arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is $k$-choosable if it has a proper coloring for every $k$-list assignment. While every $C_3$-free planar graph is $4$-choosable, some of them are not $3$-choosable, as constructed by Voigt. Hu and Zhu conjectured that if $G$ is a $C_3$-free planar graph and $X \subseteq V(G)$ induces a bipartite subgraph, then $G$ has a proper $L$-coloring whenever $|L(x)| = 3$ for $x \in X$ and $|L(v)| = 4$ for $v \in V(G) \setminus X$. As evidence, they proved the conjecture when $X$ is an independent set. We provide further evidence by proving the conjecture when the induced subgraph $G[X]$ is an induced sparse matching. This is the first result supporting the conjecture in which the set $X$ receiving smaller lists may induce a subgraph with edges.

The vertex arboricity $\mathrm{va}(G)$ of a multigraph $G$ is the minimum number $k$ for which $V(G)$ can be partitioned into $k$ subsets, each of which induces an acyclic subgraph of $G$. By definition, if $\mathrm{va}(G)= k$, then the chromatic number, $χ(G)$, satisfies $k\leq χ(G)\leq 2k$. Fundamental results by Borodin from 1976 and Bollobás and Manvel from 1979 imply an analog of Gallai's lower bound on the number of edges in a $(2k-1)$-critical graph. We consider a slight generalization of vertex arboricity in the setting of DP-coloring. Using this framework, we derive lower bounds on the number of edges in graphs critical for vertex arboricity and for list arboricity that are better than Gallai's bound, along with similar bounds in our DP-setting.

A proper $k$-coloring of vertices of an $n$-vertex graph is equitable if the size of every color class is $\lfloor n/k\rfloor$ or $\lceil n/k\rceil$. An extension of it to list coloring requires only that the size of every color class is at most $\lceil n/k\rceil$. Such colorings have interesting applications and have been actively studied recently. In this paper, we extend the notion of equitable coloring to the more general notion of equitable DP coloring and study properties of the new parameter.

For an ordered graph $F$, denote the Turán density by $\vecπ(F)$. The relative Turán density, denoted by $ρ(F)$, is the supremum over $α\in [0,1]$ such that every ordered graph $G$ contains an $F$-free subgraph $G'$ with $e(G') \geq αe(G)$. Reiher, Rödl, Sales and Schacht showed that $ρ(P) = \vecπ(P)/2$ and $ρ(K) = \vecπ(K)$ for any ascending path $P$ or clique $K$. They asked if there are any ordered graphs $F$ with $\vecπ(F)/2 < ρ(F) < \vecπ(F)$. We answer this question in the affirmative by describing a family of such $F$. We also show that the relative Turán densities of a large family of ordered matchings (including $\{\{1,6\}, \{2,3\}, \{4,5\}\}$ and $\{\{1,3\}, \{2,5\}, \{4,6\}\}$) are $0$.

An oriented graph $H$ is Turánable (resp. tileable) if there exist $n_0 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that every regular tournament on $n \ge n_0$ vertices contains a copy of $H$ (resp. a perfect $H$-tiling). We disprove a conjectured characterization of Turánable oriented graphs by DeBiasio, Han, Lo, Molla, Piga, and Treglown, show that there are Turánable oriented graphs which are not tileable, and provide a new example of tileable oriented graph.

A proper coloring of vertices of a graph is equitable if the sizes of any two color classes differ by at most 1. Such colorings have many applications and are interesting by themselves. In this paper, we discuss the state of art and unsolved problems on equitable coloring and its list versions.

A proper vertex coloring of a graph is equitable if the sizes of all color classes differ by at most $1$. For a list assignment $L$ of $k$ colors to each vertex of an $n$-vertex graph $G$, an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$ from their lists such that no color is used more than $\lceil n/k\rceil$ times. Call a graph equitably $k$-choosable if it has an equitable $L$-coloring for every $k$-list assignment $L$. A graph $G$ is $(a,b)$-sparse if for every $A\subseteq V(G)$, the number of edges in the subgraph $G[A]$ of $G$ induced by $A$ is at most $a|A|+b$. Our first main result is that every $(\frac{7}{6},\frac{1}{3})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $3$-colorable and equitably $3$-choosable. This is sharp. Our second main result is that every $(\frac{5}{4},\frac{1}{2})$-sparse graph with minimum degree at least $2$ is equitably $4$-colorable and equitably $4$-choosable. This is also sharp. One of the tools in the proof is the new notion of strongly equitable (SE) list coloring. This notion is both stronger and more natural than equitable list coloring; and our upper bounds are for SE list coloring.

If $L$ is a list assignment of $r$ colors to each vertex of an $n$-vertex graph $G$, then an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring of vertices of $G$ from their lists such that no color is used more than $\lceil n/r\rceil$ times. A graph is equitably $r$-choosable if it has an equitable $L$-coloring for every $r$-list assignment $L$. In 2003, Kostochka, Pelsmajer and West (KPW) conjectured that an analog of the famous Hajnal-Szemerédi Theorem on equitable coloring holds for equitable list coloring, namely, that for each positive integer $r$ every graph $G$ with maximum degree at most $r-1$ is equitably $r$-choosable. The main result of this paper is that for each $r\geq 9$ and each planar graph $G$, a stronger statement holds: if the maximum degree of $G$ is at most $r$, then $G$ is equitably $r$-choosable. In fact, we prove the result for a broader class of graphs -- the class ${\mathcal{B}}$ of the graphs in which each bipartite subgraph $B$ with $|V(B)|\ge3$ has at most $2|V(B)|-4$ edges. Together with some known results, this implies that the KPW Conjecture holds for all graphs in ${\mathcal{B}}$, in particular, for all planar graphs.

The Chen-Lih-Wu Conjecture states that each connected graph with maximum degree $Δ\geq 3$ that is not the complete graph $K_{Δ+1}$ or the complete bipartite graph $K_{Δ,Δ}$ admits an equitable coloring with $Δ$ colors. For planar graphs, the conjecture has been confirmed for $Δ\geq 13$ by Yap and Zhang and for $9\leq Δ\leq 12$ by Nakprasit. In this paper, we present a proof that confirms the conjecture for graphs embeddable into a surface with non-negative Euler characteristic with maximum degree $Δ\geq 9$ and for planar graphs with maximum degree $Δ\geq 8$.

Given graphs $F$ and $G$, a perfect $F$-tiling in $G$ is a collection of vertex-disjoint copies of $F$ in $G$ that together cover all the vertices in $G$. The study of the minimum degree threshold forcing a perfect $F$-tiling in a graph $G$ has a long history, culminating in the Kühn--Osthus theorem [Combinatorica 2009] which resolves this problem, up to an additive constant, for all graphs $F$. In this paper we initiate the study of the analogous question for edge-ordered graphs. In particular, we characterize for which edge-ordered graphs $F$ this problem is well-defined. We also apply the absorbing method to asymptotically determine the minimum degree threshold for forcing a perfect $P$-tiling in an edge-ordered graph, where $P$ is any fixed monotone path.

We study the minimum number of maximum matchings in a bipartite multigraph G with parts $X$ and $Y$ under various conditions, refining the well-known lower bound due to M. Hall. When $|X|=n$, every vertex in $X$ has degree at least $k$, and every vertex in $X$ has at least $r$ distinct neighbors, the minimum is $r!(k-r+1)$ when $n\ge r$ and is $[r+n(k-r)]\prod_{i=1}^{n-1}(r-i)$ when $n<r$. When every vertex has at least two neighbors and $|Y|-|X|=t\ge 0$, the minimum is $[(n-1)t+2+b](t+1)$, where $b=|E(G)|-2(n+t)$. We also determine the minimum number of maximum matchings in several other situations. We provide a variety of sharpness constructions.