arXiv++ Combinatorics

Erdős asked whether every $n$-point set in Euclidean space whose $\binom{n}{2}$ pairwise distances are mutually at least $1$ apart must have diameter at least $(1+o(1))n^2$. We disprove this statement by constructing for every prime power $q$ a set $\mathcal X_q\subset \mathbb R^{q^2+q}$ of $n=q+1$ points such that all pairwise distances in $\mathcal X_q$ are mutually at least $1$ apart, while $$\operatorname{diam}(\mathcal X_q)\le\Bigl(1-\frac{1}{π^2}+o(1)\Bigr)n^2.$$ The proof is fully formalized in Lean 4.

We introduce a quadratic form $Q$ on the space of functions on the gap poset $G$ of the numerical semigroup $\langle a,b\rangle$. We prove combinatorially that when evaluated on the indicator function of an upward closed subset $D$, this quadratic form precisely recovers the Gorsky--Mazin $\mathtt{dinv}$ statistic of $D$, viewed as a Young subdiagram of $G$. Furthermore, we prove Theorem~1.2 that when evaluated on a pair of subdiagrams of $G$, the symmetric bilinear form associated with $Q$ is equal to a novel cross-$\mathtt{dinv}$ statistic, which is nonnegative. Combining these, we prove the inequality \[ Q(\mathbf{n})\geq \dfrac{1}{|G|}\,\|\mathbf{n}\|_\infty^2\] if $\mathbf{n}$ is a real-valued decreasing function on $G$, showing an effective positive definiteness of $Q$ on the corresponding cone. Theorem~1.2, the main engine of the paper, was autoformalized in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver.

Let $f(m)$ be the largest integer such that for every set $A = \{a_1 < \cdots < a_m\}$ of $m$ positive integers and every open interval $I$ of length $2a_m$, there exist at least $f(m)$ disjoint pairs $(a, b)$ with $a \in A$ dividing $b \in I$. Solving a problem of Erdős, we determine $f(m)$ exactly, and show $$ f(m)=\min\bigl(m,\lceil 2\sqrt{m}\,\rceil\bigr) $$ for all $m$. The proof was obtained through an AI-assisted workflow: the proof strategy was first proposed by ChatGPT, and the detailed argument was subsequently made fully rigorous and formally verified in Lean by Aristotle. The exposition and final proofs presented here are entirely human-written. [This paper solves Problem #650 on Bloom's website "Erdős problems".]

We prove that the directed 3-torus D_3(m), or equivalently the Cartesian product of three directed m-cycles, admits a decomposition into three arc-disjoint directed Hamilton cycles for every integer m >= 3. The proof reduces Hamiltonicity to the m-step return maps on the layer section S=i+j+k=0. For odd m, five Kempe swaps of the canonical coloring produce return maps that are explicitly affine-conjugate to the standard 2-dimensional odometer. For even m, a sign-product invariant rules out Kempe-from-canonical constructions, and a different low-layer witness reduces after one further first-return map to a finite-defect clock-and-carry system. The remaining closure is a finite splice analysis, and the case m=4 is handled separately by a finite witness. A Lean 4 formalization accompanies the construction.

A rational triangle $T$ (one whose angles are rational multiples of $π$) unfolds to a translation surface $(X_T,ω_T)$. The lattice triangle problem asks to classify those $T$ for which $(X_T,ω_T)$ is a Veech (lattice) surface, which means that the $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb R)$-orbit of $(X_T,ω_T)$ is closed in its stratum (so its projection to moduli space is a Teichmüller curve). The most mysterious regime is the "hard obtuse window" (largest angle in $(π/2,2π/3]$), where it is conjectured that no lattice triangles exist. Using an arithmetic reformulation of the Mirzakhani-Wright rank obstruction, we prove a quantitative theorem that rules out all but a density 0 subset of the triangles in this window. The main engine in this paper was autoformalized by AxiomProver in Lean (using mathlib).

We prove Ehrenborg's conjecture that every connected bipartite graph $G$ with parts of size $m$ and $n$ has at most $\frac{1}{mn}\prod_{v\in V(G)} \operatorname{deg}(v)$ spanning trees, and that equality holds if and only if $G$ is a Ferrers graph. The proof is fully formalized in Lean 4.

We study mathematical discovery through the lens of neurosymbolic reasoning, where an AI agent powered by a large language model (LLM), coupled with symbolic computation tools, and human strategic direction, jointly produced a new result in combinatorial design theory. The main result of this human-AI collaboration is a tight lower bound on the imbalance of Latin squares for the notoriously difficult case $n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}$. We reconstruct the discovery process from detailed interaction logs spanning multiple sessions over several days and identify the distinct cognitive contributions of each component. The AI agent proved effective at uncovering hidden structure and generating hypotheses. The symbolic component consists of computer algebra, constraint solvers, and simulated annealing, which provides rigorous verification and exhaustive enumeration. Human steering supplied the critical research pivot that transformed a dead end into a productive inquiry. Our analysis reveals that multi-model deliberation among frontier LLMs proved reliable for criticism and error detection but unreliable for constructive claims. The resulting human-AI mathematical contribution, a tight lower bound of $4n(n{-}1)/9$, is achieved via a novel class of near-perfect permutations. The bound was formally verified in Lean 4. Our experiments show that neurosymbolic systems can indeed produce genuine discoveries in pure mathematics.

We study "dead ends" in square-free digit walks: square-free integers $N$ such that, in base $b$, every one-digit extension $bN+d$ is non-square-free. In base $10$, the stochastic independence model of Miller et al. suggests that infinite square-free walks occur with probability near $1$, corresponding to an asymptotic dead-end density of $\approx 5.218\times 10^{-5}$. We prove that the true asymptotic dead-end density satisfies \[ c_{\mathrm{dead}} \approx 1.317\times 10^{-9}, \] roughly a factor of $\sim 4\times 10^4$ smaller than the prediction. For every base $b\geq 2$, we prove that dead-end densities exist and are given by a closed-form expression (as a finite alternating sum of Euler products). The argument is fully formalized in Lean/Mathlib, and was produced automatically by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the problem.

Let $S=\langle d_1,\dots,d_m\rangle$ be a numerical semigroup and $k[S]$ its semigroup ring. The Hilbert numerator of $k[S]$ determines normalized alternating syzygy power sums $K_p(S)$ encoding alternating power sums of syzygy degrees. Fel conjectured an explicit formula for $K_p(S)$, for all $p\ge 0$, in terms of the gap power sums $G_r(S)=\sum_{g\notin S} g^r$ and universal symmetric polynomials $T_n$ evaluated at the generator power sums $σ_k=\sum_i d_i^k$ (and $δ_k=(σ_k-1)/2^k$). We prove Fel's conjecture via exponential generating functions and coefficient extraction, solating the universal identities for $T_n$ needed for the derivation. The argument is fully formalized in Lean/Mathlib, and was produced automatically by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the conjecture.

In recent progress on the union-closed sets conjecture, a key lemma has been Boppana's entropy inequality: $h(x^2)\geφxh(x)$, where $φ=(1+\sqrt5)/2$ and $h(x)=-x\log x-(1-x)\log(1-x)$. In this note, we prove that the generalized inequality $α_kh(x^k)\ge x^{k-1}h(x)$, first conjectured by Yuster, holds for real $k>1$, where $α_k$ is the unique positive solution to $x(1+x)^{k-1}=1$. This implies an analogue of the union-closed sets conjecture for approximate $k$-union closed set systems. We also formalize our proof in Lean 4.

This document is a blueprint for the formalization in Lean of the structural theory of regular matroids underlying Seymour's decomposition theorem. We present a modular account of regularity via totally unimodular representations, show that regularity is preserved under $1$-, $2$-, and $3$-sums, and establish regularity for several special classes of matroids, including graphic, cographic, and the matroid $R_{10}$. The blueprint records the logical structure of the proof, the precise dependencies between results, and their correspondence with Lean declarations. It is intended both as a guide for the ongoing formalization effort and as a human-readable reference for the organization of the proof.

Vizing's theorem states that every simple undirected graph can be edge-colored using fewer than $Δ+ 1$ colors, where $Δ$ is the graph's maximum degree. The original proof was given through a polynomial-time algorithmic procedure that iteratively extends a partial coloring until it becomes complete. In this work, I used the Lean theorem prover to produce a verified implementation of the Misra and Gries edge-coloring algorithm, a modified version of Vizing's original method. The focus is on building libraries for relevant mathematical objects and rigorously maintaining required invariants.

We prove that for the preorder induced by a function f: V -> V, the family of all order ideals is average-rare, that is, its normalized degree sum (nds) is nonpositive. As a base case in our reduction, we establish the same result for functional partial orders (or rooted forests). We also propose a conjecture related to Frankl's Conjecture. All proofs have been formally verified in the proof assistant Lean 4.

Automated proof assistants are a technology pre-empting mistakes in mathematics. In our practice we have seen that reasoning about planar diagrams is difficult to both humans and computers. One example that has led to wrong statements in publications is that an orientation-preserving mapping is not always defined by how it acts on triples of elements. In this paper we formalise orientation-preserving mappings in proof assistant software Lean and report on our take-aways.

We resolve a $1000 Erdős prize problem, complete with formal verification generated by a large language model. In over a dozen papers, beginning in 1976 and spanning two decades, Paul Erdős repeatedly posed one of his "favourite" conjectures: every finite Sidon set can be extended to a finite perfect difference set. We establish that {1, 2, 4, 8, 13} is a counterexample to this conjecture. During the preparation of this paper, we discovered that although this problem was presumed to be open for half a century, Marshall Hall, Jr. published a different counterexample three decades before Erdős first posed the problem. With a healthy skepticism of this apparent oversight, and out of an abundance of caution, we used ChatGPT to vibe code a Lean proof of both Hall's and our counterexamples.

Seymour's decomposition theorem is a hallmark result in matroid theory presenting a structural characterization of the class of regular matroids. Formalization of matroid theory faces many challenges, most importantly that only a limited number of notions and results have been implemented so far. In this work, we formalize the proof of the forward (composition) direction of Seymour's theorem for regular matroids. To this end, we develop a library in Lean 4 that implements definitions and results about totally unimodular matrices, vector matroids, their standard representations, regular matroids, and 1-, 2-, and 3-sums of matrices and binary matroids given by their standard representations. Using this framework, we formally state Seymour's decomposition theorem and implement a formally verified proof of the composition direction in the setting where the matroids have finite rank and may have infinite ground sets.

In this work, we present two results: The first result is the formalization of Tutte's theorem in Lean, a key theorem concerning matchings in graph theory. As this formalization is ready to be integrated in Lean's mathlib, it provides a valuable step in the path towards formalizing research-level mathematics in this area. The second result is a framework for doing educational formalization projects. This framework provides a structure to learn to formalize mathematics with minimal teacher input. This framework applies to both traditional academic settings and independent community-driven environments. We demonstrate the framework's use by connecting it to the process of formalizing Tutte's theorem.

Frankl's conjecture, also known as the union-closed sets conjecture, can be equivalently expressed in terms of intersection-closed set families by considering the complements of sets. It posits that any family of sets closed under intersections, and containing both the ground set and the empty set, must have a ``rare vertex'' -- a vertex belonging to at most half of the members of the family. The concept of \emph{average rarity} describes a set family where the average degree of all the elements is at most half of the number of its members. Average rarity is a stronger property that implies the existence of a rare vertex. This paper focuses on ideal families, which are set families that are downward-closed (except the ground set) and include the ground set. We present a proof that the normalized degree sum of any ideal family is non-positive, which is equivalent to saying that every ideal family satisfies the average rarity condition. This proof is formalized and verified using the Lean 4 theorem prover.

We present $k^{O(k^2)} m$ time algorithms for various problems about decomposing a given undirected graph by edge cuts or vertex separators of size $<k$ into parts that are ``well-connected'' with respect to cuts or separators of size $<k$; here, $m$ is the total number of vertices and edges of the graph. As an application of our results, we obtain for every fixed $k$ a linear-time algorithm for computing the $k$-edge-connected components of a given graph, solving a long-standing open problem. More generally, we obtain a $k^{O(k^2)} m$ time algorithm for computing a $k$-Gomory-Hu tree of a given graph, which is a structure representing pairwise minimum cuts of size $<k$. Our main technical result, from which the other results follow, is a $k^{O(k^2)} m$ time algorithm for computing a $k$-lean tree decomposition of a given graph. This is a tree decomposition with adhesion size $<k$ that captures the existence of separators of size $<k$ between subsets of its bags. A $k$-lean tree decomposition is also an unbreakable tree decomposition with optimal unbreakability parameters for the adhesion size bound $k$. As further applications, we obtain $k^{O(k^2)} m$ time algorithms for $k$-vertex connectivity and for element connectivity $k$-Gomory-Hu tree. All of our algorithms are deterministic. Our techniques are inspired by the tenth paper of the Graph Minors series of Robertson and Seymour and by Bodlaender's parameterized linear-time algorithm for treewidth.

We prove that every graph which admits a tree-decomposition into finite parts has a rooted tree-decomposition into finite parts that is linked, tight and componental. As an application, we obtain that every graph without half-grid minor has a lean tree-decomposition into finite parts, strengthening the corresponding result by Kriz and Thomas for graphs of finitely bounded tree-width. In particular, it follows that every graph without half-grid minor has a tree-decomposition which efficiently distinguishes all ends and critical vertex sets, strengthening results by Carmesin and by Elm and Kurkofka for this graph class. As a second application of our main result, it follows that every graph which admits a tree-decomposition into finite parts has a tree-decomposition into finite parts that displays all the ends of $G$ and their combined degrees, resolving a question of Halin from 1977. This latter tree-decomposition yields short, unified proofs of the characterisations due to Robertson, Seymour and Thomas of graphs without half-grid minor, and of graphs without binary tree subdivision.