Papers by Raquel Melgar
3 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
The combinatorial Hopf algebra of signed graphs
The theory of combinatorial Hopf algebras (CHA) is a powerful framework for studying algebraic invariants of combinatorial objects. For instance, Stanley's chromatic symmetric function and the chromatic polynomial arise naturally from the CHA of graphs. In this paper, we define a CHA of signed graphs in order to study, in the same spirit, invariants of signed graphs such as the signed chromatic polynomial. The key ingredient of our construction is a well-chosen character, from which the signed chromatic invariants are obtained. Via the antipode, we obtain new proofs of combinatorial reciprocity results for these invariants. Moreover, by deforming the character with an additional parameter, we incorporate bivariate invariants into this framework, both for classical and signed graphs. In the classical case, this technique recovers the Tutte polynomial.
Chromatic quasisymmetric functions for signed graphs
In 1995, Stanley introduced the chromatic symmetric function of a graph, which specializes to its chromatic polynomial, and which has been the focus of intense research. In 2017, Shareshian, Wachs, and Ellzey defined a refinement of this function for a directed graph, that appears to be in $QSym$, the algebra of quasisymmetric functions, which is of great interest in algebraic combinatorics. Our goal is to extend this work to signed graphs, taking into account the perspective of the hyperplane arrangement associated with a signed graph, developed by Zaslavsky. We introduce the signed chromatic quasisymmetric invariant, and obtain structural properties. As a consequence, we define and study $SQSym$, the algebra of signed quasisymmetric functions.
Poincaré series of semigroups
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Many invariants of finitely generated positive cancelative commutative semigroups can be studied from their Poincaré series. We offer and present several closed formulas for them. Moreover, those formulas have elementary proofs and are presented in two distinct forms: one characterized in terms of simplicial complexes and the other by a purely set theoretical approach.