arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Skew Howe duality and limit shapes of Young diagrams

Published: 2021-11-24 | Updated: 2023-09-22
Comments: 57 pages, 15 figures, 2 tables; v3 fixed typos, added comparison to Biane's result, updated references, fixed typos; v2 fixed typos in Theorem 4.10, 4.14, shorter proof of Theorem 4.6 (thanks to C. Krattenthaler), proved of Conjecture 4.17 in v1
Journal: J. Lond. Math. Soc., 2023

Abstract

We consider the skew Howe duality for the action of certain dual pairs of Lie groups $(G_1, G_2)$ on the exterior algebra $\bigwedge(\mathbb{C}^{n} \otimes \mathbb{C}^{k})$ as a probability measure on Young diagrams by the decomposition into the sum of irreducible representations. We prove a combinatorial version of this skew Howe for the pairs $(\mathrm{GL}_{n}, \mathrm{GL}_{k})$, $(\mathrm{SO}_{2n+1}, \mathrm{Pin}_{2k})$, $(\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}, \mathrm{Sp}_{2k})$, and $(\mathrm{Or}_{2n}, \mathrm{SO}_{k})$ using crystal bases, which allows us to interpret the skew Howe duality as a natural consequence of lattice paths on lozenge tilings of certain partial hexagonal domains. The $G_1$-representation multiplicity is given as a determinant formula using the Lindström-Gessel-Viennot lemma and as a product formula using Dodgson condensation. These admit natural $q$-analogs that we show equals the $q$-dimension of a $G_2$-representation (up to an overall factor of $q$), giving a refined version of the combinatorial skew Howe duality. Using these product formulas (at $q =1$), we take the infinite rank limit and prove the diagrams converge uniformly to the limit shape.

BibTeX

Loading...