arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that for any toric ideal of a graph the degree of any element of Graver basis is bounded above by an exponential function of the maximal degree of a circuit.

We show that the theory of sorting by reversals fits into the well-established theory of circuit partitions of 4-regular multigraphs (which also involves the combinatorial structures of circle graphs and delta-matroids). In this way, we expose strong connections between the two theories that have not been fully appreciated before. We also discuss a generalization of sorting by reversals involving the double-cut-and-join (DCJ) operation. Finally, we also show that the theory of sorting by reversals is closely related to that of gene assembly in ciliates.

It is well known that each nonnegative integral flow on a graph can be decomposed into a sum of nonnegative graphic circuit flows, which cannot be further decomposed into nonnegative integral sub-flows. This is equivalent to saying that the indecomposable flows on graphs are those graphic circuit flows. Turning from graphs to signed graphs, the indecomposable flows are much richer than those of unsigned graphs. This paper gives a complete description of indecomposable flows on signed graphs from the viewpoint of resolution of singularities by means of double covering graphs.

Let $M$ be a regular matroid. The Jacobian group ${\rm Jac}(M)$ of $M$ is a finite abelian group whose cardinality is equal to the number of bases of $M$. This group generalizes the definition of the Jacobian group (also known as the critical group or sandpile group) ${\rm Jac}(G)$ of a graph $G$ (in which case bases of the corresponding regular matroid are spanning trees of $G$). There are many explicit combinatorial bijections in the literature between the Jacobian group of a graph ${\rm Jac}(G)$ and spanning trees. However, most of the known bijections use vertices of $G$ in some essential way and are inherently "non-matroidal". In this paper, we construct a family of explicit and easy-to-describe bijections between the Jacobian group of a regular matroid $M$ and bases of $M$, many instances of which are new even in the case of graphs. We first describe our family of bijections in a purely combinatorial way in terms of orientations; more specifically, we prove that the Jacobian group of $M$ admits a canonical simply transitive action on the set ${\mathcal G}(M)$ of circuit-cocircuit reversal classes of $M$, and then define a family of combinatorial bijections $β_{σ,σ^*}$ between ${\mathcal G}(M)$ and bases of $M$. (Here $σ$ (resp. $σ^*$) is an acyclic signature of the set of circuits (resp. cocircuits) of $M$.) We then give a geometric interpretation of each such map $β=β_{σ,σ^*}$ in terms of zonotopal subdivisions which is used to verify that $β$ is indeed a bijection. Finally, we give a combinatorial interpretation of lattice points in the zonotope $Z$; by passing to dilations we obtain a new derivation of Stanley's formula linking the Ehrhart polynomial of $Z$ to the Tutte polynomial of $M$.

We construct two families of Dantzig figures, which are $(d,2d)$-polytopes with an antipodal vertex pair, from convex hulls of initial subsets for the graded lexicographic (grlex) and graded reverse lexicographic (grevlex) orders on $\mathbb{Z}^{d}_{\geq 0}$. These two polytopes have the same number of vertices, $\mathcal{O}(d^{2})$, and the same number of edges, $\mathcal{O}(d^{3})$, but are not combinatorially equivalent. We provide an explicit description of the vertices and the facets for both families and describe their graphs along with analyzing their basic properties such as the radius, diameter, existence of Hamiltonian circuits, and chromatic number. Moreover, we also analyze the edge expansions of these graphs.

From the point of view of optimization, a critical issue is relating the combinatorial diameter of a polyhedron to its number of facets $f$ and dimension $d$. In the seminal paper of Klee and Walkup [KW67], the Hirsch conjecture of an upper bound of $f-d$ was shown to be equivalent to several seemingly simpler statements, and was disproved for unbounded polyhedra through the construction of a particular 4-dimensional polyhedron $U_4$ with 8 facets. The Hirsch bound for bounded polyhedra was only recently disproved by Santos. We consider analogous properties for a variant of the combinatorial diameter called the circuit diameter. In this variant, the walks are built from the circuit directions of the polyhedron, which are the minimal non-trivial solutions to the system defining the polyhedron. We are able to prove that circuit variants of the so-called non-revisiting conjecture and $d$-step conjecture both imply the circuit analogue of the Hirsch conjecture. For the equivalences in [KW67], the wedge construction was a fundamental proof technique. We exhibit why it is not available in the circuit setting, and what are the implications of losing it as a tool. Further, we show the circuit analogue of the non-revisiting conjecture implies a linear bound on the circuit diameter of all unbounded polyhedra - in contrast to what is known for the combinatorial diameter. Finally, we give two proofs of a circuit version of the $4$-step conjecture. These results offer some hope that the circuit version of the Hirsch conjecture may hold in general. A challenge in the circuit setting is that different realizations of polyhedra of the same combinatorial structure may have different diameters. We adapt the notion of simplicity to work with circuits in the form of C-simple and wedge-simple polyhedra. We show that it suffices to consider such polyhedra.

We show that a generic framework $(G,p)$ on the cylinder is globally rigid if and only if $G$ is a complete graph on at most four vertices or $G$ is both redundantly rigid and $2$-connected. To prove the theorem we also derive a new recursive construction of circuits in the simple $(2,2)$-sparse matroid, and a characterisation of rigidity for generic frameworks on the cylinder when a single designated vertex is allowed to move off the cylinder.

In this paper we consider the question of the existence of Hamiltonian circuits in the tope graphs of central arrangements of hyperplanes. Some of the results describe connections between the existence of Hamiltonian circuits in the arrangement and the odd-even invariant of the arrangement. In conjunction with this, we present some results concerning bounds on the odd-even invariant. The results given here can be formulated more generally for oriented matroids and are still valid in that setting.

Let G be a graph with vertex set {1,...,n}. A spanning forest F of G is increasing if the sequence of labels on any path starting at the minimum vertex of a tree of F form an increasing sequence. Hallam and Sagan showed that the generating function ISF(G,t) for increasing spanning forests of G has all nonpositive integral roots. Furthermore they proved that, up to a change of sign, this polynomial equals the chromatic polynomial of G precisely when 1,...,n is a perfect elimination order for G. We give new, purely combinatorial proofs of these results which permit us to generalize them in several ways. For example, we are able to bound the coefficients of ISF(G,t) using broken circuits. We are also able to extend these results to simplicial complexes using the new notion of a cage-free complex. A generalization to labeled multigraphs is also given. We end by exploring spanning forests where the increasing condition is replaced by having the label sequences avoid the patterns 231, 312, and 321.

I propose that most problems about circles (cycles, circuits) in ordinary graphs that have odd or even length find their proper setting in the theory of signed graphs, where each edge has a sign, $+$ or $-$. Even-circle and odd-circle problems correspond to questions about positive and negative circles in signed graphs. (The sign of a circle is the product of its edge signs.) I outline questions about circles in signed graphs, that seem natural and potentially important.

A signed graph is a graph $G$ associated with a mapping $σ: E(G)\to \{-1,+1\}$, denoted by $(G,σ)$. A $cycle$ of $(G,σ)$ is a connected 2-regular subgraph. A cycle $C$ is $positive$ if it has an even number of negative edges, and negative otherwise. A $circuit$ of of a signed graph $(G,σ)$ is a positive cycle or a barbell consisting of two edge-disjoint negative cycles joined by a path. The definition of a circuit of signed graph comes from the signed-graphic matroid. A circuit cover of $(G,σ)$ is a family of circuits covering all edges of $(G,σ)$. A circuit cover with the smallest total length is called a shortest circuit cover of $(G,σ)$ and its length is denoted by $\text{scc}(G,σ)$. Bouchet proved that a signed graph with a circuit cover if and only if it is flow-admissible (i.e., has a nowhere-zero integer flow). Máčajová et. al. show that a 2-edge-connected signed graph $(G,σ)$ has $\text{scc}(G,σ)\le 9 |E(G)|$ if it is flow-admissible. This bound was improved recently by Cheng et. al. to $\text{scc}(G,σ) \le 11|E(G)|/3$ for 2-edge-connected signed graphs with even negativeness, and particularly, $\text{scc}(G,σ)\le 3|E(G)|+ε(G,σ)/3$ for 2-edge-connected cubic signed graphs with even negativeness (where $ε(G,σ)$ is the negativeness of $(G,σ)$). In this paper, we show that every 2-edge-connected cubic signed graph has $\text{scc}(G,σ)\le 26|E(G)|/9$ if it is flow-admissible, and $\text{scc}(G,σ)\le 23|E(G)|/9$ if it has even negativeness.

Bicircular lift matroids are a class of matroids defined on the edge set of a graph. For a given graph $G$, the circuits of its bicircular lift matroid $L(G)$ are the edge sets of those subgraphs of $G$ that contain at least two cycles, and are minimal with respect to this property. For each cycle $C$ of $G$, since $L(G)/C$ is graphic and most graphic matroids are not bicircular lift, the class of bicircular lift matroids is not minor-closed. In this paper, we prove that the class of matroids that are graphic or bicircular lift has a finite list of excluded minors.

We survey known results related to nowhere-zero flows and related topics, such as circuit covers and the structure of circuits of signed graphs. We include an overview of several different definitions of signed graph colouring.

A biased graph is a graph with a class of selected circles ("cycles", "circuits"), called balanced, such that no theta subgraph contains exactly two balanced circles. A biased graph $Ω$ has two natural matroids, the frame matroid $G(Ω)$, and the lift matroid $L(Ω)$, and their extensions the full frame matroid $G^{{}^{{}_{{}_\bullet}}\!}(Ω)$ and the extended (or complete) lift matroid $L_0(Ω)$. In Part IV we used algebra to study the representations of these matroids by vectors over a skew field and the corresponding embeddings in Desarguesian projective spaces. Here we redevelop those representations, independently of Part IV and in greater generality, by using synthetic geometry.

Semiring complexity is the version of arithmetic circuit complexity that allows only two operations: addition and multiplication. We show that when the number of variables is fixed, the semiring complexity of a Schur polynomial $s_λ$ is $O(log(λ_1))$; here $λ_1$ is the largest part of the partition $λ$.

A set $Z$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a zero forcing set of $G$ if initially labeling all vertices in $Z$ with $1$ and all remaining vertices of $G$ with $0$, and then, iteratively and as long as possible, changing the label of some vertex $u$ from $0$ to $1$ if $u$ is the only neighbor with label $0$ of some vertex with label $1$, results in the entire vertex set of $G$. The zero forcing number $Z(G)$, defined as the minimum order of a zero forcing set of $G$, was proposed as an upper bound of the corank of matrices associated with $G$, and was also considered in connection with quantum physics and logic circuits. In view of the computational hardness of the zero forcing number, upper and lower bounds are of interest. Refining results of Amos, Caro, Davila, and Pepper, we show that $Z(G)\leq \frac{Δ-2}{Δ-1}n$ for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$ at least $3$ if and only if $G$ does not belong to $\{ K_{Δ+1},K_{Δ,Δ},K_{Δ-1,Δ},G_1,G_2\}$, where $G_1$ and $G_2$ are two specific graphs of orders $5$ and $7$, respectively. For a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, maximum degree $3$, and girth at least $5$, we show $Z(G)\leq \frac{n}{2}-Ω\left(\frac{n}{\log n}\right)$. Using a probabilistic argument, we show $Z(G)\leq \left(1-\frac{H_r}{r}+o\left(\frac{H_r}{r}\right)\right)n$ for an $r$-regular graph $G$ of order $n$ and girth at least $5$, where $H_r$ is the $r$-th harmonic number. Finally, we show $Z(G)\geq (g-2)(δ-2)+2$ for a graph $G$ of girth $g\in \{ 5,6\}$ and minimum degree $δ$, which partially confirms a conjecture of Davila and Kenter.

Let $F$ be a 4-regular graph. Each circuit partition $P$ of $F$ has a corresponding touch-graph $Tch(P)$; the circuits in $P$ correspond to vertices of $Tch(P)$, and the vertices of $F$ correspond to edges of $Tch(P)$. We discuss the connection between modified versions of the interlacement matrix of an Euler system of $F$ and the cycle space of $Tch(P)$, over $GF(2)$ and $\mathbb{R}$.

We prove that an eulerian graph $G$ admits a decomposition into $k$ closed trails of odd length if and only if and it contains at least $k$ pairwise edge-disjoint odd circuits and $k\equiv |E(G)|\pmod{2}$. We conjecture that a connected $2d$-regular graph of odd order with $d\ge 1$ admits a decomposition into $d$ odd closed trails sharing a common vertex and verify the conjecture for $d\le 3$. The case $d=3$ is crucial for determining the flow number of a signed eulerian graph which is treated in a separate paper (arXiv:1408.1703v2). The proof of our conjecture for $d=3$ is surprisingly difficult and calls for the use of signed graphs as a convenient technical tool.

We show that any infinite matroid can be reconstructed from the torsos of a tree-decomposition over its 2-separations, together with local information at the ends of the tree. We show that if the matroid is tame then this local information is simply a choice of whether circuits are permitted to use that end. The same is true if each torso is planar, with all gluing elements on a common face.

One fundamental question in the context of the geometric complexity theory approach to the VP vs. VNP conjecture is whether VP = $\overline{\textrm{VP}}$, where VP is the class of families of polynomials that are of polynomial degree and can be computed by arithmetic circuits of polynomial size, and $\overline{\textrm{VP}}$ is the class of families of polynomials that are of polynomial degree and can be approximated infinitesimally closely by arithmetic circuits of polynomial size. The goal of this article is to study the conjecture in (Mulmuley, FOCS 2012) that $\overline{\textrm{VP}}$ is not contained in VP. Towards that end, we introduce three degenerations of VP (i.e., sets of points in $\overline{\textrm{VP}}$), namely the stable degeneration Stable-VP, the Newton degeneration Newton-VP, and the p-definable one-parameter degeneration VP*. We also introduce analogous degenerations of VNP. We show that Stable-VP $\subseteq$ Newton-VP $\subseteq$ VP* $\subseteq$ VNP, and Stable-VNP = Newton-VNP = VNP* = VNP. The three notions of degenerations and the proof of this result shed light on the problem of separating $\overline{\textrm{VP}}$ from VP. Although we do not yet construct explicit candidates for the polynomial families in $\overline{\textrm{VP}}\setminus$VP, we prove results which tell us where not to look for such families. Specifically, we demonstrate that the families in Newton-VP $\setminus$ VP based on semi-invariants of quivers would have to be non-generic by showing that, for many finite quivers (including some wild ones), any Newton degeneration of a generic semi-invariant can be computed by a circuit of polynomial size. We also show that the Newton degenerations of perfect matching Pfaffians, monotone arithmetic circuits over the reals, and Schur polynomials have polynomial-size circuits.