arXiv++ Combinatorics

In 1996, Reed, Robertson, Seymour and Thomas [Combinatorica 1996] proved Younger's Conjecture, which states that, for all directed graphs $D$, there exists a function $f$ such that, if $D$ does not contain $k$ disjoint cycles, then $D$ contains a feedback vertex set, i.e.~a subset of vertices whose deletion renders the graph acyclic, of size bounded by $f(k)$. However, the function obtained by Reed, Robertson, Seymour and Thomas in their paper is enormous and, in fact, not even elementary. We prove the first elementary upper bound for the function $f$ above, showing it is upper-bounded by a power tower of height 8. Our proof is inspired by the breakthrough result of Chekuri and Chuzhoy [J.~ACM 2016], who proved a polynomial bound for the Excluded Grid Theorem for undirected graphs. We translate a key concept of their proof to directed graphs by introducing \emph{paths of well-linked sets (PWS)}, and show that any digraph of large directed treewidth contains a large PWS, which in turn contains a large fence. We believe that the theoretical tools developed in this work may find applications beyond the results above, in a similar way as the path-of-sets-system framework due to Chekuri and Chuzhoy [J.~ACM 2016] did for undirected graphs (see, for example, Hatzel, Komosa, Pilipczuk and Sorge [Discret.~Math.~Theor.~Comput.~Sci.~2022], Chekuri and Chuzhoy [SODA 2015] and Chuzhoy and Nimavat [arXiv 2019]). Indeed, in a follow-up paper, we apply this framework to improve the bounds of the Directed Grid Theorem.

We introduce torsoids, a canonical structure in matching covered graphs, corresponding to the bricks and braces of the graph. This allows a more fine-grained understanding of the structure of finite and infinite directed graphs with respect to their 1-separations.

In 2019, Dvořák asked whether every connected graph $G$ has a tree decomposition $(T, \mathcal{B})$ so that $T$ is a subgraph of $G$ and the width of $(T, \mathcal{B})$ is bounded by a function of the treewidth of $G$. We prove that this is false, even when $G$ has treewidth $2$ and $T$ is allowed to be a minor of $G$.

We show that every graph with pathwidth strictly less than $a$ that contains no path on $2^b$ vertices as a subgraph has treedepth at most $10ab$. The bound is best possible up to a constant factor.

In the directed detour problem one is given a digraph $G$ and a pair of vertices $s$ and~$t$, and the task is to decide whether there is a directed simple path from $s$ to $t$ in $G$ whose length is larger than $\mathsf{dist}_{G}(s,t)$. The more general parameterized variant, directed long detour, asks for a simple $s$-to-$t$ path of length at least $\mathsf{dist}_{G}(s,t)+k$, for a given parameter $k$. Surprisingly, it is still unknown whether directed detour is polynomial-time solvable on general digraphs. However, for planar digraphs, Wu and Wang~[Networks, '15] proposed an $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$-time algorithm for directed detour, while Fomin et al.~[STACS 2022] gave a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time fpt algorithm for directed long detour. The algorithm of Wu and Wang relies on a nontrivial analysis of how short detours may look like in a plane embedding, while the algorithm of Fomin et al.~is based on a reduction to the $§$-disjoint paths problem on planar digraphs. This latter problem is solvable in polynomial time using the algebraic machinery of Schrijver~[SIAM~J.~Comp.,~'94], but the degree of the obtained polynomial factor is huge. In this paper we propose two simple algorithms: we show how to solve, in planar digraphs, directed detour in time $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ and directed long detour in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^4 \log n$. In both cases, the idea is to reduce to the $2$-disjoint paths problem in a planar digraph, and to observe that the obtained instances of this problem have a certain topological structure that makes them amenable to a direct greedy strategy.

A moplex is a natural graph structure that arises when lifting Dirac's classical theorem from chordal graphs to general graphs. While every non-complete graph has at least two moplexes, little is known about structural properties of graphs with a bounded number of moplexes. The study of these graphs is, in part, motivated by the parallel between moplexes in general graphs and simplicial modules in chordal graphs: unlike in the moplex setting, properties of chordal graphs with a bounded number of simplicial modules are well understood. For instance, chordal graphs having at most two simplicial modules are interval. In this work, we initiate an investigation of $k$-moplex graphs, which are defined as graphs containing at most $k$ moplexes. Of particular interest is the smallest nontrivial case $k=2$, which forms a counterpart to the class of interval graphs. As our main structural result, we show that, when restricted to connected graphs, the class of $2$-moplex graphs is sandwiched between the classes of proper interval graphs and cocomparability graphs; moreover, both inclusions are tight for hereditary classes. From a complexity theoretic viewpoint, this leads to the natural question of whether the presence of at most two moplexes guarantees a sufficient amount of structure to efficiently solve problems that are known to be intractable on cocomparability graphs, but not on proper interval graphs. We develop new reductions that answer this question negatively for two prominent problems fitting this profile, namely Graph Isomorphism and Max-Cut. On the other hand, we prove that every connected $2$-moplex graph contains a Hamiltonian path, generalising the same property of connected proper interval graphs.

Tuza famously conjectured in 1981 that in a graph without k+1 edge-disjoint triangles, it suffices to delete at most 2k edges to obtain a triangle-free graph. The conjecture holds for graphs with small treewidth or small maximum average degree, including planar graphs. However, for dense graphs that are neither cliques nor 4-colorable, only asymptotic results are known. Here, we confirm the conjecture for threshold graphs, i.e. graphs that are both split graphs and cographs, and for co-chain graphs with both sides of the same size divisible by 4.

A bramble in an undirected graph $G$ is a family of connected subgraphs of $G$ such that for every two subgraphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ in the bramble either $V(H_1) \cap V(H_2) \neq \emptyset$ or there is an edge of $G$ with one endpoint in $V(H_1)$ and the second endpoint in $V(H_2)$. The order of the bramble is the minimum size of a vertex set that intersects all elements of a bramble. Brambles are objects dual to treewidth: As shown by Seymour and Thomas, the maximum order of a bramble in an undirected graph $G$ equals one plus the treewidth of $G$. However, as shown by Grohe and Marx, brambles of high order may necessarily be of exponential size: In a constant-degree $n$-vertex expander a bramble of order $Ω(n^{1/2+δ})$ requires size exponential in $Ω(n^{2δ})$ for any fixed $δ\in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$. On the other hand, the combination of results of Grohe and Marx and Chekuri and Chuzhoy shows that a graph of treewidth $k$ admits a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2})$ and size $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(k^{3/2})$. ($\widetildeΩ$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}$ hide polylogarithmic factors and divisors, respectively.) In this note, we first sharpen the second bound by proving that every graph $G$ of treewidth at least $k$ contains a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2})$ and congestion $2$, i.e., every vertex of $G$ is contained in at most two elements of the bramble (thus the bramble is of size linear in its order). Second, we provide a tight upper bound for the lower bound of Grohe and Marx: For every $δ\in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$, every graph $G$ of treewidth at least $k$ contains a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2+δ})$ and size $2^{\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(k^{2δ})}$.

We prove a recent conjecture of Beisegel et al. that for every positive integer k, every graph containing an induced P_k also contains an avoidable P_k. Avoidability generalises the notion of simpliciality best known in the context of chordal graphs. The conjecture was only established for k in {1,2} (Ohtsuki et al. 1976, and Beisegel et al. 2019, respectively). Our result also implies a result of Chvátal et al. 2002, which assumed cycle restrictions. We provide a constructive and elementary proof, relying on a single trick regarding the induction hypothesis. In the line of previous works, we discuss conditions for multiple avoidable paths to exist.

Perfect matching width is a treewidth-like parameter designed for graphs with perfect matchings. The concept was originally introduced by Norine for the study of non-bipartite Pfaffian graphs. Additionally, perfect matching width appears to be a useful structural tool for investigating matching minors, a specialised version of minors related to perfect matchings. In this paper we lay the groundwork for understanding the interaction of perfect matching width and matching minors by establishing tight connections between the perfect matching width of any matching covered graph $G$ and the perfect matching width of its bricks and braces (a matching theoretic version of blocks) and proving that perfect matching width is almost monotone under the matching minor relation. As an application, we give several characterisations for braces of perfect matching width two, including one that allows for a polynomial time recognition algorithm.

A connected graph G is called matching covered if every edge of G is contained in a perfect matching. Perfect matching width is a width parameter for matching covered graphs based on a branch decomposition. It was introduced by Norine and intended as a tool for the structural study of matching covered graphs, especially in the context of Pfaffian orientations. Norine conjectured that graphs of high perfect matching width would contain a large grid as a matching minor, similar to the result on treewidth by Robertson and Seymour. In this paper we obtain the first results on perfect matching width since its introduction. For the restricted case of bipartite graphs, we show that perfect matching width is equivalent to directed treewidth and thus the Directed Grid Theorem by Kawarabayashi and Kreutzer for directed \treewidth implies Norine's conjecture.

The perfect matching polytope, i.e. the convex hull of (incidence vectors of) perfect matchings of a graph is used in many combinatorial algorithms. Kotzig, Lovász and Plummer developed a decomposition theory for graphs with perfect matchings and their corresponding polytopes known as the tight cut decomposition which breaks down every graph into a number of indecomposable graphs, so called bricks. For many properties that are of interest on graphs with perfect matchings, including the description of the perfect matching polytope, it suffices to consider these bricks. A key result by Lovász on the tight cut decomposition is that the list of bricks obtained is the same independent of the choice of tight cuts made during the tight cut decomposition procedure. This implies that finding a tight cut decomposition is polynomial time equivalent to finding a single tight cut. We generalise the notions of a tight cut, a tight cut contraction and a tight cut decomposition to hypergraphs. By providing an example, we show that the outcome of the tight cut decomposition on general hypergraphs is no longer unique. However, we are able to prove that the uniqueness of the tight cut decomposition is preserved on a slight generalisation of uniform hypergraphs. Moreover, we show how the tight cut decomposition leads to a decomposition of the perfect matching polytope of uniformable hypergraphs and that the recognition problem for tight cuts in uniformable hypergraphs is polynomial time solvable.