arXiv++ Combinatorics

The outer multiset dimension ${\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the cardinality of a smallest set of vertices that uniquely recognize all the vertices outside this set by using multisets of distances to the set. It is proved that ${\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G) = n(G) - 1$ if and only if $G$ is a regular graph with diameter at most $2$. Graphs $G$ with ${\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(G)=2$ are described and recognized in polynomial time. A lower bound on the lexicographic product of $G$ and $H$ is proved when $H$ is complete or edgeless, and the extremal graphs are determined. It is proved that ${\rm dim}_{\rm ms}(P_s\,\square\, P_t) = 3$ for $s\ge t\ge 2$.

Let $G$ be a graph and let $S(G)$, $M(G)$, and $T(G)$ be the subdivision, the middle, and the total graph of $G$, respectively. Let ${\rm dim}(G)$, ${\rm edim}(G)$, and ${\rm mdim}(G)$ be the metric dimension, the edge metric dimension, and the mixed metric dimension of $G$, respectively. In this paper, for the subdivision graph it is proved that $\frac{1}{2}\max\{{\rm dim}(G),{\rm edim}(G)\}\leq{\rm mdim}(S(G))\leq{\rm mdim}(G)$. A family of graphs $G_n$ is constructed for which ${\rm mdim}(G_n)-{\rm mdim}(S(G_n))\ge 2$ holds and this shows that the inequality ${\rm mdim}(S(G))\leq{\rm mdim}(G)$ can be strict, while for a cactus graph $G$, ${\rm mdim}(S(G))={\rm mdim}(G)$. For the middle graph it is proved that ${\rm dim}(M(G))\leq{\rm mdim}(G)$ holds, and if $G$ is tree with $n_1(G)$ leaves, then ${\rm dim}(M(G))={\rm mdim}(G)=n_1(G)$. Moreover, for the total graph it is proved that ${\rm mdim}(T(G))=2n_1(G)$ and ${\rm dim}(G)\leq{\rm dim}(T(G))\leq n_1(G)$ hold when $G$ is a tree.

For a given graph $G$ without isolated vertex we consider a function $f: V(G) \rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$. For every $i\in \{0,1,2\}$, let $V_i=\{v\in V(G):\; f(v)=i\}$. The function $f$ is known to be an outer-independent total Roman dominating function for the graph $G$ if it is satisfied that; (i) every vertex in $V_0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $V_2$; (ii) $V_0$ is an independent set; and (iii) the subgraph induced by $V_1\cup V_2$ has no isolated vertex. The minimum possible weight $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ among all outer-independent total Roman dominating functions for $G$ is called the outer-independent total Roman domination number of $G$. In this article we obtain new tight bounds for this parameter that improve some well-known results. Such bounds can also be seen as relationships between this parameter and several other classical parameters in graph theory like the domination, total domination, Roman domination, independence, and vertex cover numbers. In addition, we compute the outer-independent total Roman domination number of Sierpiński graphs, circulant graphs, and the Cartesian and direct products of complete graphs.

Topics concerning metric dimension related invariants in graphs are nowadays intensively studied. This compendium of combinatorial and computational results on this topic is an attempt of surveying those contributions that are of the highest interest for the research community dealing with several variants of metric dimension in graphs.

An open packing in a graph $G$ is a set $S$ of vertices in $G$ such that no two vertices in $S$ have a common neighbor in $G$. The injective chromatic number $χ_i(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest number of colors assigned to vertices of $G$ such that each color class is an open packing. Alternatively, the injective chromatic number of $G$ is the chromatic number of the two-step graph of $G$, which is the graph with the same vertex set as $G$ in which two vertices are adjacent if they have a common neighbor. The concept of injective coloring has been studied by many authors, while in the present paper we approach it from two novel perspectives, related to open packings and the two-step graph operation. We prove several general bounds on the injective chromatic number expressed in terms of the open packing number. In particular, we prove that $χ_{i}(G)\geq \frac{1}{2}+\sqrt{\frac{1}{4}+\frac{2m-n}{\opack}}$ holds for any connected graph $G$ of order $n\geq2$, size $m$, and the open packing number $\opack$, and characterize the class of graphs attaining the bound. Regarding the well-known bound $χ_i(G)\ge Δ(G)$, we describe the family of extremal graphs and prove that deciding when the equality holds (even for regular graphs) is NP-complete, solving an open problem from an earlier paper. Next, we consider the chromatic number of the two-step graph of a graph, and compare it with the clique number and the maximum degree of the graph. We present two large families of graphs in which $χ_i(G)$ equals the cardinality of a largest clique of the two-step graph of $G$. Finally, we consider classes of graphs that admit an injective coloring in which all color classes are maximal open packings. We give characterizations of three subclasses of these graphs among graphs with diameter $2$, and find a partial characterization of hypercubes with this property.

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a Roman dominating function on $G$ if every vertex $v\in V(G)$ for which $f(v)=0$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $u\in V(G)$ such that $f(u)=2$. The Roman domination number of $G$ is the minimum weight $ω(f)=\sum_{x\in V(G)}f(x)$ among all Roman dominating functions $f$ on $G$. In this article we study the Roman domination number of direct product graphs and rooted product graphs. Specifically, we give several tight lower and upper bounds for the Roman domination number of direct product graphs involving some parameters of the factors, which include the domination, (total) Roman domination, and packing numbers among others. On the other hand, we prove that the Roman domination number of rooted product graphs can attain only three possible values, which depend on the order, the domination, and the Roman domination numbers of the factors in the product. In addition, theoretical characterizations of the classes of rooted product graphs achieving each of these three possible values are given.

Let $G$ be a graph. The Steiner distance of $W\subseteq V(G)$ is the minimum size of a connected subgraph of $G$ containing $W$. Such a subgraph is necessarily a tree called a Steiner $W$-tree. The set $A\subseteq V(G)$ is a $k$-Steiner general position set if $V(T_B)\cap A = B$ holds for every set $B\subseteq A$ of cardinality $k$, and for every Steiner $B$-tree $T_B$. The $k$-Steiner general position number ${\rm sgp}_k(G)$ of $G$ is the cardinality of a largest $k$-Steiner general position set in $G$. Steiner cliques are introduced and used to bound ${\rm sgp}_k(G)$ from below. The $k$-Steiner general position number is determined for trees, cycles and joins of graphs. Lower bounds are presented for split graphs, infinite grids and lexicographic products. The lower bound for the latter products leads to an exact formula for the general position number of an arbitrary lexicographic product.

A set $R \subseteq V(G)$ is a resolving set of a graph $G$ if for all distinct vertices $v,u \in V(G)$ there exists an element $r \in R$ such that $d(r,v) \neq d(r,u)$. The metric dimension $\dim(G)$ of the graph $G$ is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of $G$. A resolving set with cardinality $\dim(G)$ is called a metric basis of $G$. We consider vertices that are in all metric bases, and we call them basis forced vertices. We give several structural properties of sparse and dense graphs where basis forced vertices are present. In particular, we give bounds for the maximum number of edges in a graph containing basis forced vertices. Our bound is optimal whenever the number of basis forced vertices is even. Moreover, we provide a method of constructing fairly sparse graphs with basis forced vertices. We also study vertices which are in no metric basis in connection to cut-vertices and pendants. Furthermore, we show that deciding whether a vertex is in all metric bases is co-NP-hard, and deciding whether a vertex is in no metric basis is NP-hard.

For a given graph $G$, the metric and edge metric dimensions of $G$, $\dim(G)$ and ${\rm edim}(G)$, are the cardinalities of the smallest possible subsets of vertices in $V(G)$ such that they uniquely identify the vertices and the edges of $G$, respectively, by means of distances. It is already known that metric and edge metric dimensions are not in general comparable. Infinite families of graphs with pendant vertices in which the edge metric dimension is smaller than the metric dimension are already known. In this article, we construct a 2-connected graph $G$ such that $\dim(G)=a$ and ${\rm edim}(G)=b$ for every pair of integers $a,b$, where $4\le b<a$. For this we use subdivisions of complete graphs, whose metric dimension is in some cases smaller than the edge metric dimension. Along the way, we present an upper bound for the metric and edge metric dimensions of subdivision graphs under some special conditions.

The metric (resp. edge metric or mixed metric) dimension of a graph $G$, is the cardinality of the smallest ordered set of vertices that uniquely recognizes all the pairs of distinct vertices (resp. edges, or vertices and edges) of $G$ by using a vector of distances to this set. In this note we show two unexpected results on hypercube graphs. First, we show that the metric and edge metric dimension of $Q_d$ differ by only one for every integer $d$. In particular, if $d$ is odd, then the metric and edge metric dimensions of $Q_d$ are equal. Second, we prove that the metric and mixed metric dimensions of the hypercube $Q_d$ are equal for every $d \ge 3$. We conclude the paper by conjecturing that all these three types of metric dimensions of $Q_d$ are equal when $d$ is large enough.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a total Roman $\{2\}$-dominating function if: (1) every vertex $v\in V$ for which $f(v)=0$ satisfies that $\sum_{u\in N(v)}f(u)\geq 2$, where $N(v)$ represents the open neighborhood of $v$, and (2) every vertex $x\in V$ for which $f(x)\geq 1$ is adjacent to at least one vertex $y\in V$ such that $f(y)\geq 1$. The weight of the function $f$ is defined as $ω(f)=\sum_{v\in V}f(v)$. The total Roman $\{2\}$-domination number, denoted by $γ_{t\{R2\}}(G)$, is the minimum weight among all total Roman $\{2\}$-dominating functions on $G$. In this article we introduce the concepts above and begin the study of its combinatorial and computational properties. For instance, we give several closed relationships between this parameter and other domination related parameters in graphs. In addition, we prove that the complexity of computing the value $γ_{t\{R2\}}(G)$ is NP-hard, even when restricted to bipartite or chordal graphs.

Given a connected graph $G$, the metric (resp. edge metric) dimension of $G$ is the cardinality of the smallest ordered set of vertices that uniquely identifies every pair of distinct vertices (resp. edges) of $G$ by means of distance vectors to such a set. In this work, we settle three open problems on (edge) metric dimension of graphs. Specifically, we show that for every $r,t\ge 2$ with $r\ne t$, there is $n_0$, such that for every $n\ge n_0$ there exists a graph $G$ of order $n$ with metric dimension $r$ and edge metric dimension $t$, which among other consequences, shows the existence of infinitely many graph whose edge metric dimension is strictly smaller than its metric dimension. In addition, we also prove that it is not possible to bound the edge metric dimension of a graph $G$ by some constant factor of the metric dimension of $G$.

A set of vertices $W$ of a graph $G$ is a resolving set if every vertex of $G$ is uniquely determined by its vector of distances to $W$. In this paper, the Maker-Breaker resolving game is introduced. The game is played on a graph $G$ by Resolver and Spoiler who alternately select a vertex of $G$ not yet chosen. Resolver wins if at some point the vertices chosen by him form a resolving set of $G$, whereas Spoiler wins if the Resolver cannot form a resolving set of $G$. The outcome of the game is denoted by $o(G)$ and $R_{\rm MB}(G)$ (resp. $S_{\rm MB}(G)$) denotes the minimum number of moves of Resolver (resp. Spoiler) to win when Resolver has the first move. The corresponding invariants for the game when Spoiler has the first move are denoted by $R'_{\rm MB}(G)$ and $S'_{\rm MB}(G)$. Invariants $R_{\rm MB}(G)$, $R'_{\rm MB}(G)$, $S_{\rm MB}(G)$, and $S'_{\rm MB}(G)$ are compared among themselves and with the metric dimension ${\rm dim}(G)$. A large class of graphs $G$ is constructed for which $R_{\rm MB}(G) > {\rm dim}(G)$ holds. The effect of twin equivalence classes and pairing resolving sets on the Maker-Breaker resolving game is described. As an application $o(G)$, as well as $R_{\rm MB}(G)$ and $R'_{\rm MB}(G)$ (or $S_{\rm MB}(G)$ and $S'_{\rm MB}(G)$), are determined for several graph classes, including trees, complete multi-partite graphs, grid graphs, and torus grid graphs.

Given a graph $G$ without isolated vertices, a total Roman dominating function for $G$ is a function $f : V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that every vertex with label 0 is adjacent to a vertex with label 2, and the set of vertices with positive labels induces a graph of minimum degree at least one. The total Roman domination number $γ_{tR}(G)$ of $G$ is the smallest possible value of $\sum_{v\in V(G)}f(v)$ among all total Roman dominating functions $f$. The total Roman domination number of the direct product $G\times H$ of the graphs $G$ and $H$ is studied in this work. Specifically, several relationships, in the shape of upper and lower bounds, between $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ and some classical domination parameters for the factors are given. Characterizations of the direct product graphs $G\times H$ achieving small values ($\le 7$) for $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ are presented, and exact values for $γ_{tR}(G\times H)$ are deduced, while considering various specific direct product classes.

The general $d$-position number ${\rm gp}_d(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the cardinality of a largest set $S$ for which no three distinct vertices from $S$ lie on a common geodesic of length at most $d$. This new graph parameter generalizes the well studied general position number. We first give some results concerning the monotonic behavior of ${\rm gp}_d(G)$ with respect to the suitable values of $d$. We show that the decision problem concerning finding ${\rm gp}_d(G)$ is NP-complete for any value of $d$. The value of ${\rm gp}_d(G)$ when $G$ is a path or a cycle is computed and a structural characterization of general $d$-position sets is shown. Moreover, we present some relationships with other topics including strong resolving graphs and dissociation sets. We finish our exposition by proving that ${\rm gp}_d(G)$ is infinite whenever $G$ is an infinite graph and $d$ is a finite integer.

A set $D$ of vertices of a graph $G$ is a total dominating set if every vertex of $G$ is adjacent to at least one vertex of $D$. The total domination number of $G$ is the minimum cardinality of any total dominating set of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_t(G)$. The total dominating set $D$ is called a total co-independent dominating set if $V(G)\setminus D$ is an independent set and has at least one vertex. The minimum cardinality of any total co-independent dominating set is denoted by $γ_{t,coi}(G)$. In this paper, we show that, for any tree $T$ of order $n$ and diameter at least three, $n-β(T)\leq γ_{t,coi}(T)\leq n-|L(T)|$ where $β(T)$ is the maximum cardinality of any independent set and $L(T)$ is the set of leaves of $T$. We also characterize the families of trees attaining the extremal bounds above and show that the differences between the value of $γ_{t,coi}(T)$ and these bounds can be arbitrarily large for some classes of trees.

For a graph $G=(V(G),E(G))$, an Italian dominating function (ID function) of $G$ is a function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ such that for each vertex $v\in V(G)$ with $f(v)=0$, $f(N(v))\geq2$, that is, either there is a vertex $u \in N(v)$ with $f (u) = 2$ or there are two vertices $x,y\in N(v)$ with $f(x)=f(y)=1$. A function $f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ is a covering Italian dominating function (CID function) of $G$ if $f$ is an ID function and $\{v\in V(G)\mid f(v)\neq0\}$ is a vertex cover set. The covering Italian domination number (CID number) $γ_{cI}(G)$ is the minimum weight taken over all CID functions of $G$. In this paper, we study the CID number in graphs. We show that the problem of computing this parameter is NP-hard even when restricted to some well-known families of graphs, and find some bounds on this parameter. We characterize the family of graphs for which their CID numbers attain the upper bound twice their vertex cover number as well as all claw-free graphs whose CID numbers attain the lower bound half of their orders. We also give the characterizations of some families of graphs with small or large CID numbers.

The general position number ${\rm gp}(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is the cardinality of a largest set $S$ of vertices such that no three distinct vertices from $S$ lie on a common geodesic; such sets are refereed to as gp-sets of $G$. The general position number of cylinders $P_r\,\square\, C_s$ is deduced. It is proved that ${\rm gp}(C_r\,\square\, C_s)\in \{6,7\}$ whenever $r\ge s \ge 3$, $s\ne 4$, and $r\ge 6$. A probabilistic lower bound on the general position number of Cartesian graph powers is achieved. Along the way a formula for the number of gp-sets in $P_r\,\square\, P_s$, where $r,s\ge 2$, is also determined.

The general position number ${\rm gp}(G)$ of a connected graph $G$ is the cardinality of a largest set $S$ of vertices such that no three pairwise distinct vertices from $S$ lie on a common geodesic. It is proved that ${\rm gp}(G)\ge ω(G_{\rm SR}$, where $G_{\rm SR}$ is the strong resolving graph of $G$, and $ω(G_{\rm SR})$ is its clique number. That the bound is sharp is demonstrated with numerous constructions including for instance direct products of complete graphs and different families of strong products, of generalized lexicographic products, and of rooted product graphs. For the strong product it is proved that $gp(G\boxtimes H) \ge gp(G)gp(H)$, and asked whether the equality holds for arbitrary connected graphs $G$ and $H$. It is proved that the answer is in particular positive for strong products with a complete factor, for strong products of complete bipartite graphs, and for certain strong cylinders.

In this paper, we initiate the study of global offensive $k$-alliances in digraphs. Given a digraph $D=(V(D),A(D))$, a global offensive $k$-alliance in a digraph $D$ is a subset $S\subseteq V(D)$ such that every vertex outside of $S$ has at least one in-neighbor from $S$ and also at least $k$ more in-neighbors from $S$ than from outside of $S$, by assuming $k$ is an integer lying between two minus the maximum in-degree of $D$ and the maximum in-degree of $D$. The global offensive $k$-alliance number $γ_{k}^{o}(D)$ is the minimum cardinality among all global offensive $k$-alliances in $D$. In this article we begin the study of the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs. For instance, we prove that finding the global offensive $k$-alliance number of digraphs $D$ is an NP-hard problem for any value $k\in \{2-Δ^-(D),\dots,Δ^-(D)\}$ and that it remains NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite digraphs when we consider the non-negative values of $k$ given in the interval above. Based on these facts, lower bounds on $γ_{k}^{o}(D)$ with characterizations of all digraphs attaining the bounds are given in this work. We also bound this parameter for bipartite digraphs from above. For the particular case $k=1$, an immediate result from the definition shows that $γ(D)\leq γ_{1}^{o}(D)$ for all digraphs $D$, in which $γ(D)$ stands for the domination number of $D$. We show that these two digraph parameters are the same for some infinite families of digraphs like rooted trees and contrafunctional digraphs. Moreover, we show that the difference between $γ_{1}^{o}(D)$ and $γ(D)$ can be arbitrary large for directed trees and connected functional digraphs.