arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $p,q$ be two integers with $p\geq q$. Given a finite graph $F$ with no isolated vertices, the generalized Ramsey achievement game of $F$ on the complete graph $K_n$, denoted by $(p,q;K_n,F,+)$, is played by two players called Alice and Bob. In each round, Alice firstly chooses $p$ uncolored edges $e_1,e_2,...,e_p$ and colors it blue, then Bob chooses $q$ uncolored edge $f_1,f_2,...,f_q$ and colors it red; the player who can first complete the formation of $F$ in his (or her) color is the winner. The generalized achievement number of $F$, denoted by ${a}(p,q;F)$ is defined to be the smallest $n$ for which Alice has a winning strategy. If $p=q=1$, then it is denoted by ${a}(F)$, which is the classical achievement number of $F$ introduced by Harary in 1982. If Alice aims to form a blue $F$, and the goal of Bob is to try to stop him, this kind of game is called the first player game by Bollobás. Let ${a}^*(F)$ be the smallest positive integer $n$ for which Alice has a winning strategy in the first player game. A conjecture due to Harary states that the minimum value of ${a}(T)$ is realized when $T$ is a path and the maximum value of ${a}(T)$ is realized when $T$ is a star among all trees $T$ of order $n$. He also asked which graphs $F$ satisfy $a^*(F)=a(F)$? In this paper, we proved that $n\leq {a}(p,q;T)\leq n+q\left\lfloor (n-2)/p \right\rfloor$ for all trees $T$ of order $n$, and obtained a lower bound of ${a}(p,q;K_{1,n-1})$, where $K_{1,n-1}$ is a star. We proved that the minimum value of ${a}(T)$ is realized when $T$ is a path which gives a positive solution to the first part of Harary's conjecture, and ${a}(T)\leq 2n-2$ for all trees of order $n$. We also proved that for $n\geq 3$, we have $2n-2-\sqrt{(4n-8)\ln (4n-4)}\leq a(K_{1,n-1})\leq 2n-2$ with the help of a theorem of Alon, Krivelevich, Spencer and Szabó. We proved that $a^*(P_n)=a(P_n)$ for a path $P_n$.

In 1982, Harary introduced the concept of Ramsey achievement game on graphs. Given a graph $F$ with no isolated vertices. Consider the following game played on the complete graph $K_n$ by two players Alice and Bob. First, Alice colors one of the edges of $K_n$ blue, then Bob colors a different edge red, and so on. The first player who can complete the formation of $F$ in his color is the winner. The minimum $n$ for which Alice has a winning strategy is the achievement number of $F$, denoted by $a(F)$. If we replace $K_n$ in the game by the completed bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$, we get the bipartite achievement number, denoted by $\operatorname{ba}(F)$. In his seminal paper, Harary proposed an open problem of determining bipartite achievement numbers for trees. In this paper, we correct $\operatorname{ba}(mK_2)=m+1$ to $m$ and disprove $\operatorname{ba}(K_{1,m})=2m-2$ from Erickson and Harary, and extend their results on bipartite achievement numbers. We also find the exact values of achievement numbers for matchings, and the exact values or upper and lower bounds of bipartite achievement numbers on matchings, stars, and double stars. Our upper bounds are obtained by deriving efficient winning strategies for Alice.

In this note, we prove a theorem covering Chartrand, Kaigars, and Lick's theorem in [Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (1972), 63-68]. As an application, we give a simpler proof of theorem proved by Mader [J. Graph Theory 65 (2010), 61-69. (Theorem 1)].

An edge-cut $R$ of an edge-colored connected graph is called a rainbow-cut if no two edges in the edge-cut are colored the same. An edge-colored graph is rainbow disconnected if for any two distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ of the graph, there exists a $u$-$v$-rainbow-cut separating them. For a connected graph $G$, the rainbow disconnection number of $G$, denoted by rd$(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ rainbow disconnected. In this paper, we first give some tight upper bounds for rd$(G)$, and moreover, we completely characterize the graphs which meet the upper bound of the Nordhaus-Gaddum type results obtained early by us. Secondly, we propose a conjecture that $λ^+(G)\leq \textnormal{rd}(G)\leq λ^+(G)+1$, where $λ^+(G)$ is the upper edge-connectivity, and prove the conjecture for many classes of graphs, to support it. Finally, we give the relationship between rd$(G)$ of a graph $G$ and the rainbow vertex-disconnection number rvd$(L(G))$ of the line graph $L(G)$ of $G$.

The concept of rainbow connection number of a graph was introduced by Chartrand et al. in 2008. Inspired by this concept, other concepts on colored version of connectivity in graphs were introduced, such as the monochromatic connection number by Caro and Yuster in 2011, the proper connection number by Borozan et al. in 2012, and the conflict-free connection number by Czap et al. in 2018, as well as some other variants of connection numbers later on. Chakraborty et al. proved that to compute the rainbow connection number of a graph is NP-hard. For a long time, it has been tried to fix the computational complexity for the monochromatic connection number, the proper connection number and the conflict-free connection number of a graph. However, it has not been solved yet. Only the complexity results for the strong version, i.e., the strong proper connection number and the strong conflict-free connection number, of these connection numbers were determined to be NP-hard. In this paper, we prove that to compute each of the monochromatic connection number, the proper connection number and the conflict free connection number for a graph is NP-hard. This solves a long standing problem in this field, asked in many talks of workshops and papers.

Let $G$ be a nontrivial connected, edge-colored graph. An edge-cut $S$ of $G$ is called a rainbow cut if no two edges in $S$ are colored with a same color. An edge-coloring of $G$ is a rainbow disconnection coloring if for every two distinct vertices $s$ and $t$ of $G$, there exists a rainbow cut $S$ in $G$ such that $s$ and $t$ belong to different components of $G\setminus S$. For a connected graph $G$, the {\it rainbow disconnection number} of $G$, denoted by $rd(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors such that $G$ has a rainbow disconnection coloring by using this number of colors. In this paper, we show that for a connected graph $G$, computing $rd(G)$ is NP-hard. In particular, it is already NP-complete to decide if $rd(G)=3$ for a connected cubic graph. Moreover, we prove that for a given edge-colored (with an unbounded number of colors) connected graph $G$ it is NP-complete to decide whether $G$ is rainbow disconnected.

An edge-colored graph $G$ is \emph{conflict-free connected} if any two of its vertices are connected by a path, which contains a color used on exactly one of its edges. The \emph{conflict-free connection number} of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $cfc(G)$, is the smallest number of colors needed in order to make $G$ conflict-free connected. For a graph $G,$ let $C(G)$ be the subgraph of $G$ induced by its set of cut-edges. In this paper, we first show that, if $G$ is a connected non-complete graph $G$ of order $n\geq 9$ with $C(G)$ being a linear forest and with the minimum degree %$δ(G)\geq 2$, then $cfc(G)=2$ for $4 \leq n\leq 8 $; if $δ(G)\geq \max\{3, \frac{n-4}{5}\}$, then $cfc(G)=2$. The bound on the minimum degree is best possible. Next, we prove that, if $G$ is a connected non-complete graph of order $n\geq 33$ with $C(G)$ being a linear forest and with $d(x)+d(y)\geq \frac{2n-9}{5}$ for each pair of two nonadjacent vertices $x, y$ of $V(G)$, then $cfc(G)=2$. Both bounds, on the order $n$ and the degree sum, are tight. Moreover, we prove several results concerning relations between degree conditions on $G$ and the number of cut edges in $G$.

An edge-colored graph $G$ is \emph{conflict-free connected} if, between each pair of distinct vertices, there exists a path containing a color used on exactly one of its edges. The \emph{conflict-free connection number} of a connected graph $G$, denoted by $cfc(G)$, is defined as the smallest number of colors that are needed in order to make $G$ conflict-free connected. In this paper, we determine all trees $T$ of order $n$ for which $cfc(T)=n-t$, where $t\geq 1$ and $n\geq 2t+2 $. Then we prove that $1\leq cfc(G)\leq n-1$ for a connected graph $G$, and characterize the graphs $G$ with $cfc(G)=1,n-4,n-3,n-2,n-1$, respectively. Finally, we get the Nordhaus-Gaddum-type theorem for the conflict-free connection number of graphs, and prove that if $G$ and $\overline{G}$ are connected, then $4\leq cfc(G)+cfc(\overline{G})\leq n$ and $4\leq cfc(G)\cdot cfc(\overline{G})\leq2(n-2)$, and moreover, $cfc(G)+cfc(\overline{G})=n$ or $cfc(G)\cdot cfc(\overline{G})=2(n-2)$ if and only if one of $G$ and $\overline{G}$ is a tree with maximum degree $n-2$ or a $P_5$, and the lower bounds are sharp.

An edge-colored graph $G$ is $k$-color connected if, between each pair of vertices, there exists a path using at least $k$ different colors. The $k$-color connection number of $G$, denoted by $cc_{k}(G)$, is the minimum number of colors needed to color the edges of $G$ so that $G$ is $k$-color connected. First, we prove that let $H$ be a subdivision of a connected graph $G$, then $cc_{k}(H)\leq cc_{k}(G)$. Second, we give sufficient conditions to guarantee that $cc_{k}(G)=k$ in terms of minimum degree and the number of edges for 2-connected graphs. As a byproduct, we show that almost all graphs have the $k$-color connection number $k$. At last, we investigate the relationship between the $k$-color connection number and the rainbow connection number for a connected graph. In addition, we give exact values of $k$-color connection numbers for some graph classes: subdivisions of the wheel and the complete graph, and the generalised $θ$-graph.

A path $P$ in an edge-colored graph $G$ is a \emph{proper path} if no two adjacent edges of $P$ are colored with the same color. The graph $G$ is \emph{proper connected} if, between every pair of vertices, there exists a proper path in $G$. The \emph{proper connection number} $pc(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is defined as the minimum number of colors to make $G$ proper connected. In this paper, we study the degree sum condition for a general graph or a bipartite graph to have proper connection number 2. First, we show that if $G$ is a connected noncomplete graph of order $n\geq 5$ such that $d(x)+d(y)\geq \frac{n}{2}$ for every pair of nonadjacent vertices $x,y\in V(G)$, then $pc(G)=2$ except for three small graphs on 6, 7 and 8 vertices. In addition, we obtain that if $G$ is a connected bipartite graph of order $n\geq 4$ such that $d(x)+d(y)\geq \frac{n+6}{4}$ for every pair of nonadjacent vertices $x,y\in V(G)$, then $pc(G)=2$. Examples are given to show that the above conditions are best possible.