arXiv++ Combinatorics

The Total Matching Polytope generalizes the Stable Set Polytope and the Matching Polytope. In this paper, we give the perfect formulation for Trees and we derive two new families of valid inequalities, the balanced biclique inequalities which are always facet-defining and the non-balanced lifted biclique inequalities obtained by a lifting procedure, which are facet-defining for bipartite graphs. Finally, we give a complete description for Complete Bipartite Graphs.

A total coloring of a graph $G = (V, E)$ is an assignment of colors to vertices and edges such that neither two adjacent vertices nor two incident edges get the same color, and, for each edge, the end-points and the edge itself receive different colors. Any valid total coloring induces a partition of the elements of $G$ into total matchings, which are defined as subsets of vertices and edges that can take the same color. In this paper, we propose Integer Linear Programming models for both the Total Coloring and the Total Matching problems, and we study the strength of the corresponding Linear Programming relaxations. The total coloring is formulated as the problem of finding the minimum number of total matchings that cover all the graph elements. This covering formulation can be solved by a Column Generation algorithm, where the pricing subproblem corresponds to the Weighted Total Matching Problem. Hence, we study the Total Matching Polytope. We introduce three families of nontrivial valid inequalities: vertex-clique inequalities based on standard clique inequalities of the Stable Set Polytope, congruent-$2k3$ cycle inequalities based on the parity of the vertex set induced by the cycle, and even-clique inequalities induced by complete subgraphs of even order. We prove that congruent-$2k3$ cycle inequalities are facet-defining only when $k = 4$, while the vertex-clique and even-cliques are always facet-defining. Finally, we present preliminary computational results of a Column Generation algorithm for the Total Coloring Problem and a Cutting Plane algorithm for the Total Matching Problem.

A Bernoulli factory is an algorithmic procedure for exact sampling of certain random variables having only Bernoulli access to their parameters. Bernoulli access to a parameter $p \in [0,1]$ means the algorithm does not know $p$, but has sample access to independent draws of a Bernoulli random variable with mean equal to $p$. In this paper, we study the problem of Bernoulli factories for polytopes: given Bernoulli access to a vector $x\in P$ for a given polytope $P\subset [0,1]^n$, output a randomized vertex such that the expected value of the $i$-th coordinate is \emph{exactly} equal to $x_i$. For example, for the special case of the perfect matching polytope, one is given Bernoulli access to the entries of a doubly stochastic matrix $[x_{ij}]$ and asked to sample a matching such that the probability of each edge $(i,j)$ be present in the matching is exactly equal to $x_{ij}$. We show that a polytope $P$ admits a Bernoulli factory if and and only if $P$ is the intersection of $[0,1]^n$ with an affine subspace. Our construction is based on an algebraic formulation of the problem, involving identifying a family of Bernstein polynomials (one per vertex) that satisfy a certain algebraic identity on $P$. The main technical tool behind our construction is a connection between these polynomials and the geometry of zonotope tilings. We apply these results to construct an explicit factory for the perfect matching polytope. The resulting factory is deeply connected to the combinatorial enumeration of arborescences and may be of independent interest. For the $k$-uniform matroid polytope, we recover a sampling procedure known in statistics as Sampford sampling.

The notion of forcing sets for perfect matchings was introduced by Harary, Klein, and Živković. The application of this problem in chemistry, as well as its interesting theoretical aspects, made this subject very active. In this work, we introduce the notion of forcing function of fractional perfect matchings, which is continuous analogous to forcing sets defined over the perfect matching polytope of graphs. We show that this object is a continuous and concave function extension of the integral forcing set. Then, we use our results in the continuous world to conclude new bounds and results in the discrete case of forcing sets, for the family of regular edge-transitive graphs. In particular, we derive new upper bounds for the maximum forcing number of hypercube graphs.

The global forcing number of a graph G is the minimal cardinality of an edge subset discriminating all perfect matchings of G, denoted by gf(G). For any perfect matching M of G, the minimal cardinality of an edge subset S in E(G)-M such that G-S has a unique perfect matching is called the anti-forcing number of M,denoted by af(G, M). The maximum anti-forcing number of G among all perfect matchings is denoted by Af(G). It is known that the maximum anti-forcing number of a hexagonal system equals the famous Fries number. We are interested in some comparisons between the global forcing number and the maximum anti-forcing number of a graph. For a bipartite graph G, we show that gf(G)is larger than or equal to Af(G). Next we mainly extend such result to non-bipartite graphs, which is the set of all graphs with a perfect matching which contain no two disjoint odd cycles such that their deletion results in a subgraph with a perfect matching. For any such graph G, we also have gf(G) is larger than or equal to Af(G) by revealing further property of non-bipartite graphs with a unique perfect matching. As a consequence, this relation also holds for the graphs whose perfect matching polytopes consist of non-negative 1-regular vectors. In particular, for a brick G, de Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty [4] showed that G satisfying the above condition if and only if G is solid, and if and only if its perfect matching polytope consists of non-negative 1-regular vectors. Finally, we obtain tight upper and lower bounds on gf(G)-Af(G). For a connected bipartite graph G with 2n vertices, we have that 0 \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq 1/2 (n-1)(n-2); For non-bipartite case, -1/2 (n^2-n-2) \leq gf(G)-Af(G) \leq (n-1)(n-2).

Motivated by the problem of bounding the number of iterations of the Simplex algorithm we investigate the possible lengths of monotone paths followed by the Simplex method inside the oriented graphs of polyhedra (oriented by the objective function). We consider both the shortest and the longest monotone paths and estimate the monotone diameter and height of polyhedra. Our analysis applies to transportation polytopes, matroid polytopes, matching polytopes, shortest-path polytopes, and the TSP, among others. We begin by showing that combinatorial cubes have monotone and Bland pivot height bounded by their dimension and that in fact all monotone paths of zonotopes are no larger than the number of edge directions of the zonotope. We later use this to show that several polytopes have polynomial-size pivot height, for all pivot rules. In contrast, we show that many well-known combinatorial polytopes have exponentially-long monotone paths. Surprisingly, for some famous pivot rules, e.g., greatest improvement and steepest edge, these same polytopes have polynomial-size simplex paths.

We illustrate the limitations of the hyperplane separation bound, a non-combinatorial lower bound on the extension complexity of a polytope. Most notably, this bounding technique is used by Rothvoß (J ACM 64.6:41, 2017) to establish an exponential lower bound for the perfect matching polytope. We point out that the technique is sensitive to the particular choice of slack matrix. For the canonical slack matrices of the spanning tree polytope and the completion time polytope, we show that the lower bounds produced by the hyperplane separation method are trivial. These bounds may, however, be strengthened by normalizing rows and columns of the slack matrices.

Let G = ((A,B),E) be an instance of the stable marriage problem where every vertex ranks its neighbors in a strict order of preference. A matching M in G is popular if M does not lose a head-to-head election against any matching. Popular matchings are a well-studied generalization of stable matchings, introduced with the goal of enlarging the set of admissible solutions, while maintaining a certain level of fairness. Every stable matching is a min-size popular matching. Unfortunately, when there are edge costs, it is NP-hard to find a popular matching of minimum cost -- even worse, the min-cost popular matching problem is hard to approximate up to any factor. Let opt be the cost of a min-cost popular matching. Our goal is to efficiently compute a matching of cost at most opt by paying the price of mildly relaxing popularity. Our main positive results are two bi-criteria algorithms that find in polynomial time a near-popular or quasi-popular matching of cost at most opt. Moreover, one of the algorithms finds a quasi-popular matching of cost at most that of a min-cost popular fractional matching, which could be much smaller than opt. Key to the other algorithm is a polynomial-size extended formulation for an integral polytope sandwiched between the popular and quasi-popular matching polytopes. We complement these results by showing that it is NP-hard to find a quasi-popular matching of minimum cost, and that both the popular and quasi-popular matching polytopes have near-exponential extension complexity. This version of the paper goes beyond the conference version [12] in the following two points: (i) the algorithm for finding a quasi-popular matching of cost at most that of a min-cost popular fractional matching is new; (ii) the proofs from Section 6.1 and Section 7.3 are now self-contained (the conference version used constructions from [10] to show these lower bounds).

The perfect matching polytope, i.e. the convex hull of (incidence vectors of) perfect matchings of a graph is used in many combinatorial algorithms. Kotzig, Lovász and Plummer developed a decomposition theory for graphs with perfect matchings and their corresponding polytopes known as the tight cut decomposition which breaks down every graph into a number of indecomposable graphs, so called bricks. For many properties that are of interest on graphs with perfect matchings, including the description of the perfect matching polytope, it suffices to consider these bricks. A key result by Lovász on the tight cut decomposition is that the list of bricks obtained is the same independent of the choice of tight cuts made during the tight cut decomposition procedure. This implies that finding a tight cut decomposition is polynomial time equivalent to finding a single tight cut. We generalise the notions of a tight cut, a tight cut contraction and a tight cut decomposition to hypergraphs. By providing an example, we show that the outcome of the tight cut decomposition on general hypergraphs is no longer unique. However, we are able to prove that the uniqueness of the tight cut decomposition is preserved on a slight generalisation of uniform hypergraphs. Moreover, we show how the tight cut decomposition leads to a decomposition of the perfect matching polytope of uniformable hypergraphs and that the recognition problem for tight cuts in uniformable hypergraphs is polynomial time solvable.

A well-studied geometric object in combinatorial optimization is the perfect matching polytope of a graph $G$. In any investigation concerning the perfect matching polytope, one may assume that $G$ is matching covered --- that is, it is a connected graph (of order at least two) and each edge lies in some perfect matching. A graph $G$ is Birkhoff-von Neumann (BvN) if its perfect matching polytope is characterized solely by non-negativity and degree constraints. A result of Balas (1981) implies that $G$ is BvN if and only if $G$ does not contain a pair of vertex-disjoint odd cycles $(C_1,C_2)$ such that $G-V(C_1)-V(C_2)$ has a perfect matching. It follows immediately that the corresponding decision problem is in co-NP. However, it is not known to be in NP. The problem is in P if the input graph is planar --- due to a result of Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty (2004). These authors, along with Kothari (2018), have shown that this problem is equivalent to the seemingly unrelated problem of deciding whether a given graph is $\overline{C_6}$-free. The combinatorial diameter of a polytope is the diameter of its $1$-skeleton graph. A graph $G$ is PM-compact (PMc) if the combinatorial diameter of its perfect matching polytope equals one. A result of Chvátal (1975) implies that $G$ is PMc if and only if $G$ does not contain a pair of vertex-disjoint even cycles $(C_1,C_2)$ such that $G-V(C_1)-V(C_2)$ has a perfect matching. Once again the corresponding decision problem is in co-NP, but it is not known to be in NP. The problem is in P if the input graph is bipartite or is near-bipartite --- due to a result of Wang, Lin, Carvalho, Lucchesi, Sanjith and Little (2013). In this paper, we consider the "intersection" of the aforementioned problems. We give a complete characterization of matching covered graphs that are BvN as well as PMc. (Thus the corresponding decision problem is in P.)

In this paper we address the graph matching problem. Following the recent works of \cite{zaslavskiy2009path,Vestner2017} we analyze and generalize the idea of concave relaxations. We introduce the concepts of conditionally concave and probably conditionally concave energies on polytopes and show that they encapsulate many instances of the graph matching problem, including matching Euclidean graphs and graphs on surfaces. We further prove that local minima of probably conditionally concave energies on general matching polytopes (e.g., doubly stochastic) are with high probability extreme points of the matching polytope (e.g., permutations).

The (combinatorial) diameter of a polytope $P \subseteq \mathbb R^d$ is the maximum value of a shortest path between a pair of vertices on the 1-skeleton of $P$, that is the graph where the nodes are given by the $0$-dimensional faces of $P$, and the edges are given the 1-dimensional faces of $P$. The diameter of a polytope has been studied from many different perspectives, including a computational complexity point of view. In particular, [Frieze and Teng, 1994] showed that computing the diameter of a polytope is (weakly) NP-hard. In this paper, we show that the problem of computing the diameter is strongly NP-hard even for a polytope with a very simple structure: namely, the \emph{fractional matching} polytope. We also show that computing a pair of vertices at maximum shortest path distance on the 1-skeleton of this polytope is an APX-hard problem. We prove these results by giving an \emph{exact characterization} of the diameter of the fractional matching polytope, that is of independent interest.

This paper is the first from a series of papers that establish a generalization of the basilica decomposition for cardinality minimum joins in grafts. Joins in grafts are also known as $T$-joins in graphs, where $T$ is a given set of vertices, and minimum joins in grafts can be considered as a generalization of perfect matchings in graphs provided in terms of parity. The basilica decomposition is a canonical decomposition applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings, and the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is one of the three central concepts that compose this theory. The classical Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a canonical decomposition for a special class of graphs known as {\em factor-connected graphs} and is famous for its contribution to the study of the matching polytope and lattice. The general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a nontrivial generalization of its classical counterpart and is applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings. As a component of the basilica decomposition theory, the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition has contributed to the derivation of further results in matching theory, such as a characterization of barriers or an alternative proof of the tight cut lemma. In this paper, we present an analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition for minimum joins in grafts.

The combinatorial diameter of a polytope $P$ is the maximum value of a shortest path between two vertices of $P$, where the path uses the edges of $P$ only. In contrast to the combinatorial diameter, the circuit diameter of $P$ is defined as the maximum value of a shortest path between two vertices of $P$, where the path uses potential edge directions of $P$ i.e., all edge directions that can arise by translating some of the facets of $P$. In this paper, we study the circuit diameter of polytopes corresponding to classical combinatorial optimization problems, such as the Matching polytope, the Traveling Salesman polytope and the Fractional Stable Set polytope.

Is perfect matching in NC? That is, is there a deterministic fast parallel algorithm for it? This has been an outstanding open question in theoretical computer science for over three decades, ever since the discovery of RNC matching algorithms. Within this question, the case of planar graphs has remained an enigma: On the one hand, counting the number of perfect matchings is far harder than finding one (the former is #P-complete and the latter is in P), and on the other, for planar graphs, counting has long been known to be in NC whereas finding one has resisted a solution. In this paper, we give an NC algorithm for finding a perfect matching in a planar graph. Our algorithm uses the above-stated fact about counting matchings in a crucial way. Our main new idea is an NC algorithm for finding a face of the perfect matching polytope at which $Ω(n)$ new conditions, involving constraints of the polytope, are simultaneously satisfied. Several other ideas are also needed, such as finding a point in the interior of the minimum weight face of this polytope and finding a balanced tight odd set in NC.

Let $G$ be a graph with an even number of vertices. The matching preclusion number of $G$, denoted by $mp(G)$, is the minimum number of edges whose deletion leaves the resulting graph without a perfect matching. We introduced a $0$-$1$ linear programming which can be used to find matching preclusion number of graphs. In this paper, by relaxing of the $0$-$1$ linear programming we obtain a linear programming and call its optimal objective value as fractional matching preclusion number of graph $G$, denoted by $mp_f(G)$. We show $mp_f(G)$ can be computed in polynomial time for any graph $G$. By using perfect matching polytope, we transform it as a new linear programming whose optimal value equals the reciprocal of $mp_f(G)$. For bipartite graph $G$, we obtain an explicit formula for $mp_f(G)$ and show that $\lfloor mp_f(G) \rfloor$ is the maximum integer $k$ such that $G$ has a $k$-factor. Moreover, for any two bipartite graphs $G$ and $H$, we show $mp_f(G \square H) \geqslant mp_f(G)+\lfloor mp_f(H) \rfloor$, where $G \square H$ is the Cartesian product of $G$ and $H$.

A cut $C:=\partial(X)$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is a separating cut if both its $C$-contractions $G/X$ and $G/\overline{X}$ are also matching covered. A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. In 2004, we (Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if it is solid. In 2006, we proved that the only simple planar solid bricks are the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains unsolved. A bi-subdivision of a graph $J$ is a graph obtained from $J$ by replacing each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph $J$ is a conformal minor of a matching covered graph $G$ if there exists a bi-subdivision $H$ of $J$ which is a subgraph of $G$ such that $G-V(H)$ has a perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-based if $J$ is a conformal minor of $G$ and, otherwise, $G$ is $J$-free. A basic result due to Lovász (1983) states that every nonbipartite matching covered graph is either $K_4$-based or is $\overline{C_6}$-based or both, where $\overline{C_6}$ is the triangular prism. In 2016, we (Kothari and Murty) showed that, for any cubic brick $J$, a matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-free if and only if each of its bricks is $J$-free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are $K_4$-free and those which are $\overline{C_6}$-free. Each of these problems remains unsolved in the nonplanar case. In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks and of characterizing nonplanar $\overline{C_6}$-free bricks are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is $\overline{C_6}$-free.

We show that the perfect matching problem in general graphs is in Quasi-NC. That is, we give a deterministic parallel algorithm which runs in $O(\log^3 n)$ time on $n^{O(\log^2 n)}$ processors. The result is obtained by a derandomization of the Isolation Lemma for perfect matchings, which was introduced in the classic paper by Mulmuley, Vazirani and Vazirani [1987] to obtain a Randomized NC algorithm. Our proof extends the framework of Fenner, Gurjar and Thierauf [2016], who proved the analogous result in the special case of bipartite graphs. Compared to that setting, several new ingredients are needed due to the significantly more complex structure of perfect matchings in general graphs. In particular, our proof heavily relies on the laminar structure of the faces of the perfect matching polytope.

2-level polytopes naturally appear in several areas of pure and applied mathematics, including combinatorial optimization, polyhedral combinatorics, communication complexity, and statistics. In this paper, we present a study of some 2-level polytopes arising in combinatorial settings. Our first contribution is proving that v(P)*f(P) is upper bounded by d*2^(d+1), for a large collection of families of such polytopes P. Here v(P) (resp. f(P)) is the number of vertices (resp. facets) of P, and d is its dimension. Whether this holds for all 2-level polytopes was asked in [Bohn et al., ESA 2015], and experimental results from [Fiorini et al., ISCO 2016] showed it true up to dimension 7. The key to most of our proofs is a deeper understanding of the relations among those polytopes and their underlying combinatorial structures. This leads to a number of results that we believe to be of independent interest: a trade-off formula for the number of cliques and stable sets in a graph; a description of stable matching polytopes as affine projections of certain order polytopes; and a linear-size description of the base polytope of matroids that are 2-level in terms of cuts of an associated tree.

The convex hull of the set of the incidence vectors of the matchings of a graph G is the matching polytope of the graph, M(G). The graph whose vertices and edges are the vertices and edges of M(G) is the skeleton of the matching polytope of G, denoted G(M(G)). Since the number of vertices of G(M(G)) is huge, the structural properties of these graphs have been studied in particular classes. In this paper, for an arbitrary graph G, we obtain a formulae to compute the degree of a vertex of G(M(G)) and prove that the minimum degree of G(M(G)) is equal to the number of edges of G. Also, we identify the vertices of the skeleton with the minimum degree and characterize regular skeletons of the matching polytopes.