes the known result that for every $k\geq 1$ and $s\geq 0$, List $k$-Colouring is polynomial-time solvable for $(sP_1+P_5)$-free graphs, which was proven for $s=0$ by Hoàng, Kamiński, Lozin, Sawada, and Shu (Algorithmica 2010) and for every $s\geq 1$ by Couturier, Golovach, Kratsch and Paulusma (Algorithmica 2015). We show our result by proving boundedness of an underlying width parameter. Namely, we show that for every $k\geq 1$, $s\geq 1$, $t\geq 1$, the class of $(K_k,K_{1,s}^1,P_t)$-free graphs has bounded mim-width and that a corresponding branch decomposition is "quickly computable" for these graphs.

For the Odd Cycle Transversal problem, the task is to find a small set $S$ of vertices in a graph that intersects every cycle of odd length. The Subset Odd Cycle Transversal problem requires S to intersect only those odd cycles that include a vertex of a distinguished vertex subset $T$. If we are given weights for the vertices, we ask instead that $S$ has small weight: this is the problem Weighted Subset Odd Cycle Transversal. We prove an almost-complete complexity dichotomy for Weighted Subset Odd Cycle Transversal for graphs that do not contain a graph $H$ as an induced subgraph. Our general approach can also be used for Weighted Subset Feedback Vertex Set, which enables us to generalize a recent result of Papadopoulos and Tzimas.

We study the computational complexity of two well-known graph transversal problems, namely Subset Feedback Vertex Set and Subset Odd Cycle Transversal, by restricting the input to $H$-free graphs, that is, to graphs that do not contain some fixed graph~$H$ as an induced subgraph. By combining known and new results, we determine the computational complexity of both problems on $H$-free graphs for every graph $H$ except when $H=sP_1+P_4$ for some $s\geq 1$. As part of our approach, we introduce the Subset Vertex Cover problem and prove that it is polynomial-time solvable for $(sP_1+P_4)$-free graphs for every $s\geq 1$.

We consider the classical problems (Edge) Steiner Tree and Vertex Steiner Tree after restricting the input to some class of graphs characterized by a small set of forbidden induced subgraphs. We show a dichotomy for the former problem restricted to $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs and a dichotomy for the latter problem restricted to $H$-free graphs. We find that there exists an infinite family of graphs $H$ such that Vertex Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $H$-free graphs, whereas there exist only two graphs $H$ for which this holds for Edge Steiner Tree. We also find that Edge Steiner Tree is polynomial-time solvable for $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs if and only if the treewidth of the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs is bounded (subject to P $\neq$ NP). To obtain the latter result, we determine all pairs $(H_1,H_2)$ for which the class of $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs has bounded treewidth.