arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph is $1$-planar, if it can be drawn in the plane such that there is at most one crossing on every edge. It is known, that $1$-planar graphs have at most $4n-8$ edges. We prove the following odd-even generalization. If a graph can be drawn in the plane such that every edge is crossed by at most one other edge {\em an odd number of times}, then it is called 1-odd-planar and it has at most $5n-9$ edges. As a consequence, we improve the constant in the Crossing Lemma for the odd-crossing number, if adjacent edges cross an even number of times. We also give upper bound for the number of edges of $k$-odd-planar graphs.

For a planar graph $G$, Borodin stated that $G$ is $(Δ+1)$-edge-choosable if $Δ\geq9$ and later Bonamy showed that $G$ is $9$-edge-choosable if $Δ=8$. At the same time, Borodin et al. proved that $G$ is $Δ$-edge-choosable if $Δ\geq12$. In the paper, we extend these results to $K_5$-minor free graphs.

In relation to oriented coloring and chromatic number, the parameter oriented relative clique number of an oriented graph $\overrightarrow{G}$, denoted by $ω_{ro}(\overrightarrow{G})$, is the main focus of this work. We solve an open problem mentioned in the recent survey on oriented coloring by Sopena (Discrete Mathematics 2016), and positively settle a conjecture due to Sen (PhD thesis 2014), by proving that the maximum value of $ω_{ro}(\overrightarrow{G})$ is $10$ when $\overrightarrow{G}$ is a planar graph.

We study the problem of counting all cycles or self-avoiding walks (SAWs) on triangulated planar graphs. We present a subexponential $2^{O(\sqrt{n})}$ time algorithm for this counting problem. Among the technical ingredients used in this algorithm are the planar separator theorem and a delicate analysis using pairs of Motzkin paths and Motzkin numbers. We can then adapt this algorithm to uniformly sample SAWs, in subexponential time. Our work is motivated by the problem of gerrymandered districting maps.

In RSST, they "replace the mammoth hand-checking of unavoidability that A&H required, by another mammoth hand-checkable proof " (page 18). Here, the proof of unavoidability is accomplished in a lengthy structured hand-checkable proof whose entirety is presented in this document.

For a graph $G = (V(G), E(G))$, a dominating set $D$ is a vertex subset of $V(G)$ in which every vertex of $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. The domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set of $G$ and is denoted by $γ(G)$. A coloring of $G$ is a partition $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ such that each of $V_{i}$ in an independent set. The chromatic number is the smallest $k$ among all colorings $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ of $G$ and is denoted by $χ(G)$. A coloring $C = (V_{1}, ... ,V_{k})$ is said to be dominator if, for all $V_{i}$, every vertex $v \in V_{i}$ is singleton in $V_{i}$ or is adjacent to every vertex of $V_{j}$. The dominator chromatic number of $G$ is the minimum $k$ of all dominator colorings of $G$ and is denoted by $χ_{d}(G)$. Further, a graph $G$ is $D(k)$ if $γ(G) = χ(G) = χ_{d}(G) = k$. In this paper, for $n \geq 4k - 3$, we prove that there always exists a $D(k)$ graph of order $n$. We further prove that there is no planar $D(k)$ graph when $k \in \{3, 4\}$. Namely, we prove that, for a non-trivial planar graph $G$, the graph $G$ is $D(k)$ if and only if $G$ is $K_{2, q}$ where $q \geq 2$.

For a fixed positive integer $d \geq 2$, a distance-$d$ independent set (D$d$IS) of a graph is a vertex subset whose distance between any two members is at least $d$. Imagine that there is a token placed on each member of a D$d$IS. Two D$d$ISs are adjacent under Token Sliding ($\mathsf{TS}$) if one can be obtained from the other by moving a token from one vertex to one of its unoccupied adjacent vertices. Under Token Jumping ($\mathsf{TJ}$), the target vertex needs not to be adjacent to the original one. The Distance-$d$ Independent Set Reconfiguration (D$d$ISR) problem under $\mathsf{TS}/\mathsf{TJ}$ asks if there is a corresponding sequence of adjacent D$d$ISs that transforms one given D$d$IS into another. The problem for $d = 2$, also known as the Independent Set Reconfiguration problem, has been well-studied in the literature and its computational complexity on several graph classes has been known. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of D$d$ISR on different graphs under $\mathsf{TS}$ and $\mathsf{TJ}$ for any fixed $d \geq 3$. On chordal graphs, we show that D$d$ISR under $\mathsf{TJ}$ is in $\mathtt{P}$ when $d$ is even and $\mathtt{PSPACE}$-complete when $d$ is odd. On split graphs, there is an interesting complexity dichotomy: D$d$ISR is $\mathtt{PSPACE}$-complete for $d = 2$ but in $\mathtt{P}$ for $d=3$ under $\mathsf{TS}$, while under $\mathsf{TJ}$ it is in $\mathtt{P}$ for $d = 2$ but $\mathtt{PSPACE}$-complete for $d = 3$. Additionally, certain well-known hardness results for $d = 2$ on perfect graphs and planar graphs of maximum degree three and bounded bandwidth can be extended for $d \geq 3$.

The arboricity $Γ(G)$ of an undirected graph $G = (V,E)$ is the minimal number such that $E$ can be partitioned into $Γ(G)$ forests. Nash-Williams' formula states that $k = \lceil γ(G) \rceil$, where $γ(G)$ is the maximum of ${|E_H|}/(|V_H| -1)$ over all subgraphs $(V_H, E_H)$ of $G$ with $|V_H| \geq 2$. The Strong Nine Dragon Tree Conjecture states that if $γ(G) \leq k + \frac{d}{d+k+1}$ for $k, d \in \mathbb N_0$, then there is a partition of the edge set of $G$ into $k+1$ forests such that one forest has at most $d$ edges in each connected component. We settle the conjecture for $d \leq k + 1$. For $d \leq 2(k+1)$, we cannot prove the conjecture, however we show that there exists a partition in which the connected components in one forest have at most $d + \lceil k \cdot \frac{d}{k+1} \rceil - k$ edges. As an application of this theorem, we show that every $5$-edge-connected planar graph $G$ has a $\frac{5}{6}$-thin spanning tree. This theorem is best possible, in the sense that we cannot replace $5$-edge-connected with $4$-edge-connected, even if we replace $\frac{5}{6}$ with any positive real number less than $1$. This strengthens a result of Merker and Postle which showed $6$-edge-connected planar graphs have a $\frac{18}{19}$-thin spanning tree.

Let $N_{\mathcal{P}}(n,H)$ denote the maximum number of copies of $H$ in an $n$ vertex planar graph. The problem of bounding this function for various graphs $H$ has been extensively studied since the 70's. A special case that received a lot of attention recently is when $H$ is the path on $2m+1$ vertices, denoted $P_{2m+1}$. Our main result in this paper is that $$ N_{\mathcal{P}}(n,P_{2m+1})=O(m^{-m}n^{m+1})\;.$$ This improves upon the previously best known bound by a factor $e^{m}$, which is best possible up to the hidden constant, and makes a significant step towards resolving conjectures of Gosh et al. and of Cox and Martin. The proof uses graph theoretic arguments together with (simple) arguments from the theory of convex optimization.

The coloring reconfiguration graph $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ has as its vertex set all the proper $k$-colorings of $G$, and two vertices in $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ are adjacent if their corresponding $k$-colorings differ on a single vertex. Cereceda conjectured that if an $n$-vertex graph $G$ is $d$-degenerate and $k\geq d+2$, then the diameter of $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ is $O(n^2)$. Bousquet and Heinrich proved that if $G$ is planar and bipartite, then the diameter of $\mathcal{C}_5(G)$ is $O(n^2)$. (This proves Cereceda's Conjecture for every such graph with degeneracy 3.) They also highlighted the particular case of Cereceda's Conjecture when $G$ is planar and has no 3-cycles. As a partial solution to this problem, we show that the diameter of $\mathcal{C}_5(G)$ is $O(n^2)$ for every planar graph $G$ with no 3-cycles and no 5-cycles.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a subset $D$ of vertices such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. A dominating set $D$ is paired if the subgraph induced by its vertices has a perfect matching, and semipaired if every vertex in $D$ is paired with exactly one other vertex in $D$ that is within distance 2 from it. The paired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a paired dominating set of $G$, and the semipaired domination number, denoted by $γ_{pr2}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a semipaired dominating set of $G$. A near-triangulation is a biconnected planar graph that admits a plane embedding such that all of its faces are triangles except possibly the outer face. We show in this paper that $γ_{pr}(G) \le 2 \lfloor \frac{n}{4} \rfloor$ for any near-triangulation $G$ of order $n\ge 4$, and that with some exceptions, $γ_{pr2}(G) \le \lfloor \frac{2n}{5} \rfloor$ for any near-triangulation $G$ of order $n\ge 5$.

A decomposition of a graph $G$ is a family of subgraphs of $G$ whose edge sets form a partition of $E(G)$. In this paper, we prove that every triangle-free planar graph $G$ can be decomposed into a $2$-degenerate graph and a matching. Consequently, every triangle-free planar graph $G$ has a matching $M$ such that $G-M$ is online 3-DP-colorable. This strengthens an earlier result in [R. Škrekovski, {\em A Grötzsch-Type Theorem for List Colourings with Impropriety One}, Combin. Prob. Comput. 8 (1999), 493-507] that every triangle-free planar graph is $1$-defective $3$-choosable.

In the 1960s, Erdős and his cooperators initiated the research of the maximum numbers of edges in a graph or a planar graph on $n$ vertices without $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. This problem had been solved for $k\leq4$. As pointed out by Bollobás, it is very difficult for general $k$. Recently, Tait and Tobin [J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 2017] confirmed a famous conjecture on maximum spectral radius of $n$-vertex planar graphs. Motivated by the above results, we consider two extremal problems on planar graphs without $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. We first determine the maximum number of edges in a planar graph of order $n$ and maximum degree $n-1$ without $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. Based on this, we then determine the maximum spectral radius as well as its unique extremal graph over all planar graphs on $n$ vertices without $k$ edge-disjoint cycles. Finally, we also discuss several extremal problems for general graphs.

A linear forest is a union of vertex-disjoint paths, and the linear arboricity of a graph $G$, denoted by $\operatorname{la}(G)$, is the minimum number of linear forests needed to partition the edge set of $G$. Clearly, $\operatorname{la}(G) \ge \lceilΔ(G)/2\rceil$ for a graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ(G)$. On the other hand, the Linear Arboricity Conjecture due to Akiyama, Exoo, and Harary from 1981 asserts that $\operatorname{la}(G) \leq \lceil(Δ(G)+1) / 2\rceil$ for every graph $ G $. This conjecture has been verified for planar graphs and graphs whose maximum degree is at most $ 6 $, or is equal to $ 8 $ or $ 10 $. Given a positive integer $k$, a graph $G$ is $k$-degenerate if it can be reduced to a trivial graph by successive removal of vertices with degree at most $k$. We prove that for any $k$-degenerate graph $G$, $\operatorname{la}(G) = \lceilΔ(G)/2 \rceil$ provided $Δ(G) \ge 2k^2 -k$.

Let $G$ be a graph of order $n$ with adjacency matrix $A(G)$. The \textit{energy} of graph $G$, denoted by $\mathcal{E}(G)$, is defined as the sum of absolute value of eigenvalues of $A(G)$. It was conjectured that if $A(G)$ is non-singular, then $\mathcal{E}(G)\geqΔ(G)+δ(G)$. In this paper we propose a stronger conjecture as for $n \geq 5$, $\mathcal{E}(G)\geq n-1+ d$, where $d$ is the average degree of $G$. Here, we show that conjecture holds for bipartite graphs, planar graphs and for the graphs with $d \leq n-2\ln n -3$

A matching of a graph is a set of edges without common end vertex. A graph is called 1-planar if it admits a drawing in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. Recently, Biedl and Wittnebel proved that every 1-planar graph with minimum degree 3 and $n\geq 7$ vertices has a matching of size at least $\frac{n+12}{7}$, which is tight for some graphs. They also provided tight lower bounds for the sizes of matchings in 1-planar graphs with minimum degree 4 or 5. In this paper, we show that any 1-planar graph with minimum degree 6 and $n \geq 36$ vertices has a matching of size at least $\frac{3n+4}{7}$, and this lower bound is tight. Our result confirms a conjecture posed by Biedl and Wittnebel.

We determine the maximum number of edges that a planar graph can have as a function of its maximum degree and matching number.

We devise constant-factor approximation algorithms for finding as many disjoint cycles as possible from a certain family of cycles in a given planar or bounded-genus graph. Here disjoint can mean vertex-disjoint or edge-disjoint, and the graph can be undirected or directed. The family of cycles under consideration must satisfy two properties: it must be uncrossable and allow for an oracle access that finds a weight-minimal cycle in that family for given nonnegative edge weights or (in planar graphs) the union of all remaining cycles in that family after deleting a given subset of edges. Our setting generalizes many problems that were studied separately in the past. For example, three families that satisfy the above properties are (i) all cycles in a directed or undirected graph, (ii) all odd cycles in an undirected graph, and (iii) all cycles in an undirected graph that contain precisely one demand edge, where the demand edges form a subset of the edge set. The latter family (iii) corresponds to the classical disjoint paths problem in fully planar and bounded-genus instances. While constant-factor approximation algorithms were known for edge-disjoint paths in such instances, we improve the constant in the planar case and obtain the first such algorithms for vertex-disjoint paths. We also obtain approximate min-max theorems of the Erdős--Pósa type. For example, the minimum feedback vertex set in a planar digraph is at most 12 times the maximum number of vertex-disjoint cycles.

An odd coloring of a graph $G$ is a proper coloring such that any non-isolated vertex in $G$ has a coloring appears odd times on its neighbors. The odd chromatic number, denoted by $χ_o(G)$, is the minimum number of colors that admits an odd coloring of $G$. Petruševski and Škrekovski in 2021 introduced this notion and proved that if $G$ is planar, then $χ_o(G)\le9$ and conjectured that $χ_o(G)\le5$. More recently, Petr and Portier improved $9$ to $8$. A graph is $1$-planar if it can be drawn in the plane so that each edge is crossed by at most one other edge. Cranston, Lafferty and Song showed that every $1$-planar graph is odd $23$-colorable. In this paper, we improved this result and showed that every $1$-planar graph is odd $13$-colorable.

The Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) algorithm is a combinatorial procedure that computes colorings on graphs, which can often be used to detect their (non-)isomorphism. Particularly the 1- and 2-dimensional versions 1-WL and 2-WL have received much attention, due to their numerous links to other areas of computer science. Knowing the expressive power of a certain dimension of the algorithm usually amounts to understanding the computed colorings. An increase in the dimension leads to finer computed colorings and, thus, more graphs can be distinguished. For example, on the class of planar graphs, 3-WL solves the isomorphism problem. However, the expressive power of 2-WL on the class is poorly understood (and, in particular, it may even well be that it decides isomorphism). In this paper, we investigate the colorings computed by 2-WL on planar graphs. Towards this end, we analyze the graphs induced by edge color classes in the graph. Based on the obtained classification, we show that for every 3-connected planar graph, it holds that: a) after coloring all pairs with their 2-WL color, the graph has fixing number 1 with respect to 1-WL, or b) there is a 2-WL-definable matching that can be used to transform the graph into a smaller one, or c) 2-WL detects a connected subgraph that is essentially the graph of a Platonic or Archimedean solid, a prism, a cycle, or a bipartite graph K_{2,\ell}. In particular, the graphs from case (a) are identified by 2-WL.