arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

kissing number

37 papers tagged with this keyword
2026-08-14
New lower bounds for constant-weight codes via seeded bit-swap tabu search
A binary constant-weight code is a set of binary words of length $n$ such that each word has exactly weight $w$ and is at least Hamming distance $d$ from every other word in the set. $A(n,d,w)$ denotes the maximum size of a binary constant-weight code with parameters $(n,d,w)$. Using seeded initialization with bit-swap tabu search, we found 124 new constructions that improve existing lower bounds for $A(n,d,w)$. As a corollary of stronger bounds on $A(n,8,8)$ for $n \in \{ 32,33,34,37 \}$, we also improve lower bounds on kissing numbers $τ_{32}$, $τ_{33}$, $τ_{34}$, and $τ_{37}$.
2026-03-11
A new lower bound for the kissing number in 19 dimensions
We prove that the kissing number in 19 dimensions is at least 11948, improving the bound of Cohn and Li by 256. The proof combines Cohn and Li's odd-sign construction with an explicit nonlinear binary code of length 19, size 1280, and minimum distance 5 inside a 5-punctured extended binary Golay code. The construction makes use of nested codes $M\le K\le D$: quotienting a particular graph on $K$ by $M$ yields the Clebsch graph, then an independent set of size 5 in that quotient lifts to a 320-word code in $K$, and finally the four cosets of $K$ in $D$ give the full 1280-word code.
2025-11-17
Enumeration of paths in a hexagonal circle packing
We investigate paths in the hexagonal circle packing and enumerate them with respect to width, height, number of steps, area, and kissing number. Functional equations and the kernel method yield closed bivariate generating functions together with coefficient formulas and asymptotics. We establish bijections with skew Dyck paths, constrained Motzkin paths, and peakless Motzkin paths, and show that several of the associated counting arrays are Riordan arrays. Continued-fraction expansions for the area and kissing-number enumerators are also obtained.
2025-02-22
p-adic Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender Bound
We introduce the notion of p-adic spherical codes (in particular, p-adic kissing number problem). We show that the one-line proof for a variant of the Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein upper bound for spherical codes, obtained by Pfender \textit{[J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 2007]}, extends to p-adic Hilbert spaces.
2025-01-12
On Generalized Kissing Numbers of Convex Bodies (II)
In 1694, Gregory and Newton discussed the problem to determine the kissing number of a rigid material ball. This problem and its higher dimensional generalization have been studied by many mathematicians, including Minkowski, van der Waerden, Hadwiger, Swinnerton-Dyer, Watson, Levenshtein, Odlyzko, Sloane and Musin. Recently, Li and Zong introduced and studied the generalized kissing numbers of convex bodies. As a continuation of this project, in this paper we obtain the exact generalized kissing numbers $κ_α^*(B^n)$ of the $n$-dimensional balls for $3\le n\le 8$ and $α=2\sqrt{3}-2$. Furthermore, the lattice kissing number of a four-dimensional cross-polytope is determined.
2024-11-07 v2
Functional Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender Bound
Pfender \textit{[J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 2007]} provided a one-line proof for a variant of the Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein upper bound for spherical codes, which offers an upper bound for the celebrated (Newton-Gregory) kissing number problem. Motivated by this proof, we introduce the notion of codes in pointed metric spaces (in particular on Banach spaces) and derive a nonlinear (functional) Delsarte-Goethals-Seidel-Kabatianskii-Levenshtein-Pfender upper bound for spherical codes. We also introduce nonlinear (functional) Kissing Number Problem.
2024-11-07
Improved kissing numbers in seventeen through twenty-one dimensions
We prove that the kissing numbers in 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 dimensions are at least 5730, 7654, 11692, 19448, and 29768, respectively. The previous records were set by Leech in 1967, and we improve on them by 384, 256, 1024, 2048, and 2048. Unlike the previous constructions, the new configurations are not cross sections of the Leech lattice minimal vectors. Instead, they are constructed by modifying the signs in the lattice vectors to open up more space for additional spheres.
2023-12-08
The kissing number in 48 dimensions for codes with certain forbidden distances is 52 416 000
Published • View PublicationBIB
We prove that the kissing number in 48 dimensions among antipodal spherical codes with certain forbidden inner products is 52\,416\,000. Constructions of attaining codes as kissing configurations of minimum vectors in even unimodular extremal lattices are well known since the 1970's. We also prove that corresponding spherical 11-designs with the same cardinality are minimal. We use appropriate modifications of the linear programming bounds for spherical codes and designs introduced by Delsarte, Goethals and Seidel in 1977.
2023-09-25 v2
Semidefinite programming bounds for distance distribution of spherical codes
We present an extension of known semidefinite and linear programming upper bounds for spherical codes. We apply the main result for the distance distribution of a spherical code and show that this method can work effectively In particular, we get a shorter solution to the kissing number problem in dimension 4.
2023-03-06
Sum-Product Bounds & an Inequality for the Kissing Number in Dimension 16
We obtain an inequality for the kissing number in 16 dimensions. We do this by generalising a sum-product bound of Solymosi and Wong for quaternions to a semialgebra in dimension 16. In particular, we obtain the inequality $$k_{16}\geq \frac{\sum_{x \in \mathcal{R}}\left|\mathcal{S}_{x}\right|}{\left|\bigcup_{x \in \mathcal{R}} \mathcal{S}_{x}\right|}-1,$$ where $k_{16}$ is the 16-dimensional kissing number, and $S_x$ and $\mathcal{R}$ are sets defined below. Along the way we also obtain a sum-product bound for subsets of the octonions which are closed under taking inverses, using a similar strategy to that used for the quaternions. We use the fact that the kissing number in eight dimensions is 240 to achieve the result. Namely, we obtain the bound $$\operatorname{max}(|\mathcal{A}+\mathcal{A}|,|\mathcal{A}\mathcal{A}|)\geq \frac{|\mathcal{A}|^{4/3}}{(1928\cdot\lceil \operatorname{log}|\mathcal{A}|\rceil)^{1/3}},$$ where $\mathcal{A}$ is a finite set of octonions such that if $x\in\mathcal{A}$, $x^{-1}\in\mathcal{A}$ also.
2023-01-19
A note on five dimensional kissing arrangements
The kissing number $τ(d)$ is the maximum number of pairwise non-overlapping unit spheres each touching a central unit sphere in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean space. In this note we report on how we discovered a new, previously unknown arrangement of $40$ unit spheres in dimension $5$. Our arrangement saturates the best known lower bound on $τ(5)$, and refutes a `belief' of Cohn--Jiao--Kumar--Torquato.
2022-07-19 v2
On the lower bound for kissing numbers of $\ell_p$-spheres in high dimensions
In this paper, we give some new lower bounds for the kissing number of $\ell_p$-spheres. These results improve the previous work due to Xu (2007). Our method is based on coding theory.
2022-07-17
Highly symmetric lines
Published • View PublicationBIB
A generalization of highly symmetric frames is presented by considering also projective stabilizers of frame vectors. This allows construction of highly symmetric line systems and study of highly symmetric frames in a more unified manner. Construction of highly symmetric line systems involves computation of twisted spherical functions associated with finite groups. Further generalizations include definition of highly symmetric systems of subspaces. We give several examples which illustrate our approach including 3 new kissing configurations which improve lower bounds on the kissing number in $d=10,11,14$ to 510, 592 and 1932 respectively.
2022-05-31
On the maximum size packings of disks with kissing radius 3
Published in Moscow J. Comb. Number Th. 11 (2022) 263-286 • View PublicationBIB
László Fejes Tóth and Aladár Heppes proposed the following generalization of the kissing number problem. Given a ball in $\mathbb{R}^d$, consider a family of balls touching it, and another family of balls touching the first family. Find the maximal possible number of balls in this arrangement, provided that no two balls intersect by interiors, and all balls are congruent. They showed that the answer for disks on the plane is $19$. They also conjectured that if there are three families of disks instead of two, the answer is $37$. In this paper we confirm this conjecture.
New lower bounds on kissing numbers and spherical codes in high dimensions
Let the kissing number $K(d)$ be the maximum number of non-overlapping unit balls in $\mathbb R^d$ that can touch a given unit ball. Determining or estimating the number $K(d)$ has a long history, with the value of $K(3)$ being the subject of a famous discussion between Gregory and Newton in 1694. We prove that, as the dimension $d$ goes to infinity, $$ K(d)\ge (1+o(1)){\frac{\sqrt{3π}}{4\sqrt2}}\,\log\frac{3}{2}\cdot d^{3/2}\cdot \Big(\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\Big)^{d}, $$ thus improving the previously best known bound of Jenssen, Joos and Perkins by a factor of $\log(3/2)/\log(9/8)+o(1)=3.442...$. Our proof is based on the novel approach from Jenssen, Joos and Perkins that uses the hard core sphere model of an appropriate fugacity. Similar constant-factor improvements in lower bounds are also obtained for general spherical codes, as well as for the expected density of random sphere packings in the Euclidean space $\mathbb R^d$.
2020-12-30 v2
A short solution of the kissing number problem in dimension three
Published • View PublicationBIB
In this note, we give a short solution of the kissing number problem in dimension three.
2020-03-11 v6
Kissing number in non-Euclidean spaces of constant sectional curvature
Published in Math. Comp. (2021) • View PublicationBIB
This paper provides upper and lower bounds on the kissing number of congruent radius $r > 0$ spheres in hyperbolic $\mathbb{H}^n$ and spherical $\mathbb{S}^n$ spaces, for $n\geq 2$. For that purpose, the kissing number is replaced by the kissing function $κ_H(n, r)$, resp. $κ_S(n, r)$, which depends on the dimension $n$ and the radius $r$. After we obtain some theoretical upper and lower bounds for $κ_H(n, r)$, we study their asymptotic behaviour and show, in particular, that $κ_H(n,r) \sim (n-1) \cdot d_{n-1} \cdot B(\frac{n-1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}) \cdot e^{(n-1) r}$, where $d_n$ is the sphere packing density in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and $B$ is the beta-function. Then we produce numeric upper bounds by solving a suitable semidefinite program, as well as lower bounds coming from concrete spherical codes. A similar approach allows us to locate the values of $κ_S(n, r)$, for $n= 3,\, 4$, over subintervals in $[0, π]$ with relatively high accuracy.
2019-10-07 v2
Kissing number in spherical space
This paper investigates the behaviour of the kissing number $κ(n, r)$ of congruent radius $r > 0$ spheres in $\mathbb{S}^n$, for $n\geq 2$. Such a quantity depends on the radius $r$, and we plot the approximate graph of $κ(n, r)$ with relatively high accuracy by using new upper and lower bounds that are produced via semidefinite programming and by using spherical codes, respectively.
2019-09-27
Kissing numbers of regular graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
We prove a sharp upper bound on the number of shortest cycles contained inside any connected graph in terms of its number of vertices, girth, and maximal degree. Equality holds only for Moore graphs, which gives a new characterization of these graphs. In the case of regular graphs, our result improves an inequality of Teo and Koh. We also show that a subsequence of the Ramanujan graphs of Lubotzky-Phillips-Sarnak have super-linear kissing numbers.
2019-06-29 v2
Kissing number in hyperbolic space
This paper provides upper and lower bounds on the kissing number of congruent radius $r > 0$ spheres in $\mathbb{H}^n$, for $n\geq 2$. For that purpose, the kissing number is replaced by the kissing function $κ(n, r)$ which depends on the radius $r$. After we obtain some theoretical lower and upper bounds for $κ(n, r)$, we study their asymptotic behaviour and show, in particular, that $\lim_{r\to \infty} \frac{\log κ(n,r)}{r} = n-1$. Finally, we compare them with the numeric upper bounds obtained by solving a suitable semidefinite program.