arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given two finite ordered sets $A = \{a_1, \ldots, a_m\}$ and $B = \{b_1, \ldots, b_n\}$, introduce the set of $m n$ outcomes of the game $O = \{(a, b) \mid a \in A, b \in B\} = \{(a_i, b_j) \mid i \in I = \{1, \ldots, m\}, j \in J = \{1, \ldots, n\}$. Two players, Alice and Bob, have the sets of strategies $X$ and $Y$ that consist of all monotone non-decreasing mappings $x: A \rightarrow B$ and $y: B \rightarrow A$, respectively. It is easily seen that each pair $(x,y) \in X \times Y$ produces at least one {\em deal}, that is, an outcome $(a,b) \in O$ such that $x(a) = b$ and $y(b) = a$. Denote by $G(x,y) \subseteq O$ the set of all such deals related to $(x,y)$. The obtained mapping $G = G_{m,n}: X \times Y \rightarrow 2^O$ is a game correspondence. Choose an arbitrary deal $g(x,y) \in G(x,y)$ to obtained a mapping $g : X \times Y \rightarrow O$, which is a game form. We will show that each such game form is tight and, hence, Nash-solvable, that is, for any pair $u = (u_A, u_B)$ of utility functions $u_A : O \rightarrow \mathbb R$ of Alice and $u_B: O \rightarrow \mathbb R$ of Bob, the obtained monotone bargaining game $(g, u)$ has at least one Nash equilibrium in pure strategies. Moreover, the same equilibrium can be chosen for all selections $g(x,y) \in G(x,y)$. We also obtain an efficient algorithm that determines such an equilibrium in time linear in $m n$, although the numbers of strategies $|X| = \binom{m+n-1}{m}$ and $|Y| = \binom{m+n-1}{n}$ are exponential in $m n$. Our results show that, somewhat surprising, the players have no need to hide or randomize their bargaining strategies, even in the zero-sum case.

We introduce and motivate the study of hypergraphical clustering games of mis-coordination. For two specific variants we prove the existence of a pure Nash equilibrium and provide bounds on the price of anarchy as a function of the cardinality of the action set and the size of the hyperedges.

Disjointly constrained multilinear programming concerns the problem of maximizing a multilinear function on the product of finitely many disjoint polyhedra. While maximizing a linear function on a polytope (linear programming) is known to be solvable in polynomial time, even bilinear programming is NP-hard. Based on a reformulation of the problem in terms of sum-of-squares polynomials, we study a hierarchy of semidefinite relaxations to the problem. It follows from the general theory that the sequence of optimal values converges asymptotically to the optimal value of the multilinear program. We show that the semidefinite hierarchy converges generically in finitely many steps to the optimal value of the multilinear problem. We outline two applications of the main result. For nondegenerate bimatrix games, a Nash equilibrium can be computed by the sum of squares approach in finitely many steps. Under an additional geometric condition, the NP-complete containment problem for projections of $\mathcal{H}$-polytopes can be decided in finitely many steps.

A derangement of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is an injective function $f:V\to V$ such that for all $v\in V$, $f(v)\neq v$ and $(v,f(v))\in E$. Not all graphs admit a derangement and previous results have characterized graphs with derangements using neighborhood conditions for subsets of $V$. We establish an alternative criterion for the existence of derangements on a graph. We analyze strict Nash equilibria of the biologically motivated Territorial Raider Game, a multi-player competition for resources in a spatially structured population based on animal raiding and defending behavior. We find that a graph $G$ admits a derangement if and only if there is a strict Nash equilibrium of the Territorial Raider game on $G$.

We consider the capacitated selfish replication (CSR) game with binary preferences, over general undirected networks. We first show that such games have an associated ordinary potential function, and hence always admit a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium (NE). Further, when the minimum degree of the network and the number of resources are of the same order, there exists an exact polynomial time algorithm which can find a NE. Following this, we study the price of anarchy of such games, and show that it is bounded above by 3; we further provide some instances for which the price of anarchy is at least 2. We develop a quasi-polynomial algorithm O(n^2D^{ln n}), where n is the number of players and D is the diameter of the network, which can find, in a distributed manner, an allocation profile that is within a constant factor of the optimal allocation, and hence of any pure-strategy NE of the game. Proof of this result uses a novel potential function.

In this short note we give an example of a four-person finite positional game with perfect information that has no positions of chance and no Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies. The corresponding directed graph has only one directed cycle and only five terminal positions. It remains open: (i) if the number $n$ of the players can be reduced from $4$ to $3$, (ii) if the number $p$ of the terminals can be reduced from $5$ to $4$, and most important, (iii) whether it is possible to get a similar example in which the outcome $c$ corresponding to all (possibly, more than one) directed cycles is worse than every terminal for each player. Yet, it is known that (j) $n$ cannot be reduced to $2$, (jj) $p$ cannot be reduced to $3$, and (jjj) there can be no similar example in which each player makes a decision in a unique position. Keywords: stochastic, positional, chess-like, transition-free games with perfect information and without moves of chance; Nash equilibrium, directed cycles (dicycles), terminal position.

Motivated by emerging resource allocation and data placement problems such as web caches and peer-to-peer systems, we consider and study a class of resource allocation problems over a network of agents (nodes). In this model, nodes can store only a limited number of resources while accessing the remaining ones through their closest neighbors. We consider this problem under both optimization and game-theoretic frameworks. In the case of optimal resource allocation we will first show that when there are only k=2 resources, the optimal allocation can be found efficiently in O(n^2\log n) steps, where n denotes the total number of nodes. However, for k>2 this problem becomes NP-hard with no polynomial time approximation algorithm with a performance guarantee better than 1+1/102k^2, even under metric access costs. We then provide a 3-approximation algorithm for the optimal resource allocation which runs only in linear time O(n). Subsequently, we look at this problem under a selfish setting formulated as a noncooperative game and provide a 3-approximation algorithm for obtaining its pure Nash equilibria under metric access costs. We then establish an equivalence between the set of pure Nash equilibria and flip-optimal solutions of the Max-k-Cut problem over a specific weighted complete graph. Using this reduction, we show that finding the lexicographically smallest Nash equilibrium for k> 2 is NP-hard, and provide an algorithm to find it in O(n^3 2^n) steps. While the reduction to weighted Max-k-Cut suggests that finding a pure Nash equilibrium using best response dynamics might be PLS-hard, it allows us to use tools from quadratic programming to devise more systematic algorithms towards obtaining Nash equilibrium points.

We consider the problem of designing distribution rules to share "welfare" (cost or revenue) among individually strategic agents. There are many known distribution rules that guarantee the existence of a (pure) Nash equilibrium in this setting, e.g., the Shapley value and its weighted variants; however, a characterization of the space of distribution rules that guarantee the existence of a Nash equilibrium is unknown. Our work provides an exact characterization of this space for a specific class of scalable and separable games, which includes a variety of applications such as facility location, routing, network formation, and coverage games. Given arbitrary local welfare functions W, we prove that a distribution rule guarantees equilibrium existence for all games (i.e., all possible sets of resources, agent action sets, etc.) if and only if it is equivalent to a generalized weighted Shapley value on some "ground" welfare functions W', which can be distinct from W. However, if budget-balance is required in addition to the existence of a Nash equilibrium, then W' must be the same as W. We also provide an alternate characterization of this space in terms of "generalized" marginal contributions, which is more appealing from the point of view of computational tractability. A possibly surprising consequence of our result is that, in order to guarantee equilibrium existence in all games with any fixed local welfare functions, it is necessary to work within the class of potential games.

The Internet has emerged as perhaps the most important network in modern computing, but rather miraculously, it was created through the individual actions of a multitude of agents rather than by a central planning authority. This motivates the game theoretic study of network formation, and our paper considers one of the most-well studied models, originally proposed by Fabrikant et al. In it, each of N agents corresponds to a vertex, which can create edges to other vertices at a cost of alpha each, for some parameter alpha. Every edge can be freely used by every vertex, regardless of who paid the creation cost. To reflect the desire to be close to other vertices, each agent's cost function is further augmented by the sum total of all (graph theoretic) distances to all other vertices. Previous research proved that for many regimes of the (alpha, N) parameter space, the total social cost (sum of all agents' costs) of every Nash equilibrium is bounded by at most a constant multiple of the optimal social cost. In algorithmic game theoretic nomenclature, this approximation ratio is called the price of anarchy. In our paper, we significantly sharpen some of those results, proving that for all constant non-integral alpha > 2, the price of anarchy is in fact 1+o(1), i.e., not only is it bounded by a constant, but it tends to 1 as N tends to infinity. For constant integral alpha >= 2, we show that the price of anarchy is bounded away from 1. We provide quantitative estimates on the rates of convergence for both results.

In Zeng et al. [Fluct. Noise Lett. 7 (2007) L439--L447] the analysis of the lowest unique positive integer game is simplified by some reasonable assumptions that make the problem tractable for arbitrary numbers of players. However, here we show that the solution obtained for rational players is not a Nash equilibrium and that a rational utility maximizer with full computational capability would arrive at a solution with a superior expected payoff. An exact solution is presented for the three- and four-player cases and an approximate solution for an arbitrary number of players.

We propose a new hierarchical approach to understand the complexity of the open problem of computing a Nash equilibrium in a bimatrix game. Specifically, we investigate a hierarchy of bimatrix games $(A,B)$ which results from restricting the rank of the matrix $A+B$ to be of fixed rank at most $k$. For every fixed $k$, this class strictly generalizes the class of zero-sum games, but is a very special case of general bimatrix games. We show that even for $k=1$ the set of Nash equilibria of these games can consist of an arbitrarily large number of connected components. While the question of exact polynomial time algorithms to find a Nash equilibrium remains open for games of fixed rank, we can provide polynomial time algorithms for finding an $ε$-approximation.