arXiv++ Combinatorics

We introduce the notion of de Bruijn entropy of an Eulerian quiver and show how the corresponding relative entropy can be applied to practical string similarity problems. This approach explicitly links the combinatorial and information-theoretical properties of words and its performance is superior to edit distances in many respects and competitive in most others. The computational complexity of our current implementation is parametrically tunable between linear and cubic, and we outline how an optimized linear algebra subroutine can reduce the cubic complexity to approximately linear. Numerous examples are provided, including a realistic application to molecular phylogenetics.

Three standard subtree transfer operations for binary trees, used in particular for phylogenetic trees, are: tree bisection and reconnection ($TBR$), subtree prune and regraft ($SPR$) and rooted subtree prune and regraft ($rSPR$). For a pair of leaf-labelled binary trees with $n$ leaves, the maximum number of such moves required to transform one into the other is $n-Θ(\sqrt{n})$, extending a result of Ding, Grunewald and Humphries. We show that if the pair is chosen uniformly at random, then the expected number of moves required to transfer one into the other is $n-Θ(n^{2/3})$. These results may be phrased in terms of agreement forests: we also give extensions for more than two binary trees.

Let $X$ be a finite set, $\mathcal N$ be a reticulation-visible network on $X$, and $\mathcal T$ be a rooted binary phylogenetic tree. We show that there is a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether or not $\mathcal N$ displays $\mathcal T$. Furthermore, for all $|X|\ge 1$, we show that $\mathcal N$ has at most $8|X|-7$ vertices in total and at most $3|X|-3$ reticulation vertices, and that these upper bounds are sharp.

We study phylogenetic complexity of finite abelian groups - an invariant introduced by Sturmfels and Sullivant. The invariant is hard to compute - so far it was only known for $Z_2$, in which case it equals $2$. We prove that phylogenetic complexity of any group $Z_p$, where $p$ is prime, is finite. We also show, as conjectured by Sturmfels and Sullivant, that the phylogenetic complexity of $Z_3$ equals $3$.

A central theme in phylogenetics is the reconstruction and analysis of evolutionary trees from a given set of data. To determine the optimal search methods for reconstructing trees, it is crucial to understand the size and structure of the neighbourhoods of trees under tree rearrangement operations. The diameter and size of the immediate neighbourhood of a tree has been well-studied, however little is known about the number of trees at distance two, three or (more generally) $k$ from a given tree. In this paper we provide a number of exact and asymptotic results concerning these quantities, and identify some key aspects of tree shape that play a role in determining these quantities. We obtain several new results for two of the main tree rearrangement operations - Nearest Neighbour Interchange and Subtree Prune and Regraft -- as well as for the Robinson-Foulds metric on trees.

Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. Given an unrooted, binary phylogenetic tree T on a set of n >= 2 taxa, a closed (but fairly opaque) expression for the number of convex characters on T has been known since 1992, and this is independent of the exact topology of T. In this note we prove that this number is actually equal to the (2n-1)th Fibonacci number. Next, we define g_k(T) to be the number of convex characters on T in which each state appears on at least k taxa. We show that, somewhat curiously, g_2(T) is also independent of the topology of T, and is equal to to the (n-1)th Fibonacci number. As we demonstrate, this topological neutrality subsequently breaks down for k >= 3. However, we show that for each fixed k >= 1, g_k(T) can be computed in O(n) time and the set of characters thus counted can be efficiently listed and sampled. We use these insights to give a simple but effective exact algorithm for the NP-hard maximum parsimony distance problem that runs in time $Θ( φ^{n} \cdot n^2 )$, where $φ\approx 1.618...$ is the golden ratio, and an exact algorithm which computes the tree bisection and reconnection distance (equivalently, a maximum agreement forest) in time $Θ( φ^{2n}\cdot \text{poly}(n))$, where $φ^2 \approx 2.619$.

A distance-based method to reconstruct a phylogenetic tree with $n$ leaves takes a distance matrix, $n \times n$ symmetric matrix with $0$s in the diagonal, as its input and reconstructs a tree with $n$ leaves using tools in combinatorics. A safety radius is a radius from a tree metric (a distance matrix realizing a true tree) within which the input distance matrices must all lie in order to satisfy a precise combinatorial condition under which the distance-based method is guaranteed to return a correct tree. A stochastic safety radius is a safety radius under which the distance-based method is guaranteed to return a correct tree within a certain probability. In this paper we investigated stochastic safety radii for the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and balanced minimal evolution (BME) method for $n = 5$.

The Shapley Value and the Fair Proportion Index of phylogenetic trees have been frequently discussed as prioritization tools in conservation biology. Both indices rank species according to their contribution to total phylogenetic diversity, allowing for a simple conservation criterion. While both indices have their specific advantages and drawbacks, it has recently been shown that both values are closely related. However, as different authors use different definitions of the Shapley Value, the specific degree of relatedness depends on the specific version of the Shapley Value - it ranges from a high correlation index to equality of the indices. In this note, we first give an overview of the different indices. Then we turn our attention to the mere ranking order provided by either of the indices. We compare the rankings obtained from different versions of the Shapley Value for a phylogenetic tree of European amphibians and illustrate their differences. We then undertake further analyses on simulated data and show that even though the chance of two rankings being exactly identical (when obtained from different versions of the Shapley Value) decreases with an increasing number of taxa, the distance between the two rankings converges to zero, i.e., the rankings are becoming more and more alike. Moreover, we introduce our freely available software package FairShapley, which was implemented in Perl and with which all calculations have been performed.

One of the goals of phylogenetic research is to find the species tree describing the evolutionary history of a set of species. But the trees derived from geneti data with the help of tree inference methods are gene trees that need not coincide with the species tree. This can for example happen when so-called deep coalescence events take place. It is also known that species trees can differ from their most likely gene trees. Therefore, as a means to find the species tree, it has been suggested to use subtrees of the gene trees, for example triples, and to puzzle them together in order to find the species tree. In this paper, we will show that this approach may lead to wrong trees regarding the minimum deep coalescence criterion (MDC). In particular, we present an example in which the optimal MDC tree is unique, but none of its triple subtrees fulfills the MDC criterion. In this sense, MDC is a non-hereditary tree reconstruction method.

Many discrete mathematics problems in phylogenetics are defined in terms of the relative labeling of pairs of leaf-labeled trees. These relative labelings are naturally formalized as tanglegrams, which have previously been an object of study in coevolutionary analysis. Although there has been considerable work on planar drawings of tanglegrams, they have not been fully explored as combinatorial objects until recently. In this paper, we describe how many discrete mathematical questions on trees "factor" through a problem on tanglegrams, and how understanding that factoring can simplify analysis. Depending on the problem, it may be useful to consider a unordered version of tanglegrams, and/or their unrooted counterparts. For all of these definitions, we show how the isomorphism types of tanglegrams can be understood in terms of double cosets of the symmetric group, and we investigate their automorphisms. Understanding tanglegrams better will isolate the distinct problems on leaf-labeled pairs of trees and reveal natural symmetries of spaces associated with such problems.

We find surprisingly simple formulas for the limiting probability that the rank of a randomly selected vertex in a randomly selected phylogenetic tree or generalized phylogenetic tree is a given integer.

A conjecture of Bandelt and Dress states that the maximum quartet distance between any two phylogenetic trees on $n$ leaves is at most $(\frac 23 +o(1))\binom{n}{4}$. Using the machinery of flag algebras we improve the currently known bounds regarding this conjecture, in particular we show that the maximum is at most $(0.69 +o(1))\binom{n}{4}$. We also give further evidence that the conjecture is true by proving that the maximum distance between caterpillar trees is at most $(\frac 23 +o(1))\binom{n}{4}$.

We present a new class of metrics for unrooted phylogenetic $X$-trees derived from the Gromov-Hausdorff distance for (compact) metric spaces. These metrics can be efficiently computed by linear or quadratic programming. They are robust under NNI-operations, too. The local behavior of the metrics shows that they are different from any formerly introduced metrics. The performance of the metrics is briefly analised on random weighted and unweighted trees as well as random caterpillars.

Coalescent histories are combinatorial structures that describe for a given gene tree and species tree the possible lists of branches of the species tree on which the gene tree coalescences take place. Properties of the number of coalescent histories for gene trees and species trees affect a variety of probabilistic calculations in mathematical phylogenetics. Exact and asymptotic evaluations of the number of coalescent histories, however, are known only in a limited number of cases. Here we introduce a particular family of species trees, the \emph{lodgepole} species trees $(λ_n)_{n\geq 0}$, in which tree $λ_n$ has $m=2n+1$ taxa. We determine the number of coalescent histories for the lodgepole species trees, in the case that the gene tree matches the species tree, showing that this number grows with $m!!$ in the number of taxa $m$. This computation demonstrates the existence of tree families in which the growth in the number of coalescent histories is faster than exponential. Further, it provides a substantial improvement on the lower bound for the ratio of the largest number of matching coalescent histories to the smallest number of matching coalescent histories for trees with $m$ taxa, increasing a previous bound of $(\sqrtπ / 32)[(5m-12)/(4m-6)] m \sqrt{m}$ to $[ \sqrt{m-1}/(4 \sqrt{e}) ]^{m}$. We discuss the implications of our enumerative results for phylogenetic computations.

We apply matrix theory over $\mathbb{F}_2$ to understand the nature of so-called "successful pressing sequences" of black-and-white vertex-colored graphs. These sequences arise in computational phylogenetics, where, by a celebrated result of Hannenhalli and Pevzner, the space of sortings-by-reversal of a signed permutation can be described by pressing sequences. In particular, we offer several alternative linear-algebraic and graph-theoretic characterizations of successful pressing sequences, describe the relation between such sequences, and provide bounds on the number of them. We also offer several open problems that arose as a result of the present work.

Phylogenetic networks are rooted acyclic directed graphs in which the leaves are identified with members of a set X of species. The cluster of a vertex is the set of leaves that are descendants of the vertex. A network is "distinct-cluster" if distinct vertices have distinct clusters. This paper focuses on the set DC(X) of distinct-cluster networks whose leaves are identified with the members of X. For a fixed X, a metric on DC(X) is defined. There is a "cluster-preserving" simplification process by which vertices or certain arcs may be removed without changing the clusters of any remaining vertices. Many of the resulting networks may be uniquely determined without regard to the order of the simplifying operations.

A phylogenetic tree is a way to organize a finite set of species, individuals or other sources of related data. The species for which we have existing DNA data make up the set of leaves of the tree. The balanced minimal evolution method of creating phylogenetic trees can be formulated as a linear programming problem, minimizing an inner product over the vertices of the BME polytope. In this paper we undertake the first steps of describing the facets of this polytope.

Within the field of phylogenetics there is great interest in distance measures to quantify the dissimilarity of two trees. Recently, a new distance measure has been proposed: the Maximum Parsimony (MP) distance. This is based on the difference of the parsimony scores of a single character on both trees under consideration, and the goal is to find the character which maximizes this difference. Here we show that computation of MP distance on two \emph{binary} phylogenetic trees is NP-hard. This is a highly nontrivial extension of an earlier NP-hardness proof for two multifurcating phylogenetic trees, and it is particularly relevant given the prominence of binary trees in the phylogenetics literature. As a corollary to the main hardness result we show that computation of MP distance is also hard on binary trees if the number of states available is bounded. In fact, via a different reduction we show that it is hard even if only two states are available. Finally, as a first response to this hardness we give a simple Integer Linear Program (ILP) formulation which is capable of computing the MP distance exactly for small trees (and for larger trees when only a small number of character states are available) and which is used to computationally verify several auxiliary results required by the hardness proofs.

We study phylogenetic invariants of models of evolution whose group of symmetries is the cyclic group with 3 elements. We prove that projective schemes corresponding to the ideal I of phylogenetic invariants of such a model and to its subideal I' generated by elements of degree at most 3 are the same. This is motivated by a conjecture of Sturmfels and Sullivant, which would imply that I = I'.

We apply classical quartet techniques to the problem of phylogenetic decisiveness and find a value $k$ such that all collections of at least $k$ quartets are decisive. Moreover, we prove that this bound is optimal and give a lower-bound on the probability that a collection of quartets is decisive.