arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the complexity of the Hitting Set problem in set systems (hypergraphs) that avoid certain sub-structures. In particular, we characterize the classical and parameterized complexity of the problem when the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VC-dimension) of the input is small. VC-dimension is a natural measure of complexity of set systems. Several tractable instances of Hitting Set with a geometric or graph-theoretical flavor are known to have low VC-dimension. In set systems of bounded VC-dimension, Hitting Set is known to admit efficient and almost optimal approximation algorithms (Brönnimann and Goodrich, 1995; Even, Rawitz, and Shahar, 2005; Agarwal and Pan, 2014). In contrast to these approximation-results, a low VC-dimension does not necessarily imply tractability in the parameterized sense. In fact, we show that Hitting Set is W[1]-hard already on inputs with VC-dimension 2, even if the VC-dimension of the dual set system is also 2. Thus, Hitting Set is very unlikely to be fixed-parameter tractable even in this arguably simple case. This answers an open question raised by King in 2010. For set systems whose (primal or dual) VC-dimension is 1, we show that Hitting Set is solvable in polynomial time. To bridge the gap in complexity between the classes of inputs with VC-dimension 1 and 2, we use a measure that is more fine-grained than VC-dimension. In terms of this measure, we identify a sharp threshold where the complexity of Hitting Set transitions from polynomial-time-solvable to NP-hard. The tractable class that lies just under the threshold is a generalization of Edge Cover, and thus extends the domain of polynomial-time tractability of Hitting Set.

A support or realization of a hypergraph $H$ is a graph $G$ on the same vertex as $H$ such that for each hyperedge of $H$ it holds that its vertices induce a connected subgraph of $G$. The NP-hard problem of finding a planar support has applications in hypergraph drawing and network design. Previous algorithms for the problem assume that twins -- pairs of vertices that are in precisely the same hyperedges -- can safely be removed from the input hypergraph. We prove that this assumption is generally wrong, yet that the number of twins necessary for a hypergraph to have a planar support only depends on its number of hyperedges. We give an explicit upper bound on the number of twins necessary for a hypergraph with $m$ hyperedges to have an $r$-outerplanar support, which depends only on $r$ and $m$. Since all additional twins can be safely removed, we obtain a linear-time algorithm for computing $r$-outerplanar supports for hypergraphs with $m$ hyperedges if $m$ and $r$ are constant; in other words, the problem is fixed-parameter linear-time solvable with respect to the parameters $m$ and $r$.

Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, we define $\textsf{v-cover}_{H}(G)$ (resp. $\textsf{e-cover}_{H}(G)$) as the minimum number of vertices (resp. edges) whose removal from $G$ produces a graph without any minor isomorphic to ${H}$. Also $\textsf{v-pack}_{H}(G)$ (resp. $\textsf{v-pack}_{H}(G)$) is the maximum number of vertex- (resp. edge-) disjoint subgraphs of $G$ that contain a minor isomaorphic to $H$. We denote by $θ_r$ the graph with two vertices and $r$ parallel edges between them. When $H=θ_r$, the parameters $\textsf{v-cover}_{H}$, $\textsf{e-cover}_{H}$, $\textsf{v-pack}_{H}$, and $\textsf{v-pack}_{H}$ are NP-hard to compute (for sufficiently big values of $r$). Drawing upon combinatorial results in [Minors in graphs of large $θ_r$-girth, Chatzidimitriou et al., arXiv:1510.03041], we give an algorithmic proof that if $\textsf{v-pack}_{θ_r}(G)\leq k$, then $\textsf{v-cover}_{θ_r}(G) = O(k\log k)$, and similarly for $\textsf{v-pack}_{θ_r}$ and $\textsf{e-cover}_{θ_r}$. In other words, the class of graphs containing ${θ_r}$ as a minor has the vertex/edge Erdős-Pósa property, for every positive integer $r$. Using the algorithmic machinery of our proofs, we introduce a unified approach for the design of an $O(\log {\rm OPT})$-approximation algorithm for $\textsf{v-pack}_{θ_r}$, $\textsf{v-cover}_{θ_r}$, $\textsf{v-pack}_{θ_r}$, and $\textsf{e-cover}_{θ_r}$ that runs in $O(n\cdot \log(n)\cdot m)$ steps. Also, we derive several new Erdős-Pósa-type results from the techniques that we introduce.

In 1969, Roberts introduced proper and unit interval graphs and proved that these classes are equal. Natural generalizations of unit interval graphs called $k$-length interval graphs were considered in which the number of different lengths of intervals is limited by $k$. Even after decades of research, no insight into their structure is known and the complexity of recognition is open even for $k=2$. We propose generalizations of proper interval graphs called $k$-nested interval graphs in which there are no chains of $k+1$ intervals nested in each other. It is easy to see that $k$-nested interval graphs are a superclass of $k$-length interval graphs. We give a linear-time recognition algorithm for $k$-nested interval graphs. This algorithm adds a missing piece to Gajarský et al. [FOCS 2015] to show that testing FO properties on interval graphs is FPT with respect to the nesting $k$ and the length of the formula, while the problem is W2-hard when parameterized just by the length of the formula. We show that a generalization of recognition called partial representation extension is NP-hard for $k$-length interval graphs, even when $k=2$, while Klavík et al. show that it is polynomial-time solvable for $k$-nested interval graphs.

The Joint Crossing Number problem asks for a simultaneous embedding of two disjoint graphs into one surface such that the number of edge crossings (between the two graphs) is minimized. It was introduced by Negami in 2001 in connection with diagonal flips in triangulations of surfaces, and subsequently investigated in a general form for small-genus surfaces. We prove that all of the commonly considered variants of this problem are NP-hard already in the orientable surface of genus 6, by a reduction from a special variant of the anchored crossing number problem of Cabello and Mohar.

In the rectilinear Steiner arborescence problem the task is to build a shortest rectilinear Steiner tree connecting a given root and a set of terminals which are placed in the plane such that all root-terminal-paths are shortest paths. This problem is known to be NP-hard. In this paper we consider a more restricted version of this problem. In our case we have a depth restrictions $d(t)\in\mathbb{N}$ for every terminal $t$. We are looking for a shortest binary rectilinear Steiner arborescence such that each terminal $t$ is at depth $d(t)$, that is, there are exactly $d(t)$ Steiner points on the unique root-$t$-path is exactly $d(t)$. We prove that even this restricted version is NP-hard.

Answering a question of Haugland, we show that the pooling problem with one pool and a bounded number of inputs can be solved in polynomial time by solving a polynomial number of linear programs of polynomial size. We also give an overview of known complexity results and remaining open problems to further characterize the border between (strongly) NP-hard and polynomially solvable cases of the pooling problem.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. Given an unrooted, binary phylogenetic tree T on a set of n >= 2 taxa, a closed (but fairly opaque) expression for the number of convex characters on T has been known since 1992, and this is independent of the exact topology of T. In this note we prove that this number is actually equal to the (2n-1)th Fibonacci number. Next, we define g_k(T) to be the number of convex characters on T in which each state appears on at least k taxa. We show that, somewhat curiously, g_2(T) is also independent of the topology of T, and is equal to to the (n-1)th Fibonacci number. As we demonstrate, this topological neutrality subsequently breaks down for k >= 3. However, we show that for each fixed k >= 1, g_k(T) can be computed in O(n) time and the set of characters thus counted can be efficiently listed and sampled. We use these insights to give a simple but effective exact algorithm for the NP-hard maximum parsimony distance problem that runs in time $Θ( φ^{n} \cdot n^2 )$, where $φ\approx 1.618...$ is the golden ratio, and an exact algorithm which computes the tree bisection and reconnection distance (equivalently, a maximum agreement forest) in time $Θ( φ^{2n}\cdot \text{poly}(n))$, where $φ^2 \approx 2.619$.

We study the problem of non-preemptively scheduling $n$ jobs, each job $j$ with a release time $t_j$, a deadline $d_j$, and a processing time $p_j$, on $m$ parallel identical machines. Cieliebak et al. (2004) considered the two constraints $|d_j-t_j|\leq λp_j$ and $|d_j-t_j|\leq p_j +σ$ and showed the problem to be NP-hard for any $λ>1$ and for any $σ\geq 2$. We complement their results by parameterized complexity studies: we show that, for any $λ>1$, the problem remains weakly NP-hard even for $m=2$ and strongly W[1]-hard parameterized by $m$. We present a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for constant $m$ and $λ$ and a fixed-parameter tractability result for the parameter $m$ combined with $σ$.

A $K_3$-WORM coloring of a graph $G$ is an assignment of colors to the vertices in such a way that the vertices of each $K_3$-subgraph of $G$ get precisely two colors. We study graphs $G$ which admit at least one such coloring. We disprove a conjecture of Goddard et al. [Congr. Numer., 219 (2014) 161--173] who asked whether every such graph has a $K_3$-WORM coloring with two colors. In fact for every integer $k\ge 3$ there exists a $K_3$-WORM colorable graph in which the minimum number of colors is exactly $k$. There also exist $K_3$-WORM colorable graphs which have a $K_3$-WORM coloring with two colors and also with $k$ colors but no coloring with any of $3,\dots,k-1$ colors. We also prove that it is NP-hard to determine the minimum number of colors and NP-complete to decide $k$-colorability for every $k \ge 2$ (and remains intractable even for graphs of maximum degree 9 if $k=3$). On the other hand, we prove positive results for $d$-degenerate graphs with small $d$, also including planar graphs. Moreover we point out a fundamental connection with the theory of the colorings of mixed hypergraphs. We list many open problems at the end.

Addressing a problem posed by Chellali, Haynes, and Hedetniemi (Discrete Appl. Math. 178 (2014) 27-32) we prove $γ_{r2}(G)\leq 2γ_r(G)$ for every graph $G$, where $γ_{r2}(G)$ and $γ_r(G)$ denote the $2$-rainbow domination number and the weak Roman domination number of $G$, respectively. We characterize the extremal graphs for this inequality that are $\{ K_4,K_4-e\}$-free, and show that the recognition of the $K_5$-free extremal graphs is NP-hard.

We consider the following question: given an $(X,Y)$-bigraph $G$ and a set $S \subset X$, does $G$ contain two disjoint matchings $M_1$ and $M_2$ such that $M_1$ saturates $X$ and $M_2$ saturates $S$? When $|S|\geq |X|-1$, this question is solvable by finding an appropriate factor of the graph. In contrast, we show that when $S$ is allowed to be an arbitrary subset of $X$, the problem is NP-hard.

In order to formulate mathematical conjectures likely to be true, a number of base cases must be determined. However, many combinatorial problems are NP-hard and the computational complexity makes this research approach difficult using a standard brute force approach on a typical computer. One sample problem explored is that of finding a minimum identifying code. To work around the computational issues, a variety of methods are explored and consist of a parallel computing approach using Matlab, a quantum annealing approach using the D-Wave computer, and lastly using satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) and corresponding SMT solvers. Each of these methods requires the problem to be formulated in a unique manner. In this paper, we address the challenges of computing solutions to this NP-hard problem with respect to each of these methods.

There are several notions of gonality for graphs. The divisorial gonality dgon(G) of a graph G is the smallest degree of a divisor of positive rank in the sense of Baker-Norine. The stable gonality sgon(G) of a graph G is the minimum degree of a finite harmonic morphism from a refinement of G to a tree, as defined by Cornelissen, Kato and Kool. We show that computing dgon(G) and sgon(G) are NP-hard by a reduction from the maximum independent set problem and the vertex cover problem, respectively. Both constructions show that computing gonality is moreover APX-hard.

We give a reduction from {\sc clique} to establish that sparse PCA is NP-hard. The reduction has a gap which we use to exclude an FPTAS for sparse PCA (unless P=NP). Under weaker complexity assumptions, we also exclude polynomial constant-factor approximation algorithms.

Given a network represented by a weighted directed graph G, we consider the problem of finding a bounded cost set of nodes S such that the influence spreading from S in G, within a given time bound, is as large as possible. The dynamic that governs the spread of influence is the following: initially only elements in S are influenced; subsequently at each round, the set of influenced elements is augmented by all nodes in the network that have a sufficiently large number of already influenced neighbors. We prove that the problem is NP-hard, even in simple networks like complete graphs and trees. We also derive a series of positive results. We present exact pseudo-polynomial time algorithms for general trees, that become polynomial time in case the trees are unweighted. This last result improves on previously published results. We also design polynomial time algorithms for general weighted paths and cycles, and for unweighted complete graphs.

We prove that every digraph of circumference $l$ has DAG-width at most $l$ and this is best possible. As a consequence of our result we deduce that the $k$-linkage problem is polynomially solvable for every fixed $k$ in the class of digraphs with bounded circumference. This answers a question posed in \cite{bangTCS562}. We also prove that the weak $k$-linkage problem (where we ask for arc-disjoint paths) is polynomially solvable for every fixed $k$ in the class of digraphs with circumference 2 as well as for digraphs with a bounded number of disjoint cycles each of length at least 3. The case of bounded circumference digraphs is open. Finally we prove that the minimum spanning strong subdigraph problem is NP-hard on digraphs of DAG-width at most 5.

Computing the clique number and chromatic number of a general graph are well-known NP-Hard problems. Codenotti et al. (Bruno Codenotti, Ivan Gerace, and Sebastiano Vigna. Hardness results and spectral techniques for combinatorial problems on circulant graphs. \emph{Linear Algebra Appl.}, 285(1-3): 123--142, 1998) showed that computing clique number and chromatic number are still NP-Hard problems for the class of circulant graphs. We show that computing clique number is NP-Hard for the class of Cayley graphs for the groups $G^n$, where $G$ is any fixed finite group (e.g., cubelike graphs). We also show that computing chromatic number cannot be done in polynomial time (under the assumption $\text{P}\neq \text{NP}$) for the same class of graphs. Our presentation uses free Cayley graphs. The proof combines free Cayley graphs with quotient graphs and Goppa codes.

The dimension of a partial order $P$ is the minimum number of linear orders whose intersection is $P$. There are efficient algorithms to test if a partial order has dimension at most $2$. In 1982 Yannakakis showed that for $k\geq 3$ to test if a partial order has dimension $\leq k$ is NP-complete. The height of a partial order $P$ is the maximum size of a chain in $P$. Yannakakis also showed that for $k\geq 4$ to test if a partial order of height $2$ has dimension $\leq k$ is NP-complete. The complexity of deciding whether an order of height $2$ has dimension $3$ was left open. This question became one of the best known open problems in dimension theory for partial orders. We show that the problem is NP-complete. Technically we show that the decision problem (3DH2) for dimension is equivalent to deciding for the existence of bipartite triangle containment representations (BTCon). This problem then allows a reduction from a class of planar satisfiability problems (P-3-CON-3-SAT(4)) which is known to be NP-hard.

Optimization over $l\times m\times n$ integer $3$-way tables with given line-sums is NP-hard already for fixed $l=3$, but is polynomial time solvable with both $l,m$ fixed. In the {\em huge} version of the problem, the variable dimension $n$ is encoded in {\em binary}, with $t$ {\em layer types}. It was recently shown that the huge problem can be solved in polynomial time for fixed $t$, and the complexity of the problem for variable $t$ was raised as an open problem. Here we solve this problem and show that the huge table problem can be solved in polynomial time even when the number $t$ of types is {\em variable}. The complexity of the problem over $4$-way tables with variable $t$ remains open. Our treatment goes through the more general class of {\em huge $n$-fold integer programming problems}. We show that huge integer programs over $n$-fold products of totally unimodular matrices can be solved in polynomial time even when the number $t$ of brick types is variable.