arXiv++ Combinatorics

A major step in the graph minors theory of Robertson and Seymour is the transition from the Grid Theorem which, in some sense uniquely, describes areas of large treewidth within a graph, to a notion of local flatness of these areas in form of the existence of a large flat wall within any huge grid of an H-minor free graph. In this paper, we prove a matching theoretic analogue of the Flat Wall Theorem for bipartite graphs excluding a fixed matching minor. Our result builds on a a tight relationship between structural digraph theory and matching theory and allows us to deduce a Flat Wall Theorem for digraphs which substantially differs from a previously established directed variant of this theorem.

Factor-critical graphs are a classical concept in matching theory that constitute an important component of the Gallai-Edmonds canonical decomposition and Edmonds' algorithm for maximum matchings. Lovász provided a constructive characterization of factor-critical graphs in terms of ear decompositions. This characterization has been a useful inductive tool for studying factor-critical graphs and also connects them with Edmonds' algorithm. Joins in grafts, also known as $T$-joins in graphs, are a classical variant of matchings proposed in terms of parity. Minimum joins and grafts are generalizations of perfect matchings and graphs with perfect matchings, respectively. Accordingly, graft analogues of fundamental concepts and results from matching theory, such as canonical decompositions, will develop the theory of minimum join. In this paper, we propose a new concept, critical quasicombs, as a bipartite graft analogue of factor-critical graphs and provide a constructive characterization of critical quasicombs using a graft version of ear decompositions. This characterization can be considered as a bipartite graft analogue of Lovász' result. From our results, the Dulmage-Mendelsohn canonical decomposition, originally a theory for bipartite graphs, has been generalized for bipartite grafts.

The classic paper of Shapley and Shubik \cite{Shapley1971assignment} characterized the core of the assignment game using ideas from matching theory and LP-duality theory and their highly non-trivial interplay. Whereas the core of this game is always non-empty, that of the general graph matching game can be empty. This paper salvages the situation by giving an imputation in the $2/3$-approximate core for the latter. This bound is best possible, since it is the integrality gap of the natural underlying LP. Our profit allocation method goes further: the multiplier on the profit of an agent is often better than ${2 \over 3}$ and lies in the interval $[{2 \over 3}, 1]$, depending on how severely constrained the agent is. Next, we provide new insights showing how discerning core imputations of an assignment games are by studying them via the lens of complementary slackness. We present a relationship between the competitiveness of individuals and teams of agents and the amount of profit they accrue in imputations that lie in the core, where by {\em competitiveness} we mean whether an individual or a team is matched in every/some/no maximum matching. This also sheds light on the phenomenon of degeneracy in assignment games, i.e., when the maximum weight matching is not unique. The core is a quintessential solution concept in cooperative game theory. It contains all ways of distributing the total worth of a game among agents in such a way that no sub-coalition has incentive to secede from the grand coalition. Our imputation, in the $2/3$-approximate core, implies that a sub-coalition will gain at most a $3/2$ factor by seceding, and less in typical cases.

We provide a canonical decomposition for a class of bipartite grafts known as combs. As every bipartite graft is a recursive combination of combs, our results provides a canonical decomposition for general bipartite grafts. Our new decomposition is by definition a generalization of the classical canonical decomposition in matching theory, that is, the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for bipartite graphs with perfect matchings. However, it exhibits much more complicated structure than its classical counterpart. It is revealed from our results that bipartite grafts has a canonical structure that is analogous to the cathedral decomposition for nonbipartite graphs with perfect matchings.

We provide an analogue of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for a class of grafts known as comb-bipartite grafts. The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition in matching theory is a classical canonical structure theorem for bipartite graphs. The substantial part of this classical theorem resides in bipartite graphs that are factorizable, that is, those with a perfect matching. Minimum joins in grafts, also known as minimum $T$-joins in graphs, is a generalization of perfect matchings in factorizable graphs. Sebö revealed in his paper that comb-bipartite grafts form one of the two fundamental classes of grafts that serve as skeletons or building blocks of any grafts. Particularly, any bipartite grafts, that is, bipartite counterpart of grafts, can be considered as a recursive combination of comb-bipartite grafts. In this paper, we generalize the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for comb-bipartite grafts. We also show for this decomposition a property that is characteristics to grafts using the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition for grafts, which is a known graft analogue of another canonical structure theorem from matching theory. This paper is the first from a series of studies regarding bipartite grafts.

The study of matching theory has gained importance recently with applications in Kidney Exchange, House Allocation, School Choice etc. The general theme of these problems is to allocate goods in a fair manner amongst participating agents. The agents generally have a unit supply/demand of a good that they want to exchange with other agents. On the other hand, Bochet et al. study a more general version of the problem where they allow for agents to have arbitrary number of divisible goods to be rationed to other agents in the network. In this current work, our main focus is on non-bipartite networks where agents have arbitrary units of a homogeneous indivisible good that they want to exchange with their neighbors. Our aim is to develop mechanisms that would identify a fair and strategyproof allocation for the agents in the network. Thus, we generalize the kidney exchange problem to that of a network with arbitrary capacity of available goods. Our main idea is that this problem and a couple of other related versions of non-bipartite fair allocation problem can be suitably transformed to one of fair allocations on bipartite networks for which we know of well studied fair allocation mechanisms.

This paper is the first from serial papers that provide constructive characterizations for classes of bidirected graphs known as radials and semiradials. In this paper, we provide constructive characterizations for five principle classes of radials and semiradials to be used for characterizing general radials and semiradials. A bidirected graph is a graph in which each end of each edge has a sign $+$ or $-$. Bidirected graphs are a common generalization of digraphs and signed graphs. We define a new concept of radials as a generalization of a classical concept in matching theory, critical graphs. Radials are also a generalization of a class of digraphs known as flowgraphs. We also define semiradials, which are a relaxed concept of radials. We further define special classes of radials and semiradials, that is, absolute semiradials, strong and almost strong radials, linear semiradials, and sublinear radials. We provide constructive characterizations for these five classes of bidirected graphs. Our serial papers are a part of a series of works that establish the strong component decomposition for bidirected graphs.

In this paper, we define locally matchable subsets of a group which is derived from the concept of matchings in groups and used as a tool to give alternative proofs for existing results in matching theory. We also give the linear analogue of local matching property for subspaces in a field extension. Our tools mix additive number theory, combinatorics and algebra.

In 2003, Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. In this paper, we motivate and define a new list analogue of equitable coloring called proportional choosability. A $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors for each vertex $v$ of $G$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. For each color $c$, let $η(c)$ be the number of vertices $v$ whose list $L(v)$ contains $c$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used $\lfloor η(c)/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil η(c)/k \rceil$ times. A graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. We show that if a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable, then every subgraph of $G$ is also proportionally $k$-choosable and also $G$ is proportionally $(k+1)$-choosable, unlike equitable choosability for which analogous claims would be false. We also show that any graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable whenever $k \geq Δ(G) + \lceil |V(G)|/2 \rceil$, and we use matching theory to completely characterize the proportional choosability of stars and the disjoint union of cliques.

This paper is the first from a series of papers that establish a generalization of the basilica decomposition for cardinality minimum joins in grafts. Joins in grafts are also known as $T$-joins in graphs, where $T$ is a given set of vertices, and minimum joins in grafts can be considered as a generalization of perfect matchings in graphs provided in terms of parity. The basilica decomposition is a canonical decomposition applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings, and the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is one of the three central concepts that compose this theory. The classical Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a canonical decomposition for a special class of graphs known as {\em factor-connected graphs} and is famous for its contribution to the study of the matching polytope and lattice. The general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition is a nontrivial generalization of its classical counterpart and is applicable to general graphs with perfect matchings. As a component of the basilica decomposition theory, the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition has contributed to the derivation of further results in matching theory, such as a characterization of barriers or an alternative proof of the tight cut lemma. In this paper, we present an analogue of the general Kotzig-Lovász decomposition for minimum joins in grafts.

In matching theory, one of the most fundamental and classical branches of combinatorics, {\em canonical decompositions} of graphs are powerful and versatile tools that form the basis of this theory. However, the abilities of the known canonical decompositions, that is, the {\em Dulmage-Mendelsohn}, {\em Kotzig-Lovász}, and {\em Gallai-Edmonds} decompositions, are limited because they are only applicable to particular classes of graphs, such as bipartite graphs, or they are too sparse to provide sufficient information. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a new canonical decomposition that is applicable to all graphs and provides much finer information. We focus on the notion of {\em factor-components} as the fundamental building blocks of a graph; through the factor-components, our new canonical decomposition states how a graph is organized and how it contains all the maximum matchings. The main results that constitute our new theory are the following: (i) a canonical partial order over the set of factor-components, which describes how a graph is constructed from its factor-components; (ii) a generalization of the Kotzig-Lovász decomposition, which shows the inner structure of each factor-component in the context of the entire graph; and (iii) a canonically described interrelationship between (i) and (ii), which integrates these two results into a unified theory of a canonical decomposition. These results are obtained in a self-contained way, and our proof of the generalized Kotzig-Lovász decomposition contains a shortened and self-contained proof of the classical counterpart.

The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is a classical canonical decomposition in matching theory applicable for bipartite graphs, and is famous not only for its application in the field of matrix computation, but also for providing a prototypal structure in matroidal optimization theory. The Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition is stated and proved using the two color classes, and therefore generalizing this decomposition for nonbipartite graphs has been a difficult task. In this paper, we obtain a new canonical decomposition that is a generalization of the Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition for arbitrary graphs, using a recently introduced tool in matching theory, the basilica decomposition. Our result enables us to understand all known canonical decompositions in a unified way. Furthermore, we apply our result to derive a new theorem regarding barriers. The duality theorem for the maximum matching problem is the celebrated Berge formula, in which dual optimizers are known as barriers. Several results regarding maximal barriers have been derived by known canonical decompositions, however no characterization has been known for general graphs. In this paper, we provide a characterization of the family of maximal barriers in general graphs, in which the known results are developed and unified.

The spectra of signed matrices have played a fundamental role in social sciences, graph theory, and control theory. In this work, we investigate the computational problems of identifying symmetric signings of matrices with natural spectral properties. Our results are twofold: 1. We show NP-completeness for the following three problems: verifying whether a given matrix has a symmetric signing that is positive semi-definite/singular/has bounded eigenvalues. However, we also illustrate that the complexity could substantially differ for input matrices that are adjacency matrices of graphs. 2. We exhibit a stark contrast between invertibility and the above-mentioned spectral properties: we show a combinatorial characterization of matrices with invertible symmetric signings and design an efficient algorithm using this characterization to verify whether a given matrix has an invertible symmetric signing. Next, we give an efficient algorithm to solve the search problem of finding an invertible symmetric signing for matrices whose support graph is bipartite. We also provide a lower bound on the number of invertible symmetric signed adjacency matrices. Finally, we give an efficient algorithm to find a minimum increase in support of a given symmetric matrix so that it has an invertible symmetric signing. We use combinatorial and spectral techniques in addition to classic results from matching theory. Our combinatorial characterization of matrices with invertible symmetric signings might be of independent interest.

In this paper, we define locally matchable subsets of a group which is extracted from the concept of matchings in groups and used as a tool to give alternative proofs for existing results in matching theory. We also give the linear analogue of locally matchability for subspaces in a field extension. Our tools mix additive number theory, combinatorics and algebra

In deriving their characterization of the perfect matchings polytope, Edmonds, Lovász, and Pulleyblank introduced the so-called {\em Tight Cut Lemma} as the most challenging aspect of their work. The Tight Cut Lemma in fact claims {\em bricks} as the fundamental building blocks that constitute a graph in studying the matching polytope and can be referred to as a key result in this field. Even though the Tight Cut Lemma is a matching \textup{(}$1$-matching\textup{)} theoretic statement that consists of purely graph theoretic concepts, the known proofs either employ a linear programming argument or are established upon results regarding a substantially wider notion than matchings. This paper presents a new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma, which attains both of the two reasonable features for the first time, namely, being {\em purely graph theoretic} as well as {\em purely matching theory closed}. Our proof uses, as the only preliminary result, the canonical decomposition recently introduced by Kita. By further developing this canonical decomposition, we acquire a new device of {\em towers} to analyze the structure of bricks, and thus prove the Tight Cut Lemma. We believe that our new proof of the Tight Cut Lemma provides a highly versatile example of how to handle bricks.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D$ of vertices of $G$ such that every vertex outside $D$ is adjacent to a vertex in $D$. A locating-dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $D$ of $G$ with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside $D$ have distinct neighbors in $D$; that is, for distinct vertices $u$ and $v$ outside $D$, $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$ where $N(u)$ denotes the open neighborhood of $u$. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted $γ_L(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in $G$. Garijo, Gonzalez and Marquez [Applied Math. Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] posed the conjecture that for $n$ sufficiently large, the maximum value of the location-domination number of a twin-free, connected graph on $n$ vertices is equal to $\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor$. We propose the related (stronger) conjecture that if $G$ is a twin-free graph of order $n$ without isolated vertices, then $γ_L(G)\leq \frac{n}{2}$. We prove the conjecture for cubic graphs. We rely heavily on proof techniques from matching theory to prove our result.

The partition of graphs into "nice" subgraphs is a central algorithmic problem with strong ties to matching theory. We study the partitioning of undirected graphs into same-size stars, a problem known to be NP-complete even for the case of stars on three vertices. We perform a thorough computational complexity study of the problem on subclasses of perfect graphs and identify several polynomial-time solvable cases, for example, on interval graphs and bipartite permutation graphs, and also NP-complete cases, for example, on grid graphs and chordal graphs.

Given a graph, a barrier is a set of vertices determined by the Berge formula---the min-max theorem characterizing the size of maximum matchings. The notion of barriers plays important roles in numerous contexts of matching theory, since barriers essentially coincides with dual optimal solutions of the maximum matching problem. In a special class of graphs called the elementary graphs, the family of maximal barriers forms a partition of the vertices; this partition was found by Lovász and is called the canonical partition. The canonical partition has produced many fundamental results in matching theory, such as the two ear theorem. However, in non-elementary graphs, the family of maximal barriers never forms a partition, and there has not been the canonical partition for general graphs. In this paper, using our previous work, we give a canonical description of structures of the odd-maximal barriers---a class of barriers including the maximal barriers---for general graphs; we also reveal structures of odd components associated with odd-maximal barriers. This result of us can be regarded as a generalization of Lovász's canonical partition.

The {\em chromatic gap} is the difference between the chromatic number and the clique number of a graph. Here we investigate $\gap(n)$, the maximum chromatic gap over graphs on $n$ vertices. Can the extremal graphs be explored? While computational problems related to the chromatic gap are hopeless, an interplay between Ramsey theory and matching theory leads to a simple and (almost) exact formula for $\gap(n)$ in terms of Ramsey numbers.

Let G be a graph and let I be its edge ideal. Our main result shows that the sets of associated primes of the powers of I form an ascending chain. It is known that the sets of associated primes of I(i) and intcl(I(i)) stabilize for large i, where "intcl" denotes integral closure and I(i) denotes the i-th power of I. We show that for edge ideals their corresponding stable sets are equal. To show our main result we use a classical result of Berge from matching theory and certain notions from combinatorial optimization.