arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given an integer $c\in \mathbb{N}$, we say a graph $G$ is $c$-pinched if $G$ does not contain an induced subgraph consisting of $c$ cycles, all going through a single common vertex and otherwise pairwise disjoint and with no edges between them. What can be said about the structure of $c$-pinched graphs? For instance, $1$-pinched graphs are exactly graphs of treewidth $1$. However, bounded treewidth for $c>1$ is immediately seen to be a false hope because complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, subdivided walls and line graphs of subdivided walls are all examples of $2$-pinched graphs with arbitrarily large treewidth. There is even a fifth obstruction for larger values of $c$, discovered by Pohoata and later independently by Davies, consisting of $3$-pinched graphs with unbounded treewidth and no large induced subgraph isomorphic to any of the first four obstructions. We fuse the above five examples into a grid-type theorem fully describing the unavoidable induced subgraphs of pinched graphs with large treewidth. More precisely, we prove that for every integer $c\in \mathbb{N}$, a $c$-pinched graph $G$ has large treewidth if and only if $G$ contains one of the following as an induced subgraph: a large complete graph, a large complete bipartite graph, a subdivision of a large wall, the line-graph of a subdivision of a large wall, or a large graph from the Pohoata-Davies construction. Our main result also generalizes to an extension of pinched graphs where the lengths of excluded cycles are lower-bounded.

We prove a conjecture of Sintiari and Trotignon that every even-hole-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains a four-vertex induced subgraph with at least five edges (that is, either the four-vertex complete graph or the unique four-vertex graph with five edges, also known as the diamond). In fact, we prove two stronger results: (a) For every $K_4$-free chordal graph $H$, every even-hole-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a four-vertex complete subgraph or an induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$ (when $H$ is the diamond, this yields their conjecture); and (b) For every $K_3$-free chordal graph $H$ (equivalently, for every forest $H$) and every $t \in \mathbb{N}$, every even-hole-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a $t$-vertex complete subgraph or an induced subgraph obtained from $H$ by adding a universal vertex (when $t=4$ and $H$ is the three-vertex path, this yields their conjecture). The choice of $H$ in both result is best possible: (a) fails for every graph $H$ that is not $K_4$-free and chordal, and (b) fails for every graph $H$ that is not a forest.

We prove that for all $r\in \mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}$ and $s,t\in \mathbb{N}$, there exists $Ω=Ω(r,s,t)\in \mathbb{N}$ with the following property. Let $G$ be a graph and let $H$ be a subgraph of $G$ isomorphic to a $(\leq r)$-subdivision of $K_Ω$. Then either $G$ contains $K_t$ or $K_{t,t}$ as an induced subgraph, or there is an induced subgraph $J$ of $G$ isomorphic to a proper $(\leq r)$-subdivision of $K_s$ such that every branch vertex of $J$ is a branch vertex of $H$. This answers in the affirmative a question of Lozin and Razgon. In fact, we show that both the branch vertices and the paths corresponding to the subdivided edges between them can be preserved.

A generalized $t$-pyramid is a graph obtained from a certain kind of tree (a subdivided star or a subdivided cubic caterpillar) and the line graph of a subdivided cubic caterpillar by identifying simplicial vertices. We prove that for every integer $t$ there exists a constant $c(t)$ such that every $n$-vertex even-hole-free graph with no clique of size $t$ and no induced subgraph isomorphic to a generalized $t$-pyramid has treewidth at most $c(t)\log{n}$. This settles a special case of a conjecture of Sintiari and Trotignon; this bound is also best possible for the class. It follows that several \textsf{NP}-hard problems such as \textsc{Stable Set}, \textsc{Vertex Cover}, \textsc{Dominating Set} and \textsc{Coloring} admit polynomial-time algorithms on this class of graphs. Results from this paper are also used in later papers of the series, in particular to solve the full version of the Sintiari-Trotignon conjecture.

The tree-independence number tree-$α$, first defined and studied by Dallard, Milanič and Štorgel, is a variant of treewidth tailored to solving the maximum independent set problem. Over a series of papers, Abrishami et al. developed the so-called central bag method to study induced obstructions to bounded treewidth. Among others, they showed that, in a certain superclass $\mathcal C$ of (even hole, diamond, pyramid)-free graphs, treewidth is bounded by a function of the clique number. In this paper, we relax the bounded clique number assumption, and show that $\mathcal C$ has bounded tree-$α$. Via existing results, this yields a polynomial time algorithm for the maximum independent set problem in this class. Our result also corroborates, for this class of graphs, a conjecture of Dallard, Milanič and Štorgel that in a hereditary graph class, tree-$α$ is bounded if and only if the treewidth is bounded by a function of the clique number.

The celebrated Erdős-Pósa Theorem, in one formulation, asserts that for every $c\geq 1$, graphs with no subgraph (or equivalently, minor) isomorphic to the disjoint union of $c$ cycles have bounded treewidth. What can we say about the treewidth of graphs containing no induced subgraph isomorphic to the disjoint union of $c$ cycles? Let us call these graphs $c$-perforated. While $1$-perforated graphs have treewidth one, complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs are examples of $2$-perforated graphs with arbitrarily large treewidth. But there are sparse examples, too: Bonamy, Bonnet, Déprés, Esperet, Geniet, Hilaire, Thomassé and Wesolek constructed $2$-perforated graphs with arbitrarily large treewidth and no induced subgraph isomorphic to $K_3$ or $K_{3,3}$; we call these graphs occultations. Indeed, it turns out that a mild (and inevitable) adjustment of occultations provides examples of $2$-perforated graphs with arbitrarily large treewidth and arbitrarily large girth, which we refer to as full occultations. Our main result shows that the converse also holds: for every $c\geq 1$, a $c$-perforated graph has large treewidth if and only if it contains, as an induced subgraph, either a large complete graph, or a large complete bipartite graph, or a large full occultation. This distinguishes $c$-perforated graphs, among graph classes purely defined by forbidden induced subgraphs, as the first to admit a grid-type theorem incorporating obstructions other than subdivided walls and their line graphs. More generally, for all $c,o\geq 1$, we establish a full characterization of induced subgraph obstructions to bounded treewidth in graphs containing no induced subgraph isomorphic to the disjoint union of $c$ cycles, each of length at least $o+2$.

We prove that every $P_5$-free graph of bounded clique number contains a small hitting set of all its maximum stable sets. More generally, let us say a class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs is $η$-bounded if there exists a function $h:\mathbb{N}\rightarrow \mathbb{N}$ such that $η(G)\leq h(ω(G))$ for every graph $G\in \mathcal{C}$, where $η(G)$ denotes smallest cardinality of a hitting set of all maximum stable sets in $G$, and $ω(G)$ is the clique number of $G$. Also, $\mathcal{C}$ is said to be polynomially $η$-bounded if in addition $h$ can be chosen to be a polynomial. We introduce $η$-boundedness inspired by a question of Alon and motivated by a number of meaningful similarities to $χ$-boundedness. In particular, we propose an analogue of the Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture, that the class of all $H$-free graphs is $η$-bounded if (and only if) $H$ is a forest. Like $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a star is easy to verify, and we prove two non-trivial extensions of this: $H$-free graphs are $η$-bounded if (1) $H$ has a vertex incident with all edges of $H$, or (2) $H$ can be obtained from a star by subdividing at most one edge, exactly once. Unlike $χ$-boundedness, the case where $H$ is a path is surprisingly hard. Our main result mentioned at the beginning shows that $P_5$-free graphs are $η$-bounded. The proof is rather involved compared to the classical ``Gyárfás path'' argument which establishes, for all $t$, the $χ$-boundedness of $P_t$-free graphs. It remains open whether $P_t$-free graphs are $η$-bounded for $t\geq 6$. It also remains open whether $P_5$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded, which, if true, would imply the Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for $P_5$-free graphs. But we prove that $H$-free graphs are polynomially $η$-bounded if $H$ is a proper induced subgraph of $P_5$.

Given a graph $H$, we prove that every (theta, prism)-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a large clique or an induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$, if and only if $H$ is a forest.

We say a class $\mathcal{C}$ of graphs is clean if for every positive integer $t$ there exists a positive integer $w(t)$ such that every graph in $\mathcal{C}$ with treewidth more than $w(t)$ contains an induced subgraph isomorphic to one of the following: the complete graph $K_t$, the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$, a subdivision of the $(t\times t)$-wall or the line graph of a subdivision of the $(t \times t)$-wall. In this paper, we adapt a method due to Lozin and Razgon (building on earlier ideas of Weißauer) to prove that the class of all $H$-free graphs (that is, graphs with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$) is clean if and only if $H$ is a forest whose components are subdivided stars. Their method is readily applied to yield the above characterization. However, our main result is much stronger: for every forest $H$ as above, we show that forbidding certain connected graphs containing $H$ as an induced subgraph (rather than $H$ itself) is enough to obtain a clean class of graphs. Along the proof of the latter strengthening, we build on a result of Davies and produce, for every positive integer $η$, a complete description of unavoidable connected induced subgraphs of a connected graph $G$ containing $η$ vertices from a suitably large given set of vertices in $G$. This is of independent interest, and will be used in subsequent papers in this series.

This paper continues a series of papers investigating the following question: which hereditary graph classes have bounded treewidth? We call a graph $t$-clean if it does not contain as an induced subgraph the complete graph $K_t$, the complete bipartite graph $K_{t, t}$, subdivisions of a $(t \times t)$-wall, and line graphs of subdivisions of a $(t \times t)$-wall. It is known that graphs with bounded treewidth must be $t$-clean for some $t$; however, it is not true that every $t$-clean graph has bounded treewidth. In this paper, we show that three types of cutsets, namely clique cutsets, 2-cutsets, and 1-joins, interact well with treewidth and with each other, so graphs that are decomposable by these cutsets into basic classes of bounded treewidth have bounded treewidth. We apply this result to two hereditary graph classes, the class of ($ISK_4$, wheel)-free graphs and the class of graphs with no cycle with a unique chord. These classes were previously studied and decomposition theorems were obtained for both classes. Our main results are that $t$-clean ($ISK_4$, wheel)-free graphs have bounded treewidth and that $t$-clean graphs with no cycle with a unique chord have bounded treewidth.

The List-3-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph $G$ and a list $L(v)\subseteq \{1,2,3\}$ of colors assigned to each vertex $v$ of $G$, whether $G$ admits a proper coloring $φ$ with $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, and the $3$-Coloring Problem is the List-$3$-Coloring Problem on instances with $L(v)=\{1,2,3\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. The List-$3$-Coloring Problem is a classical NP-complete problem, and it is well-known that while restricted to $H$-free graphs (meaning graphs with no induced subgraph isomorphic to a fixed graph $H$), it remains NP-complete unless $H$ is isomorphic to an induced subgraph of a path. However, the current state of art is far from proving this to be sufficient for a polynomial time algorithm; in fact, the complexity of the $3$-Coloring Problem on $P_8$-free graphs (where $P_8$ denotes the eight-vertex path) is unknown. Here we consider a variant of the List-$3$-Coloring Problem called the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem, where the input is an ordered graph, that is, a graph along with a linear order on its vertex set. For ordered graphs $G$ and $H$, we say $G$ is $H$-free if $H$ is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $G$ with the isomorphism preserving the linear order. We prove, assuming $H$ to be an ordered graph, a nearly complete dichotomy for the Ordered Graph List-$3$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free ordered graphs. In particular, we show that the problem can be solved in polynomial time if $H$ has at most one edge, and remains NP-complete if $H$ has at least three edges. Moreover, in the case where $H$ has exactly two edges, we give a complete dichotomy when the two edges of $H$ share an end, and prove several NP-completeness results when the two edges of $H$ do not share an end, narrowing the open cases down to three very special types of two-edge ordered graphs.

What are the unavoidable induced subgraphs of graphs with large treewidth? It is well-known that the answer must include a complete graph, a complete bipartite graph, all subdivisions of a wall and line graphs of all subdivisions of a wall (we refer to these graphs as the "basic treewidth obstructions"). So it is natural to ask whether graphs excluding the basic treewidth obstructions as induced subgraphs have bounded treewidth. Sintiari and Trotignon answered this question in the negative. Their counterexamples, the so-called "layered wheels," contain wheels, where a wheel consists of a hole (i.e., an induced cycle of length at least four) along with a vertex with at least three neighbors in the hole. This leads one to ask whether graphs excluding wheels and the basic treewidth obstructions as induced subgraphs have bounded treewidth. This also turns out to be false due to Davies' recent example of graphs with large treewidth, no wheels and and no basic treewidth obstructions as induced subgraphs. However, in Davies' example there exist holes and vertices (outside of the hole) with two neighbors in them. Here we prove that a hole with a vertex with at least two neighbors in it is inevitable in graphs with large treewidth and no basic obstruction. Our main result is that graphs in which every vertex has at most one neighbor in every hole (that does not contain it) and with the basic treewidth obstructions excluded as induced subgraphs have bounded treewidth.

A hole in a graph $G$ is an induced cycle of length at least four, and an even hole is a hole of even length. The diamond is the graph obtained from the complete graph $K_4$ by removing an edge. A pyramid is a graph consisting of a triangle called the base, a vertex called the apex, and three internally disjoint paths starting at the apex and disjoint otherwise, each joining the apex to a vertex of the base. For a family $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs, we say a graph $G$ is $\mathcal{H}$-free if no induced subgraph of $G$ is isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{H}$. Cameron, da Silva, Huang, and Vušković proved that (even hole, triangle)-free graphs have treewidth at most five, which motivates studying the treewidth of even-hole-free graphs of larger clique number. Sintiari and Trotignon provided a construction of (even hole, pyramid, $K_4$)-free graphs of arbitrarily large treewidth. Here, we show that for every $t$, (even hole, pyramid, diamond, $K_t$)-free graphs have bounded treewidth. The graphs constructed by Sintiari and Trotignon contain diamonds, so our result is sharp in the sense that it is false if we do not exclude diamonds. Our main result is in fact more general, that treewidth is bounded in graphs excluding certain wheels and three-path-configurations, diamonds, and a fixed complete graph. The proof uses "non-crossing decompositions" methods similar to those in previous papers in this series. In previous papers, however, bounded degree was a necessary condition to prove bounded treewidth. The result of this paper is the first to use the method of "non-crossing decompositions" to prove bounded treewidth in a graph class of unbounded maximum degree.

A theta is a graph consisting of two non-adjacent vertices and three internally disjoint paths between them, each of length at least two. For a family $\mathcal{H}$ of graphs, we say a graph $G$ is $\mathcal{H}$-free if no induced subgraph of $G$ is isomorphic to a member of $\mathcal{H}$. We prove a conjecture of Sintiari and Trotignon, that there exists an absolute constant $c$ for which every (theta, triangle)-free graph $G$ has treewidth at most $c\log (|V(G)|)$. A construction by Sintiari and Trotignon shows that this bound is asymptotically best possible, and (theta, triangle)-free graphs comprise the first known hereditary class of graphs with arbitrarily large yet logarithmic treewidth. Our main result is in fact a generalization of the above conjecture, that treewidth is at most logarithmic in $|V(G)|$ for every graph $G$ excluding the so-called three-path-configurations as well as a fixed complete graph. It follows that several NP-hard problems such as Stable Set, Vertex Cover, Dominating Set and Coloring admit polynomial time algorithms in graphs excluding the three-path-configurations and a fixed complete graph.

In 1981, Duffus, Gould, and Jacobson showed that every connected graph either has a Hamiltonian path, or contains a claw ($K_{1,3}$) or a net (a fixed six-vertex graph) as an induced subgraph. This implies that subject to being connected, these two are the only minimal (under taking induced subgraphs) graphs with no Hamiltonian path. Brousek (1998) characterized the minimal graphs that are $2$-connected, non-Hamiltonian and do not contain the claw as an induced subgraph. We characterize the minimal graphs that are $2$-connected and non-Hamiltonian for two classes of graphs: (1) split graphs, (2) triangle-free graphs. We remark that testing for Hamiltonicity is NP-hard in both of these classes.

This paper is motivated by the following question: what are the unavoidable induced subgraphs of graphs with large treewidth? Aboulker et al. made a conjecture which answers this question in graphs of bounded maximum degree, asserting that for all $k$ and $Δ$, every graph with maximum degree at most $Δ$ and sufficiently large treewidth contains either a subdivision of the $(k\times k)$-wall or the line graph of a subdivision of the $(k\times k)$-wall as an induced subgraph. We prove two theorems supporting this conjecture, as follows. 1. For $t\geq 2$, a $t$-theta is a graph consisting of two nonadjacent vertices and three internally disjoint paths between them, each of length at least $t$. A $t$-pyramid is a graph consisting of a vertex $v$, a triangle $B$ disjoint from $v$ and three paths starting at $v$ and disjoint otherwise, each joining $v$ to a vertex of $B$, and each of length at least $t$. We prove that for all $k,t$ and $Δ$, every graph with maximum degree at most $Δ$ and sufficiently large treewidth contains either a $t$-theta, or a $t$-pyramid, or the line graph of a subdivision of the $(k\times k)$-wall as an induced subgraph. This affirmatively answers a question of Pilipczuk et al. asking whether every graph of bounded maximum degree and sufficiently large treewidth contains either a theta or a triangle as an induced subgraph (where a theta means a $t$-theta for some $t\geq 2$). 2. A subcubic subdivided caterpillar is a tree of maximum degree at most three whose all vertices of degree three lie on a path. We prove that for every $Δ$ and subcubic subdivided caterpillar $T$, every graph with maximum degree at most $Δ$ and sufficiently large treewidth contains either a subdivision of $T$ or the line graph of a subdivision of $T$ as an induced subgraph.

For a positive integer $r$ and graphs $G$ and $H$, we denote by $G+H$ the disjoint union of $G$ and $H$, and by $rH$ the union of $r$ mutually disjoint copies of $H$. Also, we say $G$ is $H$-free if $H$ is not isomorphic to an induced subgraph of $G$. We use $P_t$ to denote the path on $t$ vertices. For a fixed positive integer $k$, the List-$k$-Coloring Problem is to decide, given a graph $G$ and a list $L(v)\subseteq \{1,\ldots,k\}$ of colors assigned to each vertex $v$ of $G$, whether $G$ admits a proper coloring $φ$ with $φ(v)\in L(v)$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$, and the $k$-Coloring Problem is the List-$k$-Coloring Problem restricted to instances with $L(v)=\{1,\ldots, k\}$ for every vertex $v$ of $G$. We prove that for every positive integer $r$, the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $rP_3$-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time. Together with known results, this gives a complete dichotomy for the complexity of the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free graphs: For every graph $H$, assuming P$\neq$NP, the List-$5$-Coloring Problem restricted to $H$-free graphs can be solved in polynomial time if and only if $H$ is an induced subgraph of either $rP_3$ or $P_5+rP_1$ for some positive integer $r$. As a hardness counterpart, we also show that the $k$-Coloring Problem restricted to $rP_4$-free graphs is NP-complete for all $k\geq 5$ and $r\geq 2$.

The smallest number of cliques, covering all edges of a graph $ G $, is called the (edge) clique cover number of $ G $ and is denoted by $ cc(G) $. It is an easy observation that for every line graph $ G $ with $ n $ vertices, $cc(G)\leq n $. G. Chen et al. [Discrete Math. 219 (2000), no. 1--3, 17--26; MR1761707] extended this observation to all quasi-line graphs and questioned if the same assertion holds for all claw-free graphs. In this paper, using the celebrated structure theorem of claw-free graphs due to Chudnovsky and Seymour, we give an affirmative answer to this question for all claw-free graphs with independence number at least three. In particular, we prove that if $ G $ is a connected claw-free graph on $ n $ vertices with $ α(G)\geq 3 $, then $ cc(G)\leq n $ and equality holds if and only if $ G $ is either the graph of icosahedron, or the complement of a graph on $10$ vertices called twister or the $p^{th}$ power of the cycle $ C_n $, for $1\leq p \leq \lfloor (n-1)/3\rfloor $.