arXiv++ Combinatorics

In a digraph, a quasi-kernel is a subset of vertices that is independent and such that the shortest path from every vertex to this subset is of length at most two. The ``small quasi-kernel conjecture,'' proposed by Erdős and Székely in 1976, postulates that every sink-free digraph has a quasi-kernel whose size is within a fraction of the total number of vertices. The conjecture is even more precise with a $1/2$ ratio, but even with larger ratio, this property is known to hold only for few classes of graphs. The focus here is on small quasi-kernels in split graphs. This family of graphs has played a special role in the study of the conjecture since it was used to disprove a strengthening that postulated the existence of two disjoint quasi-kernels. The paper proves that every sink-free split digraph $D$ has a quasi-kernel of size at most $\frac{2}{3}|V(D)|$, and even of size at most two when the graph is an orientation of a complete split graph. It is also shown that computing a quasi-kernel of minimal size in a split digraph is W[2]-hard.

In a digraph, a quasi-kernel is a subset of vertices that is independent and such that every vertex can reach some vertex in that set via a directed path of length at most two. Whereas Chvátal and Lovász proved in 1974 that every digraph has a quasi-kernel, very little is known so far about the complexity of finding small quasi-kernels. In 1976 Erdős and Székely conjectured that every sink-free digraph $D = (V, A)$ has a quasi-kernel of size at most $|V|/2$. Obviously, if $D$ has two disjoint quasi-kernels then it has a quasi-kernel of size at most $|V|/2$, and in 2001 Gutin, Koh, Tay and Yeo conjectured that every sink-free digraph has two disjoint quasi-kernels. Yet, they constructed in 2004 a counterexample, thereby disproving this stronger conjecture. We shall show that, not only sink-free digraphs occasionally fail to contain two disjoint quasi-kernels, but it is computationally hard to distinguish those that do from those that do not. We also prove that the problem of computing a small quasi-kernel is polynomial time solvable for orientations of trees but is computationally hard in most other cases (and in particular for restricted acyclic digraphs).

A permutation is said to be a square if it can be obtained by shuffling two order-isomorphic patterns. The definition is intended to be the natural counterpart to the ordinary shuffle of words and languages. In this paper, we tackle the problem of recognizing square permutations from both the point of view of algebra and algorithms. On the one hand, we present some algebraic and combinatorial properties of the shuffle product of permutations. We follow an unusual line consisting in defining the shuffle of permutations by means of an unshuffling operator, known as a coproduct. This strategy allows to obtain easy proofs for algebraic and combinatorial properties of our shuffle product. We besides exhibit a bijection between square $(213,231)$-avoiding permutations and square binary words. On the other hand, by using a pattern avoidance criterion on directed perfect matchings, we prove that recognizing square permutations is {\bf NP}-complete.

A permutation is said to be a square if it can be obtained by shuffling two order-isomorphic patterns. The definition is intended to be the natural counterpart to the ordinary shuffle of words and languages. In this paper, we tackle the problem of recognizing square permutations from both the point of view of algebra and algorithms. On the one hand, we present some algebraic and combinatorial properties of the shuffle product of permutations. We follow an unusual line consisting in defining the shuffle of permutations by means of an unshuffling operator, known as a coproduct. This strategy allows to obtain easy proofs for algebraic and combinatorial properties of our shuffle product. We besides exhibit a bijection between square $(213,231)$-avoiding permutations and square binary words. On the other hand, by using a pattern avoidance criterion on oriented perfect matchings, we prove that recognizing square permutations is $\mathbf{NP}$-complete.

Given permutations $σ\in S_k$ and $π\in S_n$ with $k<n$, the \emph{pattern matching} problem is to decide whether $π$ matches $σ$ as an order-isomorphic subsequence. We give a linear-time algorithm in case both $π$ and $σ$ avoid the two size-$3$ permutations $213$ and $231$. For the special case where only $σ$ avoids $213$ and $231$, we present a $O(max(kn^2,n^2\log(\log(n)))$ time algorithm. We extend our research to bivincular patterns that avoid $213$ and $231$ and present a $O(kn^4)$ time algorithm. Finally we look at the related problem of the longest subsequence which avoids $213$ and $231$.

We prove several combinatorial properties of suffix arrays, including a characterization of suffix arrays through a bijection with a certain well-defined class of permutations. Our approach is based on the characterization of Burrows-Wheeler arrays given in [1], that we apply by reducing suffix sorting to cyclic shift sorting through the use of an additional sentinel symbol. We show that the characterization of suffix arrays for a special case of binary alphabet given in [2] easily follows from our characterization. Based on our results, we also provide simple proofs for the enumeration results for suffix arrays, obtained in [3]. Our approach to characterizing suffix arrays is the first that exploits their relationship with Burrows-Wheeler permutations.

In this article, we study the problem of finding the longest common separable pattern between several permutations. We give a polynomial-time algorithm when the number of input permutations is fixed and show that the problem is NP-hard for an arbitrary number of input permutations even if these permutations are separable. On the other hand, we show that the NP-hard problem of finding the longest common pattern between two permutations cannot be approximated better than within a ratio of $sqrt{Opt}$ (where $Opt$ is the size of an optimal solution) when taking common patterns belonging to pattern-avoiding classes of permutations.