arXiv++ Combinatorics

In Francis and Steel (2015), it was shown that there exists non-trivial networks on $4$ leaves upon which the distance metric affords a metric on a tree which is not the base tree of the network. In this paper we extend this result in two directions. We show that for any tree $T$ there exists a family of non-trivial HGT networks $N$ for which the distance metric $d_N$ affords a metric on $T$. We additionally provide a class of networks on any number of leaves upon which the distance metric affords a metric on a tree which is not the base tree of the network. The family of networks are all "floating" networks, a subclass of a novel family of networks introduced in this paper, and referred to as "versatile" networks. Versatile networks are then characterised. Additionally, we find a lower bound for the number of `useful' HGT arcs in such networks, in a sense explained in the paper. This lower bound is equal to the number of HGT arcs required for each floating network in the main results, and thus our networks are minimal in this sense.

Choi et. al (2011) introduced a minimum spanning tree (MST)-based method called CLGrouping, for constructing tree-structured probabilistic graphical models, a statistical framework that is commonly used for inferring phylogenetic trees. While CLGrouping works correctly if there is a unique MST, we observe an indeterminacy in the method in the case that there are multiple MSTs. In this work we remove this indeterminacy by introducing so-called vertex-ranked MSTs. We note that the effectiveness of CLGrouping is inversely related to the number of leaves in the MST. This motivates the problem of finding a vertex-ranked MST with the minimum number of leaves (MLVRMST). We provide a polynomial time algorithm for the MLVRMST problem, and prove its correctness for graphs whose edges are weighted with tree-additive distances.

Motivated by applications to low-rank matrix completion, we give a combinatorial characterization of the independent sets in the algebraic matroid associated to the collection of $m\times n$ rank-2 matrices and $n\times n$ skew-symmetric rank-2 matrices. Our approach is to use tropical geometry to reduce this to a problem about phylogenetic trees which we then solve. In particular, we give a combinatorial description of the collections of pairwise distances between several taxa that may be arbitrarily prescribed while still allowing the resulting dissimilarity map to be completed to a tree metric.

Phylogenetic networks are a type of directed acyclic graph that represent how a set $X$ of present-day species are descended from a common ancestor by processes of speciation and reticulate evolution. In the absence of reticulate evolution, such networks are simply phylogenetic (evolutionary) trees. Moreover, phylogenetic networks that are not trees can sometimes be represented as phylogenetic trees with additional directed edges placed between their edges. Such networks are called {\em tree based}, and the class of phylogenetic networks that are tree based has recently been characterised. In this paper, we establish a number of new characterisations of tree-based networks in terms of path partitions and antichains (in the spirit of Dilworth's theorem), as well as via matchings in a bipartite graph. We also show that a temporal network is tree based if and only if it satisfies an antichain-to-leaf condition. In the second part of the paper, we define three indices that measure the extent to which an arbitrary phylogenetic network deviates from being tree based. We describe how these three indices can be described exactly and computed efficiently using classical results concerning maximum-sized matchings in bipartite graphs.

Trees with labelled leaves and with all other vertices of degree three play an important role in systematic biology and other areas of classification. A classical combinatorial result ensures that such trees can be uniquely reconstructed from the distances between the leaves (when the edges are given any strictly positive lengths). Moreover, a linear number of these pairwise distance values suffices to determine both the tree and its edge lengths. A natural set of pairs of leaves is provided by any `triplet cover' of the tree (based on the fact that each non-leaf vertex is the median vertex of three leaves). In this paper we describe a number of new results concerning triplet covers of minimum size. In particular, we characterize such covers in terms of an associated graph being a 2-tree. Also, we show that minimum triplet covers are `shellable' and thereby provide a set of pairs for which the inter-leaf distance values will uniquely determine the underlying tree and its associated branch lengths.

Understanding the face structure of the balanced minimal evolution (BME) polytope, especially its top-dimensional facets, is crucially important to phylogenetic applications. We show that BME polytope has a sub-lattice of its poset of faces which is isomorphic to a quotient of the well-studied permutoassociahedron. This sub-lattice corresponds to compatible sets of splits displayed by phylogenetic trees, and extends the lattice of faces of the BME polytope found by Hodge, Haws, and Yoshida. Each of the maximal elements in our new poset of faces corresponds to a single split of the leaves. Nearly all of these turn out to actually be facets of the BME polytope, a collection of facets which grows exponentially.

A classic problem in computational biology is constructing a phylogenetic tree given a set of distances between n species. In most cases, a tree structure is too constraining. We consider a circular split network, a generalization of a tree in which multiple parallel edges signify divergence. A geometric space of such networks is introduced, forming a natural extension of the work by Billera, Holmes, and Vogtmann on tree space. We explore properties of this space, and show a natural embedding of the compactification of the real moduli space of curves within it.

We prove that the phylogenetic complexity -- an invariant introduced by Sturmfels and Sullivant -- of any finite abelian group is finite.

We investigate uniqueness issues that arise in $l^\infty$-optimization to linear spaces and Bergman fans of matroids. For linear spaces, we give a polyhedral decomposition of $\mathbb{R}^n$ based on the dimension of the set of $l^\infty$-nearest neighbors. This implies that the $l^\infty$-nearest neighbor in a linear space is unique if and only if the underlying matroid is uniform. For Bergman fans of matroids, we show that the set of $l^\infty$-nearest points is a tropical polytope and give an algorithm to compute its tropical vertices. A key ingredient here is a notion of topology that generalizes tree topology. These results have practical implications for distance-based phylogenetic reconstruction using the $l^\infty$-metric. We analyze the possible dimensions of the set of $l^\infty$-nearest equidistant tree metrics to an arbitrary dissimilarity map and the number of tree topologies represented in this set. For both 3 and 4-leaf trees, we decompose the space of dissimilarity maps relative to the tree topologies represented.

In a metric space, the Fermat-Weber points of a sample are statistics to measure the central tendency of the sample and it is well-known that the Fermat-Weber point of a sample is not necessarily unique in the metric space. We investigate the computation of Fermat-Weber points under the tropical metric on the quotient space $\mathbb{R}^{n} \!/ \mathbb{R} {\bf 1}$ with a fixed $n \in \mathbb{N}$, motivated by its application to the space of equidistant phylogenetic trees with $N$ leaves (in this case $n=\binom{N}{2}$) realized as the tropical linear space of all ultrametrics. We show that the set of all tropical Fermat-Weber points of a finite sample is always a classical convex polytope, and we present a combinatorial formula for a key value associated to this set. We identify conditions under which this set is a singleton. We apply numerical experiments to analyze the set of the tropical Fermat-Weber points within a space of phylogenetic trees. We discuss the issues in the computation of the tropical Fermat-Weber points.

Billey et al. [arXiv:1507.04976] have recently discovered a surprisingly simple formula for the number $a_n(σ)$ of leaf-labelled rooted non-embedded binary trees (also known as phylogenetic trees) with $n\geq 1$ leaves, fixed (for the relabelling action) by a given permutation $σ\in\frak{S}_n$. Denoting by $λ\vdash n$ the integer partition giving the sizes of the cycles of $σ$ in non-increasing order, they show by a guessing/checking approach that if $λ$ is a binary partition (it is known that $a_n(σ)=0$ otherwise), then $$ a_n(σ)=\prod_{i=2}^{\ell(λ)}(2(λ_i+\cdots+λ_{\ell(λ)})-1), $$ and they derive from it a formula and random generation procedure for tanglegrams (and more generally for tangled chains). Our main result is a combinatorial proof of the formula, which yields a simplification of the random sampler for tangled chains.

The betweenness function $bet(n)$ is the minimum number of total orderings of $n$ objects such that for any three distinct objects $a$, $b$ and $c$, there is an ordering in which $b$ is between $a$ and $c$. The nonbetweenness function $nbet(n)$ is the minimum number of total orderings such that for any three distinct objects $a$, $b$ and $c$, there is an ordering in which $b$ is not between $a$ and $c$. We show that $nbet(n) = \left\lceil \log_2\log_2n \right\rceil+1$ and $bet(n) = Θ(\log n)$. Betweenness and Nonbetweenness are specific cases of a more general extreme value function called the `extreme ternary constraint function'. The asymptotic value of this generalisation is computed using the values of $nbet(n)$ and $bet(n)$. This result demonstrates that the minimum size of a set of rooted phylogenetic trees is consistent with all phylogenetic triplets is $Θ(\log\log n)$.

Construction of phylogenetic trees and networks for extant species from their characters represents one of the key problems in phylogenomics. While solution to this problem is not always uniquely defined and there exist multiple methods for tree/network construction, it becomes important to measure how well the constructed networks capture the given character relationship across the species. In the current study, we propose a novel method for measuring the specificity of a given phylogenetic network in terms of the total number of distributions of character states at the leaves that the network may impose. While for binary phylogenetic trees, this number has an exact formula and depends only on the number of leaves and character states but not on the tree topology, the situation is much more complicated for non-binary trees or networks. Nevertheless, we develop an algorithm for combinatorial enumeration of such distributions, which is applicable for arbitrary trees and networks under some reasonable assumptions.

Phylogenetic networks are a generalization of phylogenetic trees that are used to represent reticulate evolution. Unrooted phylogenetic networks form a special class of such networks, which naturally generalize unrooted phylogenetic trees. In this paper we define two operations on unrooted phylogenetic networks, one of which is a generalization of the well-known nearest-neighbor interchange (NNI) operation on phylogenetic trees. We show that any unrooted phylogenetic network can be transformed into any other such network using only these operations. This generalizes the well-known fact that any phylogenetic tree can be transformed into any other such tree using only NNI operations. It also allows us to define a generalization of tree space and to define some new metrics on unrooted phylogenetic networks. To prove our main results, we employ some fascinating new connections between phylogenetic networks and cubic graphs that we have recently discovered. Our results should be useful in developing new strategies to search for optimal phylogenetic networks, a topic that has recently generated some interest in the literature, as well as for providing new ways to compare networks.

A tree-based network on a set $X$ of $n$ leaves is said to be universal if any rooted binary phylogenetic tree on $X$ can be its base tree. Francis and Steel showed that there is a universal tree-based network on $X$ in the case of $n=3$, and asked whether such a network exists in general. We settle this problem by proving that there are infinitely many universal tree-based networks for any $n>1$.

The need for structures capable of accommodating complex evolutionary signals such as those found in, for example, wheat has fueled research into phylogenetic networks. Such structures generalize the standard phylogenetic tree model by also allowing cycles and have been introduced in rooted and unrooted form. In contrast to phylogenetic trees, however, surprisingly little is known about the interplay between both types thus hampering our ability to make much needed progress for rooted phylogenetic networks by drawing on insights from their much better understood unrooted counterparts. Unrooted phylogenetic networks are underpinned by split systems and by focusing on them we establish a first link between both types. More precisely, we develop a link between 1-nested phylogenetic networks which are examples of rooted phylogenetic networks and the well-studied median networks (aka Buneman graph) which are examples of unrooted phylogenetic networks. In particular, we show that not only can a 1-nested network be obtained from a median network but also that that network is, in a well-defined sense, optimal. Along the way, we characterize circular split systems in terms of the novel $\mathcal I$-intersection closure of a split system and establish the 1-nested analogue of the fundamental "Splits Equivalence Theorem" for phylogenetic trees.

Phylogenetic networks have gained prominence over the years due to their ability to represent complex non-treelike evolutionary events such as recombination or hybridization. Popular combinatorial objects used to construct them are triplet systems and cluster systems, the motivation being that any network $N$ induces a triplet system $\mathcal R(N)$ and a softwired cluster system $\mathcal S(N)$. Since in real-world studies it cannot be guaranteed that all triplets/softwired clusters induced by a network are available it is of particular interest to understand whether subsets of $\mathcal R(N)$ or $\mathcal S(N)$ allow one to uniquely reconstruct the underlying network $N$. Here we show that even within the highly restricted yet biologically interesting space of level-1 phylogenetic networks it is not always possible to uniquely reconstruct a level-1 network $N$ even when all triplets in $\mathcal R(N)$ or all clusters in $\mathcal S(N)$ are available. On the positive side, we introduce a reasonably large subclass of level-1 networks the members of which are uniquely determined by their induced triplet/softwired cluster systems. Along the way, we also establish various enumerative results, both positive and negative, including results which show that certain special subclasses of level-1 networks $N$ can be uniquely reconstructed from proper subsets of $\mathcal R(N)$ and $\mathcal S(N)$. We anticipate these results to be of use in the design of, for example, algorithms for phylogenetic network inference.

We study the geometry of metrics and convexity structures on the space of phylogenetic trees, which is here realized as the tropical linear space of all \ ultrametrics. The ${\rm CAT}(0)$-metric of Billera-Holmes-Vogtman arises from the theory of orthant spaces. While its geodesics can be computed by the Owen-Provan algorithm, geodesic triangles are complicated. We show that the dimension of such a triangle can be arbitrarily high. Tropical convexity and the tropical metric behave better. They exhibit properties desirable for geometric statistics, such as geodesics of small depth.

We solve a class of optimization problems for (phylogenetic) $X$-trees or their shapes. These problems have recently appeared in different contexts, e.g. in the context of the impact of tree shapes on the size of TBR neighborhoods, but so far these problems have not been characterized and solved in a systematic way. In this work we generalize the concept and also present several applications. Moreover, our results give rise to a nice notion of balance for trees. Unsurprisingly, so-called caterpillars are the most unbalanced tree shapes, but it turns out that balanced tree shapes cannot be described so easily as they need not even be unique.

The terminal Wiener index of a tree is the sum of distances for all pairs of pendent vertices, which recently arises in the study of phylogenetic tree reconstruction and the neighborhood of trees. This paper presents a sharp upper and lower bounds for the terminal Wiener index in terms of its order and diameter and characterizes all extremal trees which attain these bounds. In addition, we investigate the properties of extremal trees which attain the maximum terminal Wiener index among all trees of order $n$ with fixed maximum degree.