arXiv++ Combinatorics

WOW-284 asserts that the minimum dual degree of every connected graph of order at least three and girth at least five does not exceed the negative of its least distance eigenvalue. We refute it with exact counterexamples of orders $38,39,40,42$, and $50$, and develop a structural theory of the failure. For a connected $k$-regular graph of girth at least five and diameter three, we prove $δ^*(G)+λ_{\min}(D(G))=2k-2-\max_{θ\ne k}(θ+1)^2$. Here $θ$ ranges over the nonprincipal adjacency eigenvalues. We further prove that every regular strict counterexample has degree at least six and diameter at most four, while diameter four forces degree at least ten. We solve the associated one-variable nonbacktracking linear program exactly, including optimizer rigidity. For regular strict counterexamples of diameter three, the optimizer yields a positive-semidefinite slack matrix whose integral excess gives the stronger bound $|V(G)|\le\left\lfloor 3(k+2)^2(k^2+3)/(18k+41)\right\rfloor$; this follows from a three-to-one quantization theorem for the integral excess. The slack matrix's principal minors also recover local cycle constraints. In particular, regular degree-six counterexamples have order at most $50$, and at the degree-six, order-$50$ boundary the associated signed complement is necessarily disconnected. We determine the distance spectra of one- and two-vertex punctures of Moore graphs and establish a uniform deletion-stability bound: every deletion of at most five vertices from the Hoffman--Singleton graph remains a strict counterexample, whereas an explicit six-vertex deletion does not. All theorem-level computations use exact arithmetic. Lean 4.31 kernel-checks the explicit $50$-vertex Hoffman--Singleton counterexample at graph level, finite spectral certificates at orders $38,39,40,42$, and the analytic LP optimum and rigidity for every integer $k\ge4$.

Razborov's flag algebra method is a powerful tool for proving asymptotic inequalities in extremal graph theory, often reducing the task to finding a finite certificate by semidefinite programming. We present a machine-checked formalization of the method for finite simple graphs, together with a certificate-to-proof compiler that turns externally generated certificate data into algebraic proofs checked by Lean. The formalization covers the foundations of the method: partially labeled graphs, their densities in large graphs, the quotient algebra of density expressions, graph-limit semantics through positive homomorphisms, and the downward operators used to average out labels. The compiler treats the external semidefinite programming output as candidate data rather than trusted input: Lean independently computes the required density and multiplication facts, verifies positive semidefiniteness exactly over $\mathbb{Q}$, and carries out the algebraic normalization steps of flag-algebra proofs. Our case studies yield formal proofs of seven Turán-type upper bounds, including Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, a $C_4$-density bound for triangle-free graphs, and edge-density bounds for $K_4$-free, $K_5$-free, and $C_5$-free graphs. Independently of the compiler, we formalize the matching constructions that complete the exact Turán densities of Mantel's theorem and the Erdős pentagon theorem, and prove two inequalities of Goodman. Our constrained semantics also prompted a meta-theoretic comparison of two ways of imposing graph constraints: building a hereditary constraint into the flag algebra from the start, or testing inequalities afterward on constrained graph limits with labels chosen at random. We state the resulting root-plantability criterion characterizing when the two approaches agree; a forthcoming paper will present the complete account.

We exhibit a connected graph on 24 vertices with maximum degree 3, independence number 9 and zero forcing number 11, refuting a 2017 conjecture of TxGraffiti recorded as Conjecture 2 of the survey of Davila, Brimkov and Pepper. The same construction with a different gadget gives a connected cubic graph on 36 vertices with independence number 15 and zero forcing number 17; the conjecture therefore fails also in the cubic form in which the survey's Lean 4 appendix states it. In particular Z <= alpha + 1 is not a universal bound for connected cubic graphs, and the value Z = alpha + 2 is attained.

We prove a conjecture of Monical, Tokcan, and Yong that every fixed positive power of the Vandermonde determinant is non-SNP in all sufficiently many variables, where a polynomial is non-SNP if there is a lattice point in its Newton polytope that does not appear with nonzero coefficient. This means our result proves that for every even power $k\geq4$, there is always such a missing lattice monomial in large enough dimensions. The odd case follows from alternation, and the quadratic case was previously known. For every even power $k\geq4$, we exhibit an explicit lattice point in the Newton polytope of $a_{δ_k}^k$ whose coefficient vanishes. The vanishing is obtained from a Dyson constant-term identity, proved using the finite-variable Jack scalar product and Macdonald's specialization formula. The key even-power construction and proof strategy arose from prompting with OpenAI Codex (GPT Sol 5.6 Extra High), a large language model; the complete transcript appears in the appendix. The authors subsequently checked and organized the argument. The accompanying Lean formalization is available at https://github.com/steven-le-thien/vandermonde-snp.

The Kourovka Notebook is a long-running collection of open problems in group theory. In this paper we present solutions to eight of its problems. We construct a group with exactly two maximal locally soluble normal subgroups and show that, for every $1 \le k\le n!$, there is a group containing $n$ distinct elements whose $n!$ ordered products take exactly $k$ distinct values. We also give examples showing that group order together with the statistic $\sum_g\varphi(\lvert g\rvert)$ does not determine simplicity, and we construct a surjective non-injective Rota-Baxter operator on a non-abelian group. Further, we determine the group generated by the class transpositions of moduli at most $k$, prove that every power graph of a finite group that is a cograph is chordal, show that the right-relatively convex subgroups of a right-orderable group need not form a sublattice of its subgroup lattice, and disprove a proposed rank inequality for certain $p$-group extensions. All of these solutions were autonomously discovered and formally verified in Lean by Aristotle, a formal reasoning agent developed by Harmonic.

Inspired by the notion of tricolorability of knots, we introduce the concept of lean coloring for hypergraphs and the associated lean number of a hypergraph. Lean coloring often involves very few colors, yet still requires the methods of usual graph coloring, forcing the overall complexity to be NP-Hard. We provide two alternative formulations of the lean coloring problem that involve a type of coloring on abstract simplicial complexes and a partial coloring on bipartite graphs. We then provide bounds for the lean numbers of hypergraphs that are $k$-uniform, $k$-partite, wide-path connected, or $r$-complete. Python-like script is included to allow the implementation and study of a lean coloring algorithm. We conclude with some directions for future work and present the lean numbers of $130$ knots and links.

When $m = 1$, the Dyson rank generating function is a classical bridge between partition theory, Ramanujan's mock theta functions, and the theory of harmonic Maass forms and nonholomorphic Jacobi forms. The rank is a statistic on partitions, and the higher Dyson systems, for $m \geq 2$, are a natural multivariable refinement of it, combining $m$ graded rank contributions. Unlike the classical case, these higher systems are not expected to fit the mock-modular framework, which raises the question of what analytic structure governs them. We show that their root-of-unity specializations carry a hidden elliptic structure. A finite $q$-difference recurrence produces an explicit polynomial obstruction to the expected index $m$ elliptic transformation law, and because the obstruction is finite, its partial fractions canonically determine finitely many Appell--Lerch correction terms that remove it. The corrected functions satisfy a twisted index $m$ elliptic law; a natural translation removes the twist, and their holomorphic finite parts admit finite theta decompositions. Thus, the natural analogue of Dyson's mock-modular phenomenon at higher $m$ is not mock modularity but a finite theta decomposition governed by an index $m$ elliptic transformation law. These results grew out of a human--AI collaboration, and the key new formulas were formalized and machine-verified in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.

For integer vectors R,S let A(R,S) denote the class of (0,1)-matrices with row sum vector R and column sum vector S. Its interchange graph G(R,S) has A(R,S) as its vertex set, two matrices being adjacent when they differ by a single 2 x 2 interchange. Brualdi conjectured that G(R,S) is Hamiltonian for every R,S. We prove the stronger statement that G(R,S) is maximally Hamiltonian: Hamilton-laceable when bipartite, and Hamilton-connected when not. The proof is a structural induction on the number of matrices in the class, organized by the structure theory of interchange graphs. Deleting inactive lines and splitting invariant positions expresses any class as a Cartesian product, reducing the argument to the prime factors. The bipartite classes are products of complete transposition graphs; we settle them together, without induction, by proving they are paired 2-disjoint-path-coverable and hence Hamilton-laceable, using a recent theorem of Coleman, Fischberg, Gong, Harrington and Wong on paired disjoint path covers. The non-bipartite classes divide into three cases: products assembled from smaller factors, a base of Johnson graphs and small classes, and the large prime classes, treated by a pivot-and-fiber construction whose line quotients are matroid base-exchange graphs. The complete argument has been machine-checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant from first principles together with seven cited results of the literature; the disjoint-path-cover results it imports are themselves proved within the formalization.

We prove Sabidussi's compatibility conjecture. Let $G$ be a finite connected multigraph in which every vertex has even degree and the minimum degree is at least four, and let $T$ be a closed trail that traverses every edge exactly once. The edges of $G$ can be partitioned into circuits (connected 2-regular subgraphs) so that no circuit contains the two edges used consecutively anywhere in $T$. In fact, the edges can be four-coloured so that every such pair receives two different colours and the subgraph formed by the edges of each colour has even degree at every vertex. Formalization in Lean 4 is also available in the author's github.

Amdeberhan, Shareshian, and Stanley recently proved that a function $\varphi$ arising in the theory of partition Eisenstein series counts the alternating permutations of $\{1,\dots,2n\}$ with a given `record' partition, and they asked whether there is a similar theory for record compositions, suggesting a role for noncommutative symmetric functions. Here we solve their open problem by showing that the number of alternating permutations of $\{1,\dots,2n\}$ with record composition $(α_1,\dots,α_\ell)$ is \[ \prod_{j=1}^{\ell}\binom{2s_j-1}{2α_j-1}E_{2α_j-1}, \] where $s_j=α_1+\dots+α_j$, $E_k$ is an Euler number, and the record composition of $w=a_1a_2\dots a_{2n}$ (so $a_1>a_2<a_3>\dotsb$) lists the factor lengths obtained by cutting $a_1a_3\dots a_{2n-1}$ before each left-to-right maximum other than the first. These numbers are the coefficients of a natural lift of the degree-$n$ sprout symmetric function with seed $\sec(\sqrt{t}\,)$ to noncommutative symmetric functions, expanded in products of noncommutative power sums of the first kind. An analogous refinement holds for every sprout sequence whose seed is given by the exponential formula. AxiomProver autonomously produced and verified the results in this paper in Lean.

Chan and Pak introduced the relative linear extension ratio $ρ(P,x)=e(P)/e(P-x)$, where $e(P)$ is the number of linear extensions of a finite poset $P$, and let $ν(c,d)$ be the least number of elements of a poset that realizes $ρ(P,x)=d/c$. They proved that $ν(c,d)\le d/c+O(\log d\log\log d)$ for $d\ge 3c$, and asked whether the hypothesis $d\ge 3c$ can be relaxed to $d\ge(1+\varepsilon)c$ or removed. We prove the fixed-gap form of this question: for every fixed $\varepsilon>0$, $ν(c,d)\le \frac{d}{c}+O_{\varepsilon}(\log d\log\log d)$ whenever $d\ge(1+\varepsilon)c$, and the implied constant is absolute once $d\ge 2c$. The new ingredient is a one-element overlap construction: if $x$ is minimal in $P$ and $y$ is minimal in $Q$, then there is a poset $R$ with $|R|=|P|+|Q|-1$ and an element $z$ such that $ρ(R,z)=ρ(P,x)+ρ(Q,y)-1$. Together with the continued-fraction construction of Chan and Pak and Rukavishnikova's tail bound for sums of partial quotients, this removes the factor $3$ in their range. We also show that the fixed-gap hypothesis is essentially optimal for this construction. In the range $1 < d/c < 2$, with $h=d-c$, the size bound the construction can certify is at least $\lfloor c/h\rfloor$, so the method reaches the stated error term only when $h$ is at least of order $c/(\log c\log\log c)$. The remaining obstruction to removing the hypothesis is a short-interval problem for sums of partial quotients, which we describe. The deductive part of the argument has been checked with the Lean proof assistant.

A proper sub-box of $A=\{0,1,2\}^d$ is a product $S_1\times\dots\times S_d$ with each $\varnothing\neq S_i\subsetneq\{0,1,2\}$. A double cover is a finite multiset of proper sub-boxes covering every point of $A$ exactly twice; write $f(d)$ for the minimum size of a double cover. Leader, Milicevic and Tan asked whether $f(d)\ge 2^d$ for all $d$ (Question 4.1 of the PatternBoost paper of Charton-Ellenberg-Wagner-Williamson), analogous to the Alon-Bohman-Holzman-Kleitman partition bound $2^d$. No better than the trivial volume bound was previously known, for any $d\ge 2$. We prove the first nontrivial lower bounds. A modular refinement of the parity argument gives $f(d)\ge 2^{d+1}/(d+1)$; a slicing argument gives $f(4)\ge 19$, $f(5)\ge 33$, both above $2^d$, resolving the question for $d=4,5$ -- the first cases beyond the trivially known $d\le 3$. A finer "line rigidity" argument yields $f(6)\ge 60$, breaking the profile-statistic barrier (capped at $57$, shown here). This is formally verified in Lean 4: $f(6)\ge 60$ is machine-checked on the three standard Mathlib axioms alone. On the upper-bound side, a dimension-lifting construction $f(r+3)\le 6\cdot 2^r+3f(r)$ gives $f(6)\le 81$ (improving the known $82$) and $f(d)\le(\tfrac65+o(1))2^d$ asymptotically; a refinement improves the constant to $\tfrac87$. This makes partial progress on PatternBoost's problem of reducing their constant $1.28$, and refutes the closed-form guess $f(d)=5\cdot 2^{d-2}+1$ from $d=7$ on. Together, $60\le f(6)\le 81$. Finally we isolate the construction-side obstruction -- an "S+c=2^j+1" phenomenon, every skeleton sitting exactly one box past the partition bound -- and show it is of a piece with the Leader-Milicevic-Tan question itself.

Fix $n \ge 2$. A set $A = \{a_0 < a_1 < \dots < a_{n-1}\}$ of $n$ residues in $\Z_N$ is \emph{valid mod $N$} if the all-ones multiset is the \emph{only} size-$n$ multiset drawn from $A$ whose sum is $p := \sum_i a_i \pmod N$. For the super-increasing set $A = \{2^k - 1 : 0 \le k \le n-1\}$ we determine the least valid modulus exactly: $\Nmin(n) = 2^{\,n} - 2^{\lfloor \log_2 n \rfloor}$ for all $n \ge 2$. Both directions of the proof are elementary, resting on a sharp minimal-digit-sum estimate for representations by binary coins, and the full theorem has been machine-checked in Lean~4/Mathlib for all $n$ (https://github.com/jarfo/min-modulus). We conjecture that no size-$n$ residue set admits a smaller valid modulus. This validity condition is exactly what makes the permanent of an $n \times n$ matrix equal to a single coefficient of a row-product polynomial modulo $x^N - 1$, extractable by a size-$N$ discrete Fourier (or number-theoretic) transform; the theorem thus identifies the smallest transform, $N \approx 2^n$, for which this evaluation is exact. That application -- and the resulting common framework for the classical formulas of Ryser and Glynn and this transform -- is developed in a companion paper [2].

Let $p$ be a prime number. We introduce a sparseness condition on the supports of $p$-adic Hahn series, and prove that this condition implies transcendence over $\breve{\mathbf Q}_p$, the completed maximal unramified extension of $\mathbf{Q}_p$. As an application, we prove the order-type conjecture of $\mathbf{Q}_p$-algebraic $p$-adic Hahn series with bounded support under the condition that the support has only finitely many accumulation points. All results in this paper have been fully formalized in the Lean theorem prover (v 4.31.0), building over Mathlib.

For $n\ge1$, we let $$x_n:=\tan\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\arctan k\bigr).$$ In 2008, Amdeberhan, Medina, and Moll conjectured that $x_n\not \in \mathbb{Z}$ for every $n\ge5$. This was known for a set of positive integers of density $\tfrac{120}{817}\approx0.1469$. We prove that an integer value $x_n=m$ satisfies $|m|\ge e^{(1/2+o(1))\,n\log n}$, which we use to deduce that $$\#\{\,1\leq n\le N:x_n\in\mathbb{Z}\,\}=O(\log N). $$ In particular, the conjecture holds for a density-one set of $n$. The results in this note were formalized in Lean/Mathlib and produced autonomously by AxiomProver from natural-language statements.

The theory of $q$-series and basic hypergeometric series plays a crucial role at the intersection of combinatorics, number theory, and representation theory. From the classical partition identities of Euler and Jacobi to modern developments in class field theory, vertex operator algebras, and the Monstrous Moonshine conjecture, $q$-series provide the analytic framework for a wide range of profound applications. In this paper, we discuss the formalization of this theory in the Lean proof assistant, a process that requires careful design of scalable and versatile structures to reconcile formal algebraic identities with analytic convergence properties. We address these foundational challenges by focusing on the construction of $q$-Pochhammer symbols, $q$-binomial coefficients, Bailey's Lemma and similar primitives. To demonstrate the utility of this work, we provide fully verified proofs of the Jacobi Triple Product formula and the celebrated Rogers-Ramanujan identities, which serve as both historical and technical benchmarks for the field. This work establishes a rigorous computational foundation for the future formalization of mock theta functions, modular forms, and the diverse algebraic structures that underpin their applications across mathematics and physics.

Let $f_3(N)$ be the least integer such that every set $A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,N\}$ of size at least $f_3(N)$ contains distinct elements $a,b,c\in A$ such that $a+b\in A$, $a+c\in A$, and $b+c\in A$. We prove that $f_3(N)\le 5N/8+O(1)$. Together with the standard construction $[N/8,N/4]\cup[N/2,N]$, this gives $f_3(N)=5N/8+O(1)$, resolving Erdős Problem 865. The proof is self-contained. An earlier conditional version of the reduction has also been formalized in Lean 4/Mathlib with no sorries and no added axioms.

Let $D_d(m)=\operatorname{Cay}((\mathbb Z/m\mathbb Z)^d,\{e_1,\ldots,e_d\})$, with all generators oriented positively. We give a second proof that $D_d(m)$ decomposes into $d$ directed Hamilton cycles for every $d\ge 2$ and every odd $m\ge 3$. The combinatorial core is a fixed-row-sum selection theorem for replicated supports: when each indexed support $A$ is repeated in $m$ identical rows, one can select $\lfloor |A|/2\rfloor$ entries from each row so that every column total is a unit modulo $m$. Applied to the Hamilton factors using a chosen coordinate direction, these selections prescribe the voltages in a cyclic lift that splits the direction into two. In fibre coordinates, the lifted successor is $\widehat h_j(x,z)=(h_j(x),z+\mathbf 1_{\{j\in M(x)\}})$. After one traversal of the base Hamilton cycle, the fibre return is translation by the total carry. Since this carry is a unit modulo $m$, the return is a single $m$-cycle and the lifted factor is Hamilton. The new fibres also preserve the direction-constant block structure required for the next split. Iterating from a directed $m$-cycle with $d$ parallel copies of each arc yields the desired decomposition. The proof strategy was proposed with the assistance of OpenAI GPT-5.5 Pro and formally verified in Lean 4.

Start with four digits, arrange them in both descending and ascending order, subtract, and repeat. This simple process is known as the Kaprekar routine, famous in base ten for sending every nonconstant four-digit string to $6174$. We show that in every odd base $B>3$, the four-digit Kaprekar map has an unexpectedly rigid structure. After at most three iterations, every nonconstant orbit enters an explicit triangular region $\mathcal{T}_B$, and on this region the map is conjugate to projective doubling: \[ \{[r],[s]\}\longmapsto \{[2r],[2s]\}. \] This gives a complete finite description of all nonconstant terminal cycles, including an explicit formula for their lengths and counts. In particular, the longest terminal cycle has length at most $(B-1)/2$, and equality can occur only when $B$ is prime. For primes $p>5$, equality occurs precisely when the least positive $m$ with $2^m\equiv\pm1\pmod p$ is $m=(p-1)/2$. The results proved here were first formulated by Schwartz and Thakur. As a test case for AI-assisted formal mathematics, AxiomProver produced Lean/mathlib formalizations of these results.

Dirac asked in 1970 whether for every k >= 4 there is a k-vertex-critical graph without critical edges; Jensen settled all k >= 5, and only k=4 remains open. Following Skottova and Steiner, call a graph G a (4,1)-graph if chi(G)=4, chi(G-v)=3 for every vertex v, and chi(G-e)=4 for every edge e; they proved delta(G) >= 6 and lambda(G) >= 6 for every (4,1)-graph and asked whether a 6-regular (4,1)-graph exists. We prove three results about this 6-regular case. Theorem A (computational): there is no 6-regular 4-vertex-critical graph on n <= 15 vertices, except for a unique graph (up to isomorphism) on n=13, whose 13 critical edges form a Hamilton cycle; hence any 6-regular (4,1)-graph has at least 16 vertices. Theorem B: in a 6-regular (4,1)-graph every 6-edge-cut is either the edge star of a vertex or has both shores of size at least 15; consequently every 6-regular (4,1)-graph on at most 29 vertices is super-6-edge-connected. Theorem C (all sizes): no shore of a nontrivial 6-edge-cut in a 6-regular (4,1)-graph induces a bipartite graph; more generally, a shore whose deficiency is concentrated on two vertices forces them to receive equal colours in every proper 3-colouring. The proof of Theorem B rests on an exact classification of the 3x3 cut matrices of 6-edge-cuts in (4,1)-graphs (exactly 21 matrices, five types up to row/column permutations) together with a boundary-shortfall lemma; the unique near-miss is K_{3,3,3} minus a rainbow 3-matching. Several supporting lemmas are machine-checked in Lean 4/Mathlib.