arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ$-vertex critical if the domination numbers $γ(G)$ of $G$ is $k$ and $γ(G - v) < k$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$. Similarly, A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical if the connected domination numbers $γ_{c}(G)$ of $G$ is $k$ and $γ_{c}(G - v) < k$ for any vertex $v$ of $G$. The problem of interest is to determine whether or not $2$-connected $k$-$γ$-vertex critical graphs are Hamiltonian. In this paper, for all $k \geq 3$, we provide a $2$-connected $k$-$γ$-vertex critical graph which is non-Hamiltonian. We prove that every $2$-connected $3$-$γ$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian and the condition claw-free is necessary. For $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical graphs, we present a new method to prove that every $2$-connected $3$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian. Moreover, for $4 \leq k \leq 5$, we prove that every $3$-connected $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical claw-free graph is Hamiltonian. We show that the condition claw-free is necessary by giving $k$-$γ_{c}$-vertex critical non-Hamiltonian graphs containing a claw as an induced subgraph for $3 \leq k \leq 5$.

There is empirical evidence supporting the claim that almost all cubic non-Hamiltonian graphs are bridge graphs. In this paper, we pose a related conjecture and prove that the original claim holds for non-3-connected graphs if the conjecture is true.

A graph $\textit{G}$ is a tuple $(\textit{V}, \textit{E})$, where $\textit{V}$ is the vertex set, $\textit{E}$ is the edge set. A reduced graph is a graph of deleting non-Hamiltonian edges and smoothing out the redundant vertices of degree 2 on an edge except for leaving only one vertex of degree 2. We denote by I a set of cycles only jointed by inside vertices. |I| is the number of sets I in a graph. We use a norm graph to denote a reduced graph of |I|=1. $\textit{g}$ is a subgraph obtained by deleting all removable cycles from a basis of a norm graph. In this paper, we show that a norm graph $\textit{G}$ is non-Hamiltonian, if and only if, $\textit{g}$ and K_2_,_3 are homeomorphic.

We analyse a polyhedron which contains the convex hull of all Hamiltonian cycles of a given undirected connected cubic graph. Our constructed polyhedron is defined by polynomially-many linear constraints in polynomially-many continuous (relaxed) variables. Clearly, the emptiness of the constructed polyhedron implies that the graph is non-Hamiltonian. However, whenever a constructed polyhedron is non-empty, the result is inconclusive. Hence, the following natural question arises: if we assume that a non-empty polyhedron implies Hamiltonicity, how frequently is this diagnosis incorrect? We prove that, in the case of bridge graphs, the constructed polyhedron is always empty. We also demonstrate that some non-bridge non-Hamiltonian cubic graphs induce empty polyhedra as well. We compare our approach to the famous Dantzig-Fulkerson-Johnson relaxation of a TSP, and give empirical evidence which suggests that the latter is infeasible if and only if our constructed polyhedron is also empty. By considering special edge cut sets which are present in most cubic graphs, we describe a heuristic approach, built on our constructed polyhedron, for which incorrect diagnoses of non-Hamiltonian graphs as Hamiltonian appear to be very rare. In particular, for cubic graphs containing up to 18 vertices, only four out of 45,982 undirected connected cubic graphs were so misdiagnosed. By constrast, we demonstrate that an equivalent heuristic, when built on the Dantzig-Fulkerson-Johnson relaxation of a TSP, is mostly unsuccessful in identifying additional non-Hamiltonian graphs. These empirical results suggest that polynomial algorithms based on our constructed polyhedron may be able to correctly identify Hamiltonicity of a cubic graph in all but rare cases.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of graphs. The Turán number $ex(n;\mathcal{F})$ is defined to be the maximum number of edges in a graph of order $n$ that is $\mathcal{F}$-free. In 1959, Erdős and Gallai determined the Turán number of $M_{k+1}$ (a matching of size $k+1$) as follows: \[ ex(n;M_{k+1})= \max\left\{\binom{2k+1}{2},\binom{n}{2}-\binom{n-k}{2}\right\}. \] Since then, there has been a lot of research on Turán number of linear forests. A linear forest is a graph whose connected components are all paths or isolated vertices. Let $\mathcal{L}_{n,k}$ be the family of all linear forests of order $n$ with $k$ edges. In this paper, we prove that \[ ex(n;\mathcal{L}_{n,k})= \max \left\{\binom{k}{2},\binom{n}{2}-\binom{n-\left\lfloor \frac{k-1}{2}\right \rfloor}{2}+ c \right\}, \] where $c=0$ if $k$ is odd and $c=1$ otherwise. This determines the maximum number of edges in a non-Hamiltonian graph with given Hamiltonian completion number and also solves two open problems in \cite{WY} as special cases. Moreover, we show that our main theorem implies Erdős-Gallai Theorem and also gives a short new proof for it by the closure and counting techniques. Finally, we generalize our theorem to a conjecture which implies the famous Erdős Matching Conjecture.

A platypus graph is a non-hamiltonian graph for which every vertex-deleted subgraph is traceable. They are closely related to families of graphs satisfying interesting conditions regarding longest paths and longest cycles, for instance hypohamiltonian, leaf-stable, and maximally non-hamiltonian graphs. In this paper, we first investigate cubic platypus graphs, covering all orders for which such graphs exist: in the general and polyhedral case as well as for snarks. We then present (not necessarily cubic) platypus graphs of girth up to 16---whereas no hypohamiltonian graphs of girth greater than 7 are known---and study their maximum degree, generalising two theorems of Chartrand, Gould, and Kapoor. Using computational methods, we determine the complete list of all non-isomorphic platypus graphs for various orders and girths. Finally, we address two questions raised by the third author in [J. Graph Theory \textbf{86} (2017) 223--243].

In contrast with Kotzig's result that the line graph of a $3$-regular graph $X$ is Hamilton decomposable if and only if $X$ is Hamiltonian, we show that for each integer $k\geq 4$ there exists a simple non-Hamiltonian $k$-regular graph whose line graph has a Hamilton decomposition. We also answer a question of Jackson by showing that for each integer $k\geq 3$ there exists a simple connected $k$-regular graph with no separating transitions whose line graph has no Hamilton decomposition.

In this paper, we extend and refine previous Turán-type results on graphs with a given circumference. Let $W_{n,k,c}$ be the graph obtained from a clique $K_{c-k+1}$ by adding $n-(c-k+1)$ isolated vertices each joined to the same $k$ vertices of the clique, and let $f(n,k,c)=e(W_{n,k,c})$. Improving a celebrated theorem of Erdős and Gallai, Kopylov proved that for $c<n$, any 2-connected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with circumference $c$ has at most $\max{f(n,2,c),f(n,\lfloor\frac{c}{2}\rfloor,c)}$ edges. Recently, Füredi et al. proved a stability version of Kopylov's theorem. Their main result states that if $G$ is a 2-connected graph on $n$ vertices with circumference $c$ such that $10\leq c<n$ and $e(G)>\max{f(n,3,c),f(n,\lfloor\frac{c}{2}\rfloor-1,c)}$, then either $G$ is a subgraph of $W_{n,2,c}$ or $W_{n,\lfloor\frac{c}{2}\rfloor,c}$, or $c$ is odd and $G$ is a subgraph of a member of two well-characterized families which we define as $\mathcal{X}_{n,c}$ and $\mathcal{Y}_{n,c}$. We prove that if $G$ is a 2-connected graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree at least $k$ and circumference $c$ such that $10\leq c<n$ and $e(G)>\max{f(n,k+1,c),f(n,\lfloor\frac{c}{2}\rfloor-1,c)}$, then one of the following holds: (i) $G$ is a subgraph of $W_{n,k,c}$ or $W_{n,\lfloor\frac{c}{2}\rfloor,c}$, (ii) $k=2$, $c$ is odd, and $G$ is a subgraph of a member of $\mathcal{X}_{n,c}\cup \mathcal{Y}_{n,c}$, or (iii) $k\geq 3$ and $G$ is a subgraph of the union of a clique $K_{c-k+1}$ and some cliques $K_{k+1}$'s, where any two cliques share the same two vertices. This provides a unified generalization of the above result of Füredi et al. as well as a recent result of Li et al. and independently, of Füredi et al. on non-Hamiltonian graphs. Moreover, we prove a stability result on a classical theorem of Bondy on the circumference.

The classical Dirac theorem asserts that every graph $G$ on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $δ(G) \ge \lceil n/2 \rceil$ is Hamiltonian. The lower bound of $\lceil n/2 \rceil$ on the minimum degree of a graph is tight. In this paper, we extend the classical Dirac theorem to the case where $δ(G) \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor $ by identifying the only non-Hamiltonian graph families in this case. We first present a short and simple proof. We then provide an alternative proof that is constructive and self-contained. Consequently, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm that constructs a Hamiltonian cycle, if exists, of a graph $G$ with $δ(G) \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$, or determines that the graph is non-Hamiltonian. Finally, we present a self-contained proof for our algorithm which provides insight into the structure of Hamiltonian cycles when $δ(G) \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$ and is promising for extending the results of this paper to the cases with smaller degree bounds.

The problem of characterizing maximal non-Hamiltonian graphs may be naturally extended to characterizing graphs that are maximal with respect to non-traceability and beyond that to $t$-path traceability. We show how traceability behaves with respect to disjoint union of graphs and the join with a complete graph. Our main result is a decomposition theorem that reduces the problem of characterizing maximal $t$-path traceable graphs to characterizing those that have no universal vertex. We generalize a construction of maximal non-traceable graphs by Zelinka to $t$-path traceable graphs.

In 1962, Erdős proved that if a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices satisfies $$ e(G)>\max\left\{\binom{n-k}{2}+k^2,\binom{\lceil(n+1)/2\rceil}{2}+\left\lfloor \frac{n-1}{2}\right\rfloor^2\right\}, $$ where the minimum degree $δ(G)\geq k$ and $1\leq k\leq(n-1)/2$, then it is Hamiltonian. For $n \geq 2k+1$, let $E^k_n=K_{k}\vee (kK_1+K_{n-2k})$, where "$\vee$" is the "join" operation. One can observe $e(E^k_n)=\binom{n-k}{2}+k^2$ and $E^k_n$ is not Hamiltonian. As $E^k_n$ contains induced claws for $k\geq 2$, a natural question is to characterize all 2-connected claw-free non-Hamiltonian graphs with the largest possible number of edges. We answer this question completely by proving a claw-free analog of Erdős' theorem. Moreover, as byproducts, we establish several tight spectral conditions for a 2-connected claw-free graph to be Hamiltonian. Similar results for the traceability of connected claw-free graphs are also obtained. Our tools include Ryjáček's claw-free closure theory and Brousek's characterization of minimal 2-connected claw-free non-Hamiltonian graphs.

In 1962, Erdős gave a sufficient condition for Hamilton cycles in terms of the vertex number, edge number, and minimum degree of graphs which generalized Ore's theorem. One year later, Moon and Moser gave an analogous result for Hamilton cycles in balanced bipartite graphs. In this paper we present the spectral analogues of Erdős' theorem and Moon-Moser's theorem, respectively. Let $\mathcal{G}_n^k$ be the class of non-Hamiltonian graphs of order $n$ and minimum degree at least $k$. We determine the maximum (signless Laplacian) spectral radius of graphs in $\mathcal{G}_n^k$ (for large enough $n$), and the minimum (signless Laplacian) spectral radius of the complements of graphs in $\mathcal{G}_n^k$. All extremal graphs with the maximum (signless Laplacian) spectral radius and with the minimum (signless Laplacian) spectral radius of the complements are determined, respectively. We also solve similar problems for balanced bipartite graphs and the quasi-complements.