Papers by Benjamin Brubaker
3 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Crystal invariant theory II: Pseudo-energies
The geometric crystal operators and geometric $R$-matrices (or geometric Weyl group actions) give commuting actions on the field of rational functions in $mn$ variables. We study the invariants of various combinations of these actions, which we view as "crystal analogues" of the invariants of $S_m$, ${\rm SL}_m$, $S_n \times S_m$, ${\rm SL}_n \times \, S_m$, and ${\rm SL}_n \times {\rm SL}_m$ acting on the polynomial ring in an $m \times n$ matrix of variables. The polynomial invariants of the $S_m$-action generated by the ${\rm GL}_m$-geometric $R$-matrices were described by Lam and the third-named author as the ring of loop symmetric functions. In a previous paper of the authors, the polynomial invariants of the ${\rm GL}_m$-geometric crystal operators were described as a subring of the ring of loop symmetric functions.
In this paper, we give conjectural generating sets for the fields of rational invariants in the remaining cases, and we give formulas expressing a large class of loop symmetric functions in terms of these conjectural generators. Our results include new positive formulas for the central charge and energy function of a product of single-row geometric crystals, and a new derivation of Kirillov and Berenstein's piecewise-linear formula for cocharge. The formulas manifest the symmetries possessed by these functions.
Crystal invariant theory I: Geometric RSK
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Berenstein and Kazhdan's theory of geometric crystals gives rise to two commuting families of geometric crystal operators acting on the space of complex $m \times n$ matrices. These are birational actions, which we view as a crystal-theoretic analogue of the usual action of ${\rm SL}_m \times {\rm SL}_n$ on $m \times n$ matrices. We prove that the field of rational invariants (and ring of polynomial invariants) of each family of geometric crystal operators is generated by a set of algebraically independent polynomials, which are generalizations of the elementary symmetric polynomials in $m$ (or $n$) variables. We also give a set of algebraically independent generators for the intersection of these fields, and we explain how these fields are situated inside the larger fields of geometric $R$-matrix invariants, which were studied by Lam and the third-named author under the name loop symmetric functions. The key tool in our proof is the geometric RSK correspondence of Noumi and Yamada, which we show to be an isomorphism of geometric crystals.
In an appendix jointly written with Thomas Lam, we prove the fundamental theorem of loop symmetric functions, which says that the polynomial invariants of the geometric $R$-matrix are generated by the loop elementary symmetric functions.
Whittaker Coefficients of Metaplectic Eisenstein Series
Published in Geometric and Functional Analysis (GAFA) 25(4) (2015), 1180-1239
• View Publication
• BIB
We study Whittaker coefficients for maximal parabolic Eisenstein series on metaplectic covers of split reductive groups. By the theory of Eisenstein series these coefficients have meromorphic continuation and functional equation. However they are not Eulerian and the standard methods to compute them in the reductive case do not apply to covers. For "cominuscule" maximal parabolics, we give an explicit description of the coefficients as Dirichlet series whose arithmetic content is expressed in an exponential sum. The exponential sum is then shown to satisfy a twisted multiplicativity, reducing its determination to prime power contributions. These, in turn, are connected to Lusztig data for canonical bases on the dual group using a result of Kamnitzer. The exponential sum at prime powers is then evaluated for generic Lusztig data. To handle the remaining degenerate cases, the evaluation of the exponential sum appears best expressed in terms of string data for canonical bases, as shown in a detailed example in $GL_4$. Thus we demonstrate that the arithmetic part of metaplectic Whittaker coefficients is intimately connected to the relations between these two expressions for canonical bases.