arXiv++ Combinatorics

We look at structures that must be removed (or reversed) in order to make acyclic a given oriented graph. For a directed acyclic graph $H$ and an oriented graph $G$, let $f_H(G)$ be the maximum number of pairwise disjoint copies of $H$ that can be found in {\em all} feedback arc sets of $G$. In particular, to make $G$ acyclic, one must remove (or reverse) $f_H(G)$ pairwise disjoint copies of $H$. Most intriguing is the case where $H$ is a $k$-clique, where the parameter is denoted by $f_k(G)$. Determining $f_k(G)$ for arbitrary $G$ seems challenging. Here we determine $f_k(G)$ precisely for almost all $k$-partite tournaments. Let $s(G)$ denote the size of the smallest vertex class of a $k$-partite tournament $G$. We prove that for all sufficiently large $s=s(G)$, a random $k$-partite tournament $G$ satisfies $f_k(G) = s(G)-k+1$ almost surely. In particular, as the title states, $f_k(G) = \lfloor n/k\rfloor-k+1$ almost surely, where $G$ is a random orientation of the Turán graph $T(n,k)$.

A $[k,n,1]$-graph is a $k$-partite graph with parts of order $n$ such that the bipartite graph induced by any pair of parts is a matching. An independent transversal in such a graph is an independent set that intersects each part in a single vertex. A factor of independent transversals is a set of $n$ pairwise-disjoint independent transversals. Let $f(k)$ be the smallest integer $n_0$ such that every $[k,n,1]$-graph has a factor of independent transversals assuming $n \ge n_0$. Several known conjectures imply that for $k \ge 2$, $f(k)=k$ if $k$ is even and $f(k)=k+1$ if $k$ is odd. While a simple greedy algorithm based on iterating Hall's Theorem shows that $f(k) \le 2k-2$, no better bound is known and in fact, there are instances showing that the bound $2k-2$ is tight for the greedy algorithm. Here we significantly improve upon the greedy algorithm bound and prove that $f(k) \le 1.78k$ for all $k$ sufficiently large, answering a question of MacKeigan.

A vertex labeling of a hypergraph is sum distinguishing if it uses positive integers and the sums of labels taken over the distinct hyperedges are distinct. Let s(H) be the smallest integer N such that there is a sum-distinguishing labeling of H with each label at most N. The largest value of s(H) over all hypergraphs on n vertices and m hyperedges is denoted s(n,m). We prove that s(n,m) is almost-quadratic in m as long as m is not too large. More precisely, the following holds: If n < m < n^{O(1)} then s(n,m)= m^2/w(m), where w(m) is a function that goes to infinity and is smaller than any polynomial in m. The parameter s(n,m) has close connections to several other graph and hypergraph functions, such as the irregularity strength of hypergraphs. Our result has several applications, notably: 1. We answer a question of Gyarfas et al. whether there are n-vertex hypergraphs with irregularity strength greater than 2n. In fact we show that there are n-vertex hypergraphs with irregularity strength at least n^{2-o(1)}. 2. Our results imply that s*(n)=n^2/w(n) where s*(n) is the distinguishing closed-neighborhood number, i.e., the smallest integer N such that any n-vertex graph allows for a vertex labeling with positive integers at most N so that the sums of labels on distinct closed neighborhoods of vertices are distinct.

Since counting subgraphs in general graphs is, by and large, a computationally demanding problem, it is natural to try and design fast algorithms for restricted families of graphs. One such family that has been extensively studied is that of graphs of bounded degeneracy (e.g., planar graphs). This line of work, which started in the early 80's, culminated in a recent work of Gishboliner et al., which highlighted the importance of the task of counting homomorphic copies of cycles (i.e., cyclic walks) in graphs of bounded degeneracy. Our main result in this paper is a surprisingly tight relation between the above task and the well-studied problem of detecting (standard) copies of directed cycles in general directed graphs. More precisely, we prove the following: 1. One can compute the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ and $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy in time $\tilde{O}(n^{d_{k}})$, where the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs runs in time $\tilde{O}(m^{d_{k}})$. 2. Conversely, one can transform any $O(n^{b_{k}})$ algorithm for computing the number of homomorphic copies of $C_{2k}$ or of $C_{2k+1}$ in $n$-vertex graphs of bounded degeneracy, into an $\tilde{O}(m^{b_{k}})$ time algorithm for detecting directed copies of $C_k$ in general $m$-edge digraphs. We emphasize that our first result does not use a black-box reduction (as opposed to the second result which does). Instead, we design an algorithm for computing the number of $C_k$-homomorphisms in degenerate graphs and show that one part of its analysis can be reduced to the analysis of the fastest known algorithm for detecting directed cycles in general digraphs, which was carried out in a recent breakthrough of Dalirrooyfard, Vuong and Vassilevska Williams.

A shortcut of a directed path $v_1 v_2 \cdots v_n$ is an edge $v_iv_j$ with $j > i+1$. If $j = i+2$ the shortcut is called a hop. If all hops are present, the path is called hop complete, so the path and its hops form a square of a path. We prove that every tournament with $n \ge 4$ vertices has a Hamiltonian path with at least $(4n-10)/7$ hops, and has a hop complete path of order at least $n^{0.295}$. A spanning binary tree of a tournament is a spanning shortcut tree if for every vertex of the tree, all its left descendants are in-neighbors and all its right descendants are out-neighbors. It is well-known that every tournament contains a spanning shortcut tree. The number of shortcuts of a shortcut tree is the number of shortcuts of its unique induced Hamiltonian path. Let $t(n)$ denote the largest integer such that every tournament with $n$ vertices has a spanning shortcut tree with at least $t(n)$ shortcuts. We almost determine the asymptotic growth of $t(n)$ as it is proved that $Θ(n\log^2n) \ge t(n)-\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{2} \ge Θ(n \log n)$.

For a tournament $H$ with $h$ vertices, its typical density is $h!2^{-\binom{h}{2}}/aut(H)$, i.e. this is the expected density of $H$ in a random tournament. A family ${\mathcal F}$ of $h$-vertex tournaments is {\em dominant} if for all sufficiently large $n$, there exists an $n$-vertex tournament $G$ such that the density of each element of ${\mathcal F}$ in $G$ is larger than its typical density by a constant factor. Characterizing all dominant families is challenging already for small $h$. Here we characterize several large dominant families for every $h$. In particular, we prove the following for all $h$ sufficiently large: (i) For all tournaments $H^*$ with at least $5\log h$ vertices, the family of all $h$-vertex tournaments that contain $H^*$ as a subgraph is dominant. (ii) The family of all $h$-vertex tournaments whose minimum feedback arc set size is at most $\frac{1}{2}\binom{h}{2}-h^{3/2}\sqrt{\ln h}$ is dominant. For small $h$, we construct a dominant family of $6$ (i.e. $50\%$ of the) tournaments on $5$ vertices and dominant families of size larger than $40\%$ for $h=6,7,8,9$. For all $h$, we provide an explicit construction of a dominant family which is conjectured to obtain an absolute constant fraction of the tournaments on $h$ vertices. Some additional intriguing open problems are presented.

An $(n,k)$ sequence covering array is a set of permutations of $[n]$ such that each sequence of $k$ distinct elements of $[n]$ is a subsequence of at least one of the permutations. An $(n,k)$ sequence covering array is perfect if there is a positive integer $λ$ such that each sequence of $k$ distinct elements of $[n]$ is a subsequence of precisely $λ$ of the permutations. While relatively close upper and lower bounds for the minimum size of a sequence covering array are known, this is not the case for perfect sequence covering arrays. Here we present new nontrivial bounds for the latter. In particular, for $k=3$ we obtain a linear lower bound and an almost linear upper bound.

Let $F_k$ be the set of graphs on $k$ vertices. For a graph $G$, a $k$-decomposition is a set of induced subgraphs of $G$, each isomorphic to an element of $F_k$, such that each pair of vertices of $G$ is in exactly one element of the set. A fundamental result of Wilson is that for all $n=|V(G)|$ sufficiently large, $G$ has a $k$-decomposition if and only if $G$ is $k$-divisible. Let ${\bf v} \in {\mathbb R}^{|F_k|}$ be indexed by $F_k$. For a $k$-decomposition $L$ of $G$, let $ν_{\bf v}(L) = \sum_{F \in F_k} {\bf v}_F d_{L,F}$ where $d_{L,F}$ is the fraction of elements of $L$ isomorphic to $F$. Let $ν_{\bf v}(G) = \max_{L} ν_{\bf v}(L)$ and $ν_{\bf v}(n)=\min\{ν_{\bf v}(G):|V(G)|=n\}$. It is not difficult to prove that the sequence $ν_{\bf v}(n)$ has a limit so let $ν_{\bf v} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} ν_{\bf v}(n)$. Replacing $k$-decompositions with their fractional relaxations, one obtains the (polynomial time computable) fractional analogue $ν_{\bf v}^*(G)$ and corresponding fractional values $ν^*_{\bf v}(n)$ and $ν^*_{\bf v}$. Our first main result is that for each ${\bf v} \in {\mathbb R}^{|F_k|}$ $$ ν_{\bf v} = ν^*_{\bf v}\;. $$ Further, there is a polynomial time algorithm that produces a decomposition $L$ of a $k$-decomposable graph such that $ν_{\bf v}(L) \ge ν_{\bf v} - o_n(1)$. A similar result holds when $F_k$ is the family of all tournaments on $k$ vertices and when $F_k$ is the family of all edge-colorings of $K_k$. We use these results to obtain new and improved bounds on several decomposition results. For example, we prove that every $n$-vertex tournament which is $3$-divisible has a triangle decomposition in which the number of directed triangles is less than $0.0222n^2(1+o(1))$ and that every $5$-decomposable $n$-vertex graph has a $5$-decomposition in which the fraction of cycles of length $5$ is $o_n(1)$.

Erdős and Hanani proved that for every fixed integer $k \ge 2$, the complete graph $K_n$ can be almost completely packed with copies of $K_k$; that is, $K_n$ contains pairwise edge-disjoint copies of $K_k$ that cover all but an $o_n(1)$ fraction of its edges. Equivalently, elements of the set $\C(k)$ of all red-blue edge colorings of $K_k$ can be used to almost completely pack every red-blue edge coloring of $K_n$. The following strengthening of the aforementioned Erdős-Hanani result is considered. Suppose $\C' \subset \C(k)$. Is it true that we can use elements only from $\C'$ and almost completely pack every red-blue edge coloring of $K_n$? An element $C \in \C(k)$ is {\em avoidable} if $\C'=\C(k) \setminus C$ has this property and a subset ${\cal F} \subset \C(k)$ is avoidable if $\C'=\C(k) \setminus {\cal F}$ has this property. It seems difficult to determine all avoidable graphs as well as all avoidable families. We prove some nontrivial sufficient conditions for avoidability. Our proofs imply, in particular, that (i) almost all elements of $\C(k)$ are avoidable (ii) all Eulerian elements of $\C(k)$ are avoidable and, in fact, the set of all Eulerian elements of $\C(k)$ is avoidable.

Erdős, Fajtlowicz and Staton asked for the least integer $f(k)$ such that every graph with more than $f(k)$ vertices has an induced regular subgraph with at least $k$ vertices. Here we consider the following relaxed notions. Let $g(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $g(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ repeated degrees and let $h(k)$ be the least integer such that every graph with more than $h(k)$ vertices has an induced subgraph with at least $k$ maximum degree vertices. We obtain polynomial lower bounds for $h(k)$ and $g(k)$ and nontrivial linear upper bounds when the host graph has bounded maximum degree.

For an oriented graph $G$, let $f(G)$ denote the maximum chromatic number of an acyclic subgraph of $G$. Let $f(n)$ be the smallest integer such that every oriented graph $G$ with chromatic number larger than $f(n)$ has $f(G) > n$. Let $g(n)$ be the smallest integer such that every tournament $G$ with more than $g(n)$ vertices has $f(G) > n$. It is straightforward that $Ω(n) \le g(n) \le f(n) \le n^2$. This paper provides the first nontrivial lower and upper bounds for $g(n)$. In particular, it is proved that $\frac{1}{4}n^{8/7} \le g(n) \le n^2-(2-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}})n+2$. It is also shown that $f(2)=3$, i.e. every orientation of a $4$-chromatic graph has a $3$-chromatic acyclic subgraph. Finally, it is shown that a random tournament $G$ with $n$ vertices has $f(G) = Θ(\frac{n}{\log n})$ whp.

Let $G$ and $H$ be graphs. We say that $P$ is an $H$-packing of $G$ if $P$ is a set of edge-disjoint copies of $H$ in $G$. An $H$-packing $P$ is maximal if there is no other $H$-packing of $G$ that properly contains $P$. Packings of maximum cardinality have been studied intensively, with several recent breakthrough results. Here, we consider minimum cardinality maximal packings. An $H$-packing $P$ is clumsy if it is maximal of minimum size. Let $cl(G,H)$ be the size of a clumsy $H$-packing of $G$. We provide nontrivial bounds for $cl(G,H)$, and in many cases asymptotically determine $cl(G,H)$ for some generic classes of graphs $G$ such as $K_n$ (the complete graph), $Q_n$ (the cube graph), as well as square, triangular, and hexagonal grids. We asymptotically determine $cl(K_n,H)$ for every fixed non-empty graph $H$. In particular, we prove that $$ cl(K_n, H) = \frac{\binom{n}{2}- ex(n,H)}{|E(H)|}+o(ex(n,H)),$$ where $ex(n,H)$ is the extremal number of $H$. A related natural parameter is $cov(G,H)$, that is the smallest number of copies of $H$ in $G$ (not necessarily edge-disjoint) whose removal from $G$ results in an $H$-free graph. While clearly $cov(G,H) \le cl(G,H)$, all of our lower bounds for $cl(G,H)$ apply to $cov(G,H)$ as well.

Let $H$ be a graph on $h$ vertices. The number of induced copies of $H$ in a graph $G$ is denoted by $i_H(G)$. Let $i_H(n)$ denote the maximum of $i_H(G)$ taken over all graphs $G$ with $n$ vertices. Let $f(n,h) = Π_{i}^h a_i$ where $\sum_{i=1}^h a_i = n$ and the $a_i$ are as equal as possible. Let $g(n,h) = f(n,h) + \sum_{i=1}^h g(a_i,h)$. It is proved that for almost all graphs $H$ on $h$ vertices it holds that $i_H(n)=g(n,h)$ for all $n \le 2^{\sqrt{h}}$. More precisely, we define an explicit graph property ${\cal P}_h$ which, when satisfied by $H$, guarantees that $i_H(n)=g(n,h)$ for all $n \le 2^{\sqrt{h}}$. It is proved, in particular, that a random graph on $h$ vertices satisfies ${\cal P}_h$ with probability $1-o_h(1)$. Furthermore, all extremal $n$-vertex graphs yielding $i_H(n)$ in the aforementioned range are determined. We also prove a stability result. For $H \in {\cal P}_h$ and a graph $G$ with $n \le 2^{\sqrt{h}}$ vertices satisfying $i_H(G) \ge f(n,h)$, it must be that $G$ is obtained from a balanced blowup of $H$ by adding some edges inside the blowup parts. The {\em inducibility} of $H$ is $i_H = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} i_H(n)/\binom{n}{h}$. It is known that $i_H \ge h!/(h^h-h)$ for all graphs $H$ and that a random graph $H$ satisfies almost surely that $i_H \le h^{3\log h}h!/(h^h-h)$. We improve upon this upper bound almost matching the lower bound. It is shown that a graph $H$ which satisfies ${\cal P}_h$ has $i_H =(1+O(h^{-h^{1/3}}))h!/(h^h-h)$.

Let ${\mathcal G}$ be an infinite family of connected graphs and let $k$ be a positive integer. We say that $k$ is ${\it forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if for all $G \in {\mathcal G}$ but finitely many, the following holds. Any $\{-1,1\}$-weighing of the edges of $G$ for which all connected subgraphs on $k$ edges are positively weighted implies that $G$ is positively weighted. Otherwise, we say that it is ${\it weakly~forcing}$ for ${\mathcal G}$ if any such weighing implies that the weight of $G$ is bounded from below by a constant. Otherwise we say that $k$ ${\it collapses}$ for ${\mathcal G}$. We classify $k$ for some of the most prominent classes of graphs, such as all connected graphs, all connected graphs with a given maximum degree and all connected graphs with a given average degree.

Suppose one needs to change the direction of at least $εn^2$ edges of an $n$-vertex tournament $T$, in order to make it $H$-free. A standard application of the regularity method shows that in this case $T$ contains at least $f^*_H(ε)n^h$ copies of $H$, where $f^*_H$ is some tower-type function. It has long been observed that many graph/digraph problems become easier when assuming that the host graph is a tournament. It is thus natural to ask if the removal lemma becomes easier if we assume that the digraph $G$ is a tournament. Our main result here is a precise characterization of the tournaments $H$ for which $f^*_H(ε)$ is polynomial in $ε$, stating that such a bound is attainable if and only if $H$'s vertex set can be partitioned into two sets, each spanning an acyclic directed graph. The proof of this characterization relies, among other things, on a novel application of a regularity lemma for matrices due to Alon, Fischer and Newman, and on probabilistic variants of Ruzsa-Szemerédi graphs. We finally show that even when restricted to tournaments, deciding if $H$ satisfies the condition of our characterization is an NP-hard problem.

For an orientation $H$ with $n$ vertices, let $T(H)$ denote the maximum possible number of labeled copies of $H$ in an $n$-vertex tournament. It is easily seen that $T(H) \ge n!/2^{e(H)}$ as the latter is the expected number of such copies in a random tournament. For $n$ odd, let $R(H)$ denote the maximum possible number of labeled copies of $H$ in an $n$-vertex regular tournament. Adler et al. proved that, in fact, for $H=C_n$ the directed Hamilton cycle, $T(C_n) \ge (e-o(1))n!/2^{n}$ and it was observed by Alon that already $R(C_n) \ge (e-o(1))n!/2^{n}$. Similar results hold for the directed Hamilton path $P_n$. In other words, for the Hamilton path and cycle, the lower bound derived from the expectation argument can be improved by a constant factor. In this paper we significantly extend these results and prove that they hold for a larger family of orientations $H$ which includes all bounded degree Eulerian orientations and all bounded degree balanced orientations, as well as many others. One corollary of our method is that for any $k$-regular orientation $H$ with $n$ vertices, $T(H) \ge (e^k-o(1))n!/2^{e(H)}$ and in fact, for $n$ odd, $R(H) \ge (e^k-o(1))n!/2^{e(H)}$.

A path $v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_m$ in a graph $G$ is $degree$-$monotone$ if $deg(v_1) \leq deg(v_2) \leq \cdots \leq deg(v_m)$ where $deg(v_i)$ is the degree of $v_i$ in $G$. Longest degree-monotone paths have been studied in several recent papers. Here we consider the Ramsey type problem for degree monotone paths. Denote by $M_k(m)$ the minimum number $M$ such that for all $n \geq M$, in any $k$-edge coloring of $K_n$ there is some $1\leq j \leq k$ such that the graph formed by the edges colored $j$ has a degree-monotone path of order $m$. We prove several nontrivial upper and lower bounds for $M_k(m)$.

For a graph $H$, the {\em extremal number} $ex(n,H)$ is the maximum number of edges in a graph of order $n$ not containing a subgraph isomorphic to $H$. Let $δ(H)>0$ and $Δ(H)$ denote the minimum degree and maximum degree of $H$, respectively. We prove that for all $n$ sufficiently large, if $H$ is any graph of order $n$ with $Δ(H) \le \sqrt{n}/200$, then $ex(n,H)={{n-1} \choose 2}+δ(H)-1$. The condition on the maximum degree is tight up to a constant factor. This generalizes a classical result of Ore for the case $H=C_n$, and resolves, in a strong form, a conjecture of Glebov, Person, and Weps for the case of graphs. A counter-example to their more general conjecture concerning the extremal number of bounded degree spanning hypergraphs is also given.

One of the most basic results in graph theory states that every graph with at least two vertices has two vertices with the same degree. Since there are graphs without $3$ vertices of the same degree, it is natural to ask if for any fixed $k$, every graph $G$ is ``close'' to a graph $G'$ with $k$ vertices of the same degree. Our main result in this paper is that this is indeed the case. Specifically, we show that for any positive integer $k$, there is a constant $C=C(k)$, so that given any graph $G$, one can remove from $G$ at most $C$ vertices and thus obtain a new graph $G'$ that contains at least $\min\{k,|G|-C\}$ vertices of the same degree. Our main tool is a multidimensional zero-sum theorem for integer sequences, which we prove using an old geometric approach of Alon and Berman.

A minimum feedback arc set of a directed graph $G$ is a smallest set of arcs whose removal makes $G$ acyclic. Its cardinality is denoted by $β(G)$. We show that an Eulerian digraph with $n$ vertices and $m$ arcs has $β(G) \ge m^2/2n^2+m/2n$, and this bound is optimal for infinitely many $m, n$. Using this result we prove that an Eulerian digraph contains a cycle of length at most $6n^2/m$, and has an Eulerian subgraph with minimum degree at least $m^2/24n^3$. Both estimates are tight up to a constant factor. Finally, motivated by a conjecture of Bollobás and Scott, we also show how to find long cycles in Eulerian digraphs.