arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Zhipeng Gao

6 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2025-09-07 v2
Planar Turán numbers of three configurations
The planar Tuán number of $H$, denoted by $ex_{\mathcal{P}}(n,H)$, is defined as the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $H$-free planar graph. The exact value of $ex_{\mathcal{P}}(n,H)$ remains a mystery when $H$ is large (for example, $H$ is a long path or a long cycle), while tight bounds have been established for many small planar graphs such as cycles, paths, $Θ$-graphs and other small graphs formed by a union of them. One representative graph among such union graphs is $K_1+L$ where $L$ is a linear forest without isolated vertices. Previous works solved the cases when $L$ is a path or a matching. In this work, we first investigate the planar Turán number of the graph $K_1+L$ when $L$ is the disjoint union of a $P_2$ and $P_3$. Equivalently, $K_1+L$ represents a specific configuration formed by combining a $C_3$ and a $Θ_4$. We further consider the planar Turán numbers of the all graphs obtained by combining $C_3$ and $Θ_4$. Among the six possible such configurations, three have been resolved in earlier works. For the remaining three configurations (including $K_1+(P_2\dot{\cup}P_3)$), we derive tight bounds. Furthermore, we completely characterize all extremal graphs for the remaining two of these three cases.
The maximum number of cliques in disjoint copies of graphs
The problem of determining the maximum number of copies of $T$ in an $H$-free graph, for any graphs $T$ and $H$, was considered by Alon and Shikhelman. This is a variant of Turán's classical extremal problem. We show lower and upper bounds for the maximum number of $s$-cliques in a graph with no disjoint copies of arbitrary graph. We also determine the maximum number of $s$-cliques in an $n$-vertex graph that does not contain a disjoint union of $k$ paths of length two when $k=2,3$, or $s\geqslant k+2$, or $n$ is sufficiently large, this partly confirms a conjecture posed by Chen, Yang, Yuan, and Zhang \cite{2024Chen113974}.
Spanning weakly even trees of graphs
Let $G$ be a graph (with multiple edges allowed) and let $T$ be a tree in $G$. We say that $T$ is $\textit{even}$ if every leaf of $T$ belongs to the same part of the bipartition of $T$, and that $T$ is $\textit{weakly even}$ if every leaf of $T$ that has maximum degree in $G$ belongs to the same part of the bipartition of $T$. We confirm two recent conjectures of Jackson and Yoshimoto by showing that every connected graph that is not a regular bipartite graph has a spanning weakly even tree.
2024-08-13 v2
A short note on spanning even trees
We call a tree $T$ is \emph{even} if every pair of its leaves is joined by a path of even length. Jackson and Yoshimoto~[J. Graph Theory, 2024] conjectured that every $r$-regular nonbipartite connected graph $G$ has a spanning even tree. They verified this conjecture for the case when $G$ has a $2$-factor. In this paper, we prove that the conjecture holds when $r$ is odd, thereby resolving the only remaining unsolved case for this conjecture.
2024-01-09 v3
On independent domination and packing numbers of subcubic graphs
In a recent paper, Cho and Kim proved that in subcubic graphs, the independent domination number is at most three times the packing number. They subsequently posed the question of characterizing subcubic graphs that achieve this bound. In this paper, we completely solve the question by proving that exactly four graphs meet this bound.
2021-11-08
The restrained double Roman domination and graph operations
Published • View PublicationBIB
Let $G=(V(G),E(G))$ be a simple graph. A restrained double Roman dominating function (RDRD-function) of $G$ is a function $f: V(G) \rightarrow \{0,1,2,3\}$ satisfying the following properties: if $f(v)=0$, then the vertex $v$ has at least two neighbours assigned 2 under $f$ or one neighbour $u$ with $f(u)=3$; and if $f(v)=1$, then the vertex $v$ must have one neighbor $u$ with $f(u) \geq 2$; the induced graph by vertices assigned 0 under $f$ contains no isolated vertex. The weight of a RDRD-function $f$ is the sum $f(V)=\sum_{v \in V(G)} f(v)$, and the minimum weight of a RDRD-function on $G$ is the restrained double Roman domination number (RDRD-number) of $G$, denoted by $γ_{rdR}(G)$. In this paper, we first prove that the problem of computing RDRD-number is NP-hard even for chordal graphs. And then we study the impact of some graph operations, such as strong product, cardinal product and corona with a graph, on restrained double Roman domination number.