arXiv++ Combinatorics

We present tensor network representations for discrete maximum entropy distributions under expectation constraints. To this end, we introduce Computation-Activation Networks (CompActNets), a tensor network architecture that subsumes exponential families. By leveraging the geometry of the convex polytope of realizable expectation vectors, we represent any maximum entropy distribution in the same architecture. We exploit the fact that proper faces of this polytope correspond to the boundary closure of exponential families, which restricts the distribution's support. We then derive explicit representations for the support within the CompActNet architecture. The proposed framework suggests tensor network ranks as complexity measures for faces. Finally, a case study on Boolean statistics links the geometry of 0/1-polytopes directly to propositional formulas.

We report on our ongoing project to develop a computational pipeline, AutoGraphForge, for an automated graph-theoretic conjecturing-refuting-formalizing-proving system. Conjecture generation is counterexample-guided and runs in rounds: a Graffiti3 generator proposes conjectures over a small, evolving snapshot table $T$ (initially a few hundred graphs with their computed invariants) that grows only by counterexamples to its own conjectures. A novelty filter of $559$ classical and folklore relations, closed under transitive composition and linear identity substitution, decides via a linear program whether a candidate is already implied by known results. Surviving candidates are tested against a dataset of about $348,000$ graphs, unioning the complete House of Graphs invariant export, the exhaustive census of all connected graphs on at most nine vertices, several extremal families (strongly regular, minimal Ramsey, Cayley, cages, barbells, lollipops, spiders), and random models. Counterexample-search algorithms then attack the remainder. Run for several rounds on an HPC cluster, the loop yields $6,522$ conjectures that survived the refutation dataset, the novelty filter and every active-search run -- among them nontrivial relations between the annihilation number and the edge-cover number for bipartite and regular graphs, which we prove by hand. A subsequent formalization and proving stage deterministically translates each surviving conjecture into a Lean 4 statement skeleton; every candidate proof is kernel-verified against a pinned mathlib4 and our custom invariant preamble. This stage integrates two neural provers -- DeepSeek-Prover-V2-671B (served with vLLM) and the Lean-specialised OProver-32B -- behind the independent kernel check. It is implemented end-to-end and passes initial sanity checks, with the full pipeline currently running on the cluster.

Let $r\geq3$ be fixed, and let $\mathbf{G}_n$ be the set of all simple graphs with vertex set $[n]=\{1,\ldots,n\}$. We consider an exponential random graph model which gives higher probability to $G \in \mathbf{G}_n$ than to $H \in \mathbf{G}_n$ if $G$ has fewer $r$-cliques than $H$. But all graphs in $\mathbf{G}_n$ have positive probability. The degree to which graphs with fewer $r$-cliques are given higher probability is determined by a positive weight $w$. We prove that, asymptotically almost surely as $n \to \infty$, a random graph from $\mathbf{G}_n$ has a vertex partition into $r-1$ parts of roughly equal size, the density of edges between the parts is close to $1/2$, and for every $\varepsilon > 0$ the density of edges within any part is less than $\varepsilon$. The asymptotic structural properties are independent of the weight $w$ as long as it is positive. We also extend the result to the context of several clique sizes, each one with its own weight.

This paper presents new theoretical results on generalizing the Jaccard distance for lattices and real valuations. We demonstrate that when the valuation is strictly positive, monotone, and modular, the Jaccard distance satisfies the triangle inequality on arbitrary lattices, effectively generalizing earlier results that depended heavily on distributivity. Moving to relatively complemented distributive lattices (which safely drop the requirement for the global bounds found in Boolean algebras), we prove the triangle inequality holds as long as the valuation is positive, monotone, supermodular, and $\log$-submodular. Additionally, we adapt the symmetric-difference Jaccard formulation for submodular valuations to sectionally complemented distributive lattices. Shifting to necessary conditions, we prove that supermodularity is a strict requirement for the standard generalized Jaccard distance to operate as a valid metric. Finally, we map the practical value of relaxing these structural constraints to computational fields like quantum information theory, formal concept analysis, and machine learning, closing with a brief look at open mathematical problems.

AI systems are increasingly capable of contributing to mathematical research. In research practice, frontier-model reasoning is a limited resource, and expert mathematical review is even more sharply constrained. Allocating these scarce resources well is therefore central to making AI-assisted mathematical discovery efficient. In most current AI-for-math workflows, human effort is concentrated at the beginning and end, in selecting suitable research problems and later reviewing the resulting artifacts. These two stages are becoming bottlenecks for research-level mathematics. We address them by proposing a new human-AI discovery paradigm. The human input is no longer a single problem selected in advance, but a research direction in which the experts have interest and expertise. The system then searches a broad literature corpus for candidate problems in that direction. Inspired by search and recommender systems, we build Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering. In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline starts from 5,245 combinatorics papers, recovers 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, and filters them to 4,717 apparently well-posed and still-open conjectures. Subsequent reasoning and automated triage stages surface 598 potential resolutions and select 77 items for author-team review. Among them, we identify many interesting discoveries, including results on conjectures and questions of Davies--Jenssen--Perkins--Roberts, Erdős--Straus, Ikenmeyer--Pak--Panova, and Lund--Saraf--Wolf. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new mode of human-AI collaboration for mathematical discovery.

There are several methods for searching for graphs with prescribed properties, such as SAT solvers and specialized generators. These methods return the result as raw data: an adjacency matrix or a string encoding. The raw data certifies that the graph exists, but it does not reveal any structural properties of the graph. We ask whether one can automatically discover a short algebraic description if only this raw data is provided. We look for a description such as a Cayley graph $\mathrm{Cay}(Γ, S)$ or a lexicographic product $C_5[K_3]$. We address this question with a neurosymbolic approach. We propose an agent that runs on a general-purpose large language model with no fine-tuning or per-target training. The model interleaves reasoning with calls to the computer algebra system SageMath: it analyzes the target graph, proposes and tests candidate constructions, and revises them until the output matches the target. The agent communicates with SageMath through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which we release as a general-purpose bridge. Whether a construction matches the target is checked by a single exact isomorphism test, and therefore rests on the symbolic side and not on the model. We test the approach on a benchmark of 100 highly symmetric graphs, namely two-orbit graphs on up to 25 vertices; the benchmark was fixed in advance. Our agent could find verified algebraic constructions for all of them, without falling back to raw encodings. A strong template-enumeration baseline reaches only about $20\%$, and a catalog lookup could not identify any of these graphs. However, construction quality declines when symmetry is removed. As a concrete application, we identify the smallest known counterexample to the Bernhart-Kainen dispersability conjecture, a $16$-vertex graph that enumeration found as raw data. For this graph, our agent found an explicit algebraic construction.

The Zarankiewicz number Z(m,n,s,t) is the maximum number of edges in a bipartite graph with parts of orders m and n containing no copy of Ks,t. We give one combined, certificate-based computer-assisted proof for two finite slices and a corrected neighboring frontier: Z(12,n,3,3) = 6n (18 <= n <= 22), Z(13,22,3,3) = 137, Z(13, 18, 3, 3) = 116, Z(14, 18, 3, 3) = 124, Z(15,18,3,3) = 132, Z(14, 17, 3, 3) = 118, Z(15, 17, 3, 3) = 126, 132 <= Z(16,17,3,3) <= 133. The load-bearing new upper bounds are the exact 12 x 18 and 13 x 18 certificate packages. Their orbit certificates exclude every hypothetical matrix at the next edge count. Deletion lemmas and explicit witnesses close four neighboring cells, while the 16 x 17 entry is deliberately reported as an interval because only its 132-edge lower witness and the published 133 upper bound are certified here. Separately, the 13 x 22 proof excludes 138 ones by reducing to 83 degree profiles, rationally separating 77 of them, and eliminating the remaining six by marked-row congruences, leave enumeration, modular Gram tests, and exact Farkas certificates. All accepted claims are replayed by standard-library Python and exact integer/rational arithmetic; floating-point optimization is used only to discover certificates.

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over $\mathbb{Q}$, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a $C_4$-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for $K_4$-free, $K_5$-free, and $C_5$-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.

In Problem~6 of his 1988 paper on differential posets, Stanley asked for the least possible cardinality of a fixed rank of an $r$-differential poset and suggested that the minimum should be attained by $Y^r$, the $r$-fold Cartesian power of Young's lattice. We disprove the resulting universal coefficientwise lower bound. For every $r\geq 3$, we construct an infinite $r$-differential poset $P^{(r)}$ satisfying \[ \card{P^{(r)}_4} =\card{(Y^r)_4}-\left\lfloor\frac r3\right\rfloor. \] For $r=3$, the construction replaces thirteen rank-four lower-cover blocks of $Y^3$ by twelve blocks with the same point and pair incidence multiplicities, producing the initial rank sequence $1,3,9,22,50$ instead of $1,3,9,22,51$. A reflection extension then yields an infinite differential poset. The construction does not address the cases $r=1$ and $r=2$.

Let $t(N)$ be the largest $t$ for which there exist distinct sets $A_1,\dots,A_t \subseteq \{1,\dots,N\}$ such that $A_i \cap A_j$ is a nonempty arithmetic progression for all $i \neq j$ (Erdos Problem #272). Simonovits and Sos proved $t(N)=O(N^2)$ and conjectured $\binom{N}{2}+1$ is best possible; Szabo disproved this by a construction giving $t(N) \geq \binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$, proved the asymptotics $t(N)=N^2/2+O(N^{5/3}(\log N)^3)$, and asked whether $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+O(N)$ and whether some element lies in all sets of any extremal family (the kernel question). We determine $t(N)$ exactly for all $3 \leq N \leq 12$ by exhaustive computation: in this entire range Szabo's lower bound is exact, and we conjecture that $t(N)=\binom{N}{2}+1+\lfloor(N-1)/4\rfloor$ for every $N$. Towards the matching upper bound we prove, for every $N$, that Szabo's bound is the exact maximum over all families with a common element (starred families). The proof combines a self-contained ``defect-one'' counting inequality for staircase regions with a new structural theorem: every non-progression member of such a family contains a bad pair that no other member can share. Consequently the sharpened conjecture reduces to a single remaining statement, namely Szabo's kernel conjecture that some element lies in all sets of an extremal family, and we prove first structural constraints on putative non-starred extremal families.

The Shannon capacity $Θ(G)$ of a graph $G$ quantifies the maximum rate at which information can be transmitted with zero error over a noisy channel. It is lower bounded by $α(G^d)^{1/d}$ for any $d$, where $α(G^d)$ is the independence number of the $d$-th strong power of $G$. We construct independent sets of size $134753$ in $C_7^{10}$, $21909$ in $C_{11}^{6}$, and $62530$ in $C_{13}^{6}$, improving the best known lower bounds for the Shannon capacity of these graphs to $Θ(C_7)\geq 134753^{1/10}>3.258020$, $Θ(C_{11})\geq 21909^{1/6}>5.289773$, and $Θ(C_{13})\geq 62530^{1/6}>6.300109$. We also improve the best known lower bounds on the independence numbers of several individual strong powers of odd cycles that do not improve the Shannon capacity lower bound. The constructions were discovered through iterative interactions with a Large Language Model (LLM), illustrating the potential of LLMs for finding explicit combinatorial constructions.

For every loopless matroid $M$ and every Feichtner--Yuzvinsky building set $\mathcal{G}$ containing the top flat, we construct an integral tangent class $T_{M,\mathcal{G}}^{\mathbb{Z}}\in K_{\mathbb{Z}}(M,\mathcal{G})$; in the realizable case it specializes to the class of the tangent bundle of the corresponding wonderful compactification, it recovers the Hilbert series of the Chow ring through Hirzebruch--Riemann--Roch, and it satisfies the expected Chern-alpha lower bounds. This reproduces the tangent class and its key properties studied by the first author in arXiv:2606.22650. The main body of this paper was produced autonomously, without human mathematical guidance, by Danus, an AI mathematical reasoning agent. Danus solved the problem before arXiv:2606.22650 was publicly available, demonstrating the potential of AI agents in mathematical research. We reproduce its output faithfully, adding only editorial comments; the experiment is documented in Appendix B.

We study certain extremal problems in combinatorial geometry that ask about configurations of points in an $n \times n$ grid that satisfy strict, global geometric constraints. Classical exact solvers suffer from combinatorial explosion for these types of problems, and standard reinforcement learning and transformer-based models struggle with the sparse reward "validity cliff" and quadratic token-consumption limits. To overcome these bottlenecks, we propose a Geometry-Aware Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) framework. Our approach strictly enforces geometric constraints through incremental updates to the feasible action space. For constraints about collections of collinear points, like those that occur in the classic No-Three-in-Line problem (Max-N3IL), this mechanism reduces the constraint checking complexity from $O(n^3)$ to $O(n^2)$. To improve search efficiency, we exploit geometric symmetries in two ways: canonical pruning during node expansion to reduce the branching factor, and symmetric batch transitions to accelerate the discovery of promising configurations. We perform extensive experiments and establish new best-known computational results on five out of six of the problems that we considered. Notably, for Max-N3IL we find configurations of size roughly $1.8 n$ for grids of size $82 \le n \le 119$. For the Smallest Complete Set problem, we find configurations of size roughly $0.95 n$, providing new upper bounds within the tested grids. This work establishes Geometry-Aware MCTS as a highly adaptable framework for discovering novel configurations in combinatorial geometry.

This theoretical note studies the finite axiomatizability of strict majority reasoning in finite social decision frames. Moss and Pedersen (2026) <doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.23853> introduce a coherence criterion that characterizes exactly when qualitative majority judgments are representable by a finitely additive measure. The question addressed here is whether that coherence criterion can be replaced, in the finite setting, by any bounded finite fragment. We prove that it cannot. For every $k\ge 1$, we construct a maximal standard frame whose shortest coherence violation has length exactly $2k+2$. Hence there is no uniform finite bound on the incoherence index of social decision frames, resolving Conjecture 5.7 stated by Moss and Pedersen (2026). The construction is geometric, in the sense that it proceeds via orthogonality and dimension in rational vector spaces, and self-contained: it isolates a symmetric family of half-sized voting blocs and extends it to a maximal frame in which every shorter balanced obstruction is excluded. Along the explicit infinite sequence of universe sizes obtained in the construction, this also establishes the middle-layer family predicted by Conjecture B.25 by Moss and Pedersen (2026). Together with the soundness and completeness theorem for the Moss-Pedersen minimal logic for strict majorities, this establishes that measurable social decision frames are not finitely axiomatizable in that language.

Applying machine learning techniques to solving long-standing mathematical conjectures can be particularly challenging due to their extreme reward sparsity. As an illustrative example, we consider Kalai's algebraic Hirsch conjecture and recast the construction of its counterexamples as a sparse-reward reinforcement learning problem on graphs. We propose a constrained options-based HRL framework with an equivariant graph neural network policy, which allows us to learn useful temporal abstractions for this task. We evaluate our approach over a wide range of degrees and demonstrate that it consistently outperforms classical RL algorithms as well as greedy search. By exploiting the hierarchical structure of the problem, we effectively provide a first-of-its-kind application of HRL to a problem in commutative algebra.

The Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem (MT-TSP) seeks a minimum cost trajectory for an agent that departs from a static depot, visits a set of moving targets, each within one of their assigned time windows, and returns to the depot. In this article, we study the Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem with Moving Obstacles (MT-TSP-MO), a generalization of the MT-TSP where the agent trajectory must avoid moving obstacles. We present a Mixed-Integer Conic Programming (MICP) formulation that can be solved using off-the-shelf solvers, as well as a fast and scalable Two-Phase Bilevel Search (TPBS) algorithm that computes high-quality feasible solutions for the problem. We evaluate our approaches against an existing baseline algorithm on a broad range of problem instances with up to 40 targets and 40 obstacles. The results demonstrate that both the proposed methods significantly outperform the baseline with respect to success rates, solution costs, and computation time.

We present Trellis: an autoformalization system that leverages LLM agents in a deterministically constrained workflow to enforce incremental progress in Lean autoformalization tasks through iterative refinement of natural language proofs. Our approach is motivated by the common mathematician's notion of what it means to have a rigorous proof in the first place: namely, that it would be routine to elaborate any part of the proof in further detail. The result is a system which aims to achieve reliable autoformalization on a modest budget and with generalist agents, with specialization to autoformalization coming not from any task-specific agent training but instead from a meaning-of-rigor inspired workflow enforced by process semantics. We link to an end-to-end Lean formalization of a recent Ramsey theory breakthrough produced by the process.

Between April 1 and May 15, 2026, a group of 49 mathematicians compiled a dataset of research-level mathematics questions with known answers. Most of the work was done during the 3-day workshop *Benchmarks in Leipzig* with 35 participants at the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences in Leipzig, Germany. We present the resulting collection of 100 questions. We evaluated these questions in three stages: a single attempt by five state-of-the-art LLMs, followed by a 20-runs-per-model evaluation with three of these models, and finally a 3-run attempt with two heavy-thinking models. After Stage 1, 41 questions remained completely unsolved; after Stage 2, this count dropped to 16; and we concluded Stage 3 with only 2 unsolved questions. This demonstrates that the mathematical reasoning capabilities of LLMs are becoming impressive.

Complementarity is the case in which a human--AI interaction (HAI) outperforms the best prediction benchmark available among its members. Although this idea is central in HAI research, formal work on complementarity remains limited. Existing frameworks do not model how agents' predictions compose into workflow-sensitive multi-agent protocols. We close this gap by introducing a tree-based formalization of complementarity in multi-agent HAI. An HAI protocol is represented by an ordered agent-role configuration together with a rooted planar binary tree whose leaves are decorated by prediction vectors. A local binary composition rule is evaluated recursively along the tree, yielding a tree-relative complementarity functional relative to a pointwise-min oracle benchmark. We prove four results. First, selector-based HAIs, including self- or AI-reliance, cannot achieve complementarity regardless of task, loss, or prediction quality. Second, in regression under squared loss, complementarity is equivalent to Euclidean distance minimization from the ground-truth vector; for $N=2$, the optimal linear-pooling weight has a closed form and a residual-correction interpretation. Third, under linear local composition, every protocol tree defines a barycentric coordinate chart on the simplex of leaf weights; Tamari-cover reparameterizations of protocol trees preserve complementarity, and for $N=4$, they satisfy the pentagon identity. Fourth, in binary classification, no internal local composition can achieve complementarity under endpoint-monotone losses, including standard Bregman and many finite Bernoulli $f$-divergence losses; an analogous obstruction holds for multiclass aggregation under cross-entropy. In summary, our framework shows that complementarity is attainable in multi-agent regression, but obstructed in classification under natural conditions on local aggregation and loss functions.

The 2026 disproof of Erdős's unit-distance conjecture and Sawin's subsequent explicit quantitative refinement show that the maximum number $u(n)$ of unit distances among $n$ planar points can exceed $n^{1+\varepsilon}$ for a fixed positive $\varepsilon$. Sawin's explicit bound gives more than $n^{1.014}$ unit distances for arbitrarily large $n$ and exposes integer parameters whose choice is not fully optimized. This report starts from Sawin's nonlinear integer optimization problem and develops an open-source Python verification pipeline. The pipeline is first validated by reproducing Sawin's published parameter choice and is then applied to computationally improved certificates. We optimize and verify certificates involving sets of primes $T$ and $S_Q$, integer multiplicities $k(p)$, and a rationally encoded real parameter $R$. The implementation is deliberately lean, so that all results can be replicated on standard hardware and the procedures can be extended. We compare a deterministic greedy heuristic, a tailored integer evolution strategy with two-sided geometric, or discrete-Laplace, integer mutation and repair operators for number-theoretic feasibility, and a two-parent discrete-recombination variant. Four certificate levels are reported: Sawin's published example with $δ=0.0141144286784982\ldots$, a greedy certificate with $δ=0.0151718056372133\ldots$, a tailored integer evolution strategy certificate with $R=6672416/100000$ and $δ=0.0152616610684193\ldots$, and a recombination variant with the same $R$ and $δ=0.0152628688170072\ldots$. Consequently, the best current certificate supports the cautious statement $u(n)>n^{1.0152}$ for arbitrarily large $n$. Beyond this unit-distance application, the work illustrates how randomized optimization heuristics can improve explicit certificates in pure mathematics and combinatorial geometry.