arXiv++ Combinatorics

Graph burning is a round-based game or process that discretely models the spread of influence throughout a network. We introduce a generalization of graph burning which applies to hypergraphs, as well as a variant called ''lazy'' hypergraph burning. Interestingly, lazily burning a graph is trivial, while lazily burning a hypergraph can be quite complicated. Moreover, the lazy burning model is a useful tool for analyzing the round-based model. One of our key results is that arbitrary hypergraphs do not satisfy a bound analogous to the one in the Burning Number Conjecture for graphs. We also obtain bounds on the burning number and lazy burning number of a hypergraph in terms of its parameters, and present several open problems in the field of (lazy) hypergraph burning.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph. The graph burning is defined as follows: at time $t=0$, all vertices in $G$ are unburned. For each time $t\geq 1$, an unburned vertex is chosen to burn, and at each subsequent time, the fire spreads from each burned vertex to all its neighbors. Once a vertex is burned, it remains burned for all future steps. The process continues until all vertices in $V$ are burned. The burning number of a graph $G$, denoted $b(G)$, is the smallest integer $k$ such that there exists a sequence of vertices $(v_1,v_2,\ldots, v_k)\subseteq V$, where $v_i$ is burned at time $i$, and all vertices in $V$ are burned within time step $k$. The Burning Number problem asks whether the burning number of an input graph $G$ is at most $k$ or not. In this paper, we study the Burning Number problem both from an algorithmic and a structural point of view. The Burning Number problem is known to be NP-complete for interval graphs. Here, we prove that this problem is NP-complete even when restricted to connected proper interval graphs. The well-known burning number conjecture asserts that all the vertices of a graph of order $n$ can be burned in $\lceil \sqrt{n}~\rceil$ steps. In line with this conjecture, the upper and lower bounds of $b(G)$ are well-studied for various graph classes. Here, we provide an improved upper bound for the burning number of connected $P_k$-free graphs and show that the bound is tight up to an additive constant $1$. Finally, we study two variants of the problem, namely edge burning (only edges are burned) and total burning (both vertices and edges are burned). In particular, we establish their relationship with the burning number problem and evaluate the algorithmic complexity of these variants.

Given a graph $G$, the optimization version of the graph burning problem seeks for a sequence of vertices, $(u_1,u_2,...,u_p) \in V(G)^p$, with minimum $p$ and such that every $v \in V(G)$ has distance at most $p-i$ to some vertex $u_i$. The length $p$ of the optimal solution is known as the burning number and is denoted by $b(G)$, an invariant that helps quantify the graph's vulnerability to contagion. This paper explores the advantages and limitations of an $\mathcal{O}(mn + pn^2)$ deterministic greedy heuristic for this problem, where $n$ is the graph's order, $m$ is the graph's size, and $p$ is a guess on $b(G)$. This heuristic is based on the relationship between the graph burning problem and the clustered maximum coverage problem, and despite having limitations on paths and cycles, it found most of the optimal and best-known solutions of benchmark and synthetic graphs with up to 102400 vertices. Beyond practical advantages, our work unveils some of the fundamental aspects of graph burning: its relationship with a generalization of a classical coverage problem and compact integer programs. With this knowledge, better algorithms might be designed in the future.

We introduce a new graph parameter called the cooling number, inspired by the spread of influence in networks and its predecessor, the burning number. The cooling number measures the speed of a slow-moving contagion in a graph; the lower the cooling number, the faster the contagion spreads. We provide tight bounds on the cooling number via a graph's order and diameter. Using isoperimetric results, we derive the cooling number of Cartesian grids. The cooling number is studied in graphs generated by the Iterated Local Transitivity model for social networks. We conclude with open problems.

Graph burning is a discrete time process which can be used to model the spread of social contagion. One is initially given a graph of unburned vertices. At each round (time step), one vertex is burned; unburned vertices with at least one burned neighbour from the previous round also becomes burned. The burning number of a graph is the fewest number of rounds required to burn the graph. It has been conjectured that for a graph on $n$ vertices, the burning number is at most $\lceil\sqrt{n}\rceil$. We show that the graph burning conjecture is true for trees without degree-2 vertices.

Graph burning is a natural discrete graph algorithm inspired by the spread of social contagion. Despite its simplicity, some open problems remain steadfastly unsolved, notably the burning number conjecture, which says that every connected graph of order $m^2$ has burning number at most $m$. Earlier, we showed that the conjecture also holds for a path forest, which is disconnected, provided each of its paths is sufficiently long. However, finding the least sufficient length for this to hold turns out to be nontrivial. In this note, we present our initial findings and conjectures that associate the problem to some naturally impossibly burnable path forests. It is noteworthy that our problem can be reformulated as a topic concerning sumset partition of integers.

A bipartite graph $G=(A, B, E)$ is said to be a biconvex bipartite graph if there exist orderings $<_A$ in $A$ and $<_B$ in $B$ such that the neighbors of every vertex in $A$ are consecutive with respect to $<_B$ and the neighbors of every vertex in $B$ are consecutive with respect to $<_A$. A caterpillar is a tree that will result in a path upon deletion of all the leaves. In this note, we prove that there exists a spanning caterpillar in any connected biconvex bipartite graph. Besides being interesting on its own, this structural result has other consequences. For instance, this directly resolves the burning number conjecture for biconvex bipartite graphs.

The burning number of a graph $G$ is the smallest number $b$ such that the vertices of $G$ can be covered by balls of radii $0, 1, \dots, b-1$. As computing the burning number of a graph is known to be NP-hard, even on trees, it is natural to consider polynomial time approximation algorithms for the quantity. The best known approximation factor in the literature is $3$ for general graphs and $2$ for trees. In this note we give a $2/(1-e^{-2})+\varepsilon=2.313\dots$-approximation algorithm for the burning number of general graphs, and a PTAS for the burning number of trees and forests. Moreover, we show that computing a $(\frac53-\varepsilon)$-approximation of the burning number of a general graph $G$ is NP-hard.

Graph burning is a graph process that models the spread of social contagion. Initially, all the vertices of a graph $G$ are unburnt. At each step, an unburnt vertex is put on fire and the fire from burnt vertices of the previous step spreads to their adjacent unburnt vertices. This process continues till all the vertices are burnt. The burning number $b(G)$ of the graph $G$ is the minimum number of steps required to burn all the vertices in the graph. The burning number conjecture by Bonato et al. states that for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(G) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$. It is easy to observe that in order to burn a graph it is enough to burn its spanning tree. Hence it suffices to prove that for any tree $T$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ where $T$ is the spanning tree of $G$. It was proved in 2018 that $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 1/4} +1/2 \rceil$ for a tree $T$ where $n_2$ is the number of degree $2$ vertices in $T$. In this paper, we provide an algorithm to burn a tree and we improve the existing bound using this algorithm. We prove that $b(T)\leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 8}\rceil -1$ which is an improved bound for $n\geq 50$. We also provide an algorithm to burn some subclasses of the binary tree and prove the burning number conjecture for the same.

The burning number of a graph $G$ is the smallest positive integer $k$ such that the vertex set of $G$ can be covered with balls of radii $0, 1, \dots, k-1$. A well-known conjecture by Bonato, Janssen and Roshabin states that any connected graph on $n$ vertices has burning number at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$. It was recently shown by Norin and Turcotte that the conjecture holds up to a factor of $1+o(1)$. In this note, we demonstrate how this result can be applied to determine the asymptotic value of the burning number for graph classes with given minimum degree. This is based on an observation about connected $2$-hop dominating sets, which may be of independent interest.

The burning number of a graph can be used to measure the spreading speed of contagion in a network. The burning number conjecture is arguably the main unresolved conjecture related to this graph parameter, which can be settled by showing that every tree of order $m^2$ has burning number at most $m$. This is known to hold for many classes of trees, including spiders - trees with exactly one vertex of degree greater than two. In fact, it has been verified that certain spiders of order slightly larger than $m^2$ also have burning numbers at most $m$, a result that has then been conjectured to be true for all trees. The first focus of this paper is to verify this slightly stronger conjecture for double spiders - trees with two vertices of degrees at least three and they are adjacent. Our other focus concerns the burning numbers of path forests, a class of graphs in which their burning numbers are naturally related to that of spiders and double spiders. Here, our main result shows that a path forest of order $m^2$ with a sufficiently long shortest path has burning number exactly $m$, the smallest possible for any path forest of the same order.

The burning number $b(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of turns required to burn all vertices of a graph if at every turn a new fire is started and existing fires spread to all adjacent vertices. The Burning Number Conjecture of Bonato et al. (2016) postulates that $b(G)\leq \left\lceil\sqrt{n}\right\rceil$ for all graphs $G$ on $n$ vertices. We prove that this conjecture holds asymptotically, that is $b(G)\leq (1+o(1))\sqrt n$.

The Burning Number Conjecture, that a graph on $n$ vertices can be burned in at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \ \rceil$ rounds, has been of central interest for the past several years. Much of the literature toward its resolution focuses on two directions: tightening a general upper bound for the burning number, and proving the conjecture for specific graph classes. In the latter, most of the developments work within a specific graph class and exploit the intricacies particular to it. In this article, we broaden this approach by developing systematic machinery that can be used as test beds for asserting that graph classes satisfy the conjecture. We show how to use these to resolve the conjecture for several classes of graphs including triangle-free graphs with degree lower bounds, graphs with certain linear lower bounds on $r$-neighborhood sizes, all trees whose non-leaf vertices have degree at least $4$, trees whose non-leaf vertices have degree at least $3$ (on at least $81$ vertices), trees whose non-leaf vertices are less than $\frac{2}{3}$ concentrated in degree $2$, and trees with a low concentration of high degree non-leaf vertices (the last two results holding for sufficiently many non-leaf vertices).

The Burning Number Conjecture claims that for every connected graph $G$ of order $n,$ its burning number satisfies $b(G) \le \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil.$ While the conjecture remains open, we prove that it is asymptotically true when the order of the graph is much larger than its \emph{growth}, which is the maximal distance of a vertex to a well-chosen path in the graph. We prove that the conjecture for graphs of bounded growth reduces to a finite number of cases. We provide the best-known bound on the burning number of a connected graph $G$ of order $n,$ given by $b(G) \le \sqrt{4n/3} + 1,$ improving on the previously known $\sqrt{3n/2}+O(1)$ bound. Using the improved upper bound, we show that the conjecture almost holds for all graphs with minimum degree at least $3$ and holds for all large enough graphs with minimum degree at least $4$. The previous best-known result was for graphs with minimum degree $23$.

The burning number conjecture states that the burning number of a connected graph is at most $\lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil.$ While the conjecture is unresolved, Land and Lu proved that the burning number of a connected graph is at most $ \sqrt{(3/2)n}+O(1).$ Using an algorithmic approach, we provide an improved upper bound for the burning number of a connected graph: $$\bigg \lceil \frac{\sqrt{12n+64}+8}{3} \bigg \rceil = \sqrt{(4/3)n} +O(1) .$$

Given a graph $G$, the burning number of $G$ is the smallest integer $k$ for which there are vertices $x_1, x_2,\ldots,x_k$ such that $(x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_k)$ is a burning sequence of $G$. It has been shown that the graph burning problem is NP-complete, even for trees with maximum degree three, or linear forests. A $t$-unicyclic graph is a unicycle graph with exactly one vertex of degree greater than $2$. In this paper, we first present the bounds for the burning number of $t$-unicyclic graphs, and then use the burning numbers of linear forests with at most three components to determine the burning number of all $t$-unicyclic graphs for $t\le 2$.

A procedure called \textit{graph burning} was introduced to facilitate the modelling of spread of an alarm, a social contagion, or a social influence or emotion on graphs and networks. Graph burning runs on discrete time-steps (or rounds). At each step $t$, first (a) an unburned vertex is burned (as a \textit{fire source}) from "outside", and then (b) the fire spreads to vertices adjacent to the vertices which are burned till step $t-1$. This process stops after all the vertices of $G$ have been burned. The aim is to burn all the vertices in a given graph in minimum time-steps. The least number of time-steps required to burn a graph is called its \textit{burning number}. The less the burning number is, the faster a graph can be burned. Burning a general graph optimally is an NP-Complete problem. It has been proved that optimal burning of path forests, spider graphs, and trees with maximum degree three is NP-Complete. We study the \textit{graph burning problem} on several sub-classes of \textit{geometric graphs}. We show that burning interval graphs (Section 7.1, Theorem 7.1), permutation graphs (Section 7.2, Theorem 7.2) and disk graphs (Section 7.3, Theorem 7.3) optimally is NP-Complete. In addition, we opine that optimal burning of general graphs (Section 9.2, Conjecture 9.1) cannot be approximated better than 3-approximation factor.

Graph burning is a deterministic, discrete-time process that models how influence or contagion spreads in a graph. Associated to each graph is its burning number, which is a parameter that quantifies how quickly the influence spreads. We survey results on graph burning, focusing on bounds, conjectures, and algorithms related to the burning number. We will discuss state-of-the-art results on the burning number conjecture, burning numbers of graph classes, and algorithmic complexity. We include a list of conjectures, variants, and open problems on graph burning.

Graph burning runs on discrete time steps. The aim is to burn all the vertices in a given graph in the least number of time steps. This number is known to be the burning number of the graph. The spread of social influence, an alarm, or a social contagion can be modeled using graph burning. The less the burning number, the faster the spread. Optimal burning of general graphs is NP-Hard. There is a 3-approximation algorithm to burn general graphs where as better approximation factors are there for many sub classes. Here we study burning of grids; provide a lower bound for burning arbitrary grids and a 2-approximation algorithm for burning square grids. On the other hand, burning path forests, spider graphs, and trees with maximum degree three is already known to be NP-Complete. In this article we show burning problem to be NP-Complete on connected interval graphs, permutation graphs and several other geometric graph classes as corollaries.

The burning number of a graph was recently introduced by Bonato et al. Although they mention that the burning number generalises naturally to directed graphs, no further research on this has been done. Here, we introduce graph burning for directed graphs, and we study bounds for the corresponding burning number and the hardness of finding this number. We derive sharp bounds from simple algorithms and examples. The hardness question yields more surprising results: finding the burning number of a directed tree is NP-hard, but FPT; however, it is W[2]-complete for DAGs. Finally, we give a fixed-parameter algorithm to find the burning number of a digraph, with a parameter inspired by research in phylogenetic networks.